Total Posts:120|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

The origins of the people of India

Harikrish
Posts: 38,773
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2019 6:49:47 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
There appears to be a lot of confusion about the origins of the people of India.

The bible tells us Indians can be traced back to the descendants of Noah's son Japheth.

Seven Sons of Japheth:
1. Javan (Greece, Romans, Romance -- French, Italians, Spanish, Portuguese)
2. Magog (Scythians, Slavs, Russians, Bulgarians, Bohemians, Poles, Slovaks, Croatians)
3. Madai (Indians & Iranic: Medes, Persians, Afghans, Kurds)
4. Tubal (South of Black Sea)
5. Tiras (Thracians, Teutons, Germans, Scandinavian, Anglo-Saxon, Jutes)
6. Meshech (Russia)
7. Gomer (Celtic)
Note, This debunks the Out of Africa Theory. Japheth or his descendants were never in Africa.

Meet some Indians.
https://youtu. Be/NNbcQ5TnbtI
https://youtu. Be/6LvTREN4REI
https://youtu. Be/r7wVCj12I7o

Modern genetic studies confirm Indian origins can be traced to Indo Iranian and Indo European/Aryan ancestry.

Beginning with the Aryan race.
The Aryan race is a racial grouping that emerged in the period of the late 19th century and mid-20th century to describe people of Indo-European heritage. [1]

It derives from the idea that the original speakers of the Indo-European languages and their descendants up to the present day constitute a distinctive race or subrace of the Caucasian race.

Then the Indo-Aryan-European people
The Indo-Aryan peoples or the Indic peoples are a diverse Indo-European-speaking ethnolinguistic group of speakers of Indo-Aryan languages. There are over one billion native speakers of Indo-Aryan languages, Most of them native to the Indian subcontinent and presently found all across South Asia, Where they form the majority.

Finally The over one billion native speakers of Indo-Aryan languages, Most of them native to the Indian subcontinent and presently found all across South Asia, Where they form the majority.
South Asians are Indians.
South Asians are descended from a mix of farmers, Herders, And hunter-gatherers, Ancient DNA reveals.
Today, The population of South Asia is divided into dozens of ethnic, Linguistic, And religious groups that live side by side"but not always in harmony. A contentious border separates India and Pakistan; political movements draw stark lines between India"s Muslim and Hindu populations. Groups don"t mix much, As people tend to marry those who share their ethnicity and tongue.
Now, A study of the first ancient DNA recovered from South Asia shows that populations there mingled repeatedly thousands of years ago. Nearly all of the Indian subcontinent"s ethnic and linguistic groups are the product of three ancient Eurasian populations who met and mixed: local hunter-gatherers, Middle Eastern farmers, And Central Asian herders. Three similar groups also mingled in ancient Europe, Giving the two subcontinents surprisingly parallel histories.
The study, Presented here last week at the meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists and in a preprint on the bioRxiv server, Sheds light on where these populations came from and when they arrived in South Asia. It also strengthens the claim that Proto-Indo-European (PIE)"the ancestral language that gave rise to modern languages from English to Russian to Hindi"originated on the steppes of Asia.

Moorjani, David Reich of Harvard University, And Kumarasamy Thangaraj of the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology in Hyderabad, India, Spent years searching for ancient DNA in South Asia, Where hot climates might degrade it. Finally, Their team recovered and analyzed ancient genomes from 65 individuals who lived in northern Pakistan between 1200 B. C. E. And 1 C. E. They also analyzed 132 ancient genomes from Iran and southern Central Asia, And 165 from the steppes of Kazakhstan and Russia, And compared them with published ancient and modern genomes. These data allowed them to reconstruct when different populations arrived in South Asia and how they interacted.

Between 4700 and 3000 B. C. E. , Farmers from Iran mixed with hunter-gatherers indigenous to South Asia, Moorjani said. This combination of ancestries was found in the DNA of skeletal remains from sites in Turkmenistan and Iran known to have been in contact with the Indus Valley civilization, Which thrived in Pakistan and northwest India starting around 3300 B. C. E. The researchers dub this population "Indus periphery. " The 65 ancient people from Pakistan also show this combination, Although they all lived after the Indus civilization declined. The researchers suspect that "Indus periphery" people actually may have been the founders of Indus society, Although without ancient DNA from Indus Valley burials, They can"t be sure.

Still, Moorjani"s team sees this ancient mixture of Iranian farmers and South Asian hunter-gatherers all over South Asia today. As the Indus Valley civilization declined after 1300 B. C. E. , Some Indus periphery individuals moved south to mix with indigenous populations there, Forming the Ancestral South Indian population, Which today is more prominent in people who speak Dravidian languages such as Tamil and Kannada, And in those belonging to lower castes.

Meanwhile, Herders from the Eurasian steppe moved into the northern part of the subcontinent and mixed with Indus periphery people still there, Forming the Ancestral North Indian population. Today, People who belong to higher castes and those who speak Indo-European languages such as Hindi and Urdu tend to have more of this ancestry. Shortly after, These two already mixed groups mixed with each other, Giving rise to the populations living in India today.

"Strikingly, This is very similar to the pattern we see in Europe, " Moorjani said. Around 7000 B. C. E. , Agriculture spread into both Europe and South Asia with farmers from Anatolia and Iran, Respectively, Who each mixed with local hunter-gatherer populations. After about 3000 B. C. E. , Yamnaya pastoralists from the Central Asian steppe swept both east and west, Into Europe and South Asia, Bringing the wheel and perhaps cannabis.
---
The Indo-Aryan peoples or the Indic peoples are a diverse Indo-European-speaking ethnolinguistic group of speakers of Indo-Aryan languages. There are over one billion native speakers of Indo-Aryan languages, Most of them native to the Indian subcontinent and presently found all across South Asia, Where they form the majority.

The Aryan race is a racial grouping that emerged in the period of the late 19th century and mid-20th century to describe people of Indo-European heritage. [1]

It derives from the idea that the original speakers of the Indo-European languages and their descendants up to the present day constitute a distinctive race or subrace of the Caucasian race.
----
The study showed that there were two major migrations into India in the last 10, 000 years.
The first one originated from the Zagros region in south-western Iran (which has the world's first evidence for goat domestication) and brought agriculturists, Most likely herders, To India.
This would have been between 7, 000 and 3, 000BCE. These Zagrosian herders mixed with the earlier inhabitants of the subcontinent - to create the Harappan civilisation.
* Prehistoric art hints at lost Indian civilisation
In the centuries after 2000 BCE came the second set of immigrants (the Aryans) from the Eurasian Steppe, Probably from the region now known as Kazakhstan. They likely brought with them an early version of Sanskrit, Mastery over horses and a range of new cultural practices such as sacrificial rituals, All of which formed the basis of early Hindu/Vedic culture. (A thousand years before, People from the Steppe had also moved into Europe, Replacing and mixing with agriculturists there, Spawning new cultures and spreading Indo-European languages).
--
Harikrish
Posts: 38,773
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2019 7:45:49 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
50 Reasons Why Life in India is AWESOME

"To other countries, I may go as a tourist, but to India, I come as a pilgrim."
" Martin Luther King, Jr.

Life in India can be joyous, tough, colorful, stressful, chaotic but never boring. You must have heard numerous times that India is one of those countries that you can love and hate at the same time. While I am an occasional victim of "i-hate-india" syndrome, for most of the days I absolutely LOVE living here (and you will too if you"re planning on moving here). Here"s why:

01) India is a food lover"s paradise " nothing beats Indian food " curries, pakodas, momos, samosas, dosas, naans, sorpotel, kebabs, paneer and so much more! For a change, the vegetarians will not miss out on the delicious fun. The best part is how the taste of the food changes from one part of the country to another. For instance, street food in Delhi is completely different as compared to Mumbai.

02) Unity in Diversity " every city is different, people are different and there are many different subcultures. It is a lot of fun discovering new things about them even after living in India for years.

03) India offers interesting sights everywhere " it is a photographer"s delight!

04) It is the land of mother of all the teas " Masala Chai, which is available in every nook and corner.

05) Holi, Diwali, Onma, Eid, Lohri, Pongal, Christmas and more.. more than 40 festivals in a year that are super colorful and totally psychedelic! Depending on where you live, you will get a chance to experience as many as you want. More festivals = more holidays!

06) You will seldom face a language barrier here, despite the fact we have 22 official languages and 1652 unofficial languages because English unifies all of India.
07) Kaam Wali, Maali, Phool Wala, Driver " the comfort of domestic help will spoil you for life without breaking your bank balance.
Domestic Help is affordable in India - Why Life in India is Awesome

08) Traveling in Indian Railways is awesome " from luxury of a 1st class to affordability of a general class, there is something for everyone.

09) India is a paradise for shopaholics with endless possibilities for every budget.

10) Mangoes! They are a gift of GOD " taste one in India and you won"t like them anywhere else.

11) Haircuts, manicures, waxing " beauty salons are affordable.

12) Want an AFFORDABLE tailor made suit that fits like a dream? India is the place!

13) India is a sensory overload " your senses of seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, and touching get bombarded with stimulation.

14) Beauty in chaos " India demonstrates that.

15) Living in India, you will always be around architectural miracles that will make your jaws drop. (Of course I was not gonna leave our beloved Taj Mahal in Agra out of this list). Every city has some history and landmarks that have their own story to tell. By the way, check out this guide about what to do on a day trip in Agra.

16) Need your dose of mountain magic when you"re in India? There"s nothing like the majestic Himalayas!

17) Or tropical paradise? The pristine white sand beaches with turquoise blue water of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands are some of the most beautiful beaches in the world " and yet not touristy!

18) Or maybe you want a change of scene? Try the hauntingly beautiful sand dunes of Rajasthan.

19) Want to ski? The ski slopes of Gulmarg or Auli are kickass!

20) Or, you may want to see the beauty of living root bridges in Nongriat, Meghalaya. And many, many undiscovered offbeat destinations within India. Seriously, India is a traveler"s delight! There is so much to see that preparing the best itinerary for India is not so easy.

21) Living in India will test your limits in every way and toughen you up. After this, you can live just about anywhere.

22) You can get almost anything delivered to your doorstep for free. Save the cell phone number of your corner store owner to open the world of possibilities.

23) Sarees! They make every woman look sexy!

24) It is the land of spirituality. You can learn Yoga for free in a local park or a temple. (Only if you can wake up as early as 5:00 am)

25) That awesome feeling with you hear people say how traveling in India has changed them for life.

26) Bindis on the foreheads, flowers in the hair and henna on palms " it is the land of hippie fashion!

27) The amazing sight of Rangoli artwork outside houses on festivals and special occasions " very Indian and very pretty!

28) Sometimes when a yes or a no is not an acceptable answer, there"s a solution for that in India " the famous Indian head wobble.

29) Bhaang lassi " where else will you find a super potent marijuana milk shake that"s sold legally?

30) Old Monk in winters and kingfisher beer in summers " Zindabaad!

31) Watching the country"s obsession with cricket and how everyone turns overly patriotic when there"s a match against Pakistan " pure awesomeness. Yes, India has the best cricket team. Period.

32) Jets here, jets there, jets everywhere. In urban India, you will find jets in almost every toilet. In rural India, you will find floor toilets with "lota".

33) The sounds of vegetable sellers on the street, vehicles moving, children playing " these background sounds of life will never make you feel lonely. 34) Indian marriages = week long festivals. All other marriages are too boring in comparison.

35) Indian traffic will make you an expert driver. I"m a living proof of that " I can now maneuver my car through ANY narrow or twisted lane that"s full of vehicles of different kinds, animals, people and what not.

36) The traffic and long queues will teach you how to be patient.

37) Oh and the state of traffic is always a good excuse for being late. No one ever doubts it.

38) Nothing can beat a good old underground psychedelic trance party of Goa. After all, "Goa Trance" originated here.

39) Random sighting of animals everywhere " cows, monkeys sometimes even peacocks.

40) The possibility of a "jugaar" approach if things don"t work out normal way.

41) Autorichshaws! They are everywhere and make life easy. (commonly knowns as Tuk-tuks outside India)

42) Indian offices are like families " everyone eats lunch together.

43) Witnessing Diwali celebrations that begin a month before the festival " dandiya dance nights, Diwali Melas (fairs), Ram leela performances (play), card parties and beautiful decorations.

44) Watching how the entire country comes together during Ramzam month for iftar to experience delicious treats on the streets. Try Delhi"s Jama Masjid road or Mumbai"s Minara Masjid Lane, and Mohammed Ali Road.

45) Celebrating Holi with powdered colors, water balloons and water guns. You can color just about anyone that you see on the street. It"s a big, fat psychedelic party!

Holi " it"s a big fat psychedelic party where everyone"s invited (Source: Imgur.com)
46) Being a part of Christmas celebrations and parties with a dose of Indian-ness. Attending midnight mass and watching how the streets light up, especially in Old Goa, Shillong, Kolkata and Pondicherry.

47) Eating the langars of Gurudwaras! A full plate of delicious hygienic vegetarian meal can be enjoyed for free by anyone of any religion in these beautiful Sikh temples.

48) Are you a dog lover? There"s a lot of free love on Indian streets for dog lovers because killing of stray dogs is illegal in the country as of 2001. Most of these dogs are well fed and given rabies shot by the local residents and NGOs.

49) Indian street food has toughened up my digestive system. I can now eat street food anywhere in the world without any stress.

50) The number of people in your support system of family and friends is massive! It"s big enough to form your own political party if you want. This is kinda obvious considering the population situation of India.
ethang5
Posts: 22,946
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2019 8:18:32 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Real Indians on how India really is.

https://www. Debate. Org/forums/religion/topic/4339843/

With citations and links.
Harikrish
Posts: 38,773
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2019 9:37:19 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
Real Indians on how India really is.

https://www. Debate. Org/forums/religion/topic/4339843/

With citations and links.

They missed the great achievement of India.

As many already know India is the largest democracy in the world. Hinduism the religion of over a billion Indians is the oldest religion in the world. India was invaded by the Moguls, Romans, Persians and the British. But India always managed to overcome its enemies and today India towers over them both militarily and economical and throughout its challenging history the people of India maintained their intellectual integrity and religious purity.

What many may not know are the great achievements of India both past and present. But most know Harikrish and he is about to tell you everything that you need to know about Mother India.

PM Modi praises Indians for being successful in India and overseas and in space.

Modi praises Indian doctors in Singapore.
https://youtu. Be/hfdy5MB2X1c

Modi is seen with all the world leaders.

India ranked 4th in global military power.

India to become 5th largest economy in 2018.

10 great achievements of India.
1. Ending Polio among 1. 3 billion people - Ending polio in India is world's greatest health achievement, Says Bill Gates
2. Mission to Mars - India"s mission to Mars has smaller budget than hit film Gravity, Says PM
3. Mission to Moon that gave further evidence of water in the Moon - Chandrayaan helps NASA detect water on Moon "
4. Right to Information - An achievement that has turned thorn in govt flesh - The Times of India
5. Golden quadrilateral and other new highways - Over 40, 000 km of highways/expressways added in the past 15 years. We are still not near the quality of US interstates, But in terms of length of highways, We are near there (US interstates is about 76000km). NDA regime constructed 50% of national highways laid in last 30 years: Centre R32;
6. Entering the nuclear club - For years, India was a nuclear pariah, Getting to nuclear bomb little later than the top 5 powers. However, Since 1998 explosion in Pokhran India has slowly gotten recognized as a nuclear power. This has helped avoid a fullblown war with Pakistan in 1999 and helped India resist temptation to fight Pakistan in two provocations (2001 attack on Parliament and the 2008 attack on Mumbai). R32;
7. Built a software industry from nowhere. 20 years ago, Indian software industry was almost non-existent. Now, It has grown more than 100 times in 20 years. In the next decade, India would have a few dozen billion dollar software companies. R32;
8. Built a software industry from nowhere. 20 years ago, Indian software industry was almost non-existent. Now, It has grown more than 100 times in 20 years. In the next decade, India would have a few dozen billion dollar software companies. R32;
Size of Indian software industry is 87 billions of dollars (2008).
9. Over 200 million people have been brought out of illiteracy. India's literacy rate rises to 73 per cent as population growth dips and student enrollment for ages 6-14 goes up to 98%.
10 India's untouchables becoming millionaires.

16 great Science and Tech discoveries Ancient India gave to the World.

Bill Gates praises India for success, Seen congratulating PM Modi.
https://youtu. Be/te5cGXUYlfU

Trump loves India.
Trump praises India. . . Wants Indians to live in America
https://youtu. Be/4R4CbgpLQE4

Meet some Indians.

Meet some Indians.
https://youtu. Be/NNbcQ5TnbtI
https://youtu. Be/6LvTREN4REI
https://youtu. Be/r7wVCj12I7o
Harikrish
Posts: 38,773
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/4/2019 4:50:26 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Origins of the people of India the Biblical Madai.

Seven Sons of Japheth:
1. Javan (Greece, Romans, Romance -- French, Italians, Spanish, Portuguese)
2. Magog (Scythians, Slavs, Russians, Bulgarians, Bohemians, Poles, Slovaks, Croatians)
3. Madai (Indians & Iranic: Medes, Persians, Afghans, Kurds)
4. Tubal (South of Black Sea)
5. Tiras (Thracians, Teutons, Germans, Scandinavian, Anglo-Saxon, Jutes)
6. Meshech (Russia)
7. Gomer (Celtic)
Note, This debunks the Out of Africa Theory. Japheth or his descendants were never in Africa.

Madai the son of Japheth are the people that in English are called the Medes and dwelt mostly in what is now called Iran or Persia. Iran is said to mean the land of the Aryans and were composed of the Medes or the Madai and the Semite Elamites. These Iranians or Persians probably carried out the early invasion of about 1500 BC into India that brought Aryan people to India and displaced the earlier Dravidian people of India. These Aryan people as descendents of Japheth through Madai also brought Hinduism including the Hindu god Pra-japati (lord of offspring) and the Vedas or early Hindu scriptures. The Aryan people of India are like the Iranians generally olive skinned and look somewhat Caucasian in contrast to the people of India of Dravidian background that are generally brown or darker skin. Also the Aryan languages of Northern India are of the Indo-European family of languages that includes Persian or Iranian languages but also languages such as Sanskrit, Hindi and Urdu, Bengali, Panjabi, Marathi and Gujarati.
These languages are native to the people of India with Hindi being the official National Language of India.

Beginning with the Aryan race.
The Aryan race is a racial grouping that emerged in the period of the late 19th century and mid-20th century to describe people of Indo-European heritage. [1]

It derives from the idea that the original speakers of the Indo-European languages and their descendants up to the present day constitute a distinctive race or subrace of the Caucasian race.

Then the Indo-Aryan-European people
The Indo-Aryan peoples or the Indic peoples are a diverse Indo-European-speaking ethnolinguistic group of speakers of Indo-Aryan languages. There are over one billion native speakers of Indo-Aryan languages, Most of them native to the Indian subcontinent and presently found all across South Asia, Where they form the majority. [note 1]

Finally The over one billion native speakers of Indo-Aryan languages, Most of them native to the Indian subcontinent and presently found all across South Asia, Where they form the majority. [note 1]
South Asians are Indians.
South Asians are descended from a mix of farmers, Herders, And hunter-gatherers, Ancient DNA reveals.
Today, The population of South Asia is divided into dozens of ethnic, Linguistic, And religious groups that live side by side"but not always in harmony. A contentious border separates India and Pakistan; political movements draw stark lines between India"s Muslim and Hindu populations. Groups don"t mix much, As people tend to marry those who share their ethnicity and tongue.
Now, A study of the first ancient DNA recovered from South Asia shows that populations there mingled repeatedly thousands of years ago. Nearly all of the Indian subcontinent"s ethnic and linguistic groups are the product of three ancient Eurasian populations who met and mixed: local hunter-gatherers, Middle Eastern farmers, And Central Asian herders. Three similar groups also mingled in ancient Europe, Giving the two subcontinents surprisingly parallel histories.
The study, Presented here last week at the meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists and in a preprint on the bioRxiv server, Sheds light on where these populations came from and when they arrived in South Asia. It also strengthens the claim that Proto-Indo-European (PIE)"the ancestral language that gave rise to modern languages from English to Russian to Hindi"originated on the steppes of Asia.

Moorjani, David Reich of Harvard University, And Kumarasamy Thangaraj of the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology in Hyderabad, India, Spent years searching for ancient DNA in South Asia, Where hot climates might degrade it. Finally, Their team recovered and analyzed ancient genomes from 65 individuals who lived in northern Pakistan between 1200 B. C. E. And 1 C. E. They also analyzed 132 ancient genomes from Iran and southern Central Asia, And 165 from the steppes of Kazakhstan and Russia, And compared them with published ancient and modern genomes. These data allowed them to reconstruct when different populations arrived in South Asia and how they interacted.

Between 4700 and 3000 B. C. E. , Farmers from Iran mixed with hunter-gatherers indigenous to South Asia, Moorjani said. This combination of ancestries was found in the DNA of skeletal remains from sites in Turkmenistan and Iran known to have been in contact with the Indus Valley civilization, Which thrived in Pakistan and northwest India starting around 3300 B. C. E. The researchers dub this population "Indus periphery. " The 65 ancient people from Pakistan also show this combination, Although they all lived after the Indus civilization declined. The researchers suspect that "Indus periphery" people actually may have been the founders of Indus society, Although without ancient DNA from Indus Valley burials, They can"t be sure.

Still, Moorjani"s team sees this ancient mixture of Iranian farmers and South Asian hunter-gatherers all over South Asia today. As the Indus Valley civilization declined after 1300 B. C. E. , Some Indus periphery individuals moved south to mix with indigenous populations there, Forming the Ancestral South Indian population, Which today is more prominent in people who speak Dravidian languages such as Tamil and Kannada, And in those belonging to lower castes.

Meanwhile, Herders from the Eurasian steppe moved into the northern part of the subcontinent and mixed with Indus periphery people still there, Forming the Ancestral North Indian population. Today, People who belong to higher castes and those who speak Indo-European languages such as Hindi and Urdu tend to have more of this ancestry. Shortly after, These two already mixed groups mixed with each other, Giving rise to the populations living in India today.

"Strikingly, This is very similar to the pattern we see in Europe, " Moorjani said. Around 7000 B. C. E. , Agriculture spread into both Europe and South Asia with farmers from Anatolia and Iran, Respectively, Who each mixed with local hunter-gatherer populations. After about 3000 B. C. E. , Yamnaya pastoralists from the Central Asian steppe swept both east and west, Into Europe and South Asia, Bringing the wheel and perhaps cannabis.
ethang5
Posts: 22,946
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/5/2019 7:29:23 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
The curse of Ham only condemned Africans to slavery.

Then how come you're afraid to face the truth? You can't even address one fact in the real research shown to you. You're running.

Here it is again. You wanted to "discuss" it. Now that the truth is out, You got cold feet. Here it is again. Dodge it again like the shithole coward you are.

Since you're afraid of facing the truth about your shithole country, I'll bring the truth to you moron.

Read about the curse on your filthy country. It's in the bible! Lol.

The curse goes. . . .

26 Blessed be the the Lord God of Shem, And Canaan shall be his servant.

27 God shall enlarge Japheth, And he shall dwell in the tents of Shem, And Canaan shall be his servant.

Let's break the curse down. . .

Curses on Canaan:
1. A servant of servants shall he be unto his brothers
2. Canaan shall be his [Shem's] servant.
3. Canaan shall be his [Japheth's] servant

Blessings
1. Blessed be the the Lord God of Shem
2. God shall enlarge Japheth
3. He [Japheth] shall dwell in the tents of Shem

Three curses and three blessings.

I maintain that the curse of Canaan is fulfilled in the slavery of India.

* Indians are the descendants of Canaan.
* Arabs are the descendants of Japheth.
* The British are the descendants of Shem.

So let's compare the history of India and Africa and see which one better fits the curse of Canaan in Gen 9.

Curses

1. A servant of servants shall he be unto his brothers

A. India's untouchables were servants to the other Indians who were themselves servants to the Arabs and British.
Servants of servants?
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

B. Enslaved by both brothers Shem(British) & Japheth(Arabs)
Enslaved by descendants of Shem AND Japheth
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

C. Canaan shall be his [Japheth's] servant
Institutionally enslaved by Arabs.
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

Blessings

1. Blessed be the the Lord God of Shem

The descendants of Shem, The ancestor of the Roman empire, Saw their God exalted above all gods. The god of Japheth - Allah, The god of Canaan - Krishna.

2. God shall enlarge Japheth
3. He [Japheth] shall dwell in the tents of Shem

According to the Book of Jubilees (10:50-51), Madai (descendant of Japheth) had married a daughter of Shem, And preferred to live among Shem's descendants, Rather than dwell in Japheth's allotted inheritance beyond the Black Sea; so he begged his brothers-in-law, Elam, Asshur and Arphaxad, Until he finally received from them the land that was named after him, Media. .

a. God shall enlarge Japheth. . .

Some want to say Madai represents Indians. That Indians were descendants of Japheth and therefore white. But. . .

https://en. M. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Madai
Madai (Hebrew) is a son of Japheth and one of the 16 grandsons of Noah in the Book of Genesis of the Hebrew Bible.

Biblical scholars have generally identified Madai with the Iranian Medes of much later records. The Medes, Reckoned to be his offspring by Josephus and most subsequent writers, Were also known as Madai, Including in both Assyrian and Hebrew sources. Some scholars in more modern times have also proposed connections with various earlier nations, Such as Mitanni, [1] Matiene, And Mannai. In addition, The Kurds still maintain traditions of descent from Madai.

Madai is also the name of the deified ancestor of the Kachin people of Myanmar, According to the indigenous Kachin religion.

Also linked with Madai is the Iranian city of Hamadan.

https://en. M. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Japheth
In identifying Japheth's descendants, Muslim exegesis more-or-less agrees with the Biblical traditions. [18] He is usually regarded as the ancestor of the Gog and Magog tribes, And, At times, Of the Turks, Khazars, And Slavs.

The Madai mentioned in the bible is not Indians, They are Persians, Today's Iranians.

For those who say Indians are white. . . .

http://www. Cogwriter. Com/india. Htm
Cush also had sons who went east into Asia rather than into Africa. Herodotus wrote:

The Ethiopians from the sun-rise. . . Were marshalled with the Indians, And did not at all differ from [them] in appearance but only in their language, And their hair. For the eastern Ethiopians are straight-haired; but those of (Africa) have hair more curly than that of any other people. These Ethiopians from Asia were accounted (almost the same as the Indians [of India]).

The brown people of southern India and Ceylon are also descendants of Cush. Historians call them Dravidians; the ancients called them Sibae (Smith's Classical Dictionary). Their Bible name was Seba (Gen. 10:7). Josephus recognized an eastern and a western Cush--one in Asia, The other in Africa (Antiquities, Book 1, VI, 2). Herodotus calls them "Asiatic Ethiopians" (Thalia, Section 94). "Ethiopia" in Ezekiel 38:5 should be translated "Cush. " It refers primarily to the Asiatic Cush, Which is India today.

In India the highest castes were not only called Brahmins, But also Rajputs. "Rajput" means "king or chief of Put" (Raja, " Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th ed. ). "Phut" or "Put" means a "warrior" in Hebrew. The Rajputs are the most noted warriors in India. . . Of the four sons of Ham, Only Cush bears a name that means "black. " Just as some of the sons of Cush are brown, So some of the children of Phut are black. The Indians of central and northern India vary from light to dark brown.

So let us summerize. . .

A. India's untouchables were servants to the other Indians who were themselves servants to the Arabs and British.
Servants of servants?
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

B. Enslaved by both brothers Shem(British) & Japheth(Arabs)
Enslaved by descendants of Shem AND Japheth
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

C. Canaan shall be his [Japheth's] servant
Institutionally enslaved by Arabs.
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

D. Japth shall dwell in the tents of Shem. . .
Who dwelled in the tents of Shem?
Africans - No. Indians - No

E. Cursed be Canaan. . .
Most Africans were never slaves, But for 17 centuries, ALL Indians were slaves. The curse better fits the group that suffered complete slavery.
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

The curse was not to all of Canaan's descendants, But went through Ham, To Canaan, To Cush, To Seba. Seba is the one on which the curse rested, And it was not because of Noah's nakedness, But Seba's idolatry with Krishna.

God's curses do not fail. Less than 30% of Africans ever saw slavery, But for 17 centuries, All Indians, Every one of them, Were slaves or the slaves of slaves. Just as the bible prophesies.

This is real research, And not the 8th grade illiterate nonsenseyou spew.
Harikrish
Posts: 38,773
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/5/2019 8:01:38 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:

Hee, Hee! You are afraid. Feeling trapped in your stupidity moron? Can't deal with real research can you?

So let us summerize. . .

A. India's untouchables were servants to the other Indians who were themselves servants to the Arabs and British.
Both Arabs and British were driven out.
Prophecy failed.

B. Enslaved by both brothers Shem(British) & Japheth(Arabs)
Enslaved by descendants of Shem AND Japheth
Yes, Canaanites were slaughtered by Joshua.

C. Canaan shall be his [Japheth's] servant
Institutionally enslaved by Arabs.
Arabs were driven out of India. Prophecy failed.

D. Japth shall dwell in the tents of Shem. . .
Who dwelled in the tents of Shem?
Canaanites temporarily lived in Israel. Till they were slaughtered.
Indians were never in the Land of Canaanites.

E. Cursed be Canaan. . .
Most Africans were never slaves,
African slaves were owned and traded by Arabs, Romans, Portuguese and Christians and Ghana Africa shipped out over 20 million African slaves alone.

The curse was not to all of Canaan's descendants, But went through Ham, To Canaan, To Cush, To Seba. Seba is the one on which the curse rested, And it was not because of Noah's nakedness, But Seba's idolatry with Krishna.
So Krishna is a God in the Bible. Lol!

God's curses do not fail. Less than 30% of Africans ever saw slavery.
The Arabs owned and traded African slaves for 1, 300 years. The Christians did the same for 400 years.

This is real research, And not 8th grade illiterate nonsense.

The bible tells us Noah cursed Ham through his children who were the first Africans as detailed in the start of Nations in Genesis 10. Noah's curse condemned Africans to slavery.

Genesis 10:
How they were scattered.
1. 4. Four Sons of Ham
1. Mizraim (Egypt)
2. Cush (Sudan, Ethiopia)
3. Put (Lybia)
4. Canaan (Land of Canaanites)

Note the Canaanites lived in the Land Canaanites and not India.

Canaanites

Canaan, As well as his descendants, Followed in the sinful way of their father. The punishment was placed upon the descendants of Canaan-the Canaanites. These are the people who were driven out of the Promised Land by the children of Israel. Consequently, They would be in servitude to the descendants of Shem and Japeth. Because the descendants of Canaan lived corrupt lives, Their judgment was righteous. When the children of Israel entered the land of Promise they saw the detestable things that the descendants of Canaan were doing. God blessed Israel and cursed the Canaanites because their practices were similar to their father Ham.

Historical Fulfillment

History records God's promises were fulfilled. The Canaanites were defeated and placed into slavery by the eastern kings Genesis 14. Later in the history of Israel, Other descendants of Canaan, Known as the Gibeonites, Were made wood choppers and water carriers under Joshua. Thus the predictions of Noah that Canaan's descendants would serve Shem's descendants were literally fulfilled and recorded in the Old Testament.

Still no mention of India because the Indians are not Canaanites. Indians are Indo European/Aryans the descendants of Japheth. Noah only cursed the Canaanites the descendants of Canaan the son of Ham. Read your bible you low IQ nigger.

Where are the Canaanites today? Not in India. Lol?
Canaan was the name of a large and prosperous ancient country (at times independent, At others a tributary to Egypt) located in the Levant region of present-day Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, And Israel. It was also known as Phoenicia.

The nigger Ethang is burning.
No matter what the nigger Ethang says, He knows he will wake up a black shithole nigger. . The nigger Ethang is going beserk again, This time over a typo where Noah was used instead of Ham.
Indians are white Indo Europeans. Genesis puts Indians as descendants of Japheth. Only Ham and his childrem were the first Africans Genesis 10. The Biblical curse of Ham condemned only Africans to slavery.
I made the typo and said supposedly 3 times Noah's children were all Africans Genesis 10.
But I am sure I said over 200 times Ham's children were Africans because that is what Genesis 10 says and I referenced Genesis 10.

I am a proud Indian living in Canada and work in America in the IT field. Indians are high achievers. Lol!

Read your confessions, Nigger.
Ethang5: Lol. Of course I am African, Why do you keep talking about America?
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where I run Bibles to countries which outlaw the possession of Bibles. Been doing it for more than 15 years to many countries. I have 3 children.
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where slavery is still practiced today.
Ethang5 wrote: "I'm not a proud African. And if I were, I would not lie about Africa's achievements. "

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where the literacy rate is below 50%, And I see people do here, Exactly what this "test" is doing. Taking advantage of ignorance.

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where slavery is still practiced today.

Ethang5 wrote: I think you're right. I live in Ghana, West Africa, And if you were to try the "God is evil" argument here people would simply think you were an obnoxious boob.

Ethang5 wrote: Long ago, I had a night job where I worked with this guy much like Im-Em here. He told me that reality was whatever he believed.

Ethang5 wrote: I currently live in a country with a society much closer to the 1st century than the society in which you live. I have seen people get burned alive in the street, And people a few blocks away never hear of it.

Ethang5 wrote: Having been kicked off more than a hundred forums, I understand your trepidation. But I don't think you have too much to worry about. The overwhelming majority of posters here would not want you banned or censured.

Ethang5 wrote:. I live among people like the Piraha. They have to work ALL DAY. Do you believe they are working only when hunting or gathering food? Do you think they have running water? Or electricity? They sleep often during the day because it is hot and they must work for everything. There are no stores, Only rudimentary tools. Please. Working only 15 hours a week would kill them, As evidenced by their dwindling tribe.

Ethang5 wrote: In Ghana where I live, The JW's are more aggressive. I always talk to them and let them know the many times when their organization made false prophesies about the end of the world.

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Ghana, Some of what is custom here would be child abuse in America, Yet the Ghanaian parents aren't in jail.

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Ghana, West Africa. If you think life is miserable, Come here and I will open your eyes. I will show you people who will infect you with their joy. Yet they aren't all Pollyannas. Some are cynics who have simply decided not to allow their environment to define them.

Ethang5 wrote: I have an electrified fence at my house. I had it put in. Is it wrong that I warn visitors to my home about it? If a visitor ignores my warning, Can he claim because I installed it, I'm responsible for his injury after having not believed my warning?
I work with prisoners. Many say they are Christian because the think it will facilitate their case with the parole board.

Ethang5 wrote: This is like when whites tell blacks, Why are you always on about racism? A black person's ethnicity is obvious.

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where I run Bibles to countries which outlaw the possession of Bibles. Been doing it for more than 15 years to many countries. I have 3 children.

Your father was a black negroid atheist. But you turned out to be a black negroid slave delivering bibles for free.

Karmic Justice combined with the curse of Ham and Slavery by Arabs produced Blacks.
ethang5
Posts: 22,946
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/5/2019 8:32:50 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Harikrish wrote:
ethang5 wrote:

Hee, Hee! You are afraid. Feeling trapped in your stupidity moron? Can't deal with real research can you?

So let us summerize. . .

A. India's untouchables were servants to the other Indians who were themselves servants to the Arabs and British.
Servants of servants?
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

B. Enslaved by both brothers Shem(British) & Japheth(Arabs)
Enslaved by descendants of Shem AND Japheth
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

C. Canaan shall be his [Japheth's] servant
Institutionally enslaved by Arabs.
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

D. Japth shall dwell in the tents of Shem. . .
Who dwelled in the tents of Shem?
Africans - No. Indians - No

E. Cursed be Canaan. . .

Most Africans were never slaves,

African slaves were owned and traded by Arabs, Romans, Portuguese and Christians and Ghana Africa shipped out over 20 million African slaves alone.

Still, Most African were never slaves. ALL Indians were slaves. Indians fit the curse perfectly.

The curse was not to all of Canaan's descendants, But went through Ham, To Canaan, To Cush, To Seba. Seba is the one on which the curse rested, And it was not because of Noah's nakedness, But Seba's idolatry with Krishna.

So Krishna is a God in the Bible. Lol!

An idol idiot. Learn to read. This is educated research, Not racist trash.

God's curses do not fail. Less than 30% of Africans ever saw slavery.

The Arabs owned and traded African slaves for 1, 300 years. The Christians did the same for 400 years.

Still, Most African were never slaves. ALL Indians were slaves. Indians fit the curse.

This is real research, And not 8th grade illiterate nonsense.

Still no mention of India because the Indians are not Canaanites.

They would not have been called Indians at that time moron, The ancients called them Sibaens. The curse was not to all of Canaan's descendants, But went through Ham, To Canaan, To Cush, To Seba. Seba is the one on which the curse rested, And it was not because of Noah's nakedness, But Seba's idolatry with Krishna.

Seba is the descendant of Canaan that settled in India.

God's curses do not fail. Less than 30% of Africans ever saw slavery, But for 17 centuries, All Indians, Every one of them, Were slaves or the slaves of slaves. Just as the bible prophesies. Gen 7. 10 It's in the bible!

For those who say Indians are white. . . .

http://www. Cogwriter. Com/india. Htm
Cush also had sons who went east into Asia rather than into Africa. Herodotus wrote:

The Ethiopians from the sun-rise. . . Were marshalled with the Indians, And did not at all differ from [them] in appearance but only in their language, And their hair. For the eastern Ethiopians are straight-haired; but those of (Africa) have hair more curly than that of any other people. These Ethiopians from Asia were accounted (almost the same as the Indians [of India]).

The brown people of southern India and Ceylon are also descendants of Cush. Historians call them Dravidians; the ancients called them Sibae (Smith's Classical Dictionary). Their Bible name was Seba (Gen. 10:7). Josephus recognized an eastern and a western Cush--one in Asia, The other in Africa (Antiquities, Book 1, VI, 2). Herodotus calls them "Asiatic Ethiopians" (Thalia, Section 94). "Ethiopia" in Ezekiel 38:5 should be translated "Cush. " It refers primarily to the Asiatic Cush, Which is India today.

In India the highest castes were not only called Brahmins, But also Rajputs. "Rajput" means "king or chief of Put" (Raja, " Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th ed. ). "Phut" or "Put" means a "warrior" in Hebrew. The Rajputs are the most noted warriors in India. . . Of the four sons of Ham, Only Cush bears a name that means "black. " Just as some of the sons of Cush are brown, So some of the children of Phut are black. The Indians of central and northern India vary from light to dark brown

Run little brown boy, But the facts will not change. You are under the curse of Ham. Indian slavery fits perfectly. All three curses.

No wonder no one likes you. Like Cain, God has marked you as a shithole. You and your country are cursed from your shithole religion.
Harikrish
Posts: 38,773
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/5/2019 8:52:45 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
The curse of Ham only condemned Africans to slavery.

Here it is again. You wanted to "discuss" it. Now that the truth is out, You got cold feet. Dodge it again like the shithole coward you are.

Read about the curse on your filthy country. It's in the bible! Lol.

The curse goes. . . .

26 Blessed be the the Lord God of Shem, And Canaan shall be his servant.

27 God shall enlarge Japheth, And he shall dwell in the tents of Shem, And Canaan shall be his servant.

Let's break the curse down. . .

Curses on Canaan:
1. A servant of servants shall he be unto his brothers
2. Canaan shall be his [Shem's] servant.
3. Canaan shall be his [Japheth's] servant
The Canaanites were the descendants of Ham's son Canaan who lived in the Land of Canaanites and not India.

Blessings
1. Blessed be the the Lord God of Shem
2. God shall enlarge Japheth
3. He [Japheth] shall dwell in the tents of Shem

Three curses and three blessings.

I maintain that the curse of Canaan is fulfilled in the slavery of India.

* Indians are the descendants of Canaan.
* Arabs are the descendants of Japheth.
* The British are the descendants of Shem.
You got all three wrong you low IQ nigger.
The children of Shem were Elam, Ashur, Arphaxad, Lud and Aram, In addition to daughters. Abraham, The patriarch of the Hebrews and Arabs, Was one of the descendants of Arphaxad.
Indians are the descendants of Japheth. Indians were never in the Land of Canaanites.
The Canaanites who lived in the Land of Canaanites were the descendants of Canaan.

So let's compare the history of India and Africa and see which one better fits the curse of Canaan in Gen 9.

Curses

1. A servant of servants shall he be unto his brothers

A. India's untouchables were servants to the other Indians who were themselves servants to the Arabs and British.
Servants of servants?
Africans - No. Indians - Yes
The Arabs and British were driven out of India by the Indians. The prophecy failed because Noah' curse only Condemned Africans to slavery.

B. Enslaved by both brothers Shem(British) & Japheth(Arabs)
Enslaved by descendants of Shem AND Japheth
Africans - No. Indians - Yes
The children of Shem were Elam, Ashur, Arphaxad, Lud and Aram, In addition to daughters. Abraham, The patriarch of the Hebrews and Arabs, Was one of the descendants of Arphaxad.
Indians are the descendants of Japheth. Indians were never in the Land of Canaanites. Indo Europeans were the descendants of Japheth
The Canaanites who lived in the Land of Canaanites were the descendants of Canaan.

C. Canaan shall be his [Japheth's] servant
Institutionally enslaved by Arabs.
Africans - No. Indians - Yes
Arabs were the descendants of Shem. Read your bible nigger.
Blessings

1. Blessed be the the Lord God of Shem

The descendants of Shem, The ancestor of the Roman empire, Saw their God exalted above all gods. The god of Japheth - Allah, The god of Canaan - Krishna.
Europeans and Indo Europeans were the descendants of Japheth. Read your bible, Nigger.

2. God shall enlarge Japheth
3. He [Japheth] shall dwell in the tents of Shem

According to the Book of Jubilees (10:50-51), Madai (descendant of Japheth) had married a daughter of Shem, And preferred to live among Shem's descendants, Rather than dwell in Japheth's allotted inheritance beyond the Black Sea; so he begged his brothers-in-law, Elam, Asshur and Arphaxad, Until he finally received from them the land that was named after him, Media. .

a. God shall enlarge Japheth. . .

Some want to say Madai represents Indians. That Indians were descendants of Japheth and therefore white. But. . .

https://en. M. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Madai
Madai (Hebrew) is a son of Japheth and one of the 16 grandsons of Noah in the Book of Genesis of the Hebrew Bible.

Biblical scholars have generally identified Madai with the Iranian Medes of much later records. The Medes, Reckoned to be his offspring by Josephus and most subsequent writers, Were also known as Madai, Including in both Assyrian and Hebrew sources. Some scholars in more modern times have also proposed connections with various earlier nations, Such as Mitanni, [1] Matiene, And Mannai. In addition, The Kurds still maintain traditions of descent from Madai.

Madai is also the name of the deified ancestor of the Kachin people of Myanmar, According to the indigenous Kachin religion.

Also linked with Madai is the Iranian city of Hamadan.

https://en. M. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Japheth
In identifying Japheth's descendants, Muslim exegesis more-or-less agrees with the Biblical traditions. [18] He is usually regarded as the ancestor of the Gog and Magog tribes, And, At times, Of the Turks, Khazars, And Slavs.

The Madai mentioned in the bible is not Indians, They are Persians, Today's Iranians.
The Persians were driven out of Persia by the Muslims and settled in India. That is how we have the Indo Iranians (Indian Iranians). The Indo Europeans also appears around the same time in India. Thus resulting in 1 billion Indo Aryan Indians.

For those who say Indians are white. . . .
http://www. Cogwriter. Com/india. Htm
Cush also had sons who went east into Asia rather than into Africa. Herodotus wrote:
The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia. Indians are not Ethiopians. Ethiopians are still living in Ethiopia.
.
The Ethiopians from the sun-rise. . . Were marshalled with the Indians, And did not at all differ from [them] in appearance but only in their language, And their hair. For the eastern Ethiopians are straight-haired; but those of (Africa) have hair more curly than that of any other people. These Ethiopians from Asia were accounted (almost the same as the Indians [of India]).
The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia. Indians are not Ethiopians. Ethiopians are still living in Ethiopia.

The brown people of southern India and Ceylon are also descendants of Cush. Historians call them Dravidians; the ancients called them Sibae (Smith's Classical Dictionary). Their Bible name was Seba (Gen. 10:7). Josephus recognized an eastern and a western Cush--one in Asia, The other in Africa (Antiquities, Book 1, VI, 2). Herodotus calls them "Asiatic Ethiopians" (Thalia, Section 94). "Ethiopia" in Ezekiel 38:5 should be translated "Cush. " It refers primarily to the Asiatic Cush, Which is India today.
They are called Dravidians and not Crush or Ethiopians because they are not Africans.

In India the highest castes were not only called Brahmins, But also Rajputs. "Rajput" means "king or chief of Put" (Raja, " Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th ed. ). "Phut" or "Put" means a "warrior" in Hebrew. The Rajputs are the most noted warriors in India. . . Of the four sons of Ham, Only Cush bears a name that means "black. " Just as some of the sons of Cush are brown, So some of the children of Phut are black. The Indians of central and northern India vary from light to dark brown.
So Indians are not Black. Only Africans are Black.

So let us summerize. . .

The curse was not to all of Canaan's descendants, But went through Ham.
Noah only cursed Ham through his children.

We know Hams's children were the first Africans.
Genesis 10:
1. 4. Four Sons of Ham
1. Mizraim (Egypt)
2. Cush (Sudan, Ethiopia)
3. Put (Lybia)
4. Canaan (Land of Canaanites)
Note the countries where Ham's children lived are in Africa and not India. India is not among them.
ethang5
Posts: 22,946
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/5/2019 11:12:07 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Harikrish wrote:
ethang5 wrote:

The curse of Ham only condemned Africans to slavery.

The curse of Ham condemned the sons of Canaan to slavery. Indians are the descendants of Canaan and fit the curse perfectly.

Read about the curse on your filthy country. It's in the bible! Lol.

Indians are the descendants of Japheth. Indians were never in the Land of Canaanites.

Indians are descendants of Seba, A son of Canaan. Read Gen 10. 7 you idiot.

The Canaanites who lived in the Land of Canaanites were the descendants of Canaan.

All Canaan's children are his descendants idiot.

The children of Shem were Elam, Ashur, Arphaxad, Lud and Aram, In addition to daughters. Abraham, The patriarch of the Hebrews and Arabs, Was one of the descendants of Arphaxad.

Indians are the descendants of Japheth. Indians were never in the Land of Canaanites. Indo Europeans were the descendants of Japheth

Read my citation moron. Experts say Madai means Persians, Not Indians.

Europeans and Indo Europeans were the descendants of Japheth. Read your bible, Nigger.

Yet Europeans never dwelt in the tents of Shem moron. Indian are descendants of Cush.

According to the Book of Jubilees (10:50-51), Madai (descendant of Japheth) had married a daughter of Shem, And preferred to live among Shem's descendants, Rather than dwell in Japheth's allotted inheritance beyond the Black Sea; so he begged his brothers-in-law, Elam, Asshur and Arphaxad, Until he finally received from them the land that was named after him, Media. .

Some want to say Madai represents Indians. That Indians were descendants of Japheth and therefore white. But. . .

https://en. M. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Madai
Madai (Hebrew) is a son of Japheth and one of the 16 grandsons of Noah in the Book of Genesis of the Hebrew Bible.

Biblical scholars have generally identified Madai with the Iranian Medes of much later records. The Medes, Reckoned to be his offspring by Josephus and most subsequent writers, Were also known as Madai, Including in both Assyrian and Hebrew sources. Some scholars in more modern times have also proposed connections with various earlier nations, Such as Mitanni, [1] Matiene, And Mannai. In addition, The Kurds still maintain traditions of descent from Madai.

https://en. M. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Japheth
In identifying Japheth's descendants, Muslim exegesis more-or-less agrees with the Biblical traditions. [18] He is usually regarded as the ancestor of the Gog and Magog tribes, And, At times, Of the Turks, Khazars, And Slavs.

The Madai mentioned in the bible is not Indians, They are Persians, Today's Iranians.

The Persians were driven out of Persia by the Muslims and settled in India. That is how we have the Indo Iranians (Indian Iranians).

There were already people in India when the Persians and Arabs arrived. Those people were Sanaens, The descendants of Cush, The son of Canaan.

For those who say Indians are white. . . .
http://www. Cogwriter. Com/india. Htm

Cush also had sons who went east into Asia rather than into Africa. Herodotus wrote:

The word Cush means black.

Yeah. We know.

Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod.

Cush was the grandson of Ham. Read your bible idiot.

He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia. Indians are not Ethiopians. Ethiopians are still living in Ethiopia.

Indians were called Ethiopians of the east because they were black, Looked like Africans, And shared an ancestor with Africans. Read the real research below idiot.

The Ethiopians from the sun-rise. . . Were marshalled with the Indians, And did not at all differ from [them] in appearance but only in their language, And their hair. For the eastern Ethiopians are straight-haired; but those of (Africa) have hair more curly than that of any other people. These Ethiopians from Asia were accounted (almost the same as the Indians [of India]).

Repeating your silly comment doesn't help you.

The brown people of southern India and Ceylon are also descendants of Cush. Historians call them Dravidians; the ancients called them Sibae (Smith's Classical Dictionary). Their Bible name was Seba (Gen. 10:7). Josephus recognized an eastern and a western Cush--one in Asia, The other in Africa (Antiquities, Book 1, VI, 2). Herodotus calls them "Asiatic Ethiopians" (Thalia, Section 94). "Ethiopia" in Ezekiel 38:5 should be translated "Cush. " It refers primarily to the Asiatic Cush, Which is India today.

They are called Dravidians and not Crush or Ethiopians because they are not Africans.

The brown people of southern India and Ceylon are also descendants of Cush. Historians call them Dravidians; the ancients called them Sibae (Smith's Classical Dictionary). Their Bible name was Seba (Gen. 10:7).

In India the highest castes were not only called Brahmins, But also Rajputs. "Rajput" means "king or chief of Put" (Raja, " Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th ed. ). "Phut" or "Put" means a "warrior" in Hebrew. The Rajputs are the most noted warriors in India. . . Of the four sons of Ham, Only Cush bears a name that means "black. " Just as some of the sons of Cush are brown, So some of the children of Phut are black. The Indians of central and northern India vary from light to dark brown.

So Indians are not Black. Only Africans are Black.

Indians are descendants of Cush, Who was black.

The curse was not to all of Canaan's descendants, But went through Ham -> Canaan -> Cush -> Seba -> Indians

Noah only cursed Ham through his children.

We know Hams's children were the first Africans.

Cush's children were the first Africans. Indians are descendent from that line. The sons of Cush had children idiot.

Indian slavery fits the curse perfectly.
Servant of servants - Indians. . . . . Dalit slaves to higher castes
Condemned to slavery - Indians. . . . . All Indians were slaves, ALL of them.
Slaves to both brothers - Indians. . . . . Slaves to both Europeans and Arabs

The reason for the condemnation of Canaan's sons is mentioned in the bible. They were idol worshippers. That vile religion of Hinduism.

You have been proven wrong on almost every point.
"Medai were not Indians, They were Persians.
*Noah was not white
*Cush was Ham's grandson, Not his son.
*Noah did not live in Africa, His son did.
*Noah did not live in temperate climates, He lived in a desert.
*Noah did not curse Ham, He cursed the sons of Canaan. Seba was one.
*Africans were never enslaved by both of Ham's other sons. Indians were.
*Africans were never totally enslaved, Indians were.
*Indians are not descendent from Japheth, They are from Canaan -> Cush-> Seba
*Noah and his sons were black.
*The historical documents I cited support the above.

You have no case but your ignorant racism. Even your questions show your ignorance.

Slavery in India perfectly fits the curse of Ham, Or as I like to call it, The curse of stupidity.
Harikrish
Posts: 38,773
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/6/2019 4:33:27 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:

The curse of Ham only condemned Africans to slavery.

The curse of Ham condemned the sons of Canaan to slavery. Indians are the descendants of Canaan and fit the curse perfectly.
Nowhere in the bible does it say Indians are the descendants of Canaan. Indians are the descendants of Japheth. Indo Europeans. .

Indians are the descendants of Japheth. Indians were never in the Land of Canaanites.

Indians are descendants of Seba, A son of Canaan. Read Gen 10. 7 you idiot.
Genesis 10:7 does not say Indians were the descendants of Canaan.
Seba was never in India nor were his descendants in India.

The Canaanites who lived in the Land of Canaanites were the descendants of Canaan.

All Canaan's children are his descendants idiot.

Indians are the descendants of Japheth. Indians were never in the Land of Canaanites. Indo Europeans were the descendants of Japheth
Madai (Indians & Iranic: Medes, Persians, Afghans, Kurds)
Read my citation moron. Experts say Madai means Persians, Not Indians.
Madai (Indians & Iranic: Medes, Persians, Afghans, Kurds)
Europeans and Indo Europeans were the descendants of Japheth. Read your bible, Nigger.

Yet Europeans never dwelt in the tents of Shem moron. Indian are descendants of Cush.
The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.

According to the Book of Jubilees (10:50-51), Madai (descendant of Japheth) had married a daughter of Shem, And preferred to live among Shem's descendants, Rather than dwell in Japheth's allotted inheritance beyond the Black Sea; so he begged his brothers-in-law, Elam, Asshur and Arphaxad, Until he finally received from them the land that was named after him, Media. .
Indo Europeans settled in Indian. Over 1 billion Indians are descendants of Indo European/Aryan ancestry.
Some want to say Madai represents Indians. That Indians were descendants of Japheth and therefore white. But. . .

https://en. M. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Madai
Madai (Hebrew) is a son of Japheth and one of the 16 grandsons of Noah in the Book of Genesis of the Hebrew Bible.
So Indians are the descendants of Japheth. The Persians were driven out by the Muslims and settled in India.

Biblical scholars have generally identified Madai with the Iranian Medes of much later records. The Medes, Reckoned to be his offspring by Josephus and most subsequent writers, Were also known as Madai, Including in both Assyrian and Hebrew sources. Some scholars in more modern times have also proposed connections with various earlier nations, Such as Mitanni, [1] Matiene, And Mannai. In addition, The Kurds still maintain traditions of descent from Madai.
Which proves Indians are Madai because the Persians settled in India. So did the Indo Europeans.
https://en. M. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Japheth
In identifying Japheth's descendants, Muslim exegesis more-or-less agrees with the Biblical traditions. [18] He is usually regarded as the ancestor of the Gog and Magog tribes, And, At times, Of the Turks, Khazars, And Slavs.
Which proves Indians are Madai because the Persians settled in India. So did the Indo Europeans.
The Madai mentioned in the bible is not Indians, They are Persians, Today's Iranians.
The Persians were driven out of Persia by the Muslims and settled in India. That is how we have the Indo Iranians (Indian Iranians).

There were already people in India when the Persians and Arabs arrived. Those people were Sanaens, The descendants of Cush, The son of Canaan.
There were no sanaens in India. The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.
For those who say Indians are white. . . .
http://www. Cogwriter. Com/india. Htm

Cush also had sons who went east into Asia rather than into Africa. Herodotus wrote:

The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.

Yeah. We know.

Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod.

Cush was the grandson of Ham. Read your bible idiot.
Nigger, Ham himself has four sons, Namely: Cush (Ethiopia), Mizraim (Egypt), Put (Libya), And lastly, Canaan (Canaanites).
He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia. Indians are not Ethiopians. Ethiopians are still living in Ethiopia.

Indians were called Ethiopians of the east because they were black, Looked like Africans, And shared an ancestor with Africans. Read the real research below idiot.
Indians are white because their DNA is traced to Indo Europeans/Aryans. You are quoting a discredited Roman historian.

The Ethiopians from the sun-rise. . . Were marshalled with the Indians, And did not at all differ from [them] in appearance but only in their language, And their hair. For the eastern Ethiopians are straight-haired; but those of (Africa) have hair more curly than that of any other people. These Ethiopians from Asia were accounted (almost the same as the Indians [of India]).
But the historian was discredited. Modern DNA traced Indians to Indo Europeans.

The brown people of southern India and Ceylon are also descendants of Cush. Historians call them Dravidians; the ancients called them Sibae (Smith's Classical Dictionary). Their Bible name was Seba (Gen. 10:7). Josephus recognized an eastern and a western Cush--one in Asia, The other in Africa (Antiquities, Book 1, VI, 2). Herodotus calls them "Asiatic Ethiopians" (Thalia, Section 94). "Ethiopia" in Ezekiel 38:5 should be translated "Cush. " It refers primarily to the Asiatic Cush, Which is India today.
But Africans are Black. South Indians are brown and not negroid like Africans.

They are called Dravidians and not Crush or Ethiopians because they are not Africans.

The brown people of southern India and Ceylon are also descendants of Cush. Historians call them Dravidians; the ancients called them Sibae (Smith's Classical Dictionary). Their Bible name was Seba (Gen. 10:7).
Genesis 10:7 does not say Seba settled in India. The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.

In India the highest castes were not only called Brahmins, But also Rajputs. "Rajput" means "king or chief of Put" (Raja, " Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th ed. ). "Phut" or "Put" means a "warrior" in Hebrew. The Rajputs are the most noted warriors in India. . . Of the four sons of Ham, Only Cush bears a name that means "black. " Just as some of the sons of Cush are brown, So some of the children of Phut are black. The Indians of central and northern India vary from light to dark brown.
Rajputs are not Black. Rajputs are from northern India. North Indians are mostly white.
So Indians are not Black. Only Africans are Black.

Indians are descendants of Cush, Who was black.
The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.

The curse was not to all of Canaan's descendants, But went through Ham -> Canaan -> Cush -> Seba -> Indians

Noah only cursed Ham through his children.

We know Hams's children were the first Africans.

Cush's children were the first Africans. Indians are descendent from that line. The sons of Cush had children idiot.
The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.
Harikrish
Posts: 38,773
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/6/2019 4:43:25 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:

Seven Sons of Japheth:
1. Javan (Greece, Romans, Romance -- French, Italians, Spanish, Portuguese)
2. Magog (Scythians, Slavs, Russians, Bulgarians, Bohemians, Poles, Slovaks, Croatians)
3. Madai (Indians & Iranic: Medes, Persians, Afghans, Kurds)
4. Tubal (South of Black Sea)
5. Tiras (Thracians, Teutons, Germans, Scandinavian, Anglo-Saxon, Jutes)
6. Meshech (Russia)
7. Gomer (Celtic)
Note, This debunks the Out of Africa Theory. Japheth or his descendants were never in Africa.

Madai the son of Japheth are the people that in English are called the Medes and dwelt mostly in what is now called Iran or Persia. Iran is said to mean the land of the Aryans and were composed of the Medes or the Madai and the Semite Elamites. These Iranians or Persians probably carried out the early invasion of about 1500 BC into India that brought Aryan people to India and displaced the earlier Dravidian people of India. These Aryan people as descendents of Japheth through Madai also brought Hinduism including the Hindu god Pra-japati (lord of offspring) and the Vedas or early Hindu scriptures. The Aryan people of India are like the Iranians generally olive skinned and look somewhat Caucasian in contrast to the people of India of Dravidian background that are generally brown or darker skin. Also the Aryan languages of Northern India are of the Indo-European family of languages that includes Persian or Iranian languages but also languages such as Sanskrit, Hindi and Urdu, Bengali, Panjabi, Marathi and Gujarati.
These languages are native to the people of India with Hindi being the official National Language of India.

Beginning with the Aryan race.
The Aryan race is a racial grouping that emerged in the period of the late 19th century and mid-20th century to describe people of Indo-European heritage. [1]

It derives from the idea that the original speakers of the Indo-European languages and their descendants up to the present day constitute a distinctive race or subrace of the Caucasian race.

Then the Indo-Aryan-European people
The Indo-Aryan peoples or the Indic peoples are a diverse Indo-European-speaking ethnolinguistic group of speakers of Indo-Aryan languages. There are over one billion native speakers of Indo-Aryan languages, Most of them native to the Indian subcontinent and presently found all across South Asia, Where they form the majority.

Finally The over one billion native speakers of Indo-Aryan languages, Most of them native to the Indian subcontinent and presently found all across South Asia, Where they form the majority.
South Asians are Indians.
South Asians are descended from a mix of farmers, Herders, And hunter-gatherers, Ancient DNA reveals.
Today, The population of South Asia is divided into dozens of ethnic, Linguistic, And religious groups that live side by side"but not always in harmony. A contentious border separates India and Pakistan; political movements draw stark lines between India"s Muslim and Hindu populations. Groups don"t mix much, As people tend to marry those who share their ethnicity and tongue.
Now, A study of the first ancient DNA recovered from South Asia shows that populations there mingled repeatedly thousands of years ago. Nearly all of the Indian subcontinent"s ethnic and linguistic groups are the product of three ancient Eurasian populations who met and mixed: local hunter-gatherers, Middle Eastern farmers, And Central Asian herders. Three similar groups also mingled in ancient Europe, Giving the two subcontinents surprisingly parallel histories.
The study, Presented here last week at the meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists and in a preprint on the bioRxiv server, Sheds light on where these populations came from and when they arrived in South Asia. It also strengthens the claim that Proto-Indo-European (PIE)"the ancestral language that gave rise to modern languages from English to Russian to Hindi"originated on the steppes of Asia.

Moorjani, David Reich of Harvard University, And Kumarasamy Thangaraj of the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology in Hyderabad, India, Spent years searching for ancient DNA in South Asia, Where hot climates might degrade it. Finally, Their team recovered and analyzed ancient genomes from 65 individuals who lived in northern Pakistan between 1200 B. C. E. And 1 C. E. They also analyzed 132 ancient genomes from Iran and southern Central Asia, And 165 from the steppes of Kazakhstan and Russia, And compared them with published ancient and modern genomes. These data allowed them to reconstruct when different populations arrived in South Asia and how they interacted.

Between 4700 and 3000 B. C. E. , Farmers from Iran mixed with hunter-gatherers indigenous to South Asia, Moorjani said. This combination of ancestries was found in the DNA of skeletal remains from sites in Turkmenistan and Iran known to have been in contact with the Indus Valley civilization, Which thrived in Pakistan and northwest India starting around 3300 B. C. E. The researchers dub this population "Indus periphery. " The 65 ancient people from Pakistan also show this combination, Although they all lived after the Indus civilization declined. The researchers suspect that "Indus periphery" people actually may have been the founders of Indus society, Although without ancient DNA from Indus Valley burials, They can"t be sure.

Still, Moorjani"s team sees this ancient mixture of Iranian farmers and South Asian hunter-gatherers all over South Asia today. As the Indus Valley civilization declined after 1300 B. C. E. , Some Indus periphery individuals moved south to mix with indigenous populations there, Forming the Ancestral South Indian population, Which today is more prominent in people who speak Dravidian languages such as Tamil and Kannada, And in those belonging to lower castes.

Meanwhile, Herders from the Eurasian steppe moved into the northern part of the subcontinent and mixed with Indus periphery people still there, Forming the Ancestral North Indian population. Today, People who belong to higher castes and those who speak Indo-European languages such as Hindi and Urdu tend to have more of this ancestry. Shortly after, These two already mixed groups mixed with each other, Giving rise to the populations living in India today.

"Strikingly, This is very similar to the pattern we see in Europe, " Moorjani said. Around 7000 B. C. E. , Agriculture spread into both Europe and South Asia with farmers from Anatolia and Iran, Respectively, Who each mixed with local hunter-gatherer populations. After about 3000 B. C. E. , Yamnaya pastoralists from the Central Asian steppe swept both east and west, Into Europe and South Asia, Bringing the wheel and perhaps cannabis.
Harikrish
Posts: 38,773
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/6/2019 5:51:28 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:

The reason for the condemnation of Canaan's sons is mentioned in the bible. They were idol worshippers. That vile religion of Hinduism.
Read your bible nigger.
Genesis 9:Noah, A man of the soil, Proceeded[a] to plant a vineyard. 21 When he drank some of its wine, He became drunk and lay uncovered inside his tent. 22 Ham, The father of Canaan, Saw his father naked and told his two brothers outside. 23 But Shem and Japheth took a garment and laid it across their shoulders; then they walked in backward and covered their father"s naked body. Their faces were turned the other way so that they would not see their father naked.

24 When Noah awoke from his wine and found out what his youngest son had done to him,
Noah cursed Ham when he found out what Ham his youngest son had done to him.
he said,

"Cursed be Canaan!
The lowest of slaves
will he be to his brothers. "
26 He also said,

"Praise be to the Lord, The God of Shem!
May Canaan be the slave of Shem.
27 May God extend Japheth"s[b] territory;
may Japheth live in the tents of Shem,
and may Canaan be the slave of Japheth. "

Note Canaan was not yet born in Genesis 9. So Noah cursed Ham through Ham's children.

You have been proven wrong on almost every point.

"Medai were not Indians, They were Persians.
Madai the son of Japheth are the people that in English are called the Medes and dwelt mostly in what is now called Iran or Persia. Iran is said to mean the land of the Aryans and were composed of the Medes or the Madai and the Semite Elamites. These Iranians or Persians probably carried out the early invasion of about 1500 BC into India that brought Aryan people to India and displaced the earlier Dravidian people of India. These Aryan people as descendents of Japheth through Madai also brought Hinduism including the Hindu god Pra-japati (lord of offspring) and the Vedas or early Hindu scriptures. The Aryan people of India are like the Iranians generally olive skinned and look somewhat Caucasian in contrast to the people of India of Dravidian background that are generally brown or darker skin. Also the Aryan languages of Northern India are of the Indo-European family of languages that includes Persian or Iranian languages but also languages such as Sanskrit, Hindi and Urdu, Bengali, Panjabi, Marathi and Gujarati.
These languages are native to the people of India with Hindi being the official National Language of India.
Finally The over one billion native speakers of Indo-Aryan languages, Most of them native to the Indian subcontinent and presently found all across India(South Asia), Where they form the majority.

*Noah was not white
Noah was a descendant of Adam. Noah was white living in a moderate climate outside the garden of Eden in Iraq.

*Cush was Ham's grandson, Not his son.
Nigger, Cush is Ham's son. Ham himself has four sons, Namely: Cush (Ethiopia), Mizraim (Egypt), Put (Libya), And lastly, Canaan (Canaanites).

*Noah did not live in Africa, His son did.
Noah did not live in Africa, His son did. That is why the curse of Ham only condemned Ham's children to slavery.

*Noah did not live in temperate climates, He lived in a desert.
Noah lived in Iraq which was outside the Garden of Eden.

*Noah did not curse Ham, He cursed the sons of Canaan. Seba was one.
Noah cursed his youngest son. Ham was his youngest son. Noah cursed Ham through his children.

*Africans were never enslaved by both of Ham's other sons. Indians were.
Noah's curse condemned Ham's children who were the first Africans.
Indians are not the descendants of Ham. They are the descendants of Japheth.

*Africans were never totally enslaved, Indians were.
African slaves were owned and traded by Arabs, Romans, Portuguese and Christians. Ghana Africa was the Trans Atlantic Slave Trade Centre of the Work. Over 20 million African slaves were shipped out of Ghana alone.

*Indians are not descendent from Japheth, They are from Canaan -> Cush-> Seba
Indians are not Canaanites and were never in the Land of Canaanites.
The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.

*Noah and his sons were black.
Noah was white. The curse turned Ham and his children Black. The hot African sun turned them genetically black permanently.

*The historical documents I cited support the above.
The historical document you cited was from 500 BC where Herodotus a Greek geographer visited Sindh which is in Pakistan and not India. . His account has been discredited by modern DNA which traced Indians to Indo Europesn/Aryan ancestry.

You have no case but your ignorant racism. Even your questions show your ignorance.
You confessed you are African. You have been a delivery mule for over 15 years living in Ghana Africa a shithole country.

Slavery in India perfectly fits the curse of Ham, Or as I like to call it, The curse of stupidity.
The Biblical curse of Ham only condemned Africans to slavery.
African slaves were owned and traded by Arabs, Romans, Portuguese and Christians throughout African history. Ghana Africa was the Trans Atlantic Slave Trade Centre of the Work. Over 20 million African slaves were shipped out of Ghana alone.

African phenotypes are uniquely African.
Evidence for the curse of Ham.

Phenotypic Variations Between Blacks (Africans) and Non-Blacks(Others)

Blacks (Africans)have wide noses, Kinky hair, Black skin, High waist-to-hip ratios, Prognathic jaws, Long arms, And soulless, Vacant eyes. Everything about them is ugly.

Blacks have the lowest IQ in the world (ignoring the equally disgusting and black-skinned Australian aborigines for convenience"s sake). The Bushmen clock in at around 50 IQ, The average Bantu achieves the mentally retarded level of 70 IQ, And the highly cultivated, Well fed, Well cared for, Partially White African-Americans reach 85 IQ. IQ has an enormous impact on lifestyle, Achievement, And behavior. IQ correlates to poverty, Crime, Mortality, And broken homes on one side " and education, Wealth, Human accomplishment, Long life and stable homes on the other. According to IQ and the Wealth of Nations, A country must have a minimum average IQ of 90 to run a technological civilization. It is not a far cry to say it is IQ that makes humans better than the animals, And it is IQ that makes some humans better than other humans.
ethang5
Posts: 22,946
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/6/2019 10:16:00 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
The curse of Ham condemned the sons of Canaan to slavery. Indians are the descendants of Canaan and fit the curse perfectly.

Nowhere in the bible does it say Indians are the descendants of Canaan.

Nowhere does it say Africans are the descendants of Canaan either. Some of our knowledge comes from history too. Indians are called Sabaens.

Indians are the descendants of Japheth. Indians were never in the Land of Canaanites.

Indians are descendants of Seba, A son of Canaan, Son of Ham. They moved to south east Asia. Read Gen 10. 7 you idiot.

Genesis 10:7 does not say Indians were the descendants of Canaan. Seba was never in India nor were his descendants in India.

Disadvantage of being uneducated. Read your history moron. There is history outside the bible too.

The Canaanites who lived in the Land of Canaanites were the descendants of Canaan.

All Canaan's children are his descendants idiot.

Madai (Indians & Iranic: Medes, Persians, Afghans, Kurds)
Read my citation moron. Experts say Madai means Persians, Not Indians.

Europeans and Indo Europeans were the descendants of Japheth. Read your bible, Nigger.

Yet Europeans never dwelt in the tents of Shem moron. Indian are negroid descendants of Cush.

The word Cush means black.

Repeat it as often as you like, Indians are the descendants of Cush, Who was black.

According to the Book of Jubilees (10:50-51), Madai (descendant of Japheth) had married a daughter of Shem, And preferred to live among Shem's descendants, Rather than dwell in Japheth's allotted inheritance beyond the Black Sea; so he begged his brothers-in-law, Elam, Asshur and Arphaxad, Until he finally received from them the land that was named after him, Media.

Indo Europeans settled in Indian.

Lie. Indos were already there and already Indian. The original people of India were descendants of Saba, The son of Cush.

Some want to say Madai represents Indians. That Indians were descendants of Japheth and therefore white. But. . .

So Indians are the descendants of Japheth. The Persians were driven out by the Muslims and settled in India.

And Europeans settled in Australia too, But native Australians are not white. Stop being stupid. India was already occupied when the Persians arrived.

Biblical scholars have generally identified Madai with the Iranian Medes of much later records. The Medes, Reckoned to be his offspring by Josephus and most subsequent writers, Were also known as Madai, Including in both Assyrian and Hebrew sources. Some scholars in more modern times have also proposed connections with various earlier nations, Such as Mitanni, [1] Matiene, And Mannai. In addition, The Kurds still maintain traditions of descent from Madai.

Which proves Indians are Madai because the Persians settled in India.

Are Australians Europeans because Englishmen settled there? Stop being stupid. Indians are negroid. Some of them have mixed, But Indians are negroid.

https://en. M. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Japheth
In identifying Japheth's descendants, Muslim exegesis more-or-less agrees with the Biblical traditions. He is usually regarded as the ancestor of the Gog and Magog tribes, And, At times, Of the Turks, Khazars, And Slavs. The Madai mentioned in the bible is not Indians, They are Persians, Today's Iranians.


That is how we have the Indo Iranians (Indian Iranians).

Then indo Europeans are just a mix of negroid Indian and European. Indians are negroid. Indo-anything is a mix, Not a race.

There were already people in India when the Persians and Arabs arrived. Those people were Sabaens, The descendants of Cush, The son of Canaan.

There were no sabaens in India.

Educated experts contradict you. Many historical writers mention the movements of the sons of Cush. I told you that Africa was not the only place they settled.

http://www. Cogwriter. Com/india. Htm

Cush also had sons who went east into Asia rather than into Africa. Herodotus wrote:

The word Cush means black.

Yeah. We know.

Indians are not Ethiopians.

We know. They share a common ancestor.

Ethiopians are still living in Ethiopia.

And Indians are still living in India.

Indians were called "Ethiopians of the East" because they were black, Looked like Africans, And shared an ancestor with Africans. Read the real research below idiot.

Indians are white because their DNA is traced to Indo Europeans/Aryans. You are quoting a discredited Roman historian.

Indo means Indian idiot. People's DNA cannot be traced to themselves. And Herodotus is not discredited. You just don't like the truth because you're a racist.

The Ethiopians from the sun-rise. . . Were marshalled with the Indians, And did not at all differ from [them] in appearance but only in their language, And their hair. For the eastern Ethiopians are straight-haired; but those of (Africa) have hair more curly than that of any other people. These Ethiopians from Asia were accounted (almost the same as the Indians [of India]).

But the historian was discredited. Modern DNA traced Indians to Indo Europeans.

People cannot be traced to themselves moron. Indo means Indian.

The brown people of southern India and Ceylon are also descendants of Cush. Historians call them Dravidians; the ancients called them Sibae (Smith's Classical Dictionary). Their Bible name was Seba (Gen. 10:7). Josephus recognized an eastern and a western Cush--one in Asia, The other in Africa (Antiquities, Book 1, VI, 2). Herodotus calls them "Asiatic Ethiopians" (Thalia, Section 94). "Ethiopia" in Ezekiel 38:5 should be translated "Cush. " It refers primarily to the Asiatic Cush, Which is India today.

But Africans are Black.

Africans come in all shades.

South Indians are brown and not negroid like Africans.

Some are black, But Negroid doesn't refer only to skin color. The phenotype of Indians is negroid.

They are called Dravidians and not Crush or Ethiopians because they are not Africans.

No one said they were African. The brown people of southern India and Ceylon are descendants of Cush. Historians call them Dravidians; the ancients called them Sibae (Smith's Classical Dictionary). Their Bible name was Seba (Gen. 10:7).

Genesis 10:7 does not say Seba settled in India.

It doesn't say Jephath settled in Asia either. There is history outside the bible too moron.

In India the highest castes were not only called Brahmins, But also Rajputs. "Rajput" means "king or chief of Put" (Raja, " Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th ed. ). "Phut" or "Put" means a "warrior" in Hebrew. The Rajputs are the most noted warriors in India. . . Of the four sons of Ham, Only Cush bears a name that means "black. " Just as some of the sons of Cush are brown, So some of the children of Phut are black. The Indians of central and northern India vary from light to dark brown.

Rajputs are not Black. Rajputs are from northern India. North Indians are mostly white. So Indians are not Black. Only Africans are Black.

Only the descendants of Cush are negroid. Indians are negroid. While a population can change by mixing, The original Indian is negroid. Indians are descendants of Cush, Who was black.

The curse was not to all of Canaan's descendants, But went through Ham -> Canaan -> Cush -> Seba -> Indians

Noah only cursed Ham through his children.

Noah did not curse Ham. He did not even curse Canaan. He cursed Canaan's descendants. Seba was one.

We know Hams's children were the first Africans.

We also know that Ham's descendants through Cush were the first Indians.

Cush's children were the first Africans. Indians are descendent from that line. The sons of Cush had children you idiot.
Harikrish
Posts: 38,773
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/6/2019 3:17:27 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
The curse of Ham condemned the sons of Canaan to slavery. Indians are the descendants of Canaan and fit the curse perfectly.
Ham and his children were the first Africans.
Ham himself has four sons, Namely: Cush (Ethiopia), Mizraim (Egypt), Put (Libya), And lastly, Canaan (Canaanites).
Indians are not Canaanites. Indians are the descendants of Japheth(Madai (Indians & Iranic: Medes, Persians, Afghans, Kurds)

Nowhere in the bible does it say Indians are the descendants of Canaan.

Nowhere does it say Africans are the descendants of Canaan either. Some of our knowledge comes from history too. Indians are called Sabaens.
Genesis 10 gives us the start of Nations. Ham and his children were the first Africans.
Ham himself has four sons, Namely: Cush (Ethiopia), Mizraim (Egypt), Put (Libya), And lastly, Canaan (Canaanites).
Indians are the descendants of Japheth. Indians were never in the Land of Canaanites.

Indians are descendants of Seba, A son of Canaan, Son of Ham. They moved to south east Asia. Read Gen 10. 7 you idiot.
Genesis 10:7 does not say Indians were the descendants of Canaan. Seba was never in India nor were his descendants in India.

Disadvantage of being uneducated. Read your history moron. There is history outside the bible too.
You are quoting a Greek geographer who visited Sindh which is in Pakostan and not India. DNA study has traced Indians to the Indo Europeans/Aryans. Get an education, Nigger.

The Canaanites who lived in the Land of Canaanites were the descendants of Canaan.

All Canaan's children are his descendants idiot.
And the Canaanites were punished by God when Joshua destroyed the Canaanites. Read your bible nigger.

Joshua 11:14 The Israelites carried off for themselves all the plunder and livestock of these cities, But all the people they put to the sword until they completely destroyed them, Not sparing anyone that breathed. 15 As the Lord commanded his servant Moses, So Moses commanded Joshua, And Joshua did it; he left nothing undone of all that the Lord commanded Moses.

Read my citation moron. Experts say Madai means Persians, Not Indians.
Nigger, Indians are not Canaanites. Indians are the descendants of Japheth(Madai (Indians & Iranic: Medes, Persians, Afghans, Kurds)

Europeans and Indo Europeans were the descendants of Japheth. Read your bible, Nigger.

Yet Europeans never dwelt in the tents of Shem moron. Indian are negroid descendants of Cush.
The people of Cush were Ethiopians not Indians.
The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.

Repeat it as often as you like, Indians are the descendants of Cush, Who was black.
You are in denial. Ham himself has four sons, Namely: Cush (Ethiopia), Mizraim (Egypt), Put (Libya), And lastly, Canaan (Canaanites).

According to the Book of Jubilees (10:50-51), Madai (descendant of Japheth) had married a daughter of Shem, And preferred to live among Shem's descendants, Rather than dwell in Japheth's allotted inheritance beyond the Black Sea; so he begged his brothers-in-law, Elam, Asshur and Arphaxad, Until he finally received from them the land that was named after him, Media.

Indo Europeans settled in India.

Lie. Indos were already there and already Indian. The original people of India were descendants of Saba, The son of Cush.
You are confused Nigger.
You first said: Indians are descendants of Seba, A son of Canaan, Son of Ham. They moved to south east Asia. Read Gen 10. 7. Now you are saying the original people of India were descendants of Saba, The son of Cush.
Read tge bible nigger. Ham himself has four sons, Namely: Cush (Ethiopia), Mizraim (Egypt), Put (Libya), And lastly, Canaan (Canaanites).

Some want to say Madai represents Indians. That Indians were descendants of Japheth and therefore white. But. . .

So Indians are the descendants of Japheth. The Persians were driven out by the Muslims and settled in India.

And Europeans settled in Australia too, But native Australians are not white. Stop being stupid. India was already occupied when the Persians arrived.

The convict Europeans settled in Australia 18 and 19 century. Indo Europeans settled in India 1, 800 BC and account for 1 billion Indians.
Biblical scholars have generally identified Madai with the Iranian Medes of much later records. The Medes, Reckoned to be his offspring by Josephus and most subsequent writers, Were also known as Madai, Including in both Assyrian and Hebrew sources. Some scholars in more modern times have also proposed connections with various earlier nations, Such as Mitanni, [1] Matiene, And Mannai. In addition, The Kurds still maintain traditions of descent from Madai.

Which proves Indians are Madai because the Persians settled in India.

Are Australians Europeans because Englishmen settled there? Stop being stupid. Indians are negroid. Some of them have mixed, But Indians are negroid.

Indo-Aryan peoples or the Indic peoples are a diverse Indo-European-speaking ethnolinguistic group of speakers of Indo-Aryan languages. There are over one billion native speakers of Indo-Aryan languages, Most of them native to the Indian subcontinent and presently found all across South Asia, Where they form the majority.
Indo Aryans settled in India 1, 800 BC and today account for 1 billion Indians out of the 1. 2 billion Indians today. The balance are the Indo Persians, Muslims and British.

https://en. M. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Japheth
In identifying Japheth's descendants, Muslim exegesis more-or-less agrees with the Biblical traditions. He is usually regarded as the ancestor of the Gog and Magog tribes, And, At times, Of the Turks, Khazars, And Slavs. The Madai mentioned in the bible is not Indians, They are Persians, Today's Iranians.

Persians were driven out by the Arabs and fled to India where they were joined by the Indo Europeans.
That is how we have the Indo Iranians (Indian Iranians).

Then indo Europeans are just a mix of negroid Indian and European. Indians are negroid. Indo-anything is a mix, Not a race.
The only negroids in India were African slaves from the Bantu tribe brought to India. They are called Siddis and are going extinct because they are ignored and isolated by Indians.

There were already people in India when the Persians and Arabs arrived. Those people were Sabaens, The descendants of Cush, The son of Canaan.
The descendants of Canaanites were completely destroyed by Joshua.
Joshua 11:14 The Israelites carried off for themselves all the plunder and livestock of these cities, But all the people they put to the sword until they completely destroyed them, Not sparing anyone that breathed. 15 As the Lord commanded his servant Moses, So Moses commanded Joshua, And Joshua did it; he left nothing undone of all that the Lord commanded Moses.

There were no sabaens in India. The Canaanites were wiped out by Joshua. And Cush is not the son of Canaan. You are a low IQ nigger delivery mule. Your scriptural ignorance and stupidity is expected.

Educated experts contradict you. Many historical writers mention the movements of the sons of Cush. I told you that Africa was not the only place they settled.

http://www. Cogwriter. Com/india. Htm

Cush also had sons who went east into Asia rather than into Africa. Herodotus wrote:
Herodotus only visited Sindh which is in Pakistan and not India and the account is 500BC. DNA tests traced Indians to Indo Europeans/Aryans. Get an education nigger.

The word Cush means black and Ethiopians.

Yeah. We know.

Indians are not Ethiopians.

We know. They share a common ancestor.

Ethiopians are still living in Ethiopia. They never left Ethiopia.
ethang5
Posts: 22,946
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/6/2019 6:31:12 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Indians are not black. - Hindu hari

Indians and Africans have a common ancestor. Read and learn moron.

https://www. Upi. Com/Science_News/

Where did the earliest Indians come from?

Modern DNA reveals ancient origins of Indian population

The origins of the peoples of the Indian Subcontinent remains a much debated topic among scientists. But new research has offered some clarity on the matter.

The latest analysis suggests India was populated by a succession of migrations from Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia.

Previously, A lack of ancient DNA samples has hampered the search for India's genetic origins. The subcontinent has yielded few well-preserved skeletal remains.

Marine Silva, An archaeogeneticist and doctoral student at the University of Huddersfield, Was able to skirt this impediment by using modern DNA sourced from people living in India today.

Their analysis, Detailed in the journal BMC Evolutionary Biology, showed India hosts some very ancient lineages and was populated by several waves of migration.

The earliest Indians were hunter-gatherers from Africa. They arrived on the subcontinent 50, 000 years ago. More settlers arrived from what is now Iran between 10, 000 and 20, 000 years ago, Shortly after the end of the last ice age. The migrants brought early farming techniques with them.

African and Middle Eastern origins are most apparent among the male genetic lineage, The Y-chromosome. The female lineage, Mitochondrial DNA, Suggests a large influx of people from Central Asia migrated to India 5, 000 years ago.


The experts say, Just like the bible says, India was populated by the sons of Cush.

You can lie, Or pretend to be obtuse, But the truth remains. Persians and Europeans arrived later. The sons of Seba were already in India when they arrived.

The curse of Ham condemned all Indians to slavery. History shows it. Science shows it. And the bible shows it.
Harikrish
Posts: 38,773
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/6/2019 9:59:32 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
Indians are not black. - Hindu Hari

Indians and Africans have a common ancestor. Read and learn moron.

https://www. Upi. Com/Science_News/

Where did the earliest Indians come from?

Modern DNA reveals ancient origins of Indian population

The origins of the peoples of the Indian Subcontinent remains a much debated topic among scientists. But new research has offered some clarity on the matter.

The latest analysis suggests India was populated by a succession of migrations from Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia.

Previously, A lack of ancient DNA samples has hampered the search for India's genetic origins. The subcontinent has yielded few well-preserved skeletal remains.

Marine Silva, An archaeogeneticist and doctoral student at the University of Huddersfield, Was able to skirt this impediment by using modern DNA sourced from people living in India today.

Their analysis, Detailed in the journal BMC Evolutionary Biology, showed India hosts some very ancient lineages and was populated by several waves of migration.

The earliest Indians were hunter-gatherers from Africa. They arrived on the subcontinent 50, 000 years ago. More settlers arrived from what is now Iran between 10, 000 and 20, 000 years ago, Shortly after the end of the last ice age. The migrants brought early farming techniques with them.

African and Middle Eastern origins are most apparent among the male genetic lineage, The Y-chromosome. The female lineage, Mitochondrial DNA, Suggests a large influx of people from Central Asia migrated to India 5, 000 years ago.


The same study confirms.
Conclusions

Maternal lineages primarily reflect earlier, Pre-Holocene processes, And paternal lineages predominantly episodes within the last 10 ka. In particular, Genetic influx from Central Asia in the Bronze Age was strongly male-driven, Consistent with the patriarchal, Patrilocal and patrilineal social structure attributed to the inferred pastoralist early Indo-European society. This was part of a much wider process of Indo-European expansion, With an ultimate source in the Pontic-Caspian region, Which carried closely related Y-chromosome lineages, A smaller fraction of autosomal genome-wide variation and an even smaller fraction of mitogenomes across a vast swathe of Eurasia between 5 and 3. 5 ka.

Researchers believe these Bronze Age migrants were Indo-European speakers who populated the grasslands between the Black and Caspian seas. These male-dominated, Roaming pastoralists domesticated the horse and spoke an early iteration of Sanskrit.

Some 200 years ago, Linguists showed Sanskrit is related to Greek and Latin. Previous studies have suggested the same population of horse-riders settled Europe. The latest findings suggest Europeans and Indians share a common ancestor.


The experts say, Just like the bible says, India was populated by the sons of Cush.

The bible say Noah cursed Ham's son Canaan. The Canaanites settled in the Land of Canaanites. Joshua was told by God to slaughter the Canaanites down to every man, Woman and child.
The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.
Indians are not Ethiopians.
Meet some Ethiopians.
https://i. Imgur. Com/d18KASZ. Jpg

You can lie, Or pretend to be obtuse, But the truth remains. Persians and Europeans arrived later. The sons of Seba were already in India when they arrived.
You said that Seba was in India according to Genesis 10:7.
But Genesis 10:7 does not tell us Seba ever left Ethiopia.
So you lied.
The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.
Indians are not Ethiopians.
The curse of Ham condemned all Indians to slavery. History shows it. Science shows it. And the bible shows it.
The curse of Ham condemned Africans to slavery.
African slaves were owned and traded by Arabs, Romans, Portuguese and Christians throughout African history. Ghana Africa was the Trans Atlantic Slave Trade Centre of the world. Over 20 million African skaves were shipped out of Ghana Africs alone.

Read your confession.

Ethang5: Lol. Of course I am African, Why do you keep talking about America?
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where I run Bibles to countries which outlaw the possession of Bibles. Been doing it for more than 15 years to many countries. I have 3 children.
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where slavery is still practiced today.
Ethang5 wrote: "I'm not a proud African. And if I were, I would not lie about Africa's achievements. "
Ethang said: For His Majesty King Jesus? Full time slave here moron. Jesus has my all.
Ethang is a full time slave.

African phenotypes are uniquely African and only seen in African negroids.

Phenotypic Variations Between Blacks (Africans) and Non-Blacks(Others)

Blacks (Africans) have wide noses, Kinky hair, Black skin, High waist-to-hip ratios, Prognathic jaws, Long arms, And soulless, Vacant eyes. Everything about them is ugly.

Blacks (Africans) have the lowest IQ in the world (ignoring the equally disgusting and black-skinned Australian aborigines for convenience"s sake). The Bushmen clock in at around 50 IQ, The average Bantu achieves the mentally retarded level of 70 IQ, And the highly cultivated, Well fed, Well cared for, Partially White African-Americans reach 85 IQ. IQ has an enormous impact on lifestyle, Achievement, And behavior. IQ correlates to poverty, Crime, Mortality, And broken homes on one side " and education, Wealth, Human accomplishment, Long life and stable homes on the other. According to IQ and the Wealth of Nations, A country must have a minimum average IQ of 90 to run a technological civilization. It is not a far cry to say it is IQ that makes humans better than the animals, And it is IQ that makes some humans better than other humans.

The curse of Ham was clearly pointing to African slavery.
Genesis 9:25 The lowest of slaves will he be to his brothers. "
ethang5
Posts: 22,946
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/7/2019 6:47:26 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
Read your confession.

Ethang5: Lol. Of course I am African, Why do you keep talking about America?

Ethang5: Studies show the earliest Indians were hunter-gatherers from Africa. They arrived on the subcontinent 50, 000 years ago.

Ethang5: Everyone in the world can trace their ancestry to Africa.


You are wrong and have been proven ignorant on the origins of the people of India, And your response is to post uncited lies about "my confession".

How stupid are you?

The origin of India is Africa. The origin of your racism is Hinduism. The origin of Hinduism is stupidity. The origin of stupidity is hatred of Jesus Christ.

Spam your own thread some more loser. You've got nothing else.
Harikrish
Posts: 38,773
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/7/2019 4:11:54 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
Read your confession.

Ethang5: Lol. Of course I am African, Why do you keep talking about America?

Ethang5: Studies show the earliest Indians were hunter-gatherers from Africa. They arrived on the subcontinent 50, 000 years ago.

Ethang5: Everyone in the world can trace their ancestry to Africa.


You are wrong and have been proven ignorant on the origins of the people of India, And your response is to post uncited lies about "my confession".

How stupid are you?

The origin of India is Africa. The origin of your racism is Hinduism. The origin of Hinduism is stupidity. The origin of stupidity is hatred of Jesus Christ.

Spam your own thread some more loser. You've got nothing else.

The different theories about the origin of species.

Evolution theory 1

Humans evolved from a common ancestor; monkeys!
In the beginning Darwin wrote in The descent of man: "The Simiadae then branched off into two great stems, The New World and Old World monkeys; and from the latter, At a remote period, Man, The wonder and glory of the Universe, Proceeded.

Where did the common ancestors (Monkeys) come from?
Out of Asia: How Monkey and Ape Ancestors Colonized Africa
A new fossil discovery suggests that anthropoid ancestors originated in Asia and then rafted across the ocean to Africa

Evolution theory 2.
Scientists replace common ancestor Out of Asia monkeys with Out of Africa black monkeys. But when that didn't work they come out with the Out of Africa Blacks and dropped the word monkey.

No one is buying the out of Africa theory today. Africans living in Africa haven't changed much. And those living out of Africa have the highest school drop out rates, 30% of Africans are in prison, 30% of Africans are inemployed. The rest are either drug dealers or pimps with some exceptions. All this proves Africans are genetically different with lower IQ than non Africans and their dark skin and negroid appearance can be traced back to subhuman species now established as African ancestors.
Even interracial marriages cannot wean out the negroid because negroid genes are dominant genes. It puts back the jungle instincts in every negroid generation.

I just proved to you the African race has not evolved. They are basically where they were when they started out. Low IQ, Jungle culture. Whereas all other races evolved and show little resemblance to dark skinned negroid appearance of subhuman species.
These links were artificially established to explain the evolution of race. But it was an over simplistic view.

We don't see a similar pattern of migration with animals and many are region specific.
There is even an out of Australia theory and an out of Israel theory. The fact the rest of the world didn't turn out like Africans makes it obvious we did not all start out as Africans.

If you take the Genesis account. The garden of Eden was not in Africa. The Jews being the diect descendants of Adam and Eve were not Africans. In fact Christians trace the lineage of Africans to Ham.

The First Race: Out-of-*Australia, Not Africa!
http://nationalunitygovernment. Org/content/first-race-out-australia-not-africa-0

Take it from the experts. The only Africans out of Africa were slaves. Their negroid appearance and dark skin was unknown to the free world.
After scientists discovered Africans had lower IQ than non Africans. The out of Africa theory lost credibility because dumb people are only found in Africa. Ancient civilizations were far more advanced than even modern Africa today. Nothing good ever came out of Africa.

But we know Blacks themselves are self loathing and hate being black. Now we have a black self loathing negroid Ethang5 promoting the Out of Africa theory which suggests we are all Africans. Lol!

Read nigger Ethang5's disparaging comments about his African country and African people.

Ethang5: Lol. Of course I am African, Why do you keep talking about America?
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where I run Bibles to countries which outlaw the possession of Bibles. Been doing it for more than 15 years to many countries. I have 3 children.
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where slavery is still practiced today.
Ethang5 wrote: "I'm not a proud African. And if I were, I would not lie about Africa's achievements. "
Ethang said: For His Majesty King Jesus? Full time slave here moron. Jesus has my all.
Ethang is a full time slave.

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where the literacy rate is below 50%, And I see people do here, Exactly what this "test" is doing. Taking advantage of ignorance.
Ethang5 said: I live close to where Boko Haram operates. There are no Boko Harams in America.
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where slavery is still practiced today.

Ethang5 wrote: I think you're right. I live in Ghana, West Africa, And if you were to try the "God is evil" argument here people would simply think you were an obnoxious boob.

Ethang5 wrote: Long ago, I had a night job where I worked with this guy much like Im-Em here. He told me that reality was whatever he believed.

Ethang5 wrote: I currently live in a country with a society much closer to the 1st century than the society in which you live. I have seen people get burned alive in the street, And people a few blocks away never hear of it.

Ethang5 wrote: Having been kicked off more than a hundred forums, I understand your trepidation. But I don't think you have too much to worry about. The overwhelming majority of posters here would not want you banned or censured.

Ethang5 wrote:. I live among people like the Piraha. They have to work ALL DAY. Do you believe they are working only when hunting or gathering food? Do you think they have running water? Or electricity? They sleep often during the day because it is hot and they must work for everything. There are no stores, Only rudimentary tools. Please. Working only 15 hours a week would kill them, As evidenced by their dwindling tribe.

Ethang5 wrote: In Ghana where I live, The JW's are more aggressive. I always talk to them and let them know the many times when their organization made false prophesies about the end of the world.

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Ghana, Some of what is custom here would be child abuse in America, Yet the Ghanaian parents aren't in jail.

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Ghana, West Africa. If you think life is miserable, Come here and I will open your eyes. I will show you people who will infect you with their joy. Yet they aren't all Pollyannas. Some are cynics who have simply decided not to allow their environment to define them.

Ethang5 wrote: I have an electrified fence at my house. I had it put in. Is it wrong that I warn visitors to my home about it? If a visitor ignores my warning, Can he claim because I installed it, I'm responsible for his injury after having not believed my warning?
I work with prisoners. Many say they are Christian because the think it will facilitate their case with the parole board.

Ethang5 wrote: This is like when whites tell blacks, Why are you always on about racism? A black person's ethnicity is obvious.

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where I run Bibles to countries which outlaw the possession of Bibles. Been doing it for more than 15 years to many countries. I have 3 children.

Your said your father was a black negroid atheist. But you turned out to be a black negroid slave delivering bibles for free whereas your position as an atheist was that religion was a crutch for the mentally weak. "

Karmic Justice combined with the curse of Ham and Slavery by Arabs produced Black shitholes.
Wow! Africans are cursed in 4 religions. Judaism, Islam, Christianity and Hinduism.
ethang5
Posts: 22,946
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/9/2019 5:57:51 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Imagine if the bible had not kept records of ham and his descendants? Though there are directions in nature, It was the bible that gave man the clues of even where to look.

One of the things most people don't know, Is just how long ago Noah was. They think Noah was about 6, 000 years ago, But it is clear Noah was much older than that.

So while they are talking about migrations between 2 and 10 thousand years ago, The actual time is much older. People today think it's no big deal that the bible pointed to Africa as the source of all humans on earth because they grew up with the out of Africa idea. But before science confirmed it, The out of Africa was novel and scary. And the racist fought against mightily.

But as always, Each new discovery of science only makes the bible more plausible. As the science of biogenetics matured, It became clearer and clearer that the bible could not be this correct just by coincidence.

It is clear though that African slavery did not match the curse.

First, The only descendants of Canaan who match the "servants of servants" are the branch of Seba. There are other descendants of Canaan who were enslaved from time to time in places, But none were completely enslaved as the branch of Seba was.

For example, When God told Israel they would be enslaved by Egypt, The entire country of Israel was taken into Egypt. All of them were enslaved in Egypt.

So the only descendants that match the "servant of servants" part of the curse is the Seba branch of the Canaan line. The caste system in India made slaves within the slave system. An Indian enslaved by the Arabs, Could himself have a dalit slave.

In one of the testimonials in "Indians Speak On India", The speaker tells us that even today in India, Any higher caste person can order a dalit to remove the corpse of say, A dead animal, And the dalit would be forced under threat of bodily harm, To obey.

The second part of the curse is, That the cursed line would be slaves of both the descendants of Shem and Japheth. Again, The only descendants of Canaan who qualify are the Seba line. No other line out of Canaan fits this condition. Africans don't.

So then the only question is, Who are today's descendants of Seba?

The answer is in ancient history. Ancient writings mention Sabeans (Sabae) as the people who settled India. Some of the ancient accounts of India also mention names associated with the Cush line, Like rajputs being a combination word of raj, Which is Indian, And phut, Which is African.

As anthropologists tracked the movements of ancient peoples, It became clear that the Sabaens were ancestors of the first people to inhabit India.

And the correctness of the bible becomes plain. The curse of Canaan could only be. . . . .
1. On the actual descendants of Canaan
2. On the descendants of Canaan who became servants of servants and
3. On the descendants of Canaan who became servants of servants to both the descendants of Shem and Japheth.
4. On the descendants of Canaan who entire line became servants of servants to both the descendants of Shem and Japheth.

The only population fitting all 4 requirements of the curse is the Seba line that became India. And history shows India was totally enslaved for 17 centuries. The entire country.

Then after science confirms that Indians are descendants of Africans, The case becomes airtight.

The curse was on Indians.

In my next post, I address the question that occurs to anyone reading the account of the curse, Why were the descendants of Canaan cursed and not Ham himself?
Harikrish
Posts: 38,773
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/9/2019 10:30:20 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
Imagine if the bible had not kept records of ham and his descendants? Though there are directions in nature, It was the bible that gave man the clues of even where to look.

One of the things most people don't know, Is just how long ago Noah was. They think Noah was about 6, 000 years ago, But it is clear Noah was much older than that.
The bible geneology from Adam to Jesus is detailed in the bible.

The geneology in the Bible from Jesus to Adam adds up to 4000 years.

TIME FROM ADAM TO JESUS

Adam to Abraham = 1948 yrs
Abraham to Egypt = 290 yrs

From Egypt to Moses: (X) Let X = 63 63 yrs

X = (Kohath to Amram to Moses)

Moses to the Exodus = 80 yrs
Exodus to death Joshua = 70 yrs
Judges to Samuel = 450 yrs (Acts 13:20)
Kings of Judah = 513 yrs
Babylonian Captivity = 586 B. C. E.
--
Adam to Jesus 4000 yrs

So while they are talking about migrations between 2 and 10 thousand years ago, The actual time is much older. People today think it's no big deal that the bible pointed to Africa as the source of all humans on earth because they grew up with the out of Africa idea. But before science confirmed it, The out of Africa was novel and scary. And the racist fought against mightily.
The out of Africa theory was popular when some of the oldest fossils were found in Africa. But Africa was the only place they were looking for fossils. But now they are finding older fossils in China, The Middle East and Asia that challenge the old out of Africa Theory.
The only out of Africa theory that has support is the flow of African slaves out of Africa to Arab countries for 1, 300 years and then to the Americas and Europe for another 4 centuries. The migration of slaves were coerced and not voluntary.

The fossil that rewrites human history: 260, 000-year-old Chinese skull suggests we descend from ASIAN as well as African ancestors
Now we are finally able to separate the dumb ones that stayed in Africa from the smart ones that left Asia.

Try accounting for the dark skin and negroid appearance only found among Africans. Then there is the genetically discovered low IQ among Africans. Now top that with the subhuman species Homo Naledi that is traced to negroid ancestors. Africans have no record of sea faring skills, No written script, No navigational concepts. They were simply hunters living in a jungle culture. Africa was lush with wild life and vegetation. The only reason there was any out of Africa migration was the Arab slave trade and later the European slave trade.
Europeans came up with the Neanderthals to explain their lineage. Asians have their own parallel evolution.
We are not related brother.

No one is buying the out of Africa theory today. Africans living in Africa haven't changed much. And those living out of Africa have the highest school drop out rates, 30% of Africans are in prison, 30% of Africans are inemployed. The rest are either drug dealers or pimps with some exceptions. All this proves Africans are genetically different with lower IQ than non Africans and their dark skin and negroid appearance can be traced back to subhuman species now established as African ancestors.

I just proved to you the African race has not evolved. They are basically where they were when they started out. Low IQ, Jungle culture. Whereas all other races evolved and show little resemblance to dark skinned negroid appearance of subhuman species.
These links were artificially established to explain the evolution of race. But it was an over simplistic view.

But as always, Each new discovery of science only makes the bible more plausible. As the science of biogenetics matured, It became clearer and clearer that the bible could not be this correct just by coincidence.
It is science that relegated the bible to fables because it could not survive scientific scrutiny.
Bibles are not taught in schools because it does not meet the minimum educational standards required. You don't get any math or science credits for studying thei bible.

It is clear though that African slavery did not match the curse.
Africans were owned and traded as slaves by Arabs, Romans, Portugues and Christians throughout African history. Ghana Africa was the Trans Atlantic Slave Trade Centre of the world. 20 million African slaves were shipped out from Ghana alone. Nigger that's African history.

First, The only descendants of Canaan who match the "servants of servants" are the branch of Seba. There are other descendants of Canaan who were enslaved from time to time in places, But none were completely enslaved as the branch of Seba was.

The Canaanites are the descendants of Canaan. They settled in the land of Canaanites against the warnings of Ham. The Canaanites were destroyed by Joshua in the Bible.

For example, When God told Israel they would be enslaved by Egypt, The entire country of Israel was taken into Egypt. All of them were enslaved in Egypt.
Genesis 15:13 Then the Lord said to him(Abraham), "Know for certain that for four hundred years your descendants will be strangers in a country not their own and that they will be enslaved and mistreated there.
God determined his long they would be enslaved.

So the only descendants that match the "servant of servants" part of the curse is the Seba branch of the Canaan line. The caste system in India made slaves within the slave system. An Indian enslaved by the Arabs, Could himself have a dalit slave.

Read you bible, Nigger. Seba is not a descendant of Canaan.
Genesis 10:7 The sons of Cush:
Seba, Havilah, Sabtah, Raamah and Sabteka.
The sons of Raamah: Sheba and Dedan.

In one of the testimonials in "Indians Speak On India", The speaker tells us that even today in India, Any higher caste person can order a dalit to remove the corpse of say, A dead animal, And the dalit would be forced under threat of bodily harm, To obey.
Get an education, Nigger. Dalits are untouchable low caste and not slaves.

The second part of the curse is, That the cursed line would be slaves of both the descendants of Shem and Japheth. Again, The only descendants of Canaan who qualify are the Seba line. No other line out of Canaan fits this condition. Africans don't.
Read you bible, Nigger. Seba is not a descendant of Canaan.
Genesis 10:7 The sons of Cush:
Seba, Havilah, Sabtah, Raamah and Sabteka.
The sons of Raamah: Sheba and Dedan.

So then the only question is, Who are today's descendants of Seba?

Read you bible, Nigger. Seba is not a descendant of Canaan.
Genesis 10:7 The sons of Cush:
Seba, Havilah, Sabtah, Raamah and Sabteka.
The sons of Raamah: Sheba and Dedan.

Seba was the son of Cush.

The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.
The descendants of Seba are Ethiopians.
The name of a country and nation (Isa. 43:3; 45:14) mentioned along with Egypt and Ethiopia, And therefore probably in north-eastern Africa.

In Genesis 10:7, Their ancestor is said to be a son of Cush, The progenitor of the Ethiopians. In Isaiah 43:3 and Psalm 72:10, Seba is mentioned as a distant and wealthy country; in the former passage, It is connected with Egypt and Ethiopia; and Meroe was one of the most important commercial cities of interior Africa. These Sabeans are described by Herodotus as men of uncommon size. Compare Isaiah 45:14. A branch of this family, It is thought, Located themselves near the head of the Persian Gulf; and the Sabeans mentioned in Job 1:15 were probably Cushites.
Harikrish
Posts: 38,773
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/9/2019 10:37:31 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:

The second part of the curse is, That the cursed line would be slaves of both the descendants of Shem and Japheth. Again, The only descendants of Canaan who qualify are the Seba line. No other line out of Canaan fits this condition. Africans don't.

Canaanites

Canaan, As well as his descendants, Followed in the sinful way of their father. The punishment was placed upon the descendants of Canaan-the Canaanites. These are the people who were driven out of the Promised Land by the children of Israel. Consequently, They would be in servitude to the descendants of Shem and Japeth. Because the descendants of Canaan lived corrupt lives, Their judgment was righteous. When the children of Israel entered the land of Promise they saw the detestable things that the descendants of Canaan were doing. God blessed Israel and cursed the Canaanites because their practices were similar to their father Ham.

Historical Fulfillment

History records God's promises were fulfilled. The Canaanites were defeated and placed into slavery by the eastern kings Genesis 14. Later in the history of Israel, Other descendants of Canaan, Known as the Gibeonites, Were made wood choppers and water carriers under Joshua. Thus the predictions of Noah that Canaan's descendants would serve Shem's descendants were literally fulfilled and recorded in the Old Testament.
Indians are Indo European/Aryans the descendants of Japheth. Noah only cursed the Canaanites the descendants of Canaan the son of Ham. Read your bible you low IQ nigger.

Where are the Canaanites today? Not in India. Lol?

Why did Ham's son Canaan leave Africa when Ham and his other sons settled in African countries?
4. Four Sons of Ham
1. Mizraim (Egypt)
2. Cush (Sudan, Ethiopia)
3. Put (Lybia)
4. Canaan (Land of Canaanites)

And Ham divided amongst his sons, And the first portion came forth for Cush towards the east(Sudan, Ethiopia), And to the west of him for Mizraim(Egypt), And to the west of him for Put(Lybia), And to the west of him [and to the west thereof] on the sea for Canaan.
Jubilees 9:1
And Canaan saw the land of Lebanon to the river of Egypt, That it was very good, And he went not into the land of his inheritance to the west (that is to) the sea, And he dwelt in the land of Lebanon, Eastward and westward from the border of Jordan and from the border of the sea. And Ham, His father, And Cush and Mizraim his brothers said unto him: 'Thou hast settled in a land which is not thine, And which did not fall to us by lot: do not do so; for if thou dost do so, Thou and thy sons will fall in the land and (be) accursed through sedition; for by sedition ye have settled, And by sedition will thy children fall, And thou shalt be rooted out for ever. Dwell not in the dwelling of Shem; for to Shem and to his sons did it come by their lot. Cursed art thou, And cursed shalt thou be beyond all the sons of Noah, By the curse by which we bound ourselves by an oath in the presence of the holy judge, And in the presence of Noah our father. ' But he did not hearken unto them, And dwelt in the land of Lebanon from Hamath to the entering of Egypt, He and his sons until this day. And for this reason that land is named Canaan. ;"Jubilees 10:29-34.


So then the only question is, Who are today's descendants of Seba?
Read you bible, Nigger. Seba is not a descendant of Canaan.
Genesis 10:7 The sons of Cush:
Seba, Havilah, Sabtah, Raamah and Sabteka.
The sons of Raamah: Sheba and Dedan.

Seba was the son of Cush.

The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.
The descendants of Seba are Ethiopians.
The name of a country and nation (Isa. 43:3; 45:14) mentioned along with Egypt and Ethiopia, And therefore probably in north-eastern Africa.

In Genesis 10:7, Their ancestor is said to be a son of Cush, The progenitor of the Ethiopians. In Isaiah 43:3 and Psalm 72:10, Seba is mentioned as a distant and wealthy country; in the former passage, It is connected with Egypt and Ethiopia; and Meroe was one of the most important commercial cities of interior Africa. These Sabeans are described by Herodotus as men of uncommon size. Compare Isaiah 45:14. A branch of this family, It is thought, Located themselves near the head of the Persian Gulf; and the Sabeans mentioned in Job 1:15 were probably Cushites.

The answer is in ancient history. Ancient writings mention Sabeans (Sabae) as the people who settled India. Some of the ancient accounts of India also mention names associated with the Cush line, Like rajputs being a combination word of raj, Which is Indian, And phut, Which is African.

Read you bible, Nigger. Seba is not a descendant of Canaan.
Genesis 10:7 The sons of Cush:
Seba, Havilah, Sabtah, Raamah and Sabteka.
The sons of Raamah: Sheba and Dedan.

Seba was the son of Cush.

The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.
The descendants of Seba are Ethiopians.

Indians are not Ethiopians. Ethiopians never left Africa, Only Canaan did. The Canaanites were slaughtered by Joshua which stopped the migration of Africans out of Africa.

As anthropologists tracked the movements of ancient peoples, It became clear that the Sabaens were ancestors of the first people to inhabit India.

Sabaens were never India. The Sabeans lived in the land of Sheba, Which archeology suggests was a Semitic trading state that existed for 1, 000 years in the area that is now Yemen. The capital of Sheba was called Marib (or Ma"rib), And the kingdom existed from 1200 BC to AD 275, Trading primarily in spices. The land of the Sabeans was eventually destroyed as a result of civil war.
The next two biblical events involving the Sabeans are prophecies by Isaiah and Joel. Isaiah prophesies about Israel"s eventual victory over three cultures: the Egyptians, The Cushites, And the Sabeans. Isaiah 45:14. , Joel 3:4"8.

And the correctness of the bible becomes plain. The curse of Canaan could only be. . . . .
1. On the actual descendants of Canaan
Descendants if Canaan were Africans.

2. On the descendants of Canaan who became servants of servants and

The Canaanites were defeated and placed into slavery by the eastern kings Genesis 14. Later in the history of Israel, Other descendants of Canaan, Known as the Gibeonites, Were made wood choppers and water carriers under Joshua. Thus the predictions of Noah that Canaan's descendants would serve Shem's descendants were literally fulfilled and recorded in the Old Testament.

3. On the descendants of Canaan who became servants of servants to both the descendants of Shem and Japheth.
The Canaanites were defeated and placed into slavery by the eastern kings Genesis 14.

4. On the descendants of Canaan who entire line became servants of servants to both the descendants of Shem and Japheth.

Later in the history of Israel, Other descendants of Canaan, Known as the Gibeonites, Were made wood choppers and water carriers under Joshua. Thus the predictions of Noah that Canaan's descendants would serve Shem's descendants were literally fulfilled and recorded in the Old Testament.

The only population fitting all 4 requirements of the curse is the Seba line that became India. And history shows India was totally enslaved for 17 centuries. The entire country.

African slaves were owned and traded by Arabs, Romans, Portuguese and Christians. Ghana Africa was the Trans Atlantic Slave Trade Centre of the World. 20 million African slaves were shipped out of Ghana alone.
No record of Indian slavery.
ethang5
Posts: 22,946
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/10/2019 12:32:59 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
Forgot to give the reference for the account. It begins in Genesis chapter 6, And goes on to chapter 13. The more in depth story about the offspring of Canaan is at other places and I will reference those when the time comes.

Just remember that there is no time scale given in the bible and many times, Only sons pertinent to the main story line of Israel's redemption are mentioned, So counting generations is an inaccurate way to try to time the bible.

But notice two things, The land settled by the descendants of Canaan is as early as Gen 12 promised to Abraham and his descendants. From God's POV, The Canaanites had already lost their possession. The second thing is the sin of Lots children and the connection to Sodom and Gomorrah.

It all ties in to why the children of Canaan were cursed.

Even though the Indian valley was relatively far away from Africa, The descendants of Cush bypassed nearer places for there. It must have been a beautiful location back then, But looking at it now, The filth and degradation are startling. And that too will tie in to the curse.
Harikrish
Posts: 38,773
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/10/2019 3:56:39 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
Forgot to give the reference for the account. It begins in Genesis chapter 6, And goes on to chapter 13. The more in depth story about the offspring of Canaan is at other places and I will reference those when the time comes.

Just remember that there is no time scale given in the bible and many times, Only sons pertinent to the main story line of Israel's redemption are mentioned, So counting generations is an inaccurate way to try to time the bible.

But notice two things, The land settled by the descendants of Canaan is as early as Gen 12 promised to Abraham and his descendants. From God's POV, The Canaanites had already lost their possession. The second thing is the sin of Lots children and the connection to Sodom and Gomorrah.

There were Canaanites (Africans) as well.

It all ties in to why the children of Canaan were cursed.
And the children of Canaan were Africans. As were the other sons of Ham.
Genesis 10 gives us the start of Nations.
Only Ham's children were the first Africans.
1. 4. Four Sons of Ham
1. Mizraim (Egypt)
2. Cush (Sudan, Ethiopia)
3. Put (Lybia)
4. Canaan (Land of Canaanites)

Even though the Indian valley was relatively far away from Africa, The descendants of Cush bypassed nearer places for there. It must have been a beautiful location back then, But looking at it now, The filth and degradation are startling. And that too will tie in to the curse.

The descendants of Cush were Africans. Genesis 10 tells us the descendants of Cush were Ethiopians. The Indus valley is in Pakistan and not India. That is why no Ethiopians are found in India.

Even the Greek historian Herodotus wrote about the Indus region and Sindh. Both are in Pakistan and not India.

Read Herodotus's account.
According to Herodotus 4. 44, Scylax of Caryanda, A Greek explorer sailed down the length of the Indus in the service of Darius. Hecataeus of Miletus, Around 500 BC, Wrote about the geography and peoples of India. The Greek pysician Ctesias also wrote about India. Most of these works have not survived in their original form but fragments are known through transmission by later writers. Not only individual Greeks, But also large groups of Greeks were forced to settle in Bactria (northern Afghanistan), Who must have had prolonged contact with Indians. Herodotus's account is believed to be based on these accounts. [1]

The Greeks (or Persians) were not aware of the geography of India (or Asia in general) east of the Indus basin. Herodotus in 4. 40 is explicit about India being on the eastern fringe of the inhabitable world,

"As far as India, Asia is an inhabited land; but thereafter, All to the east is desolation, Nor can anyone say what kind of land is there. " (trans. A. D. Godley 1920)

Even Alexandar the Great could not penetrate into India and was stopped at the northern boders. This is why so little was known about the rest of India. Invading armies were all stopped at the northern borders.

The curse of Ham's son Canaan.

Canaanites


Canaan, As well as his descendants, Followed in the sinful way of their father. The punishment was placed upon the descendants of Canaan-the Canaanites. These are the people who were driven out of the Promised Land by the children of Israel. Consequently, They would be in servitude to the descendants of Shem and Japeth. Because the descendants of Canaan lived corrupt lives, Their judgment was righteous. When the children of Israel entered the land of Promise they saw the detestable things that the descendants of Canaan were doing. God blessed Israel and cursed the Canaanites because their practices were similar to their father Ham.

Historical Fulfillment

History records God's promises were fulfilled. The Canaanites were defeated and placed into slavery by the eastern kings Genesis 14. Later in the history of Israel, Other descendants of Canaan, Known as the Gibeonites, Were made wood choppers and water carriers under Joshua. Thus the predictions of Noah that Canaan's descendants would serve Shem's descendants were literally fulfilled and recorded in the Old Testament.
Indians are Indo European/Aryans the descendants of Japheth. Noah only cursed the Canaanites the descendants of Canaan the son of Ham. Read your bible you low IQ nigger.

Where are the Canaanites today? Not in India. Lol?

Why did Ham's son Canaan leave Africa when Ham and his other sons settled in African countries?
4. Four Sons of Ham
1. Mizraim (Egypt)
2. Cush (Sudan, Ethiopia)
3. Put (Lybia)
4. Canaan (Land of Canaanites)

And Ham divided amongst his sons, And the first portion came forth for Cush towards the east(Sudan, Ethiopia), And to the west of him for Mizraim(Egypt), And to the west of him for Put(Lybia), And to the west of him [and to the west thereof] on the sea for Canaan.
Jubilees 9:1
And Canaan saw the land of Lebanon to the river of Egypt, That it was very good, And he went not into the land of his inheritance to the west (that is to) the sea, And he dwelt in the land of Lebanon, Eastward and westward from the border of Jordan and from the border of the sea. And Ham, His father, And Cush and Mizraim his brothers said unto him: 'Thou hast settled in a land which is not thine, And which did not fall to us by lot: do not do so; for if thou dost do so, Thou and thy sons will fall in the land and (be) accursed through sedition; for by sedition ye have settled, And by sedition will thy children fall, And thou shalt be rooted out for ever. Dwell not in the dwelling of Shem; for to Shem and to his sons did it come by their lot. Cursed art thou, And cursed shalt thou be beyond all the sons of Noah, By the curse by which we bound ourselves by an oath in the presence of the holy judge, And in the presence of Noah our father. ' But he did not hearken unto them, And dwelt in the land of Lebanon from Hamath to the entering of Egypt, He and his sons until this day. And for this reason that land is named Canaan. ;"Jubilees 10:29-34.


So then the only question is, Who are today's descendants of Seba?
Read you bible, Nigger. Seba is not a descendant of Canaan.
Genesis 10:7 The sons of Cush:
Seba, Havilah, Sabtah, Raamah and Sabteka.
The sons of Raamah: Sheba and Dedan.

Seba was the son of Cush.

The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.
The descendants of Seba are Ethiopians.
The name of a country and nation (Isa. 43:3; 45:14) mentioned along with Egypt and Ethiopia, And therefore probably in north-eastern Africa.

In Genesis 10:7, Their ancestor is said to be a son of Cush, The progenitor of the Ethiopians. In Isaiah 43:3 and Psalm 72:10, Seba is mentioned as a distant and wealthy country; in the former passage, It is connected with Egypt and Ethiopia; and Meroe was one of the most important commercial cities of interior Africa. These Sabeans are described by Herodotus as men of uncommon size. Compare Isaiah 45:14. A branch of this family, It is thought, Located themselves near the head of the Persian Gulf; and the Sabeans mentioned in Job 1:15 were probably Cushites.

Sabaens were never India. The Sabeans lived in the land of Sheba, Which archeology suggests was a Semitic trading state that existed for 1, 000 years in the area that is now Yemen. The capital of Sheba was called Marib (or Ma"rib), And the kingdom existed from 1200 BC to AD 275, Trading primarily in spices. The land of the Sabeans was eventually destroyed as a result of civil war.
The next two biblical events involving the Sabeans are prophecies by Isaiah and Joel. Isaiah prophesies about Israel"s eventual victory over three cultures: the Egyptians, The Cushites, And the Sabeans. Isaiah 45:14. , Joel 3:4"8.
ethang5
Posts: 22,946
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/11/2019 11:06:03 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:

There appears to be a lot of confusion about the origins of the people of India.

The only confusion is in you moron. Your racism has curdled your brain.

Indians are not black. - Hindu hari

Indians and Africans have a common ancestor. Read and learn moron.

https://www. Upi. Com/Science_News/

Where did the earliest Indians come from?

Modern DNA reveals ancient origins of Indian population

The origins of the peoples of the Indian Subcontinent remains a much debated topic among scientists. But new research has offered some clarity on the matter.

The latest analysis suggests India was populated by a succession of migrations from Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia.

Marine Silva, An archaeogeneticist and doctoral student at the University of Huddersfield, Was able to use modern DNA sourced from people living in India today.

Their analysis, Detailed in the journal BMC Evolutionary Biology, showed India hosts some very ancient lineages and was populated by several waves of migration.

The earliest Indians were hunter-gatherers from Africa. They arrived on the subcontinent 50, 000 years ago. More settlers arrived from what is now Iran between 10, 000 and 20, 000 years ago, Shortly after the end of the last ice age. The migrants brought early farming techniques with them.

African and Middle Eastern origins are most apparent among the male genetic lineage, The Y-chromosome. The female lineage, Mitochondrial DNA, Suggests a large influx of people from Central Asia migrated to India 5, 000 years ago.


The experts say, Just like the bible says, India was populated by the sons of Cush.

You can lie, Or do your obtuse dance, But the truth remains. Persians and Europeans arrived later. The sons of Seba were already in India when they arrived.

The curse of Ham condemned all Indians to slavery. History shows it. Science shows it. And the bible shows it.

The earliest Indians were hunter-gatherers from Africa. They arrived on the subcontinent 50, 000 years ago.
- journal BMC Evolutionary Biology

Dance little brown boy, Dance!
Harikrish
Posts: 38,773
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/11/2019 11:27:33 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:

If everyone descended from Africa, Why are Africans denying they are Africans?

Does Black denials they are Black betray a inner self loathing.

https://youtu. Be/alR5WI2ODNI

Black Teen Tells Dr. Phil She"s White And Hates Black People

Move over Candace Owens " you"ve been replaced by another chocolate girl whose hatred for "ni**ers" rivals that of notable KKK leader David Duke.

On today"s episode of Dr. Phil, The "alleged" self-help guru opened his platform to Treasure, One of the most delusional guests he"s ever entertained.

That"s right " Dr. Phil needed his A-game to help the truly sick 16-year-old who believes she"s 100 percent WHITE!

https://youtu. Be/2TPFBI2sYik

Making matters worse, The teen thinks her body is on par with Kim Kardashian.

Nevertheless, Miss Treasure says she thinks and acts like white people, She looks like white people and that she is "completely and utterly better" than Black people.

The teen often calls African-American people "hood rats, Thuggish, And ghetto, " and even speaks derogatorily to their face.

After trying to determine the reasons for the teen"s behavior, Dr. Phil introduces Spirit, A licensed therapist and life coach (from Atlanta), To weigh in.

"We have issues around culture, We have issues around class, We have issues around racial identity, And we have issues around self-esteem, " Spirit says. "It"s not that she hates Black people; it"s that she hates herself, And she wants her old life back. "

https://youtu. Be/zZHy5UXSmrI

Hear Treasure"s response in the video above from Wednesday"s episode of Dr. Phil.

When Spirit invites Treasure to spend a day with her, Will Treasure take her up on her offer of help?

But does it get better or worse when they accept they are Black negroids?

Now read an article posted by a self loathing African.

The article was posted titled.
Why I hate being a black man
Orville Lloyd Douglas.
https://www. Theguardian. Com/commentisfree/2013/nov/09/i-hate-being-a-black-man

We espouse 'black is beautiful', But the true image of blackness is ugly. If we confront our self-hatred, Maybe we'll have real pride.

Every time I sit on a crowded street car, Bus, Or subway train in Toronto, I know I will have an empty seat next to me. It's like a broken record. Sometimes I don't mind having the extra space, But other times I feel awkward, Uncomfortable, And annoyed.

I know I have good hygiene, I dress appropriately, And I mind my own business. However, Recently, I finally became cognizant of why people might fear being around me or in close proximity to me: I am a black male. Although Canadian society presents the fa"ade of multiculturalism the truth is Canada has a serious problem with the issue of race.

I didn't realize it until my sister said to me:

Orville, People are afraid of you. You are a six-foot tall black man with broad shoulders.
My sister is right, People don't sit next to me on the street car, The subway or on the bus because they are afraid.

The issue of black self-hatred is something I am supposed to pretend does not exist. However, The great French psychiatrist Frantz Fanon wrote about this issue in his groundbreaking book Black Skin White Masks, In a chapter called "the Lived Experience of the Black Man". According to Fanon, The black man is viewed in the third person, And he isn't seen as a three-dimensional human being. The black man internalizes the perspectives of white society and its negative thoughts about blackness affect his psyche. In the chapter, Fanon discusses a white child calling him the "N word" and how he becomes cognizant of how he is different and viewed as someone people should fear.

There is also a fear by some black people that discussing the issue of self-hatred is a sign of weakness. There is a discourse that black people engender: that black is beautiful. But the truth is, The image of blackness is ugly " at least it's perceived that way. There is nothing special or wonderful about being a black male " it is a life of misery and shame.

The issue of black self-hatred is usually depicted from a female point of view. There are documentaries such as Dark Girls which aired on Oprah's OWN network earlier this year, In which black women discuss their feelings of self hatred for having dark skin. There are numerous books, Articles, Documentaries, And essays published by black female writers describing black self-hatred. Black women are not afraid to speak out about their self-loathing, Yet for some reason, Black men are silent about our own contempt for what we are.

A lot of black men don't want to acknowledge the feelings of disgust we have for ourselves. It is considered emasculating to even admit the existence of such thoughts. I think my own self-hatred manifests from the exterior, From the outside world. It is born out of the despair and the unhappiness I see within a lot of young black men.

I can honestly say I hate being a black male. Although black people like to wax poetic about loving their label I hate "being black". I just don't fit into a neat category of the stereotypical views people have of black men. In popular culture black men are recognized in three areas: sports, Crime, And entertainment. I hate rap music, I hate most sports, And I like listening to rock music such as PJ Harvey, Morrissey, And Tracy Chapman. I have nothing in common with the archetypes about the black male.
2ethang5
There is so much negativity and criminal suspicion associated with being a black male in Toronto. Yet, I don't have a criminal record, And I certainly don't associate with criminals. In fact, I abhor violence, And I resent being compared to young black males (or young people of any race) who are lazy, Not disciplined, Or delinquent. Usually, When black male youth are discussed in Toronto, It is about something going wrong.

Honestly, Who would want to be black? Who would want people to be terrified of you and not want to sit next to you on public transportation?

Who would want to have this dark skin, Broad nose, Large thick lips, And wake up in the morning being despised by the rest of the world?

A lot of the time I feel like my skin color is like my personal prison, Something that I have no control over, For I am judged just because of the way I look.

Not discussing the issue doesn't mean it is going to go away. In fact, By ignoring the issue, It simply lurks underneath the surface. I believe a dialogue about self-hatred should be brought to the fore in the public sphere, So that some sort of healing and the development of true non-label-based pride can occur.

Of course, I do not want to have these feelings, To have these dark thoughts about being a black man. However, I cannot deny that this is the way I feel. I don't want to be ashamed of being a black man; I just want to be treated as an individual based on the content of my character, And not just based on the colour of my skin.

Now we know how Negroids feel about their black skin and negroid appearance and why Ethang like the author Orville Lloyd Douglas is not proud to be African.

Ethang5: Lol. Of course I am African, Why do you keep talking about America?
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where I run Bibles to countries which outlaw the possession of Bibles. Been doing it for more than 15 years to many countries. I have 3 children.
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where slavery is still practiced today.
Ethang5 wrote: "I'm not a proud African. And if I were, I would not lie about Africa's achievements. "
Ethang said: For His Majesty King Jesus? Full time slave here moron. Jesus has my all.
Ethang is a full time slave.
ethang5
Posts: 22,946
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/12/2019 12:44:03 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Anon- If no one has a good explanation of where the white man and black man came from and when, Then no one is even qualified to answer the question to know the cause of racism.

The Moron - We know where the Black man is from and how he got out of Africa.

Anon - Harikrish, First you did not state where the first black man originated, But mixed your convoluted post into the theory of Africa and suppose curse of Ham.

The moron never answers questions Anon. You know that. Both black and white men originally came from Africa. Anyone with a brain knows that.

Anon - You mixed the ideas of slavery into the discussion. Cut the crap and tell me where the first black man came from.

He can't tell you Anon. He is invested in his stupid racism and the truth exposes his stupidity. He can't cut the crap because crap is all he has. We know racism comes from shame and fear.

Men hate what they are afraid of. Anything you say to the moron, He immediately compares something or someone he pretends is "worse" than him. Is that not from low self esteem? Constantly needing to compare yourself to others as proof that you are good?

Jesus said there was no fear in love. He said that love castes out fear. In people who's hearts have no love, Fear festers. The fear breeds hate, And in hate grows racism. That is where racism comes from.

I don't even need to debate the moron because his own posts do that for me. People instinctively feel a revulsion to him. They instinctively know he is putrid. And people who are like him, Who have allowed hate to grow like ragweed in their hearts, Think like him. Look at willows and Anne.

Anon - I am not asking a difficult or trick question. If you cannot do this, Then you simply do not know the correct answer. There is nothing wrong with saying, "I do not know. "

The moron knows Anon, But has no love of the truth, As Jesus said. He is wedded to hate and lies. When he lies, It is natural for him, His father being the father of lies.

The Moron - The first black man originated in Africa. Both the bible and DNA place the first Black man in Africa.

Watch the moron dodge the question of how did man get here.

Anon - Harikrish, You are cutting and pasting from the internet, And you do not know what the hell you believe--or do you?

He does. He knows he believes lies, So he isn't open to close scrutiny of his beliefs.

Anon - 'When in Africa did the black man appear? These people and sources copied don't even believe in the Bible. What are you doing with this racial issue?

Nothing. He is stupid and lonely, And craves attention. He is an unpleasant person, And can only get attention by being a jerk. So he gets progressively more stupid as people get used to his stupidity. Now he's at "everyone should own a black slave", And "niggar" (sic). Most people, Knowing he's an idiot, Just thought he was a moron.

Where will he go from here? He has run out of "shocking" things to say, So now he left with childishly stupid personal attacks, (Ethan delivers bibles) and can do nothing but stupidly repeat them.

When I posted the study confirming that India was populated by a single population emerging from Africa between 50, 000 and 80, 000 years ago. . .

In the journal Nature, Three separate teams of geneticists survey DNA collected from cultures around the globe, Many for the first time, And conclude that all non-Africans today trace their ancestry to a single population emerging from Africa between 50, 000 and 80, 000 years ago.

He was ashamed and angry. But he is locked into his stupidity, So on he goes, As if the scientific study by 3 separate teams of geneticists saying he is wrong does not exist.

Anon - Cutting and pasting information from the internet and plagiarizing ideas will not produce a very good discussion on DDO.

Neither does spamming the same post to every thread over and over produce very good discussions on DDO. The moron is not interested in discussion. He's too stupid for that. He is just an idiot racist consumed by racist hate. Obsessed and compulsive, Unable to stop being a moron.
anonthesmallone
Posts: 6,210
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/12/2019 1:26:31 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
EThang5, This is a very reasonable post. Hari can be a pain. The plagiarism bugs me the most. As the saying goes, Follow the money. He is getting his money from somewhere. So are you. I spend a lot of time on the Internet for my mission, And I retired early to finish my 14 books (7 on banking system and 7 on ETs). The sea of glass tells me the truth about you and Hari, But I have been forbidden to reveal the personal life of anyone. It is only for me to know and no one else. Need to know stuff. I will never tell what I know.
ethang5
Posts: 22,946
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/12/2019 4:01:46 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
anonthesmallone wrote:

EThang5, This is a very reasonable post. Hari can be a pain. The plagiarism bugs me the most. As the saying goes, Follow the money. He is getting his money from somewhere. So are you. I spend a lot of time on the Internet for my mission, And I retired early to finish my 14 books (7 on banking system and 7 on ETs). The sea of glass tells me the truth about you and Hari, But I have been forbidden to reveal the personal life of anyone. It is only for me to know and no one else. Need to know stuff. I will never tell what I know.

A poster's personal life doesn't interest me at all. I focus on the person's posts to the board. The moron is not conscious enough to bug me. I just regret the damping effect he (and willows and WoA) have on the board, But then the board has always had losers like them.

Good luck on finishing your books.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.