Total Posts:4|Showing Posts:1-4
Jump to topic:

Nazarene Prophecy

anonthegreat
Posts: 1,040
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/11/2018 4:40:53 PM
Posted: 12 months ago
The truth is usually the opposite of what we are taught in school pertaining to false cause and effect narratives that are fabricated from imaginations of very creative leaders that know how to reorder the facts they cherry pick. Much debate is over the town of Nazareth not being in the Old Testament, Or the writings of Josephus, Or the Talmud. But Matthew writes:

And he came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth, That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, "He shall be called a Nazarene. " (Matt 2:3)

As mentioned in another post, Pilate tried to whip Him until He passed out to save His life, And failed. The Holy Spirit told Pilate to crucify Him, And he would not be held accountable, But to put the sign over his head on the cross:

JESUS OF NAZARETH, THE KING OF THE JEWS. (John 19;19)

The town of Nazareth was a very small village that Yahushua was raised in. It has no reputation and was built in the first or second century BC, And did not exist in Old Testament times. However, Amazingly, Nazareth is mentioned 33 times in the New Testament and Yahushua is mentioned "Jesus of Nazareth" frequently. Why? What is the true cause and effect answer to this riddle? Is Jesus and the town a myth as many propose? No!

Knowing how the lying pen of the scribes work to discredit Yahweh using the Creator's power (Jer 8:8), They removed the prophecy from the First Covenant scripture after the Christian word of mouth narrative was hijacked. Why?

Because this was the REAL proof the Yahushua was the Messiah. The town did not exist at the time the prophecy was given, And the people had no idea what it meant when Yahweh gave it. The Satanist Jewish leaders took notice when Nazareth was built and controlled the narrative that the Messiah would come from Bethlehem, But they hid He would also be called a Nazarene, They knew what it meant after Nazareth was built, But it was their mission to discredit Him to ruin His reputation, Which they do routinely today to smear good Christians in politics.

Therefore, The hid the prophecy. Remember, The leaders controlled the synagogues.

After Yahushua (Jesus) was baptized, He told his apostles where the scripture was, And they believed the prophecy. The miracles started, And the people went wild also believing the prophecy as word of mouth spread the verse around.

Later, After Christianity took root, The scribes actually removed the powerful text prophesy and added some ideas to John. What I have done below is show the original text of John follow d by the corrupted text everyone reads today in the Bible:

ORIGINAL TEXT

On the last day, That great day of the feast, Jesus stood and cried out, Saying, "If anyone thirsts, Let him come to Me and drink. He who believes in Me, As the Scripture has said, Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water. " But this He spoke concerning the Spirit, Whom those believing in Him would receive; for the Holy Spirit was not yet given, Because Jesus was not yet glorified. Therefore, Many from the crowd, When they heard this saying, Said, "Truly this is the Prophet. " Then the officers came to the chief priests and Pharisees, Who said to them, "Why have you not brought Him? " The officers answered, "No man ever spoke like this Man! " Nicodemus (he who came to Jesus by night, Being one of them) said to them, "Does our law judge a man before it hears him and knows what he is doing? " And everyone went to his own house.
(John 7:38-52)

CORRUPTED TEXT

On the last day, That great day of the feast, Jesus stood and cried out, Saying, "If anyone thirsts, Let him come to Me and drink. He who believes in Me, As the Scripture has said, Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water. " But this He spoke concerning the Spirit, Whom those believing in Him would receive; for the [h]Holy Spirit was not yet given, Because Jesus was not yet glorified. Therefore many from the crowd, When they heard this saying, Said, "Truly this is the Prophet. " ***Others said, "This is the Christ. " But some said, "Will the Christ come out of Galilee? Has not the Scripture said that the Christ comes from the seed of David and from the town of Bethlehem, Where David was? " So there was a division among the people because of Him. Now some of them wanted to take Him, But no one laid hands on Him. *** Then the officers came to the chief priests and Pharisees, Who said to them, "Why have you not brought Him? " The officers answered, "No man ever spoke like this Man! " ***Then the Pharisees answered them, "Are you also deceived? Have any of the rulers or the Pharisees believed in Him? But this crowd that does not know the law is accursed. "*** Nicodemus (he who came to Jesus by night, Being one of them) said to them, "Does our law judge a man before it hears him and knows what he is doing? "
***They answered and said to him, "Are you also from Galilee? Search and look, For no prophet [l]has arisen out of Galilee. "*** And everyone went to his own house. (John 7:38-52)

Matthew and John cannot both be correct. Knowing Satanists are in control at the top, We can enter heaven and use the Logos Word of Reason to find where the Bible has been corrupted by those who hate Yahweh and fix the contradictions.
Harikrish
Posts: 28,303
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/11/2018 6:26:48 PM
Posted: 12 months ago
anonthegreat wrote:
The truth is usually the opposite of what we are taught in school pertaining to false cause and effect narratives that are fabricated from imaginations of very creative leaders that know how to reorder the facts they cherry pick. Much debate is over the town of Nazareth not being in the Old Testament, Or the writings of Josephus, Or the Talmud. But Matthew writes:

And he came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth, That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, "He shall be called a Nazarene. " (Matt 2:3)

Matthew 2:23 says about Jesus, "He went and lived in a town called Nazareth. So was fulfilled what was said through the prophets, That he would be called a Nazarene. " This prophecy is not found in the Old Testament?
Matthew is obviously not quoting a prophecy directly, As there is no Old Testament passage with the wording he uses.

As mentioned in another post, Pilate tried to whip Him until He passed out to save His life, And failed. The Holy Spirit told Pilate to crucify Him, And he would not be held accountable, But to put the sign over his head on the cross:

JESUS OF NAZARETH, THE KING OF THE JEWS. (John 19;19)

The Holy Spirt was to appear only after jesus was resurrected.
John 16:7 But I tell you the truth, It is for your benefit that I am going away. Unless I go away, The Advocate will not come to you; but if I go, I will send Him to you.

Pilate wanted Jesus alive so he could defend the charges against him. Jesus was accused of blasphemy which was punishable by death. The lashing was to purse age the criminal to confess. But Jesus continued to be evasive and lie. He even claimed his kingdom was not of this world.

John 18:36 Jesus answered, "My kingdom is not of this world; if it were, My servants would fight to prevent My arrest by the Jews. But now, My kingdom is not of this realm. "

Jesus was tried, Convicted and crucified.

The town of Nazareth was a very small village that Yahushua was raised in. It has no reputation and was built in the first or second century BC, And did not exist in Old Testament times. However, Amazingly, Nazareth is mentioned 33 times in the New Testament and Yahushua is mentioned "Jesus of Nazareth" frequently. Why? What is the true cause and effect answer to this riddle? Is Jesus and the town a myth as many propose? No!

The New Testament was written after Jesus was born which is why his birthplace Nazareth is not mentioned in the Old Testament. Nor is there any prophecy in the Old Testament alluding to the messiah being a Nazarene. Read your bible you ignorant mutt.

Knowing how the lying pen of the scribes work to discredit Yahweh using the Creator's power (Jer 8:8), They removed the prophecy from the First Covenant scripture after the Christian word of mouth narrative was hijacked. Why?

The Old Testament was already in circulation centuries before Jesus appeared on the scene. If anything the New Testament relied on the Old Testament for validation.

Because this was the REAL proof the Yahushua was the Messiah. The town did not exist at the time the prophecy was given, And the people had no idea what it meant when Yahweh gave it. The Satanist Jewish leaders took notice when Nazareth was built and controlled the narrative that the Messiah would come from Bethlehem, But they hid He would also be called a Nazarene, They knew what it meant after Nazareth was built, But it was their mission to discredit Him to ruin His reputation, Which they do routinely today to smear good Christians in politics.

Jesus was crucified fir his blasphemous lies and lunacy and not the scribes. The Gospels were accounts of what Jesus did and said which included his lies and delusions.

Therefore, The hid the prophecy. Remember, The leaders controlled the synagogues.

The New Testament us not part of Jewish sacred scriptures, Never was. Therefore it us not taught in synagogues. Only Christians believe the lies and distortions spread in the New Testament. Learn some Jewish history you ignorant mutt.

After Yahushua (Jesus) was baptized, He told his apostles where the scripture was, And they believed the prophecy. The miracles started, And the people went wild also believing the prophecy as word of mouth spread the verse around.

Actually Jesus told his disciples not to tell the people who or what he was.
Matthew 16:20 Then He admonished the disciples not to tell anyone that He was the Christ.

Besides Jesus only spoke in parables that no one understood.

Later, After Christianity took root, The scribes actually removed the powerful text prophesy and added some ideas to John. What I have done below is show the original text of John follow d by the corrupted text everyone reads today in the Bible:

So you admit it was the New Testament that was corrupted. The Jews don't recognize the New Testament anyways and fir the same reason. They believe the Christians corrupted it.

ORIGINAL TEXT

On the last day, That great day of the feast, Jesus stood and cried out, Saying, "If anyone thirsts, Let him come to Me and drink. He who believes in Me, As the Scripture has said, Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water. " But this He spoke concerning the Spirit, Whom those believing in Him would receive; for the Holy Spirit was not yet given, Because Jesus was not yet glorified. Therefore, Many from the crowd, When they heard this saying, Said, "Truly this is the Prophet. " Then the officers came to the chief priests and Pharisees, Who said to them, "Why have you not brought Him? " The officers answered, "No man ever spoke like this Man! " Nicodemus (he who came to Jesus by night, Being one of them) said to them, "Does our law judge a man before it hears him and knows what he is doing? " And everyone went to his own house.
(John 7:38-52)

CORRUPTED TEXT

On the last day, That great day of the feast, Jesus stood and cried out, Saying, "If anyone thirsts, Let him come to Me and drink. He who believes in Me, As the Scripture has said, Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water. " But this He spoke concerning the Spirit, Whom those believing in Him would receive; for the [h]Holy Spirit was not yet given, Because Jesus was not yet glorified. Therefore many from the crowd, When they heard this saying, Said, "Truly this is the Prophet. " ***Others said, "This is the Christ. " But some said, "Will the Christ come out of Galilee? Has not the Scripture said that the Christ comes from the seed of David and from the town of Bethlehem, Where David was? " So there was a division among the people because of Him. Now some of them wanted to take Him, But no one laid hands on Him. *** Then the officers came to the chief priests and Pharisees, Who said to them, "Why have you not brought Him? " The officers answered, "No man ever spoke like this Man! " ***Then the Pharisees answered them, "Are you also deceived? Have any of the rulers or the Pharisees believed in Him? But this crowd that does not know the law is accursed. "*** Nicodemus (he who came to Jesus by night, Being one of them) said to them, "Does our law judge a man before it hears him and knows what he is doing? "
***They answered and said to him, "Are you also from Galilee? Search and look, For no prophet [l]has arisen out of Galilee. "*** And everyone went to his own house. (John 7:38-52)

Your comparisons don't make sense. John 7:38-52 are identical in all the New Testament translations.
Matthew and John cannot both be correct. Knowing Satanists are in control at the top, We can enter heaven and use the Logos Word of Reason to find where the Bible has been corrupted by those who hate Yahweh and fix the contradictions.

Because both are wrong. The prophecy alluded to by Matthews is not found in the Old Testament.

John is faced with a dilemma as well.
He is defending a Nazarene prophecy that doesn't exist.
anonthegreat
Posts: 1,040
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/13/2018 5:35:32 AM
Posted: 11 months ago
You can believe whatever you want. But your rabbit trail answers miss the point of a debate that has never been resolved since the Dark Ages. The prophecy was removed by the Satanists, And when we remove the convoluted logic from John, Then John makes perfect rational sense.

It is the same issue with the words atonement and testament, And the word "reformation" instead of 'translation" in Hebrews 9, Or adding "there is no remission without shedding of blood" in Hebrews 9, Or adding that man's authority is "over" women, Or adding the idea of bald women in head coverings, Or adding the word "translator" with speaking in tongues, Or adding "torture forever" in the Book of Revelation, Or replacing the words "called to be saved" with "called to be saints" in Romans, Or Mosed died instead of being "translated", Or changing the words "First Covenant" to "Old Testament", Or removing the words "but you say you are Adam", Or claiming Paul and Christ were not married, Or saying Christ died on Friday by utilizing two different calendars, Or changing the way Mary was a virgin when Christ was born, Or adding the phony story of Christ at 12 in the temple, Or adding the idea of the Island of Patmos to make it appear the Book of Revelation was written later than it was, Which corruptions completely change the meaning of the Bible by stealth strategy.

In addition, In business as usual, The Satanists removed the most potent prophecy from the scripture that said He would be called a Nazarene. It is interesting to note these little changes create endless debating among scholars to distract us by 30, 000 churches from following the direction from Yahusha that actually comes from Moses, "Repent, For the kingdom of heaven is at hand (or near). " The Satanists have done a great job deceiving all of us,

Do comprehend the power of Yahweh? He said Yahushua (Jesus) would be called a Nazarene before the town even existed!
Harikrish
Posts: 28,303
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/13/2018 5:38:07 PM
Posted: 11 months ago
anonthegreat wrote:
You can believe whatever you want. But your rabbit trail answers miss the point of a debate that has never been resolved since the Dark Ages. The prophecy was removed by the Satanists, And when we remove the convoluted logic from John, Then John makes perfect rational sense.

You are profoundly stupid. The prophecy was not removed from the Old Testament. It was added in Matthew 2:23.
Matthew 2:23 says about Jesus, "He went and lived in a town called Nazareth. So was fulfilled what was said through the prophets, That he would be called a Nazarene. " This prophecy is not found in the Old Testament?
Matthew is obviously not quoting a prophecy directly, As there is no Old Testament passage with the wording he uses.

John is faced with a dilemma as well.
He is defending a Nazarene prophecy that doesn't exist.

It is the same issue with the words atonement and testament, And the word "reformation" instead of 'translation" in Hebrews 9,
Hebrews does not contain the words you alluded to such as atonement and testament, And the word "reformation" instead of 'translation" in Hebrews 9.

Or adding "there is no remission without shedding of blood" in Hebrews 9, Or adding that man's authority is "over" women, Or adding the idea of bald women in head coverings, Or adding the word "translator" with speaking in tongues,
In Hebrew 9 there is no mention of Moses or bald women or the word "translator" with speaking in tongues,
Learn to read you ignorant mutt.

Or adding "torture forever" in the Book of Revelation, Or replacing the words "called to be saved" with "called to be saints" in Romans, Or Mosed died instead of being "translated", Or changing the words "First Covenant" to "Old Testament", Or removing the words "but you say you are Adam", Or claiming Paul and Christ were not married, Or saying Christ died on Friday by utilizing two different calendars, Or changing the way Mary was a virgin when Christ was born, Or adding the phony story of Christ at 12 in the temple, Or adding the idea of the Island of Patmos to make it appear the Book of Revelation was written later than it was, Which corruptions completely change the meaning of the Bible by stealth strategy.


The first covenant was established which is mentioned in the Old Testament which is the Hebrew Bible.
Funny you claim the bible is 99. 999% correct.
You wrote:" Let's get this straight. 99. 999% of the Bible is correct. "
Yet you struggled for 43 years to make sense of the Bible and you have all the above mentioned issues you have yet to resolve.
Repeated below.
you wrote: Or adding "torture forever" in the Book of Revelation, Or replacing the words "called to be saved" with "called to be saints" in Romans, Or Mosed died instead of being "translated", Or changing the words "First Covenant" to "Old Testament", Or removing the words "but you say you are Adam", Or claiming Paul and Christ were not married, Or saying Christ died on Friday by utilizing two different calendars, Or changing the way Mary was a virgin when Christ was born, Or adding the phony story of Christ at 12 in the temple, Or adding the idea of the Island of Patmos to make it appear the Book of Revelation was written later than it was, Which corruptions completely change the meaning of the Bible by stealth strategy. "

In addition, In business as usual, The Satanists removed the most potent prophecy from the scripture that said He would be called a Nazarene. It is interesting to note these little changes create endless debating among scholars to distract us by 30, 000 churches from following the direction from Yahusha that actually comes from Moses, "Repent, For the kingdom of heaven is at hand (or near). " The Satanists have done a great job deceiving all of us,

Jesus was asked at his trial to prove his claims he was the Christ which would have validated the prophecy you argue the Satanist removed.
Luke 23:3 So Pilate asked Him, "Are You the King of the Jews? " "You have said so, " Jesus replied. . . .
But Jesus refused to commit his answer. He was evasive.
He then went on to deny he was even from this world.
John 18:36 this world. If it were, My servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jewish leaders. But now my kingdom is from another place. "
The Romans crucified Jesus and sent him packing to his alien world.

Do comprehend the power of Yahweh? He said Yahushua (Jesus) would be called a Nazarene before the town even existed!

You mean Matthew 2:23 says about Jesus, "He went and lived in a town called Nazareth. So was fulfilled what was said through the prophets, That he would be called a Nazarene. " This prophecy is not found in the Old Testament?
Matthew is obviously not quoting a prophecy directly, As there is no Old Testament passage with the wording he uses.

Why do you pick the bible as your platform for your occult conspiracy theories? You are scripturally ignorant. You spent 43 years trying to make sense of the bible and that caused your mental illness. There are a lot of alternate reality theories that don't use the bible to back their claims because it is an exercise in futility.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.