Total Posts:205|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Pi-Space( 31 ) Pi Time( 66.4 )

ebuc
Posts: 2,915
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/13/2018 2:54:37 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Pi- Space{ XYZ/3D } i.e.

Pi^3{ XYZ/3D } = 31.00 62 7 66

Pi-Time{ 4th dimension of time } i.e.

Pi^4 = 97.40 90 91 034002437236440332688705

ergo 97.4 minus 31{ XYZ/3D } = 66.4 as Pi-Time after we subtract out the XYZ/3D as 31.

Pi-Time Renormalized as XYZ/3D is as follows

Pi^4 / 4{ renormalization } = 24.35 22 7 27 58500609309110083172176

or should it be 66.4 divided by 4 ergo 16,6

or should the renormalization process be 66.4 / 3{ XYZ/3D } ergo

66.4 / 3 = 22.13 33 3 33 33333333333333333333333

Pi^5 / 5 = 61.20 39 3 69 57056290652548262008687
...there exist 61 codons produced by 20 amino-acids.....

There exists 31 bilateral spinal nerves ergo 62 spinal nerves
Pi^3 = 31.00 62 7 66
...5-fold icosahedron has 31 primary great circles/tori
...6, 10, and 15 = 31 primary great bisecting planes of 5-fold icosahedron...
...66 lines-of-relationship exist between 12 nodal events{ vertexes } of both 4-fold cubo-octahedron and the 5-fold icosahedron.....
....12 pairs of cranial nerves total 24.....

Pi^4 / 4 = 24.35 22 7 27
...4-fold cubo-octahedron aka Vector Equilibrum, has 24 circumferential chords...
...4-fold VE has 24 radii when constructed from 4 great circle planes.
...see http://www.rwgrayprojects.com...

4-fold VE has 25 primary great circle/tori planes
..3, 4, 6 and 12 total 25......

In my asymmetrical geo-numerical pattern, the 66th invagination occurs at 225th invagination from inner{ bottom line } of Dark Energy )( if we do not count zero{ 0 }.

Zero{ 0 } in of itself is a non-counting number.

The 10 great circles of 5-fold icosahedron efine five sets of 4-fold cubo-octahedron{ VE }
.... http://www.rwgrayprojects.com... ...

So just as group of five contains 4, 3 and 2,

The 5-fold contains the 4-fold and 3-fold.

The 5-fold icosahedron is the maximal, regular structurally stable polyhedron of Universe.

The 4-fold octahedron is the medio- regular, structurally stable polyhedron of Universe,

and the 3-fold tetrahedron is the minimal, regular, structurally stable polyhedron of Universe.

All other synmmetrys are derived from these three.
" U "niverse > Universe > Universe I -verse < you-verse we-verse > them-verse
Gravitational SPACE ( + )
Dark Energy SPACE )-(
Time >66.4< --frequency ^v^v
Mind/Intellect 12--3-fold 4-fold and 5-fold
Biological *8* --bilateral four's
Spin <left 6 right >---Pitch, Yaw Roll{ 3 * 2 = 6 }
IS >2<--positive and negative tetrhaedron
John_C_1812
Posts: 1,433
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/13/2018 9:31:01 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
I disagree Goldtop it is not drug related at all.

Pi does not equal it is assigned 3.141592654
Pi^3 does not equal it is assigned 31.00627668
Pi + Pi + Pi does not equal it is assigned 9.424777962

Pi is a range set by ratio of diameter to circumference the perorations of the ratio are not naturally square to a fixed position in the circle that is being measured. Hence 12: Hours: Minutes: Seconds: Distance less than seconds the three numerical assigned numbers are proportioned to cube from square.

This exposes the use of irrational numbers eating to Pi as a fraud.
Goldtop
Posts: 6,992
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/14/2018 8:40:09 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/13/2018 9:31:01 PM, John_C_1812 wrote:
I disagree Goldtop it is not drug related at all.

So, are you saying that both you and ebuc are just garden variety lunatics?
John_C_1812
Posts: 1,433
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/15/2018 2:06:43 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
No, I am not saying I am garden verity lunatic, simply well-adjusted. It just can"t be helped how funny you are by simple not saying the obvious observation. Pi is irrational and the debate of mathematic principle has little to do with ebuc, other than his persistence at debating using irrational mathematics.

I personal thing you are both lunatics as neither of you display a basic ability in understanding scale too ratio. It"s like neither of you had ever built a model ( 1: 25) scale.

The difference is how time is set to ratio in a guidance computer program makes it a threat to the general welfare. Not that you program at all.
ebuc
Posts: 2,915
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/15/2018 2:35:07 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
The 5-fold contains 4-fold. Stormy contain Donald

Pi- Space{ XYZ/3D } i.e.
Pi^3{ XYZ/3D } = 31.00 62 7 66

Stormy Daniels as goddess of truth, beauty and symmetry

Pi-Time{ 4th dimension of time } i.e.
Pi^4 = 97.40 90 91 034002437236440332688705
ergo 97.4 minus 31{ XYZ/3D } = 66.4 as Pi-Time after we subtract out the XYZ/3D as 31.

Donal Trump as the beast { 66-6 } ego male ego based lies.

Pi-Time Renormalized as XYZ/3D is as follows
Pi^4 / 4{ renormalization } = 24.35 22 7 27 58500609309110083172176

or should it be 66.4 divided by 4 ergo 16,6

or should the renormalization process be 66.4 / 3{ XYZ/3D } ergo
66.4 / 3 = 22.13 33 3 33 33333333333333333333333

Pi^5 / 5 = 61.20 39 3 69 57056290652548262008687
...there exist 61 codons{ triplets } produced by 20 amino-acids.....

There exists 31 bilateral spinal nerves ergo 62 spinal nerves
Pi^3 = 31.00 62 7 66
...5-fold icosahedron has 31 primary great circles/tori
...6, 10, and 15 = 31 primary great bisecting planes of 5-fold icosahedron...
...66 lines-of-relationship exist between 12 nodal events{ vertexes } of both 4-fold cubo-octahedron and the 5-fold icosahedron.....
....12 pairs of cranial nerves total 24.....

Pi^4 / 4 = 24.35 22 7 27
...4-fold cubo-octahedron aka Vector Equilibrum, has 24 circumferential chords...
...4-fold VE has 24 radii when constructed from 4 great circle planes.
...see http://www.rwgrayprojects.com...

4-fold VE has 25 primary great circle/tori planes
..3, 4, 6 and 12 total 25......

In my asymmetrical geo-numerical pattern, the 66th invagination occurs at 225th invagination from inner{ bottom line } of Dark Energy )( if we do not count zero{ 0 }.

Zero{ 0 } in of itself is a non-counting number.

The 10 great circles of 5-fold icosahedron efine five sets of 4-fold cubo-octahedron{ VE }
.... http://www.rwgrayprojects.com... ...

So just as group of five contains 4, 3 and 2,
The 5-fold contains the 4-fold and 3-fold.

The 5-fold icosahedron is the maximal, regular structurally stable polyhedron of Universe.

The 4-fold octahedron is the medio- regular, structurally stable polyhedron of Universe,

and the 3-fold tetrahedron is the minimal, regular, structurally stable polyhedron of Universe.

All other synmmetrys are derived from these three.
" U "niverse > Universe > Universe I -verse < you-verse we-verse > them-verse
Gravitational SPACE ( + )
Dark Energy SPACE )-(
Time >66.4< --frequency ^v^v
Mind/Intellect 12--3-fold 4-fold and 5-fold
Biological *8* --bilateral four's
Spin <left 6 right >---Pitch, Yaw Roll{ 3 * 2 = 6 }
IS >2<--positive and negative tetrhaedron
Goldtop
Posts: 6,992
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/16/2018 3:06:53 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/15/2018 2:06:43 PM, John_C_1812 wrote:
No, I am not saying I am garden verity lunatic, simply well-adjusted.

Your posts here show you're anything but well adjusted. Clearly bonkers.
John_C_1812
Posts: 1,433
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/16/2018 1:36:19 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/16/2018 3:06:53 AM, Goldtop wrote:
At 4/15/2018 2:06:43 PM, John_C_1812 wrote:
No, I am not saying I am garden verity lunatic, simply well-adjusted.

Your posts here show you're anything but well adjusted. Clearly bonkers.

Yes; but it that I made that point clearly to you which describes me as well adjusted.........lol
John_C_1812
Posts: 1,433
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/16/2018 1:44:07 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
What I like is that by observation you both share the same problem with time as with putting a 1:25 scale model part on a 1:30 scale model. You keep seeing a difference in the size of the part you are interchanging, yet you both keep exchanging the same part, out of a different boxes over, and over expecting to work.

Keep the faith it"s got to be the box"""""".lmao, right?
ebuc
Posts: 2,915
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/16/2018 4:21:07 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Pi is linear

Pi^2 is 2D

Pi^3 is 3D

Pi^4 is 4D.

This is simple no brainer rational, logical common sense pathways of thought that a10 year old can do on most calculators and even easier if there is Pi function button etc.

Divine woman as wom{b}man is represented by the geodesic arcs of my geo-numerical torus as outer positive shaped Gravity ( ) and the innernegative shaped Dark Energy )( ergo ( )( ).

Divine woman invaginates >< to create local man and woman as the internalized sine-wave /\/\/ frequency^v^v pattern of observed Time/Reality.

Pi^3{ XYZ/3D } = 31.00 62 7 66
.......31.00 *62* 7 66.....................

31 = rational 3D whole

00 = irrational { 2D? } linear metaphysical-1 mind/intellect and meno/minus-pause


*62* = bilateral nervous system ergo consciousness

7 = broken symmetry as 7 axis sets of spin 4-fold 3, 4. 6, 12 and 5-fold 6, 10 and 15

66 = 66 lines-of-relationship between 4-fold 12 nodal vertexes and 5-fold 12 nodal vertexes
...12^2, minus 12, divided by 2 = 66 see following link
http://www.rwgrayprojects.com...

Pi^4 = 97.40 90 91 034002437236440332688705
ergo 97.4 subtract 31{ XYZ/3D } = 66.4

Pi-Time = 66.4 is no brainer for those who do not have ego based mental blockage to truth.

This is the generic linear representation oof localized discrete quantised Time

If we want renormalize Pi-Time to volumetric 3D then we do this as follows

Pi^4 / 4{ renormalization } = 24.35 22 7 27 58500609309110083172176

Pi^4 = 97.40 90 91 034002437236440332688705
" U "niverse > Universe > Universe I -verse < you-verse we-verse > them-verse
Gravitational SPACE ( + )
Dark Energy SPACE )-(
Time >66.4< --frequency ^v^v
Mind/Intellect 12--3-fold 4-fold and 5-fold
Biological *8* --bilateral four's
Spin <left 6 right >---Pitch, Yaw Roll{ 3 * 2 = 6 }
IS >2<--positive and negative tetrhaedron
John_C_1812
Posts: 1,433
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/16/2018 8:08:51 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Okay this is what math tells me Ebuc. Pi is a single state between a diameter meaning one line in the center of a circle equaling two radios in ratio (00:00) to a relationship of distance around the outside edge of that circle.

Pi^2 power cannot equal 2D ever. There is only one Pi in a circle interpretation there are 360 diameters that are all the same by ratio equals 1. The one relationship never changes. 3-D is created by the presence mathematically of 3 ratio ( 00:00:00) forming cube. Width 00 : Height 00: Length 00: or X : Y : Z:

In the analog clock square sits before cube in presents of motion. I get what you are trying to say really but you are going to need to lighten up on irrational numbers.
ebuc
Posts: 2,915
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/19/2018 3:53:18 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/16/2018 8:08:51 PM, John_C_1812 wrote:
I get what you are trying to say really but you are going to need to lighten up on irrational numbers.:

http://www.rwgrayprojects.com...

1} First John, you need to learn that squaring and triangulating are the same function at the above link,

John besides having some slight mental disorders you dont understand --or do and jsut being obstiinate-- that squaring or cubing can be done with rational or irrational numbers.

2} perfect and imperfect squares and cubes, triangles and tetrahedra

http://www.mathwarehouse.com...

Ex 31 is a perfect square

Pi^3 = 31.00 '62' 7 66

http://www.learnalberta.ca...

perfect and non=perfect squares and cubes

25 is a perfect square.

25 is a natural number, and since there is another natural number 5, such that 52 = 25, 25 is a perfect square.

24 is NOT a perfect square.

24 is a natural number, but since there is no other natural number that can be squared to result in the number 24, 24 is NOT a perfect square.

or

Since 24 is a natural number, but the square root of 24 isn't a natural number (it's an irrational number that never terminates or repeats [4.898 979 486 ...]), 24 is NOT a perfect square.

http://www.mathsisfun.com...

https://quizlet.com...

1.75 = 7 divided by 4
" U "niverse > Universe > Universe I -verse < you-verse we-verse > them-verse
Gravitational SPACE ( + )
Dark Energy SPACE )-(
Time >66.4< --frequency ^v^v
Mind/Intellect 12--3-fold 4-fold and 5-fold
Biological *8* --bilateral four's
Spin <left 6 right >---Pitch, Yaw Roll{ 3 * 2 = 6 }
IS >2<--positive and negative tetrhaedron
ebuc
Posts: 2,915
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/19/2018 5:16:59 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Here is another thought, John. Pi is circle ratioed to radius <--><--> radius ergo diameter.

My geo-numerical torus is two kinds of great Circle ( )( ) or at least a spiral that may approimate a circle as it goes around, however,

it invaginates >< from positive curvature peak and negative curvature peak.

These two invaginations approximate two radii.

So in actuality, we have a circle truncated by 4 radii. H.mm, this brings me to new pathways of thought. H,mm so if apply four radii instead of two what does Pi become?

The circle is not doubled but the number of radii are. H,mm not sure if or how to apply four radii to Pi ratio. Any ideas John?

(><)(><) = H.mmm?

At 4/19/2018 3:53:18 PM, ebuc wrote:
2} perfect and imperfect squares and cubes, triangles and tetrahedra

http://www.mathwarehouse.com...

Ex 31 is a perfect square

Pi^3 = 31.00 '62' 7 66:
" U "niverse > Universe > Universe I -verse < you-verse we-verse > them-verse
Gravitational SPACE ( + )
Dark Energy SPACE )-(
Time >66.4< --frequency ^v^v
Mind/Intellect 12--3-fold 4-fold and 5-fold
Biological *8* --bilateral four's
Spin <left 6 right >---Pitch, Yaw Roll{ 3 * 2 = 6 }
IS >2<--positive and negative tetrhaedron
ebuc
Posts: 2,915
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/20/2018 3:29:07 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
I think the correct answer here is to halve Pi ergo;
1.57 07 9 63 267948966192313216916398

Since there are 4 radii in my geo-numerical torus, one semi-great circle around the tube has two invaginations ergo 4 radii.

--(--)-- = circle with diameter twice as long. ergo we have a smaller ratio and I think it becomes exactly halved.

Not sure where any of this is going. Just a thought that came to mind when thinking of the semi-great circle arcs{ two } that each go half way around the tube in a spiral trajectory.
Here is another thought, John. Pi is circle ratioed to radius <--><--> radius ergo diameter.

My geo-numerical torus is two kinds of great Circle ( )( ) or at least a spiral that may approimate a circle as it goes around, however,

it invaginates >< from positive curvature peak and negative curvature peak.

These two invaginations approximate two radii.

So in actuality, we have a circle truncated by 4 radii. H.mm, this brings me to new pathways of thought. H,mm so if apply four radii instead of two what does Pi become?

The circle is not doubled but the number of radii are. H,mm not sure if or how to apply four radii to Pi ratio. Any ideas John?

(><)(><) = H.mmm?

At 4/19/2018 3:53:18 PM, ebuc wrote:
2} perfect and imperfect squares and cubes, triangles and tetrahedra

http://www.mathwarehouse.com...

Ex 31 is a perfect square

Pi^3 = 31.00 '62' 7 66:
" U "niverse > Universe > Universe I -verse < you-verse we-verse > them-verse
Gravitational SPACE ( + )
Dark Energy SPACE )-(
Time >66.4< --frequency ^v^v
Mind/Intellect 12--3-fold 4-fold and 5-fold
Biological *8* --bilateral four's
Spin <left 6 right >---Pitch, Yaw Roll{ 3 * 2 = 6 }
IS >2<--positive and negative tetrhaedron
John_C_1812
Posts: 1,433
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/20/2018 8:48:40 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/19/2018 5:16:59 PM, ebuc wrote:

The circle is not doubled but the number of radii are. H,mm not sure if or how to apply four radii to Pi ratio. Any ideas John?

Yes I do have a suggestion for you. I was going to ask if you would minded if I had a go.

First Pi by principle can be described in relationship to just one circle. Each circle having its own Pi created as mathematic numerical diameter. Therefore by law of motion 1 / Pi is by fact a true relative ratio describing Pi as a decimal state of (.318309886) for all circles with diameter, no matter the size. Meaning now every one circle has one Pi by ratio set as this identical decimal state expressing the change in direction show to be made with translations mathematically for Pi.

Now there are four Pi, two written Pi, and two written iPy

Which was set as one way until now by lack if mathematic principle. Is now two ways of direction. You needed to express two direction in and X to X point, Y to Y point, or Z to Z point. Why you did not understand is you are explaining Pi as one way motion mathematically by principle.

All Rights Reserved.
John_C_1812
Posts: 1,433
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/20/2018 9:10:05 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/19/2018 5:16:59 PM, ebuc wrote:


The circle is not doubled but the number of radii are. H,mm not sure if or how to apply four radii to Pi ratio. Any ideas John?

Sorry forgot to detail the answer you asked for. The mathematic outcome of 1 / Pi = .318309886 can now just be divided by 2 for all diameter or equal to radii, two radius. A true relative ratio.
ebuc
Posts: 2,915
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/21/2018 4:24:17 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/20/2018 9:10:05 PM, John_C_1812 wrote:
The mathematic outcome of 1 / Pi = .318309886 can now just be divided by 2 for all diameter or equal to radii, two radius. A true relative ratio.:

As per your usual this does address anything I stated or asked about.

I gave the correct answer and your still confused and obvious mental disorder.

--(--)--- was very clear your brain missed it as you miss most everything of signifcant relevance because of your brain disorders. Sad :--(

Sorry John you have nothing of significant relevance to offer.
" U "niverse > Universe > Universe I -verse < you-verse we-verse > them-verse
Gravitational SPACE ( + )
Dark Energy SPACE )-(
Time >66.4< --frequency ^v^v
Mind/Intellect 12--3-fold 4-fold and 5-fold
Biological *8* --bilateral four's
Spin <left 6 right >---Pitch, Yaw Roll{ 3 * 2 = 6 }
IS >2<--positive and negative tetrhaedron
John_C_1812
Posts: 1,433
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/21/2018 2:36:47 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Okay,
First: You gave an answer. Not the only answer.
Second: All I describes was how to set relativity in a ratio as a fixed linear equation. It was almost exactly what was done in Einstein"s formulation of relativity with the difference of being out in the open, and not hidden deep in the linear calculation by mathematically form with calculus.
Third. The noted difference is it expresses a change in motion. We place a limit of distance using decimal point of one object so we know there is a starting point, and end point by simplifying all circles to the number value 1 from three-hundred, sixty. This process is true for all circle not matter the size, each circle is only one line. With a fixed limit of one.
Fourth: While all diameter are also just 1 line, this is the obvious and open fixing to relative number state being held within the one line of a circle, ratio of (1: 1) this is no motion. Neither of the lines are a real decimal state alone it is created, or set when they are placed in proportion which is a motion in mathematics that can be assigned two different self-values.
Fifth: The complete relative number that all circles share with each diameter shares is 1, this describes the lines as stopped a constant relative mathematic fact meaning complete. Again (1: 1) this is a value of no motion and 1 / Pi = .318309886 is the value of motion. Using ( .0000000000) as starting point in ratio to the decimal value .318309886 as the end point. You could count down. This creates the relative value of 1 that all of the other states reach as complete. Stop motion.
Six: What is also being done here is a fixing of all the values as absolute. By simplifying in relativity and expressing all objects as complete number. In an easy to see way. The math is still complicated by describes both motion and as absolute number it describes it from stillness.
Things you appear to forget all the time.
ebuc
Posts: 2,915
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/21/2018 4:27:06 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/21/2018 2:36:47 PM, John_C_1812 wrote:
First: You gave an answer. Not the only answer.:

The only correct answer. And you still have not addressed it specifically. You missed it because you have a brain disorder and at best, just ego based mental blockage.

1 / Pi = .318309886 is the value of motion.:

It is not clear why anyone should believe that.

Fuller states it more like this we have 4D being the four face planes of a tetrahedron wherein we have the minimal enclosure and the 5th dimension being spin i.e spin of tetrahedron are any of it edges/chords.

For Fuller 5th dimension is spin ergo motion of 4 mininal plane of volumetric enclosure.

66.4 = Pi-time and is my latest conclusion and time = motion and time = frequency{ Fuller } ex /\/\/ sine-wave pattern ^v^ frequency.

IVe been very clear aat how I arrived at my Pi-Time.

However, two posts back you did get me too thinking about radii and Pi and that caused me to think about how there is 4 radii for one great circle ---two geodesic arcs around the tube, not whole torus--- so arrived at a diameter twice that of the great circle --(--)--.

You still dont grasp that. Mental or ego issues.

So here again, I have to go back to how I arrived at 66.4 as Pi-Time.

Pi^3{ XYZ/3D } = 31.00 62 7 66

...................Pi^4 = 97.4 { XYZ/3D plus time }
.....minus XYZ/3D 31......................
..........resultant = 66.4...........

You nor anyone else has offered any shred of rational, logical common sense that invalidates that resultant.

At best we could assign the value of one-half Pi ---my four radii-- that create two invaginations ^v. One from peak of positive curvature and one from negative curvature.

Ergo four radii have value of one-half Pi.
1.57 07 9 63 267948966192313216916398

So it is interesting to ponder two ways of arriving at a Pi-Time value.

And again, the 66th invagination in my geo-numerical torus occurs at 225th nodal even or 228th.

This latter being one approach to establishing if there is minimal number of invaginations as geo-numerical torus as integral whole entity.

However my particles can never be less than two great tori as and integral set, not just one i.e. each one would have at minimum 225 or 228 invaginations, if were to accept this scenario of 66.4 Pi-Tiime being associated with invaginations.

Certainly gives rise to ponderance but Pi^3 and Pi^4 - 31= 66.4 is hard to get past.

Thx for exchange that got me to consider four radii{ two invaginations } as minimal time value.

Maybe if divided 66.4 by 1.57? That is 42.29 29 9 36 30573248407643312101911

Or if we take the renmoralized XYZ/3D value of 24.35 22 7 27 and divide that by 1.57?

15.51 10 0 17 5700675752172616762559

66-6{ The beast } > 66.4{ Pi-Time } > 66{ lines-of-realtionship }

15 great circle planes of icosahedron? Who knows.
" U "niverse > Universe > Universe I -verse < you-verse we-verse > them-verse
Gravitational SPACE ( + )
Dark Energy SPACE )-(
Time >66.4< --frequency ^v^v
Mind/Intellect 12--3-fold 4-fold and 5-fold
Biological *8* --bilateral four's
Spin <left 6 right >---Pitch, Yaw Roll{ 3 * 2 = 6 }
IS >2<--positive and negative tetrhaedron
John_C_1812
Posts: 1,433
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/21/2018 8:11:55 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/21/2018 4:27:06 PM, ebuc wrote:
At 4/21/2018 2:36:47 PM, John_C_1812 wrote:
First: You gave an answer. Not the only answer.:

( 1/Pi = .31839886 is the value of motion) this is out of context

It is not clear why anyone should believe that. (Don"t)

Why understand depth of field, the movement is created in the focus of numbers into a ratio. The use of dividing is creating a depth of field in a 2-d plain. The context was 1:1 and 1 divided by Pi now changes the depth of the ratio when written as ( 3.141592654: 31839886: 31839886: 31839886) becomes a max value in-between two points of direction that is set to be scaled proportionally to Pi. As with absolute Time it was or would be 12: 60:60:60:60 if expanded full scale. For a series or (1:5:5:5:5)

(When you say the only correct answer, and I still have not addressed it.) You create a different problem FOR me to solve ebuc. You are admitting to me you have formed a calculation with no test for you answer. Linear formulas need a test to verify an answer. This too can be expressed verbally as a mathematic form of motion suppling two ways to find one answer. Pi a test can be formulated using motion as cylinder and cube, instead of only circle and line. There is a simple change in direction made with this test.

A tetrahedron has four sides as face, but only presents them in three plains. (Plane did I start that grammar mistake if so sorry) There is a depth of field formulation by point there but that is only creating a bigger obstruction to focus at this ease of understanding.
ebuc
Posts: 2,915
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/22/2018 3:42:07 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/21/2018 8:11:55 PM, John_C_1812 wrote:
A tetrahedron has four sides as face, but only presents them in three plains. (Plane did I start that grammar mistake if so sorry) :

As per your usual John, I only see mental disorder coming fromyou and nothing that addresses none of the specifics Ive presented. Sad :--(
" U "niverse > Universe > Universe I -verse < you-verse we-verse > them-verse
Gravitational SPACE ( + )
Dark Energy SPACE )-(
Time >66.4< --frequency ^v^v
Mind/Intellect 12--3-fold 4-fold and 5-fold
Biological *8* --bilateral four's
Spin <left 6 right >---Pitch, Yaw Roll{ 3 * 2 = 6 }
IS >2<--positive and negative tetrhaedron
John_C_1812
Posts: 1,433
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/22/2018 5:59:40 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Ebuc,
I know you are fix to mental disorders as excuse. I have to addressing many of these issues one at a time so limits are placed on any time I must waist in details raised by you objections. It is a minor flaw in the D.O. debate system. This is not one of those things that insanity easily discredits. Nor, is it something you want to judge people on who may take more time than others to understand.

Four sides of the Tetrahedron are always only displayed in three plains, as the idea of open field is only really taken as a degree to which angles are attached so a changed in the surface area exposure from tetrahedron to display plain of our eye"s has limit, there are four sides from a viewable position. Yes. Viewable position is three there is no added plain in dimensional space to the geometric shape displayed. We are inside the three plains. View plains are a second or multiple place to see object inside the space pointed in a direction. In programming this added view was eventually called a camera view, birds eye view, or view plain, etc.

A mirrored surface is still in the same plain it is set in a different angle to view. There is still only X, Y, and Z plain, while time displays all three X: Y: Z through a single depth of field. One Time with open mathematic idea of expansion and contraction. A depth of greater detail, or lesser detail can be created as a distance of perception in time is understanding, even as mathematic absolute. The simple is written as (X: Y: Z) to equal the X, Y, Z plains in motion space. The problem is that the full ratio was never addressed simply write as (W: X: Y: Z) before scale shift. So the full ratio of time and space, not space time is never completely written in expanded depth, or collapsed depth.

Observe; (X^p = X: Y: Z: W) and (Y^p = X: Y: Z: W) again (Z^p = X: Y: Z: W) But there is not (W^p = X: Y: Z) there is no such object as space time, no added demotion only space as the universe. Period. The understanding of space time is nothing more than a fabrication of English literature formed in the process of College Degree by teacher and student. The collage process never adapted Isaac Newton"s mathematical principle by vote. Vote in this case is the abuse of democratic force not finding of mathematic study.

Key: p = plain
X= direction one. 0 volume, 0 Velocity.
Y = direction two. 0 volume, 0 Velocity.
Z = direction three.0 volume, 0 Velocity.
A: = distance five. Self-value volume.
X: = distance one. Self-value volume.
Y: = distance two. Self-value volume.
Z: = distance three. Self-value volume.
W: = distance four. Self-value volume.

These are directions of distance between area depth and would be written as (A: X: Y: Z: W) time. No such this as space-time. Time has a so far unreported mathematic self-value wrongly plagiarized by science.

Rights Reserved.
ebuc
Posts: 2,915
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/22/2018 7:29:52 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/22/2018 5:59:40 PM, John_C_1812 wrote:
Four sides of the Tetrahedron are always only displayed in three plains, :

John, you have no excuse for you mental disorder.
Tetra = v4 ,
Hedron = surface face/plane,

\Y/ = texticonic bird-eye-view of tetrahedron

66-6 = The Beast{ naricisstic male }

66-4 = Pi-Time i.e P^4, minus 31{ XYZ/3D }

66 = lines-of-relationship between 12 vertexes of 4-fold cubo-octahedron and/or 5 fold icosahedron

Woman{ left 31 right } geodesic curvature is the XYZ/3D container

Man{ 66.4 } is the invaginations ---inward-- from peak of positive and negative curvature

Invaginations result in numerically triangulated sine-wave 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24 etc
" U "niverse > Universe > Universe I -verse < you-verse we-verse > them-verse
Gravitational SPACE ( + )
Dark Energy SPACE )-(
Time >66.4< --frequency ^v^v
Mind/Intellect 12--3-fold 4-fold and 5-fold
Biological *8* --bilateral four's
Spin <left 6 right >---Pitch, Yaw Roll{ 3 * 2 = 6 }
IS >2<--positive and negative tetrhaedron
John_C_1812
Posts: 1,433
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/22/2018 9:58:13 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Yes I do Ebuc you are trying to fabricate or cause metal duress""""..

The 4 surface are still visible in only 3 plane. Sorry plane was correct. ( X, Y, and Z.) which display either( Height, Width, and Length.)

Time on the other hand is X: Y: and Z: or H: M: and S: which can be expanded by use of depth in a measurement of each of the plains written as X, Y, and Z. This fact does not fabricate ab additional plane it only details the three now present. We explain time as Y: M: D: H: M: S: A: B: C: It can expand equally in each direction of depth displayed on either end of the two point scale.

Rights Reserved.
These mathematics are part of a 4.3 billion dollar intellectual property in soft-ware development.
John_C_1812
Posts: 1,433
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/23/2018 5:30:42 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Okay first: you are trying to set the mathematical absolute time as a liberty that can be taken by science. It is not time does has a self-value. Science has always made up its own guideline to marking duration to and from events. This does not make these measurements of duration saleable to motion.

What an evaluation of absolute time may have to do with male, female gender is not relevant to Pi as a ratio for time. The conversion of Pi to a complete decimal state is relevant to time. As this process becomes a key in accurate ability of scale in motion to hold order of equal distance by ratio to scale. The idea of time is scientifically placed in question of understand by the past scientific durations science has created itself as idea. As term of era or geological time scale (GTS) points out science has not obligation to hold a mathematic self-value instead as the absolute principle using the absolute ratio of mathematic time.

Mathematical time is a ratio between orbit motion and ration motion. (12 :) is one side of the ratio and (:60:60:60:60) would be explain the complete other side of (24 :) hours. So as you explain it Pi time has the same issue of scale digital time has. Human error.
John_C_1812
Posts: 1,433
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/23/2018 5:40:29 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
In case a person is wondering this meant the mathematically the orbit of earth was never meant to be placed in direct connection to the rotation of earth mathematically to are a scale set for ratio of proportion to motion. DANGER! WILL ROBISON!............................. DANGER! ( Lost in Space, Irwin Allen 1965-1968)
ebuc
Posts: 2,915
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/23/2018 6:43:03 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/22/2018 9:58:13 PM, John_C_1812 wrote:
The 4 surface are still visible in only 3 plane.:

Mental disorder.

4 hedra = 4 faces = 4 planes

4surface planes inherent include 3 planes.

#4 inherently includes #3.

The greater value always contains the lesser value.

All else is mental disorder.

Regular/Symmerical 5-fold icosahedron has;

20 surface planes,

15 bisecting golden ratio rectangular planes,

15 / 3 = 5 sets of bisecting 3 planes ,

(----) == diameter

--(--)-- = two radii values doubled ergo, four invaginations

Pi / 2 = 1.57 07 9 63 267948966192313216916398

1.57 07 9 63 = value of Pi-invaginations in geo-numercal torus

Here below I make some corrections

#396 is 66th invagination { from peak of positive curvature } of torus if we do not count 0

#393th is 66th invagination { from peak of negative curvature } if we do not count the 0.

..1.5..7...11..13.17
-
-
0.....6........12.........18....24.....30....36......42....48.....54.....60---------396........402...
...3......9............15.....21....27.....33....39.....45.....51.....57--------393.......399........
-
-
.2..4..8..10.....14-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
" U "niverse > Universe > Universe I -verse < you-verse we-verse > them-verse
Gravitational SPACE ( + )
Dark Energy SPACE )-(
Time >66.4< --frequency ^v^v
Mind/Intellect 12--3-fold 4-fold and 5-fold
Biological *8* --bilateral four's
Spin <left 6 right >---Pitch, Yaw Roll{ 3 * 2 = 6 }
IS >2<--positive and negative tetrhaedron
John_C_1812
Posts: 1,433
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/23/2018 11:17:05 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
4 Hedra = 4 surface area = 3 dimensional planes.

4 surface area inherent only 3 dimensional planes.

The number of a geometric surface plane is not a dictation to the number of dimensional plane""""""ever.

Your display of any lack of understanding between ratio to scale may be in fact a delusion that others may have. It does not make it right ebuc.

The curvature of the torus does not matter as it has no relationship to motion. Pi is always equal to 1 circle as a ratio, so the ratio of Pi can be explained as 1 / pi, while again the radius of diameter describes no motion. Its display of direction can be changed one-hundred, and eighty degrees.

Time does not move as an object it moves as a scale. True?
However time does describe a ratio to motion. True?

It is time which holds multiple plane as these are depth in each dimension we describe as X, Y, and Z. So we can write X^dp (A: H: M: S: W:) is (A: H: M: S: W:) from Y^dp, earth"s orbit might be explained as a ratio made form 60 degrees change in alignment in relationship to equator, the constant of 24 Hours rotation is set to the three-hundred, sixty degrees. The sun and earth are both round and are not the same size. So ratio matters in math calculation. This is obvious to even some-one Centuries ago.

Yeah I am kind of sure the 5.4 Billion is sufficient to substantiate a universal form of time. Not the only form of time in history just one that translates beyond the stars we see. Call it a mental disorder it may be the only way your fragile state might perceive it can be accomplished.
ebuc
Posts: 2,915
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2018 1:15:44 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/23/2018 11:17:05 PM, John_C_1812 wrote:

Mental disorder with nothing of relevant significance that adds to or detracts from my givens.

4 hedra = 4 faces = 4 surface planes

4surface planes inherent include 3 planes.

#4 inherently includes #3.

The greater value always contains the lesser value.

All else is mental disorder.

Regular/Symmerical 5-fold icosahedron has;

20 surface planes,

15 bisecting golden ratio rectangular planes,

15 / 3 = 5 sets of bisecting 3 planes ,

(----) == diameter

--(--)-- = two radii values doubled ergo, four invaginations

Pi / 2 = 1.57 07 9 63 267948966192313216916398

1.57 07 9 63 = value of Pi-invaginations in geo-numercal torus

Here below I make some corrections

#396 is 66th invagination { from peak of positive curvature } of torus if we do not count 0

#393th is 66th invagination { from peak of negative curvature } if we do not count the 0.

..1.5..7...11..13.17
-
-
0.....6........12.........18....24.....30....36......42....48.....54.....60---------396........402...
...3......9............15.....21....27.....33....39.....45.....51.....57--------393.......399........
-
-
.2..4..8..10.....14------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
" U "niverse > Universe > Universe I -verse < you-verse we-verse > them-verse
Gravitational SPACE ( + )
Dark Energy SPACE )-(
Time >66.4< --frequency ^v^v
Mind/Intellect 12--3-fold 4-fold and 5-fold
Biological *8* --bilateral four's
Spin <left 6 right >---Pitch, Yaw Roll{ 3 * 2 = 6 }
IS >2<--positive and negative tetrhaedron

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.