Total Posts:190|Showing Posts:61-90|Last Page
Jump to topic:

The biblical curse of Ham Harikrish explains

ethang5
Posts: 23,680
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/5/2019 9:51:32 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
The curse of Ham condemned all Indians to slavery.

Here it is again. You wanted to "discuss" it. Now that the truth is out, You got cold feet. Dodge it again like the shithole coward you are.

Since you'Esaafraid of facing the truth about your shithole country, I'll bring the truth to you moron.

Read about the curse on your filthy country. It's in the bible! Lol.

The curse goes. . . .

26 Blessed be the the Lord God of Shem, And Canaan shall be his servant.

27 God shall enlarge Japheth, And he shall dwell in the tents of Shem, And Canaan shall be his servant.

Let's break the curse down. . .

Curses on Canaan:
1. A servant of servants shall he be unto his brothers
2. Canaan shall be his [Shem's] servant.
3. Canaan shall be his [Japheth's] servant

The Canaanites were the descendants of Ham's son Canaan who lived in the Land of Canaanited and not India.

Canaan had sons idiot. One of them was Cush. Cush had sons, One of them was Seba. Seba settled in Asia and is the ancestor of Indians.

Blessings
1. Blessed be the the Lord God of Shem
2. God shall enlarge Japheth
3. He [Japheth] shall dwell in the tents of Shem

Three curses and three blessings.

I maintain that the curse of Canaan is fulfilled in the slavery of India.

* Indians are the descendants of Canaan.
* Arabs are the descendants of Japheth.
* The British are the descendants of Shem.

You got all three wrong you low IQ nigger.

Indians are the descendants of Japheth. Indians were never in the Land of Canaanites.

Indians are descendants of Cush, The son of Canaan. Madai (Hebrew: pronounced [maG2;da. I]; Greek: [mɛH0;G2;dos]) is a son of Japheth and one of the 16 grandsons of Noah in the Book of Genesis of the Hebrew Bible.

Biblical scholars have generally identified Madai with the Iranian Medes of much later records. The Medes, Reckoned to be his offspring by Josephus and most subsequent writers, Were also known as Madai, Including in both Assyrian and Hebrew sources. Some scholars in more modern times have also proposed connections with various earlier nations, Such as Mitanni, [1] Matiene, And Mannai. In addition, The Kurds still maintain traditions of descent from Madai.

Madai is also the name of the deified ancestor of the Kachin people of Myanmar, According to the indigenous Kachin religion.

Also linked with Madai is the Iranian city of Hamadan.

https://en. M. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Japheth
In identifying Japheth's descendants, Muslim exegesis more-or-less agrees with the Biblical traditions. He is usually regarded as the ancestor of the Gog and Magog tribes, And, At times, Of the Turks, Khazars, And Slavs.

The Madai mentioned in the bible is not Indians, They are Persians, Today's Iranians.

The curse was not to all of Canaan's descendants, But went through Ham, To Canaan, To Cush, To Seba. Seba is the one on which the curse rested, And it was not because of Noah's nakedness, But Seba's idolatry with Krishna.

So Krishna is a God in the Bible. Lol!

An idol idiot. Learn to read. This is educated research, Not racist trash.

God's curses do not fail. Less than 30% of Africans ever saw slavery.

The Arabs owned and traded African slaves for 1, 300 years. The Christians did the same for 400 years.

Still, Most African were never slaves. ALL Indians were slaves. Indians fit the curse.

This is real research, And not 8th grade illiterate nonsense.

Still no mention of India because the Indians are not Canaanites.

They would not have been called Indians at that time moron, The ancients called them Sibaens. The curse was not to all of Canaan's descendants, But went through Ham, To Canaan, To Cush, To Seba. Seba is the one on which the curse rested, And it was not because of Noah's nakedness, But Seba's idolatry with Krishna.

Seba is the descendant of Canaan that settled in India.

The Canaanites who lived in the Land of Canaanites were the descendants of Canaan.

Canaan had sons idiot. All his sons are his descendants. Cush also had sons who went east into Asia rather than into Africa. Herodotus wrote:

The Ethiopians from the sun-rise. . . Were marshalled with the Indians, And did not at all differ from [them] in appearance but only in their language, And their hair. For the eastern Ethiopians are straight-haired; but those of (Africa) have hair more curly than that of any other people. These Ethiopians from Asia were accounted (almost the same as the Indians [of India]).

So let's compare the history of India and Africa and see which one better fits the curse of Canaan in Gen 9.

1. A servant of servants shall he be unto his brothers

A. India's untouchables were servants to the other Indians who were themselves servants to the Arabs and British.
Servants of servants?
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

The Arabs and British were driven out of India by the Indians.

After 17 centuries of complete slavery. They were still completely enslaved just like the curse says. Africans were never totally enslaved like Indians were. Some African countries were never even colonized like India was. India fits the curse, Africa does not.

The prophecy failed because Noah' curse only Condemned Africans to slavery.

Based on what? Your insipid racism? It fits India completely. Africans were never "servants of servants", Indians were. And the curse was on the descendants of Canaan, Who Seba was.

B. Enslaved by both brothers Shem(British) & Japheth(Arabs)
Enslaved by descendants of Shem AND Japheth
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

The children of Shem were Elam, Ashur, Arphaxad, Lud and Aram, In addition to daughters. Abraham, The patriarch of the Hebrews and Arabs, Was one of the descendants of Arphaxad.

Untrue, But so? We aren't talking about Abraham, We're talking about your ancestor Seba, The son of Cush, The son of Canaan.

C. Canaan shall be his [Japheth's] servant
Institutionally enslaved by Arabs.
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

Arabs were the descendants of Shem. Read your bible nigger.

Arabs are the descendants of Esau, The son of Abraham, You dolt. Even kids in bible class know that.

Blessings

1. Blessed be the the Lord God of Shem

The descendants of Shem, The ancestor of the Roman empire, Saw their God exalted above all gods. The god of Japheth - Allah, The god of Canaan - Krishna.

Europeans and Indo Europeans were the descendants of Japheth. Read your bible, Nigger.

I cited my claim idiot. You just keep blurting nonsense. As I told you, Your racism cannot change history. Europeans never dwelt in the tents of Shem. Indians fit the curse.

2. God shall enlarge Japheth
3. He [Japheth] shall dwell in the tents of Shem

According to the Book of Jubilees (10:50-51), Madai (descendant of Japheth) had married a daughter of Shem, And preferred to live among Shem's descendants, Rather than dwell in Japheth's allotted inheritance beyond the Black Sea; so he begged his brothers-in-law, Elam, Asshur and Arphaxad, Until he finally received from them the land that was named after him, Media. .

Brothers in law moron.

The Ethiopians from the sun-rise. . . Were marshalled with the Indians, And did not at all differ from [them] in appearance but only in their language, And their hair. For the eastern Ethiopians are straight-haired; but those of (Africa) have hair more curly than that of any other people. These Ethiopians from Asia were accounted (almost the same as the Indians [of India]).

Indians are black descendants of Seba -> Cush -> Canaan -> Ham.
Harikrish
Posts: 41,160
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/6/2019 4:37:46 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:

The curse of Ham only condemned Africans to slavery.

The curse of Ham condemned the sons of Canaan to slavery. Indians are the descendants of Canaan and fit the curse perfectly.
Nowhere in the bible does it say Indians are the descendants of Canaan. Indians are the descendants of Japheth. Indo Europeans. .

Indians are the descendants of Japheth. Indians were never in the Land of Canaanites.

Indians are descendants of Seba, A son of Canaan. Read Gen 10. 7 you idiot.
Genesis 10:7 does not say Indians were the descendants of Canaan.
Seba was never in India nor were his descendants in India.

The Canaanites who lived in the Land of Canaanites were the descendants of Canaan.

All Canaan's children are his descendants idiot.

Indians are the descendants of Japheth. Indians were never in the Land of Canaanites. Indo Europeans were the descendants of Japheth
Madai (Indians & Iranic: Medes, Persians, Afghans, Kurds)
Read my citation moron. Experts say Madai means Persians, Not Indians.
Madai (Indians & Iranic: Medes, Persians, Afghans, Kurds)
Europeans and Indo Europeans were the descendants of Japheth. Read your bible, Nigger.

Yet Europeans never dwelt in the tents of Shem moron. Indian are descendants of Cush.
The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.

According to the Book of Jubilees (10:50-51), Madai (descendant of Japheth) had married a daughter of Shem, And preferred to live among Shem's descendants, Rather than dwell in Japheth's allotted inheritance beyond the Black Sea; so he begged his brothers-in-law, Elam, Asshur and Arphaxad, Until he finally received from them the land that was named after him, Media. .
Indo Europeans settled in Indian. Over 1 billion Indians are descendants of Indo European/Aryan ancestry.
Some want to say Madai represents Indians. That Indians were descendants of Japheth and therefore white. But. . .

https://en. M. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Madai
Madai (Hebrew) is a son of Japheth and one of the 16 grandsons of Noah in the Book of Genesis of the Hebrew Bible.
So Indians are the descendants of Japheth. The Persians were driven out by the Muslims and settled in India.

Biblical scholars have generally identified Madai with the Iranian Medes of much later records. The Medes, Reckoned to be his offspring by Josephus and most subsequent writers, Were also known as Madai, Including in both Assyrian and Hebrew sources. Some scholars in more modern times have also proposed connections with various earlier nations, Such as Mitanni, [1] Matiene, And Mannai. In addition, The Kurds still maintain traditions of descent from Madai.
Which proves Indians are Madai because the Persians settled in India. So did the Indo Europeans.
https://en. M. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Japheth
In identifying Japheth's descendants, Muslim exegesis more-or-less agrees with the Biblical traditions. [18] He is usually regarded as the ancestor of the Gog and Magog tribes, And, At times, Of the Turks, Khazars, And Slavs.
Which proves Indians are Madai because the Persians settled in India. So did the Indo Europeans.
The Madai mentioned in the bible is not Indians, They are Persians, Today's Iranians.
The Persians were driven out of Persia by the Muslims and settled in India. That is how we have the Indo Iranians (Indian Iranians).

There were already people in India when the Persians and Arabs arrived. Those people were Sanaens, The descendants of Cush, The son of Canaan.
There were no sanaens in India. The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.
For those who say Indians are white. . . .
http://www. Cogwriter. Com/india. Htm

Cush also had sons who went east into Asia rather than into Africa. Herodotus wrote:

The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.

Yeah. We know.

Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod.

Cush was the grandson of Ham. Read your bible idiot.
Nigger, Ham himself has four sons, Namely: Cush (Ethiopia), Mizraim (Egypt), Put (Libya), And lastly, Canaan (Canaanites).
He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia. Indians are not Ethiopians. Ethiopians are still living in Ethiopia.

Indians were called Ethiopians of the east because they were black, Looked like Africans, And shared an ancestor with Africans. Read the real research below idiot.
Indians are white because their DNA is traced to Indo Europeans/Aryans. You are quoting a discredited Roman historian.

The Ethiopians from the sun-rise. . . Were marshalled with the Indians, And did not at all differ from [them] in appearance but only in their language, And their hair. For the eastern Ethiopians are straight-haired; but those of (Africa) have hair more curly than that of any other people. These Ethiopians from Asia were accounted (almost the same as the Indians [of India]).
But the historian was discredited. Modern DNA traced Indians to Indo Europeans.

The brown people of southern India and Ceylon are also descendants of Cush. Historians call them Dravidians; the ancients called them Sibae (Smith's Classical Dictionary). Their Bible name was Seba (Gen. 10:7). Josephus recognized an eastern and a western Cush--one in Asia, The other in Africa (Antiquities, Book 1, VI, 2). Herodotus calls them "Asiatic Ethiopians" (Thalia, Section 94). "Ethiopia" in Ezekiel 38:5 should be translated "Cush. " It refers primarily to the Asiatic Cush, Which is India today.
But Africans are Black. South Indians are brown and not negroid like Africans.

They are called Dravidians and not Crush or Ethiopians because they are not Africans.

The brown people of southern India and Ceylon are also descendants of Cush. Historians call them Dravidians; the ancients called them Sibae (Smith's Classical Dictionary). Their Bible name was Seba (Gen. 10:7).
Genesis 10:7 does not say Seba settled in India. The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.

In India the highest castes were not only called Brahmins, But also Rajputs. "Rajput" means "king or chief of Put" (Raja, " Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th ed. ). "Phut" or "Put" means a "warrior" in Hebrew. The Rajputs are the most noted warriors in India. . . Of the four sons of Ham, Only Cush bears a name that means "black. " Just as some of the sons of Cush are brown, So some of the children of Phut are black. The Indians of central and northern India vary from light to dark brown.
Rajputs are not Black. Rajputs are from northern India. North Indians are mostly white.
So Indians are not Black. Only Africans are Black.

Indians are descendants of Cush, Who was black.
The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.

The curse was not to all of Canaan's descendants, But went through Ham -> Canaan -> Cush -> Seba -> Indians

Noah only cursed Ham through his children.

We know Hams's children were the first Africans.

Cush's children were the first Africans. Indians are descendent from that line. The sons of Cush had children idiot.
The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.
Harikrish
Posts: 41,160
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/6/2019 4:41:49 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
Seven Sons of Japheth:
1. Javan (Greece, Romans, Romance -- French, Italians, Spanish, Portuguese)
2. Magog (Scythians, Slavs, Russians, Bulgarians, Bohemians, Poles, Slovaks, Croatians)
3. Madai (Indians & Iranic: Medes, Persians, Afghans, Kurds)
4. Tubal (South of Black Sea)
5. Tiras (Thracians, Teutons, Germans, Scandinavian, Anglo-Saxon, Jutes)
6. Meshech (Russia)
7. Gomer (Celtic)
Note, This debunks the Out of Africa Theory. Japheth or his descendants were never in Africa.

Madai the son of Japheth are the people that in English are called the Medes and dwelt mostly in what is now called Iran or Persia. Iran is said to mean the land of the Aryans and were composed of the Medes or the Madai and the Semite Elamites. These Iranians or Persians probably carried out the early invasion of about 1500 BC into India that brought Aryan people to India and displaced the earlier Dravidian people of India. These Aryan people as descendents of Japheth through Madai also brought Hinduism including the Hindu god Pra-japati (lord of offspring) and the Vedas or early Hindu scriptures. The Aryan people of India are like the Iranians generally olive skinned and look somewhat Caucasian in contrast to the people of India of Dravidian background that are generally brown or darker skin. Also the Aryan languages of Northern India are of the Indo-European family of languages that includes Persian or Iranian languages but also languages such as Sanskrit, Hindi and Urdu, Bengali, Panjabi, Marathi and Gujarati.
These languages are native to the people of India with Hindi being the official National Language of India.

Beginning with the Aryan race.
The Aryan race is a racial grouping that emerged in the period of the late 19th century and mid-20th century to describe people of Indo-European heritage. [1]

It derives from the idea that the original speakers of the Indo-European languages and their descendants up to the present day constitute a distinctive race or subrace of the Caucasian race.

Then the Indo-Aryan-European people
The Indo-Aryan peoples or the Indic peoples are a diverse Indo-European-speaking ethnolinguistic group of speakers of Indo-Aryan languages. There are over one billion native speakers of Indo-Aryan languages, Most of them native to the Indian subcontinent and presently found all across South Asia, Where they form the majority.

Finally The over one billion native speakers of Indo-Aryan languages, Most of them native to the Indian subcontinent and presently found all across South Asia, Where they form the majority.
South Asians are Indians.
South Asians are descended from a mix of farmers, Herders, And hunter-gatherers, Ancient DNA reveals.
Today, The population of South Asia is divided into dozens of ethnic, Linguistic, And religious groups that live side by side"but not always in harmony. A contentious border separates India and Pakistan; political movements draw stark lines between India"s Muslim and Hindu populations. Groups don"t mix much, As people tend to marry those who share their ethnicity and tongue.
Now, A study of the first ancient DNA recovered from South Asia shows that populations there mingled repeatedly thousands of years ago. Nearly all of the Indian subcontinent"s ethnic and linguistic groups are the product of three ancient Eurasian populations who met and mixed: local hunter-gatherers, Middle Eastern farmers, And Central Asian herders. Three similar groups also mingled in ancient Europe, Giving the two subcontinents surprisingly parallel histories.
The study, Presented here last week at the meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists and in a preprint on the bioRxiv server, Sheds light on where these populations came from and when they arrived in South Asia. It also strengthens the claim that Proto-Indo-European (PIE)"the ancestral language that gave rise to modern languages from English to Russian to Hindi"originated on the steppes of Asia.

Moorjani, David Reich of Harvard University, And Kumarasamy Thangaraj of the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology in Hyderabad, India, Spent years searching for ancient DNA in South Asia, Where hot climates might degrade it. Finally, Their team recovered and analyzed ancient genomes from 65 individuals who lived in northern Pakistan between 1200 B. C. E. And 1 C. E. They also analyzed 132 ancient genomes from Iran and southern Central Asia, And 165 from the steppes of Kazakhstan and Russia, And compared them with published ancient and modern genomes. These data allowed them to reconstruct when different populations arrived in South Asia and how they interacted.

Between 4700 and 3000 B. C. E. , Farmers from Iran mixed with hunter-gatherers indigenous to South Asia, Moorjani said. This combination of ancestries was found in the DNA of skeletal remains from sites in Turkmenistan and Iran known to have been in contact with the Indus Valley civilization, Which thrived in Pakistan and northwest India starting around 3300 B. C. E. The researchers dub this population "Indus periphery. " The 65 ancient people from Pakistan also show this combination, Although they all lived after the Indus civilization declined. The researchers suspect that "Indus periphery" people actually may have been the founders of Indus society, Although without ancient DNA from Indus Valley burials, They can"t be sure.

Still, Moorjani"s team sees this ancient mixture of Iranian farmers and South Asian hunter-gatherers all over South Asia today. As the Indus Valley civilization declined after 1300 B. C. E. , Some Indus periphery individuals moved south to mix with indigenous populations there, Forming the Ancestral South Indian population, Which today is more prominent in people who speak Dravidian languages such as Tamil and Kannada, And in those belonging to lower castes.

Meanwhile, Herders from the Eurasian steppe moved into the northern part of the subcontinent and mixed with Indus periphery people still there, Forming the Ancestral North Indian population. Today, People who belong to higher castes and those who speak Indo-European languages such as Hindi and Urdu tend to have more of this ancestry. Shortly after, These two already mixed groups mixed with each other, Giving rise to the populations living in India today.

"Strikingly, This is very similar to the pattern we see in Europe, " Moorjani said. Around 7000 B. C. E. , Agriculture spread into both Europe and South Asia with farmers from Anatolia and Iran, Respectively, Who each mixed with local hunter-gatherer populations. After about 3000 B. C. E. , Yamnaya pastoralists from the Central Asian steppe swept both east and west, Into Europe and South Asia, Bringing the wheel and perhaps cannabis.
ethang5
Posts: 23,680
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/6/2019 12:33:46 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Harikrish wrote:
ethang5 wrote:

The reason for the condemnation of Canaan's sons is mentioned in the bible. They were idol worshippers. That vile religion of Hinduism.

Read your bible nigger. Noah cursed Ham when he found out what Ham his youngest son had done to him.

Noah did not curse Ham idiot. He cursed the descendants of Canaan.

Note Canaan was not yet born in Genesis 9. So Noah cursed Ham through Ham's children.

Ham was not cursed idiot. Canaan's descendants were.

You have been proven wrong on almost every point.

"Medai were not Indians, They were Persians.

*Noah was not white

Noah was a descendant of Adam.

Everyone is a descendant of Adam idiot.

Noah was white living in a moderate climate outside the garden of Eden in Iraq.

The garden of eden was in Africa, Not Iraq. And the climate where Noah lived was not moderate. It was desert.

*Noah did not live in Africa, His son did.

Noah did not live in Africa, His son did.

Thank you for acknowledging you were wrong.

That is why the curse of Ham only condemned Ham's children to slavery.

Most Africans were never slaves. The curse condemned Canaan's children, Not Ham's children. Learn to read idiot.

*Noah did not live in temperate climates, He lived in a desert.

Noah lived in Iraq which was outside the Garden of Eden.

Noah did not live in Iraq. The ark came to rest in what is now Iraq. And the garden of eden was not in Iraq. You are wrong.

*Noah did not curse Ham, He cursed the sons of Canaan. Seba was one.

Noah cursed his youngest son. Ham was his youngest son. Noah cursed Ham through his children.

Noah did not curse Ham.

*Africans were never enslaved by both of Ham's other sons. Indians were.

Noah's curse condemned Ham's children. . . .

Lie. Only the descendants of Canaan were cursed. Ham's other children were not cursed but blessed.

. . . . Who were the first Africans.

And the first Indians.

Indians are not the descendants of Ham. They are the descendants of Japheth.

Untrue. The Persians and Arabs who invaded and enslaved India were descendants of Japheth. Indians were negroid.

*Africans were never totally enslaved, Indians were.

African slaves were owned and traded by Arabs, Romans, Portuguese and Christians. Ghana Africa was the Trans Atlantic Slave Trade Centre of the Work. Over 20 million African slaves were shipped out of Ghana alone.

This doesn't contradict the fact that Africans were never totally enslaved the way Indians were. Fewer than 30% of Africans were enslaved. 100% of Indians were slaves. The curse fits Indian slavery. You are wrong.

*Indians are not descendent from Japheth, They are from Canaan -> Cush-> Seba

Indians are not Canaanites and were never in the Land of Canaanites.

No one has said Indians were Canaanites, So I guess you'll repeat that stupidity forever. Indians are descendants of Cush's son Seba.

https://en. M. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Ham_(son_of_Noah)
Ham's descendants are interpreted by Flavius Josephus and others as having populated Africa and adjoining parts of Asia.

The word Cush means black.

Thanks, And his son Saba was also black.

*Noah and his sons were black.

Noah was white.

You think so because you are racist and uneducated.

The curse turned Ham and his children Black.

The curse was not on Ham or his other children. Learn to read.

The hot sun turned them genetically black permanently.

That same hot son shone on Noah for longer idiot. I would bring up the science of genetics but you're uneducated.

*The historical documents I cited support the above.

The historical document you cited was from 500 BC where Herodotus a Greek geographer visited Sindh which is in Pakistan and not India.

He did not need to visit India. You haven't visited Africa.

His account has been discredited by modern DNA which traced Indians to Indo Europesn/Aryan ancestry.

Untrue. India DNA cannot be traced to Indo, That is illogical. Info is Indian. You have no case but your ignorant racism. Even your questions show your ignorance.

You confessed you are African.

But you can't cite. If I was African, You would still be wrong, And Indians would still be negroid.

You have been a delivery mule for over 15 years living in Ghana Africa a shithole country.

Doesn't change any of the facts about the curse fitting Indian slavery. You can't address that, So you talk about irrelevant stupidity.

Slavery in India perfectly fits the curse of Ham, Or as I like to call it, The curse of stupidity.

The Biblical curse of Ham only condemned Africans to slavery.

It condemned the sons of Canaan. Indians are the sons of Seba, The son of Cush, The son of Canaan.

African phenotypes are uniquely African.

That is how we know Indians are negroid and share the same ancestors with Africans.

Self loathing racists always try to revise history. But in our information age, It cannot be done as it was in days past. Bible history contradicts you. General history contradicts you. Science contradicts you.

Indian slavery fits the curse of Ham perfectly. It fits all three curses to the letter. African slavery does not.

You still cannot answer - Did Europeans ever dwell in the tents of Shem? You say Europeans are descendants of Japheth. The curse says Japheth would dwell in the tents of Shem. When did Europeans dwell in the tents of Shem?

Where did the children of Seba settle? Do you know?

If Africans were cursed, Why were so many of them never slaves. You just repeat that some were, But never address the question, Or the fact that ALL Indians were under slavery. Again, Indian slavery fits the curse, African slavery does not.

And the killer, "servants of servants" you play obtuse with. You can't address it, So you pretend it isn't there.

All the facts point to the curse being on Indians. Your shameful history fits the curse to the letter. It is clear now why Indians are ashamed of being Indians. Also clear is why you so dislike your fellow African brothers.

Indians were condemned to slavery, And on them the curse worked. For 17 centuries, Every single Indian was a slave. And dalits were the slaves of slaves.

Your ancestors are from the line of Ham's sons that were cursed. And finally we can tell from your behavior here that you are cursed. No one likes or respects you.

Indians were cursed. Not Africans.
Harikrish
Posts: 41,160
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/6/2019 3:20:36 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
The curse of Ham condemned the sons of Canaan to slavery. Indians are the descendants of Canaan and fit the curse perfectly.
Ham and his children were the first Africans.
Ham himself has four sons, Namely: Cush (Ethiopia), Mizraim (Egypt), Put (Libya), And lastly, Canaan (Canaanites).
Indians are not Canaanites. Indians are the descendants of Japheth(Madai (Indians & Iranic: Medes, Persians, Afghans, Kurds)

Nowhere in the bible does it say Indians are the descendants of Canaan.

Nowhere does it say Africans are the descendants of Canaan either. Some of our knowledge comes from history too. Indians are called Sabaens.
Genesis 10 gives us the start of Nations. Ham and his children were the first Africans.
Ham himself has four sons, Namely: Cush (Ethiopia), Mizraim (Egypt), Put (Libya), And lastly, Canaan (Canaanites).
Indians are the descendants of Japheth. Indians were never in the Land of Canaanites.

Indians are descendants of Seba, A son of Canaan, Son of Ham. They moved to south east Asia. Read Gen 10. 7 you idiot.
Genesis 10:7 does not say Indians were the descendants of Canaan. Seba was never in India nor were his descendants in India.

Disadvantage of being uneducated. Read your history moron. There is history outside the bible too.
You are quoting a Greek geographer who visited Sindh which is in Pakostan and not India. DNA study has traced Indians to the Indo Europeans/Aryans. Get an education, Nigger.

The Canaanites who lived in the Land of Canaanites were the descendants of Canaan.

All Canaan's children are his descendants idiot.
And the Canaanites were punished by God when Joshua destroyed the Canaanites. Read your bible nigger.

Joshua 11:14 The Israelites carried off for themselves all the plunder and livestock of these cities, But all the people they put to the sword until they completely destroyed them, Not sparing anyone that breathed. 15 As the Lord commanded his servant Moses, So Moses commanded Joshua, And Joshua did it; he left nothing undone of all that the Lord commanded Moses.

Read my citation moron. Experts say Madai means Persians, Not Indians.
Nigger, Indians are not Canaanites. Indians are the descendants of Japheth(Madai (Indians & Iranic: Medes, Persians, Afghans, Kurds)

Europeans and Indo Europeans were the descendants of Japheth. Read your bible, Nigger.

Yet Europeans never dwelt in the tents of Shem moron. Indian are negroid descendants of Cush.
The people of Cush were Ethiopians not Indians.
The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.

Repeat it as often as you like, Indians are the descendants of Cush, Who was black.
You are in denial. Ham himself has four sons, Namely: Cush (Ethiopia), Mizraim (Egypt), Put (Libya), And lastly, Canaan (Canaanites).

According to the Book of Jubilees (10:50-51), Madai (descendant of Japheth) had married a daughter of Shem, And preferred to live among Shem's descendants, Rather than dwell in Japheth's allotted inheritance beyond the Black Sea; so he begged his brothers-in-law, Elam, Asshur and Arphaxad, Until he finally received from them the land that was named after him, Media.

Indo Europeans settled in India.

Lie. Indos were already there and already Indian. The original people of India were descendants of Saba, The son of Cush.
You are confused Nigger.
You first said: Indians are descendants of Seba, A son of Canaan, Son of Ham. They moved to south east Asia. Read Gen 10. 7. Now you are saying the original people of India were descendants of Saba, The son of Cush.
Read tge bible nigger. Ham himself has four sons, Namely: Cush (Ethiopia), Mizraim (Egypt), Put (Libya), And lastly, Canaan (Canaanites).

Some want to say Madai represents Indians. That Indians were descendants of Japheth and therefore white. But. . .

So Indians are the descendants of Japheth. The Persians were driven out by the Muslims and settled in India.

And Europeans settled in Australia too, But native Australians are not white. Stop being stupid. India was already occupied when the Persians arrived.

The convict Europeans settled in Australia 18 and 19 century. Indo Europeans settled in India 1, 800 BC and account for 1 billion Indians.
Biblical scholars have generally identified Madai with the Iranian Medes of much later records. The Medes, Reckoned to be his offspring by Josephus and most subsequent writers, Were also known as Madai, Including in both Assyrian and Hebrew sources. Some scholars in more modern times have also proposed connections with various earlier nations, Such as Mitanni, [1] Matiene, And Mannai. In addition, The Kurds still maintain traditions of descent from Madai.

Which proves Indians are Madai because the Persians settled in India.

Are Australians Europeans because Englishmen settled there? Stop being stupid. Indians are negroid. Some of them have mixed, But Indians are negroid.

Indo-Aryan peoples or the Indic peoples are a diverse Indo-European-speaking ethnolinguistic group of speakers of Indo-Aryan languages. There are over one billion native speakers of Indo-Aryan languages, Most of them native to the Indian subcontinent and presently found all across South Asia, Where they form the majority.
Indo Aryans settled in India 1, 800 BC and today account for 1 billion Indians out of the 1. 2 billion Indians today. The balance are the Indo Persians, Muslims and British.

https://en. M. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Japheth
In identifying Japheth's descendants, Muslim exegesis more-or-less agrees with the Biblical traditions. He is usually regarded as the ancestor of the Gog and Magog tribes, And, At times, Of the Turks, Khazars, And Slavs. The Madai mentioned in the bible is not Indians, They are Persians, Today's Iranians.

Persians were driven out by the Arabs and fled to India where they were joined by the Indo Europeans.
That is how we have the Indo Iranians (Indian Iranians).

Then indo Europeans are just a mix of negroid Indian and European. Indians are negroid. Indo-anything is a mix, Not a race.
The only negroids in India were African slaves from the Bantu tribe brought to India. They are called Siddis and are going extinct because they are ignored and isolated by Indians.

There were already people in India when the Persians and Arabs arrived. Those people were Sabaens, The descendants of Cush, The son of Canaan.
The descendants of Canaanites were completely destroyed by Joshua.
Joshua 11:14 The Israelites carried off for themselves all the plunder and livestock of these cities, But all the people they put to the sword until they completely destroyed them, Not sparing anyone that breathed. 15 As the Lord commanded his servant Moses, So Moses commanded Joshua, And Joshua did it; he left nothing undone of all that the Lord commanded Moses.

There were no sabaens in India. The Canaanites were wiped out by Joshua. And Cush is not the son of Canaan. You are a low IQ nigger delivery mule. Your scriptural ignorance and stupidity is expected.

Educated experts contradict you. Many historical writers mention the movements of the sons of Cush. I told you that Africa was not the only place they settled.

http://www. Cogwriter. Com/india. Htm

Cush also had sons who went east into Asia rather than into Africa. Herodotus wrote:
Herodotus only visited Sindh which is in Pakistan and not India and the account is 500BC. DNA tests traced Indians to Indo Europeans/Aryans. Get an education nigger.

The word Cush means black and Ethiopians.

Yeah. We know.

Indians are not Ethiopians.

We know. They share a common ancestor.

Ethiopians are still living in Ethiopia. They never left Ethiopia.
ethang5
Posts: 23,680
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/6/2019 6:28:58 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
The original people of India were descendants of Saba, The son of Cush.

You are confused Nigger.

We will see just below which niggar is confused. Lol

You first said: Indians are descendants of Seba, A son of Canaan, Son of Ham. They moved to south east Asia. Read Gen 10. 7. Now you are saying the original people of India were descendants of Saba, The son of Cush.

Yes. The sons of Seba were the first in India idiot. They moved from Africa. The Earth had just been cleaned of people by the flood. India was empty. They settled and became the Indians of today.

Indians and Africans have a common ancestor. Read and learn moron.

https://www. Upi. Com/Science_News/

Where did the earliest Indians come from?

Modern DNA reveals ancient origins of Indian population

The origins of the peoples of the Indian Subcontinent remains a much debated topic among scientists. But new research has offered some clarity on the matter.

The latest analysis suggests India was populated by a succession of migrations from Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia.

Previously, A lack of ancient DNA samples has hampered the search for India's genetic origins. The subcontinent has yielded few well-preserved skeletal remains.

Marine Silva, An archaeogeneticist and doctoral student at the University of Huddersfield, Was able to skirt this impediment by using modern DNA sourced from people living in India today.

Their analysis, Detailed in the journal BMC Evolutionary Biology, showed India hosts some very ancient lineages and was populated by several waves of migration.

The earliest Indians were hunter-gatherers from Africa. They arrived on the subcontinent 50, 000 years ago. More settlers arrived from what is now Iran between 10, 000 and 20, 000 years ago, Shortly after the end of the last ice age. The migrants brought early farming techniques with them.

African and Middle Eastern origins are most apparent among the male genetic lineage, The Y-chromosome. The female lineage, Mitochondrial DNA, Suggests a large influx of people from Central Asia migrated to India 5, 000 years ago.


The experts say, Just like the bible says, India was populated by the sons of Cush. Feeling trapped by your stupidity confused idiot?

You can lie, Or pretend to be obtuse, But the truth remains. Persians and Europeans arrived later. The sons of Seba were already in India when they arrived.

The curse of Ham condemned all Indians to slavery. History shows it. Science shows it. And the bible shows it.
Harikrish
Posts: 41,160
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/6/2019 9:57:21 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
The original people of India were descendants of Saba, The son of Cush.

You are confused Nigger.

We will see just below which niggar is confused. Lol

You first said: Indians are descendants of Seba, A son of Canaan, Son of Ham. They moved to south east Asia. Read Gen 10. 7. Now you are saying the original people of India were descendants of Saba, The son of Cush.

Yes. The sons of Seba were the first in India idiot. They moved from Africa. The Earth had just been cleaned of people by the flood. India was empty. They settled and became the Indians of today.

Indians and Africans have a common ancestor. Read and learn moron.

https://www. Upi. Com/Science_News/

Where did the earliest Indians come from?

Modern DNA reveals ancient origins of Indian population

The origins of the peoples of the Indian Subcontinent remains a much debated topic among scientists. But new research has offered some clarity on the matter.

The latest analysis suggests India was populated by a succession of migrations from Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia.

Previously, A lack of ancient DNA samples has hampered the search for India's genetic origins. The subcontinent has yielded few well-preserved skeletal remains.

Marine Silva, An archaeogeneticist and doctoral student at the University of Huddersfield, Was able to skirt this impediment by using modern DNA sourced from people living in India today.

Their analysis, Detailed in the journal BMC Evolutionary Biology, showed India hosts some very ancient lineages and was populated by several waves of migration.

The earliest Indians were hunter-gatherers from Africa. They arrived on the subcontinent 50, 000 years ago. More settlers arrived from what is now Iran between 10, 000 and 20, 000 years ago, Shortly after the end of the last ice age. The migrants brought early farming techniques with them.

African and Middle Eastern origins are most apparent among the male genetic lineage, The Y-chromosome. The female lineage, Mitochondrial DNA, Suggests a large influx of people from Central Asia migrated to India 5, 000 years ago.


The same study confirms.
Conclusions

Maternal lineages primarily reflect earlier, Pre-Holocene processes, And paternal lineages predominantly episodes within the last 10 ka. In particular, Genetic influx from Central Asia in the Bronze Age was strongly male-driven, Consistent with the patriarchal, Patrilocal and patrilineal social structure attributed to the inferred pastoralist early Indo-European society. This was part of a much wider process of Indo-European expansion, With an ultimate source in the Pontic-Caspian region, Which carried closely related Y-chromosome lineages, A smaller fraction of autosomal genome-wide variation and an even smaller fraction of mitogenomes across a vast swathe of Eurasia between 5 and 3. 5 ka.

Researchers believe these Bronze Age migrants were Indo-European speakers who populated the grasslands between the Black and Caspian seas. These male-dominated, Roaming pastoralists domesticated the horse and spoke an early iteration of Sanskrit.

Some 200 years ago, Linguists showed Sanskrit is related to Greek and Latin. Previous studies have suggested the same population of horse-riders settled Europe. The latest findings suggest Europeans and Indians share a common ancestor.


The experts say, Just like the bible says, India was populated by the sons of Cush.

The bible say Noah cursed Ham's son Canaan. The Canaanites settled in the Land of Canaanites. Joshua was told by God to slaughter the Canaanites down to every man, Woman and child.
The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.
Indians are not Ethiopians.
Meet some Ethiopians.
https://i. Imgur. Com/d18KASZ. Jpg

You can lie, Or pretend to be obtuse, But the truth remains. Persians and Europeans arrived later. The sons of Seba were already in India when they arrived.
You said that Seba was in India according to Genesis 10:7.
But Genesis 10:7 does not tell us Seba ever left Ethiopia.
So you lied.
The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.
Indians are not Ethiopians.
The curse of Ham condemned all Indians to slavery. History shows it. Science shows it. And the bible shows it.
The curse of Ham condemned Africans to slavery.
African slaves were owned and traded by Arabs, Romans, Portuguese and Christians throughout African history. Ghana Africa was the Trans Atlantic Slave Trade Centre of the world. Over 20 million African skaves were shipped out of Ghana Africs alone.

Read your confession.

Ethang5: Lol. Of course I am African, Why do you keep talking about America?
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where I run Bibles to countries which outlaw the possession of Bibles. Been doing it for more than 15 years to many countries. I have 3 children.
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where slavery is still practiced today.
Ethang5 wrote: "I'm not a proud African. And if I were, I would not lie about Africa's achievements. "
Ethang said: For His Majesty King Jesus? Full time slave here moron. Jesus has my all.
Ethang is a full time slave.

African phenotypes are uniquely African and only seen in African negroids.

Phenotypic Variations Between Blacks (Africans) and Non-Blacks(Others)

Blacks (Africans) have wide noses, Kinky hair, Black skin, High waist-to-hip ratios, Prognathic jaws, Long arms, And soulless, Vacant eyes. Everything about them is ugly.

Blacks (Africans) have the lowest IQ in the world (ignoring the equally disgusting and black-skinned Australian aborigines for convenience"s sake). The Bushmen clock in at around 50 IQ, The average Bantu achieves the mentally retarded level of 70 IQ, And the highly cultivated, Well fed, Well cared for, Partially White African-Americans reach 85 IQ. IQ has an enormous impact on lifestyle, Achievement, And behavior. IQ correlates to poverty, Crime, Mortality, And broken homes on one side " and education, Wealth, Human accomplishment, Long life and stable homes on the other. According to IQ and the Wealth of Nations, A country must have a minimum average IQ of 90 to run a technological civilization. It is not a far cry to say it is IQ that makes humans better than the animals, And it is IQ that makes some humans better than other humans.

The curse of Ham was clearly pointing to African slavery.
Genesis 9:25 The lowest of slaves will he be to his brothers. "
anonthesmallone
Posts: 6,210
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/6/2019 11:04:41 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Harikrish and EThang5, You both are mixing the curse of iniquity or witchcraft with the curse of Canaan. The curse of iniquity is lifted with the promise of translation in Malachi. The symbolic death curse of using witchcraft is 3 to 4 generations for those who practice iniquity or witchcraft. The curse of death on the planet can go on forever if God did not send John the Baptist with the truths to stop the curse of death, Especially during the third temple era.

The third and fourth generation means the Holy Spirit (3) and Self (4) without Christ. If the reader is new, They will need to find the discussions from many months ago. 1000 years means chopping of the carnal mind like those in Rev 20 did. All of this was discussed in great detail many months ago. Someone will be called to organize the posts into books and webpages for the insiders.

The curse of death has nothing to do with the curse of Canaan, Except both curses are related to the death of the dragon of black grace power. By not separating the two curses distinctly, You are both confusing the Bible facts.

Harikrish. By claiming the Land of Canaan was Egyptian ruled after Israel was carried away to different counties is very deceptive. I was talking about the Land of Canaan before God kicked Israel off the land for violating the rules of the future gods and goddesses Yahweh established in the Land. It was NOT the land of Egypt. Israel conquered the land. The Canaanites where swept off the land symbolic that the angels and gods will not live on the same planets in eternity.
Harikrish
Posts: 41,160
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/7/2019 12:25:09 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
anonthesmallone wrote:
Harikrish and EThang5, You both are mixing the curse of iniquity or witchcraft with the curse of Canaan. The curse of iniquity is lifted with the promise of translation in Malachi. The symbolic death curse of using witchcraft is 3 to 4 generations for those who practice iniquity or witchcraft. The curse of death on the planet can go on forever if God did not send John the Baptist with the truths to stop the curse of death, Especially during the third temple era.

The third and fourth generation means the Holy Spirit (3) and Self (4) without Christ. If the reader is new, They will need to find the discussions from many months ago. 1000 years means chopping of the carnal mind like those in Rev 20 did. All of this was discussed in great detail many months ago. Someone will be called to organize the posts into books and webpages for the insiders.

The curse of death has nothing to do with the curse of Canaan, Except both curses are related to the death of the dragon of black grace power. By not separating the two curses distinctly, You are both confusing the Bible facts.

Harikrish. By claiming the Land of Canaan was Egyptian ruled after Israel was carried away to different counties is very deceptive. I was talking about the Land of Canaan before God kicked Israel off the land for violating the rules of the future gods and goddesses Yahweh established in the Land. It was NOT the land of Egypt. Israel conquered the land. The Canaanites where swept off the land symbolic that the angels and gods will not live on the same planets in eternity.

Noah's curse and its fulfillment.

Canaanites

Canaan, As well as his descendants, Followed in the sinful way of their father. The punishment was placed upon the descendants of Canaan-the Canaanites. These are the people who were driven out of the Promised Land by the children of Israel. Consequently, They would be in servitude to the descendants of Shem and Japeth. Because the descendants of Canaan lived corrupt lives, Their judgment was righteous. When the children of Israel entered the land of Promise they saw the detestable things that the descendants of Canaan were doing. God blessed Israel and cursed the Canaanites because their practices were similar to their father Ham.

Historical Fulfillment

History records God's promises were fulfilled. The Canaanites were defeated and placed into slavery by the eastern kings Genesis 14. Later in the history of Israel, Other descendants of Canaan, Known as the Gibeonites, Were made wood choppers and water carriers under Joshua. Thus the predictions of Noah that Canaan's descendants would serve Shem's descendants were literally fulfilled and recorded in the Old Testament.
Indians are Indo European/Aryans the descendants of Japheth. Noah only cursed the Canaanites the descendants of Canaan the son of Ham. Read your bible you low IQ nigger.

Where are the Canaanites today? Not in India. Lol?
Canaan was the name of a large and prosperous ancient country (at times independent, At others a tributary to Egypt) located in the Levant region of present-day Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, And Israel. It was also known as Phoenicia.

Why did Ham's son Canaan leave Africa when Ham and his other sons settled in African countries?
4. Four Sons of Ham
1. Mizraim (Egypt)
2. Cush (Sudan, Ethiopia)
3. Put (Lybia)
4. Canaan (Land of Canaanites)

Canaan in Jubliees.
And Ham divided amongst his sons, And the first portion came forth for Cush towards the east(Sudan, Ethiopia), And to the west of him for Mizraim(Egypt), And to the west of him for Put(Lybia), And to the west of him [and to the west thereof] on the sea for Canaan.
Jubilees 9:1
And Canaan saw the land of Lebanon to the river of Egypt, That it was very good, And he went not into the land of his inheritance to the west (that is to) the sea, And he dwelt in the land of Lebanon, Eastward and westward from the border of Jordan and from the border of the sea. And Ham, His father, And Cush and Mizraim his brothers said unto him: 'Thou hast settled in a land which is not thine, And which did not fall to us by lot: do not do so; for if thou dost do so, Thou and thy sons will fall in the land and (be) accursed through sedition; for by sedition ye have settled, And by sedition will thy children fall, And thou shalt be rooted out for ever. Dwell not in the dwelling of Shem; for to Shem and to his sons did it come by their lot. Cursed art thou, And cursed shalt thou be beyond all the sons of Noah, By the curse by which we bound ourselves by an oath in the presence of the holy judge, And in the presence of Noah our father. ' But he did not hearken unto them, And dwelt in the land of Lebanon from Hamath to the entering of Egypt, He and his sons until this day. And for this reason that land is named Canaan. Jubilees 10:29-34.
anonthesmallone
Posts: 6,210
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/7/2019 3:05:54 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
The book of Jubilees is not in the Bible, And like the Book of Enoch, It was created to discredit Yahweh and promote the ideas of Lucifer. If you or EThang5 have studied a lot off the occult text, Literature, And stories, Their is a great need for you and EThang5 to get onto the sea of glass and have your own revelations in the light to separate fact from the fictional narrative.

Once you get to the sea of glass, The new knowledge you receive directly from the Lord will be invaluable for you to know the truth and know good from evil.

1 John 2:20-21
But you have an anointing from the Holy One, And you [can] know all things. I have not written to you because you do not know the truth, But because you know it, And that no lie is of the truth.

I can't really help you, But you have a strong feeling the curse of Ham exists still today, And it doesn't in the sense of the Land of Canaan in the Holy Land. You are misreading your prophetic gifts, Just like you misread my bankruptcy. .

What still exists on earth is the curse of black magic and iniquity of witchcraft, And that will continue until occult Israel sees the error and flips the coin over to have faith in Christ and the white grace power of God, Go occult Israel to use the 4 wheels of Ezekiel to overcome and be translated as gods and goddesses, Especially in the third temple era

It is very easy to misread the two curses in your heart considering all the ideas you have read from different source and because both curses are related the death. You have many sources of facts and knowledge, And it is important that you overcome and get to the sea of glass so God's can help you sort all the idea out and where they belong in mortality, Or eternity, Or in the trash can lake of fire, Symbolically speaking.

Considering who you are from your past life, You are much better prepared to sort the ideas all out on the sea of glass because of the knowledge you have. God can only work with the words and concepts in your conscious mind from natural study. He cannot work with an empty head of words and a lukewarm mind. I have never received an unknown word on the sea of glass that I did not already understand in the natural. The natural meaning of words always comes first. Therefore, The better the vocabulary, The better your training on the sea of glass will be from the Lord directly. The spirit-orb growth comes by becoming poor in spirit and lowly in hear like a child:

Matthew 19:14
But Jesus said, "Let the little children come to Me, And do not forbid them; for of such is the kingdom of heaven. "

If you have any questions about the 4 wheels of Ezekiel documented in the Book of Revelation, Please let me know. I have been charting a map to someplace unknown by others. But it is not a mystery to the elect of occult Israel. I am just a process and cause and effect guy. I can map the trail to the sea of glass, But you have to walk with God like Melchizedek or Enoch did. You have to follow the repentence bread crumbs to get to the sea of glass.
ethang5
Posts: 23,680
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/7/2019 6:28:17 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
Harikrish wrote:
ethang5 wrote:

The original people of India were descendants of Saba, The son of Cush.

You are confused Nigger.

We will see just below which niggar is confused.

You first said: Indians are descendants of Seba, A son of Canaan, Son of Ham.

All true.

They moved to south east Asia. Read Gen 10. 7.

When your reading comp is up to par, You'll get it.

Now you are saying the original people of India were descendants of Saba, The son of Cush.

Same thing moron. The original people of India were descendants of Saba, The son of Cush, Who moved to south east Asia and settled and populated India. You are wrong.

The original people of India were descendants of Saba, The son of Cush.

Looks like you're the confused one moron.

African phenotypes are uniquely African and only seen in African negroids.

True. That is why we see it in Indians. All non-Africans descend from a single migration of early humans from Africa.

Phenotypic Variations Between Blacks (Africans) and Non-Blacks(Others)

We know how blacks look. We can see you. A Single Migration From Africa Populated the World, Studies Find

In the journal Nature, three separate teams of geneticists survey DNA collected from cultures around the globe, Many for the first time, And conclude that all non-Africans today trace their ancestry to a single population emerging from Africa between 50, 000 and 80, 000 years ago.

"I think all three studies are basically saying the same thing, " said Joshua M. Akey of the University of Washington, Who wrote a commentary accompanying the new work. "We know there were multiple dispersals out of Africa, But we can trace our ancestry back to a single one. "

Each team of researchers tackled different questions about our origins, Such as how people spread across Africa and how others populated Australia. But all aimed to settle the controversial question of human expansion from Africa.

Early studies of bits of DNA also supported this idea. All non-Africans are closely related to one another, Geneticists found, And they all branch from a family tree rooted in Africa.

Yet there are also clues that at least some modern humans may have departed Africa well before 50, 000 years ago, perhaps part of an earlier wave of migration.

In 2011, Eske Willerslev, A renowned geneticist at the University of Copenhagen, And his colleagues came across some puzzling clues to the expansion out of Africa by sequencing the genome of an Aboriginal Australian for the first time.

Examining their data separately, all three groups came to the same conclusion: All non-Africans descend from a single migration of early humans from Africa. The estimates from the studies point to an exodus somewhere between 80, 000 and 50, 000 years.

"The vast majority of their ancestry " if not all of it " is coming from the same out-of-Africa wave as Europeans and Asians, " said Dr. Willerslev.

But on that question, Dr. Metspalu and his colleagues ended up with a somewhat different result. In Papua New Guinea, Dr. Metspalu and his colleagues found, 98 percent of each person"s DNA can be traced to that single migration from Africa. But the other 2 percent seemed to be much older.

Dr. Metspalu concluded that all people in Papua New Guinea carry a trace of DNA from an earlier wave of Africans who left the continent as long as 140, 000 years ago, And then vanished.

But when the last wave came out of Africa, descendants of the first wave disappeared. "They may have not been technologically advanced, Living in small groups, " Dr. Pagani said. "Maybe it was easy for a major later wave that was more successful to wipe them out. "

The moron's reply?

Blacks have big noses!

Lol. What a moron loser.
Harikrish
Posts: 41,160
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/7/2019 4:23:11 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
Harikrish wrote:
ethang5 wrote:

The original people of India were descendants of Saba, The son of Cush.

You are confused Nigger.

We will see just below which niggar is confused.

You first said: Indians are descendants of Seba, A son of Canaan, Son of Ham.

All true.

They moved to south east Asia. Read Gen 10. 7.

When your reading comp is up to par, You'll get it.

Now you are saying the original people of India were descendants of Saba, The son of Cush.

Same thing moron. The original people of India were descendants of Saba, The son of Cush, Who moved to south east Asia and settled and populated India. You are wrong.

The original people of India were descendants of Saba, The son of Cush.

How is Saba both the son of Canaan and Cush, nigger?
Seba never left Ethiopia. Indians are not Ethiopians, nigger.

The different theories about the origin of species.

Evolution theory 1

Humans evolved from a common ancestor; monkeys!!
In the beginning Darwin wrote in The descent of man: "The Simiadae then branched off into two great stems, the New World and Old World monkeys; and from the latter, at a remote period, Man, the wonder and glory of the Universe, proceeded.

Where did the common ancestors (Monkeys) come from?
Out of Asia: How Monkey and Ape Ancestors Colonized Africa
A new fossil discovery suggests that anthropoid ancestors originated in Asia and then rafted across the ocean to Africa

Evolution theory 2.
Scientists replace common ancestor Out of Asia monkeys with Out of Africa black monkeys. But when that didn't work they come out with the Out of Africa Blacks and dropped the word monkey.

No one is buying the out of Africa theory today. Africans living in Africa haven't changed much. And those living out of Africa have the highest school drop out rates, 30% of Africans are in prison, 30% of Africans are inemployed. The rest are either drug dealers or pimps with some exceptions. All this proves Africans are genetically different with lower IQ than non Africans and their dark skin and negroid appearance can be traced back to subhuman species now established as African ancestors.
Even interracial marriages cannot wean out the negroid because negroid genes are dominant genes. It puts back the jungle instincts in every negroid generation.

I just proved to you the African race has not evolved. They are basically where they were when they started out. Low IQ, jungle culture. Whereas all other races evolved and show little resemblance to dark skinned negroid appearance of subhuman species.
These links were artificially established to explain the evolution of race. But it was an over simplistic view.

We don't see a similar pattern of migration with animals and many are region specific.
There is even an out of Australia theory and an out of Israel theory. The fact the rest of the world didn't turn out like Africans makes it obvious we did not all start out as Africans.

If you take the Genesis account. The garden of Eden was not in Africa. The Jews being the diect descendants of Adam and Eve were not Africans. In fact Christians trace the lineage of Africans to Ham.

The First Race: Out-of-*Australia, Not Africa!
http://nationalunitygovernment.org...

Take it from the experts. The only Africans out of Africa were slaves. Their negroid appearance and dark skin was unknown to the free world.
After scientists discovered Africans had lower IQ than non Africans. The out of Africa theory lost credibility because dumb people are only found in Africa. Ancient civilizations were far more advanced than even modern Africa today. Nothing good ever came out of Africa.

But we know Blacks themselves are self loathing and hate being black. Now we have a black self loathing negroid Ethang5 promoting the Out of Africa theory which suggests we are all Africans. Lol!

Read nigger Ethang5's disparaging comments about his African country and African people.

Ethang5: Lol. Of course I am African, Why do you keep talking about America?
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where I run Bibles to countries which outlaw the possession of Bibles. Been doing it for more than 15 years to many countries. I have 3 children.
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where slavery is still practiced today.
Ethang5 wrote: "I'm not a proud African. And if I were, I would not lie about Africa's achievements. "
Ethang said: For His Majesty King Jesus? Full time slave here moron. Jesus has my all.
Ethang is a full time slave.

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where the literacy rate is below 50%, And I see people do here, Exactly what this "test" is doing. Taking advantage of ignorance.
Ethang5 said: I live close to where Boko Haram operates. There are no Boko Harams in America.
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where slavery is still practiced today.

Ethang5 wrote: I think you're right. I live in Ghana, West Africa, And if you were to try the "God is evil" argument here people would simply think you were an obnoxious boob.

Ethang5 wrote: Long ago, I had a night job where I worked with this guy much like Im-Em here. He told me that reality was whatever he believed.

Ethang5 wrote: I currently live in a country with a society much closer to the 1st century than the society in which you live. I have seen people get burned alive in the street, And people a few blocks away never hear of it.

Ethang5 wrote: Having been kicked off more than a hundred forums, I understand your trepidation. But I don't think you have too much to worry about. The overwhelming majority of posters here would not want you banned or censured.

Ethang5 wrote:. I live among people like the Piraha. They have to work ALL DAY. Do you believe they are working only when hunting or gathering food? Do you think they have running water? Or electricity? They sleep often during the day because it is hot and they must work for everything. There are no stores, Only rudimentary tools. Please. Working only 15 hours a week would kill them, As evidenced by their dwindling tribe.

Ethang5 wrote: In Ghana where I live, The JW's are more aggressive. I always talk to them and let them know the many times when their organization made false prophesies about the end of the world.

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Ghana, Some of what is custom here would be child abuse in America, Yet the Ghanaian parents aren't in jail.

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Ghana, West Africa. If you think life is miserable, Come here and I will open your eyes. I will show you people who will infect you with their joy. Yet they aren't all Pollyannas. Some are cynics who have simply decided not to allow their environment to define them.

Ethang5 wrote: I have an electrified fence at my house. I had it put in. Is it wrong that I warn visitors to my home about it? If a visitor ignores my warning, Can he claim because I installed it, I'm responsible for his injury after having not believed my warning?
I work with prisoners. Many say they are Christian because the think it will facilitate their case with the parole board.

Ethang5 wrote: This is like when whites tell blacks, Why are you always on about racism? A black person's ethnicity is obvious.

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where I run Bibles to countries which outlaw the possession of Bibles. Been doing it for more than 15 years to many countries. I have 3 children.

Your said your father was a black negroid atheist. But you turned out to be a black negroid slave delivering bibles for free whereas your position as an atheist was that religion was a crutch for the mentally weak. "

Karmic Justice combined with the curse of Ham and Slavery by Arabs produced Black shitholes.
Wow! Africans are cursed in 4 religions. Judaism, Islam, Christianity and Hinduism.
anonthesmallone
Posts: 6,210
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/7/2019 9:42:45 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Harikrish, As explained on the other thread, You are confused about the two curses of slavery, Confusing mortal slavery with eternal slavery. Contact me at my email recorded at DDO, And we can discuss further privately. The black skin has nothing to do with slavery except the blacks are genetically designed to be happy workers that do not love power.
Harikrish
Posts: 41,160
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/7/2019 9:58:26 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
anonthesmallone wrote:
Harikrish, As explained on the other thread, You are confused about the two curses of slavery, Confusing mortal slavery with eternal slavery. Contact me at my email recorded at DDO, And we can discuss further privately. The black skin has nothing to do with slavery except the blacks are genetically designed to be happy workers that do not love power.

Ethang proved he is both a mortal and moral slave and with his over 15 years as a slave for King Jesus is looking forward to eternal slavery as well. I don't know if one can be genetically designed to be happy workers/slaves that do not love power. Ethang goes about calling everyone moron because he feels empowered by his slave religion.
anonthesmallone
Posts: 6,210
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/8/2019 12:45:05 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
Yahweh stays away from name calling since each spirit-orb is His child of creation. No one knows who you or EThang5 really are on the internet. Your personal life is hidden. A person must trust what you say on the internet is true about your personal lives. Yahweh knows. He tells me the truth.
ethang5
Posts: 23,680
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/8/2019 1:04:11 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
Harikrish wrote:
anonthesmallone wrote:

Harikrish, As explained on the other thread, You are confused. . . .

Wow. A guy you said has mental problems just called you confused.

The black skin has nothing to do with slavery. . .

That fact cannot sink through the morons thick skull. He loves racism more than he values truth.

Ethang proved he is both a mortal and moral slave and with his over 15 years as a slave for King Jesus is looking forward to eternal slavery as well.

Yes! I love to hear me be described as a slave of King Jesus! You used to leave out who I was a slave of. It makes a difference. You, For example, Are a slave to sin and the demon Krishna, I am a slave of His mighty beatific excellence, King Jesus.

I don't know if one can be genetically designed to be happy workers/slaves that do not love power. Ethang goes about calling everyone moron because he feels empowered by his slave religion.

I call you a moron. Not everyone. Almost everyone calls you a moron though. Remember the thread, "Hindu Hari's Friends Speak Up"?

My religion doesn't have a slave making caste system that was so vile, The very country in which the religion was born had to outlaw it.
Harikrish
Posts: 41,160
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/8/2019 7:42:09 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
Harikrish wrote:
anonthesmallone wrote:

Harikrish, As explained on the other thread, You are confused. . . .

Wow. A guy you said has mental problems just called you confused.

The black skin has nothing to do with slavery. . .

That fact cannot sink through the morons thick skull. He loves racism more than he values truth.

Ethang proved he is both a mortal and moral slave and with his over 15 years as a slave for King Jesus is looking forward to eternal slavery as well.

Yes! I love to hear me be described as a slave of King Jesus! You used to leave out who I was a slave of. It makes a difference. You, For example, Are a slave to sin and the demon Krishna, I am a slave of His mighty beatific excellence, King Jesus.

I don't know if one can be genetically designed to be happy workers/slaves that do not love power. Ethang goes about calling everyone moron because he feels empowered by his slave religion.

I call you a moron. Not everyone. Almost everyone calls you a moron though. Remember the thread, "Hindu Hari's Friends Speak Up"?

My religion doesn't have a slave making caste system that was so vile, The very country in which the religion was born had to outlaw it.

Christianity's role in African slavery was justified by the biblical curse of Ham. Harikrish explains the How's and Whys for their justification.
Several research material is presented to help the readers arrive at the desired conclusion and, Also to justify the amount of time and effort put to ascertain a biblical truth which is far reaching and racially sensitive because it details the sources and methods that went into this research, To make it relevant.

For example: My exchanges with Ethang a black negroid Ghanaian who lives and works in Africa has contributed a lot to my research on the evidence of the Biblical curse of Ham on Africans and its continued presence.
Ethang5 posted he was physically and sexually attracted to pictures of an older Indian woman he assumed was my grandma. He then lowered his expectation by inquiring about Indian temple dancers who might be available as prostitutes and finally settled for virgin cows whose backside he would love to lick. It is this perverted nature that earned them the curse of Ham. Hebrew Scriptures tell us Noah was sodomized by Hams children.

If you read my research material you would have found it contains citations and peer published studies. When I introduce Ethang, I use a collection of his own words and quotes he posted on this very site DDO which contain his disparaging comment about his country Ghana Africa and his people Ghanaian Africans.
The rebuttals I use are also based on Ethang's retraction of his fabricated lies. I have not called Ethang anything that he has not called himself and 'Trump's Africans are shitholes' was a universal declaration that was hard to ignore.
I also cite confessions from other self loathing Blacks to show Ethang that he is not alone. That there are other self loathing Blacks like him.
African slavery was blessed by the Bible and justified by the curse of Ham. From African slavery to African shitholes is where science meets the Bible. And the fact we have the Black Lives Matter is a logical conclusion these shitholes are seeking help.
As a biblical scholar and spiritual leader I have an obligation to draw attention to the damage Christianity has done to the generations of Africans like Ethang who through Gods design were created different which is explained in.

Phenotypic Variations Between Blacks and Non-Blacks

Blacks have wide noses, Kinky hair, Black skin, High waist-to-hip ratios, Prognathic jaws, Long arms, And soulless, Vacant eyes. Everything about them is ugly.

The psychological development of black negroids like Ethang5 are linked to the biblical curse of Ham. They remain cursed and it is reflected in their social rejection, Physical appearance and life decisions.
---

Harikrish's efforts in biblical research and scholarly discussion on a religion forum are objective because Hindus are not affected by the curse of Ham. . Other members could be objective too under the same assumption and in their participation in these scholarly theological discussions.
Unfortunately Ethang5 is both the subject and target of my research unwittingly because he is a black negroid slave living in Ghana Africa.

But we cannot argue with biblical and scientific facts by denying what I presented as The biblical curse of Ham and the genetic study of Negroid phenotypes. Now top that with the actual confessions of Ethan as both a negroid slave and his disparaging comments about his country and people and we have the ideal platform to study where science meets religion in the curse of Ham.

I have confirmed through research the curse of Ham not only justified African slavery, It was designed to control the Black epidemic.
Christians should be concerned the Black epidemic is growing as a consequence of the abolition of African slavery, Evidence the curse of Ham continues today. Black women care which is why most Black women abort their negroid babies to control the cursed Black epidemic.
Ethang should care because he is a black negroid slave living in Ghana Africa. That is the evidence the curse of Ham that Harikrish speaks of is Biblical.

Evidence for the curse of Ham.

Phenotypic Variations Between Blacks and Non-Blacks

Blacks have wide noses, Kinky hair, Black skin, High waist-to-hip ratios, Prognathic jaws, Long arms, And soulless, Vacant eyes. Everything about them is ugly.

Blacks have the lowest IQ in the world (ignoring the equally disgusting and black-skinned Australian aborigines for convenience"s sake). The Bushmen clock in at around 50 IQ, The average Bantu achieves the mentally retarded level of 70 IQ, And the highly cultivated, Well fed, Well cared for, Partially White African-Americans reach 85 IQ. IQ has an enormous impact on lifestyle, Achievement, And behavior. IQ correlates to poverty, Crime, Mortality, And broken homes on one side " and education, Wealth, Human accomplishment, Long life and stable homes on the other. According to IQ and the Wealth of Nations, A country must have a minimum average IQ of 90 to run a technological civilization. It is not a far cry to say it is IQ that makes humans better than the animals, And it is IQ that makes some humans better than other humans.

The curse of Ham was clearly pointing to African slavery.
Genesis 9:25 The lowest of slaves will he be to his brothers. "

Scope of research covered in:
1. Christianity's role in African slavery.
2. If Africans are subhuman, Is God to blame?
3. Why are there no great African achievements?
4. The curse of Ham points to African slavery and African phenotypes.
5. Ethang5 is the evidence of the biblical curse of Ham and our live exhibit of a Negroid slave.
anonthesmallone
Posts: 6,210
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/11/2019 7:20:47 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
EThang5 and Harikrish, Where did the first white man originate? Were did the first black man originate? Where did the first Hindu originate? Where did all the races come from? If you do not know the answer, Then your bickering and cat fight will never stop.
Harikrish
Posts: 41,160
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/11/2019 10:03:54 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
anonthesmallone wrote:
EThang5 and Harikrish, Where did the first white man originate? Were did the first black man originate? Where did the first Hindu originate? Where did all the races come from? If you do not know the answer, Then your bickering and cat fight will never stop.

Read your bible. Ethang is African a black nigger. Harikrish is Indo Aryan a white scholar.

Noah had 3 sons Shem, Japheth and Ham. Noah only cursed Ham and his children and Ham's children were destined to be slaves to Shem and Japheth and their descendants. (Genesis 9)

Genesis 10 gives us the start of Nations.
Only Ham's children were the first Africans.
1. 4. Four Sons of Ham
1. Mizraim (Egypt)
2. Cush (Sudan, Ethiopia)
3. Put (Lybia)
4. Canaan (Land of Canaanites)

As you can see those are African countries. Both the curse and hot sun changed the genetics of Hams descendant. This gave rise to the African race and phenotypes.

Noah's sons Shem and Japheth started the other nations.

2. Five Sons of Shem (see map below):
1. Elam (Arabia)
2. Asshur (Assyria)
3. Lud (Lydians)
4. Aram (Aramaic, Armenia, Mesopotamia, Syria)
5. Arphaxad (From which Abraham descended)
Note, This debunks the Out of Africa Theory. Shem or his descendants were never in Africa.

3. Seven Sons of Japheth:
1. Javan (Greece, Romans, Romance -- French, Italians, Spanish, Portuguese)
2. Magog (Scythians, Slavs, Russians, Bulgarians, Bohemians, Poles, Slovaks, Croatians)
3. Madai (Indians & Iranic: Medes, Persians, Afghans, Kurds)
4. Tubal (South of Black Sea)
5. Tiras (Thracians, Teutons, Germans, Scandinavian, Anglo-Saxon, Jutes)
6. Meshech (Russia)
7. Gomer (Celtic)
Note, This debunks the Out of Africa Theory. Japheth or his descendants were never in Africa.

Now you know why the curse of Ham only condemned Africans who were the descendants of Hams children who built the African nations.
Noah's curse and its fulfillment.

Canaanites

Canaan, As well as his descendants, Followed in the sinful way of their father. The punishment was placed upon the descendants of Canaan-the Canaanites. These are the people who were driven out of the Promised Land by the children of Israel. Consequently, They would be in servitude to the descendants of Shem and Japeth. Because the descendants of Canaan lived corrupt lives, Their judgment was righteous. When the children of Israel entered the land of Promise they saw the detestable things that the descendants of Canaan were doing. God blessed Israel and cursed the Canaanites because their practices were similar to their father Ham.

Historical Fulfillment

History records God's promises were fulfilled. The Canaanites were defeated and placed into slavery by the eastern kings Genesis 14. Later in the history of Israel, Other descendants of Canaan, Known as the Gibeonites, Were made wood choppers and water carriers under Joshua. Thus the predictions of Noah that Canaan's descendants would serve Shem's descendants were literally fulfilled and recorded in the Old Testament.
Indians are Indo European/Aryans the descendants of Japheth. Noah only cursed the Canaanites the descendants of Canaan the son of Ham. Read your bible you low IQ nigger.

Where are the Canaanites today? Not in India. Lol?
Canaan was the name of a large and prosperous ancient country (at times independent, At others a tributary to Egypt) located in the Levant region of present-day Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, And Israel. It was also known as Phoenicia.

Why did Ham's son Canaan leave Africa when Ham and his other sons settled in African countries?
4. Four Sons of Ham
1. Mizraim (Egypt)
2. Cush (Sudan, Ethiopia)
3. Put (Lybia)
4. Canaan (Land of Canaanites)

And Ham divided amongst his sons, And the first portion came forth for Cush towards the east(Sudan, Ethiopia), And to the west of him for Mizraim(Egypt), And to the west of him for Put(Lybia), And to the west of him [and to the west thereof] on the sea for Canaan.
Jubilees 9:1
And Canaan saw the land of Lebanon to the river of Egypt, That it was very good, And he went not into the land of his inheritance to the west (that is to) the sea, And he dwelt in the land of Lebanon, Eastward and westward from the border of Jordan and from the border of the sea. And Ham, His father, And Cush and Mizraim his brothers said unto him: 'Thou hast settled in a land which is not thine, And which did not fall to us by lot: do not do so; for if thou dost do so, Thou and thy sons will fall in the land and (be) accursed through sedition; for by sedition ye have settled, And by sedition will thy children fall, And thou shalt be rooted out for ever. Dwell not in the dwelling of Shem; for to Shem and to his sons did it come by their lot. Cursed art thou, And cursed shalt thou be beyond all the sons of Noah, By the curse by which we bound ourselves by an oath in the presence of the holy judge, And in the presence of Noah our father. ' But he did not hearken unto them, And dwelt in the land of Lebanon from Hamath to the entering of Egypt, He and his sons until this day. And for this reason that land is named Canaan. R32;"Jubilees 10:29-34.

The bible does not tell us all the humans descended from Africa. The Bible tells us all the humans descended from Noah after the flood and his children Shem, Japheth and Ham started the nations each carving out separate countries for their descendants.
Four Sons of Ham
1. Mizraim (Egypt)
2. Cush (Sudan, Ethiopia)
3. Put (Lybia)
4. Canaan (Land of Canaanites)

Five Sons of Shem
1. Elam (Arabia)
2. Asshur (Assyria)
3. Lud (Lydians)
4. Aram (Aramaic, Armenia, Mesopotamia, Syria)
5. Arphaxad (From which Abraham descended)
Note, This debunks the Out of Africa Theory. Shem or his descendants were never in Africa.

3. Seven Sons of Japheth:
1. Javan (Greece, Romans, Romance -- French, Italians, Spanish, Portuguese)
2. Magog (Scythians, Slavs, Russians, Bulgarians, Bohemians, Poles, Slovaks, Croatians)
3. Madai (Indians & Iranic: Medes, Persians, Afghans, Kurds)
4. Tubal (South of Black Sea)
5. Tiras (Thracians, Teutons, Germans, Scandinavian, Anglo-Saxon, Jutes)
6. Meshech (Russia)
7. Gomer (Celtic)
Note, This debunks the Out of Africa Theory. Japheth or his descendants were never in Africa.

Now you know why the curse of Ham only condemned Africans who were the descendants of Hams children who built the African nations.
Africans were owned and traded as slaves by the Arabs, Romans, Portuguese and Christians throughout their African history.

The Bible does not tell us Noah and all his children started out in Africa. It tells us only Ham and his children were the first Africans.
So the bible rebuts the Out of Africa Theory as the origins of humans.
anonthesmallone
Posts: 6,210
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/11/2019 6:38:36 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Harikrish, Are you concluding the white man and black man started in genesis 10 to answer the question of the origin of races? Do you assume God created the different races at the same time He (She) confounded the languages? Yes? No? What are you saying to answer the question I asked? Please clarify your thoughts. . Thank you.
Harikrish
Posts: 41,160
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/11/2019 6:59:42 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
anonthesmallone wrote:
Harikrish, Are you concluding the white man and black man started in genesis 10 to answer the question of the origin of races? Do you assume God created the different races at the same time He (She) confounded the languages? Yes? No? What are you saying to answer the question I asked? Please clarify your thoughts. . Thank you.

The survivors of the flood were Noah and his sons. They all spoke one language. Genesis 10 tells us about the start of Nations giving us an idea where the children of Noah eventually settled in. Genesis 11 tells us how and why language was created before the descendants of Noah scattered.
anonthesmallone
Posts: 6,210
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/11/2019 7:05:43 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Harikish, Did the white man "evolve" into white skin in the cold Netherland and the black man "evolve" in the hot son? Does this have anything to do with Genesis 10? What EXACTLY are the assumptions you are using from the many data points of sources you are using, Including the corrupted book of Jubilees?

Focus on your assumptions and paradigms. Are they based on spiritual adultery in your intimate life with Yahweh Elohim? If true, Find the ideas causing the sin and kill them.

Also, Spiritual coveting of spiritual gifts of others was Paul's weakness that he really tried to overcome, Complaining about his dragon and flesh conflict to his Luciferian friends in Rome ( the oh wretched man that I am passage).

When we cover the flesh we can be poor in spirit, But we can go overboard in coveting the spiritual gifts of other which is sin. No problem. We all have our own paths to walk and overcome. Paul died. He was not predestinated to be translated in His life by grace through faith. He did not reach perfection. But Paul will be reincarnate into the 3rd temple era to finish the translation objective.
Harikrish
Posts: 41,160
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/11/2019 7:15:50 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
anonthesmallone wrote:
Harikish, Did the white man "evolve" into white skin in the cold Netherland and the black man "evolve" in the hot son? Does this have anything to do with Genesis 10? What EXACTLY are the assumptions you are using from the many data points of sources you are using, Including the corrupted book of Jubilees?

Focus on your assumptions and paradigms. Are they based on spiritual adultery in your intimate life with Yahweh Elohim? If true, Find the ideas causing the sin and kill them.

Also, Spiritual coveting of spiritual gifts of others was Paul's weakness that he really tried to overcome, Complaining about his dragon and flesh conflict to his Luciferian friends in Rome ( the oh wretched man that I am passage).

When we cover the flesh we can be poor in spirit, But we can go overboard in coveting the spiritual gifts of other which is sin. No problem. We all have our own paths to walk and overcome. Paul died. He was not predestinated to be translated in His life by grace through faith. He did not reach perfection. But Paul will be reincarnate into the 3rd temple era to finish the translation objective.

Noah had 3 sons Shem, Japheth and Ham. Noah only cursed Ham and his children and Ham's children were destined to be slaves to Shem and Japheth and their descendants. (Genesis 9)

Genesis 10 gives us the start of Nations.
Only Ham's children were the first Africans.
1. 4. Four Sons of Ham
1. Mizraim (Egypt)
2. Cush (Sudan, Ethiopia)
3. Put (Lybia)
4. Canaan (Land of Canaanites)

As you can see those are African countries. Both the curse and hot sun changed the genetics of Hams descendant. This gave rise to the African race and phenotypes.

Noah's sons Shem and Japheth started the other nations.

2. Five Sons of Shem (see map below):
1. Elam (Arabia)
2. Asshur (Assyria)
3. Lud (Lydians)
4. Aram (Aramaic, Armenia, Mesopotamia, Syria)
5. Arphaxad (From which Abraham descended)
Note, This debunks the Out of Africa Theory. Shem or his descendants were never in Africa.

3. Seven Sons of Japheth:
1. Javan (Greece, Romans, Romance -- French, Italians, Spanish, Portuguese)
2. Magog (Scythians, Slavs, Russians, Bulgarians, Bohemians, Poles, Slovaks, Croatians)
3. Madai (Indians & Iranic: Medes, Persians, Afghans, Kurds)
4. Tubal (South of Black Sea)
5. Tiras (Thracians, Teutons, Germans, Scandinavian, Anglo-Saxon, Jutes)
6. Meshech (Russia)
7. Gomer (Celtic)
Note, This debunks the Out of Africa Theory. Japheth or his descendants were never in Africa.

Now you know why the curse of Ham only condemned Africans who were the descendants of Hams children who built the African nations.

Noah's curse and its fulfillment.
The curse of Ham only condemned Africans to slavery. African slaves were owned and traded by the Arabs, Romans, Portuguese and Christians since the beginning of African history. Ghana Africa was the Trans Arlantic Slave Trade Centre of the world. 20 million African slaves were shipped out of Ghana alone.
Example. The phenotypes of African negroes are very distinct and unique to Africans.

Phenotypic Variations Between Blacks (Africans) and Non-Blacks(Others)

Blacks (Africans) have wide noses, Kinky hair, Black skin, High waist-to-hip ratios, Prognathic jaws, Long arms, And soulless, Vacant eyes. Everything about them is ugly.

Blacks (Africans) have the lowest IQ in the world (ignoring the equally disgusting and black-skinned Australian aborigines for convenience"s sake). The Bushmen clock in at around 50 IQ, The average Bantu achieves the mentally retarded level of 70 IQ, And the highly cultivated, Well fed, Well cared for, Partially White African-Americans reach 85 IQ. IQ has an enormous impact on lifestyle, Achievement, And behavior. IQ correlates to poverty, Crime, Mortality, And broken homes on one side " and education, Wealth, Human accomplishment, Long life and stable homes on the other. According to IQ and the Wealth of Nations, A country must have a minimum average IQ of 90 to run a technological civilization. It is not a far cry to say it is IQ that makes humans better than the animals and other humans.
----
anonthesmallone
Posts: 6,210
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/11/2019 7:26:45 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
***Harirish. The survivors of the flood were Noah and his sons. They all spoke one language. Genesis 10 tells us about the start of Nations giving us an idea where the children of Noah eventually settled in. Genesis 11 tells us how and why language was created before the descendants of Noah scattered.

This is true, But the Bible does not mention races or skin color. Why? What language did they all speak? It could not be Hebrew for God said He confounded *all* the languages. What language did they use as one language?

Here is a big hint. Ra (Lucifire) is a Son of God and His language was never confounded. Think through your programmed assumptions from a million sources of men. What language did everyone speak on earth that was so dangerous for Nimrod to accomplish his goals of the Law of One had the Lord not stopped Ra (Lucifer)?

Again I ask. Where did the white man and black man originate? Think! Using only the Bible and not the ideas of men. Drop all occult sources designed to help Ra (Lucifer). Yahweh knows what He is doing.

Go occult Israel!
Harikrish
Posts: 41,160
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/11/2019 7:39:11 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
anonthesmallone wrote:
***Harirish. The survivors of the flood were Noah and his sons. They all spoke one language. Genesis 10 tells us about the start of Nations giving us an idea where the children of Noah eventually settled in. Genesis 11 tells us how and why language was created before the descendants of Noah scattered.

This is true, But the Bible does not mention races or skin color. Why? What language did they all speak? It could not be Hebrew for God said He confounded *all* the languages. What language did they use as one language?

Here is a big hint. Ra (Lucifire) is a Son of God and His language was never confounded. Think through your programmed assumptions from a million sources of men. What language did everyone speak on earth that was so dangerous for Nimrod to accomplish his goals of the Law of One had the Lord not stopped Ra (Lucifer)?
It wasn't what language Nimrod spoke that was threatening to the Lord. It has his vanity that brought about the wrath from God. Read your bible, Anon.

Again I ask. Where did the white man and black man originate? Think! Using only the Bible and not the ideas of men. Drop all occult sources designed to help Ra (Lucifer). Yahweh knows what He is doing.

Go occult Israel!
In Genesis 10 the start of Nations tell us where the black (Africans) and White(Europeans) came from.
The White Europeans came from the descendants of Japheth.
The Middle Eastern came from the descendants of Shem.
Africans came from the descendants of Ham. The curse and hot African sun turned Ham and his children Black permanently.
anonthesmallone
Posts: 6,210
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/11/2019 7:47:33 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Everyone on earth spoke one language. It was not Hebrew. What was the language that threatened Yahweh? Simple question. I gave you a hint.
Harikrish
Posts: 41,160
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/11/2019 7:58:47 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
anonthesmallone wrote:
Everyone on earth spoke one language. It was not Hebrew. What was the language that threatened Yahweh? Simple question. I gave you a hint.

It had to be Adamic the language that Adam spoke.
anonthesmallone
Posts: 6,210
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/11/2019 8:07:41 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
And what language was Adam's language that threaten Yahweh Elohim? Hint. Ra (Lucifer) is the Son of God. What language does He speak?
Harikrish
Posts: 41,160
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/11/2019 8:12:44 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
anonthesmallone wrote:
And what language was Adam's language that threaten Yahweh Elohim? Hint. Ra (Lucifer) is the Son of God. What language does He speak?

Adams language didn't threaten Yahweh. It was his vanity. Wanting to become like God knowing good and evil.
anonthesmallone
Posts: 6,210
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/11/2019 8:55:30 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Genesis 11:6-11
But the Lord came down to see the city and the **tower which the sons of men had built [completed].
And the Lord said, "Indeed the people are one and they all have **one language** [including Noah and his children],
and this is what they begin to do [built one city and pyramid for electricity and water using occult powers from God witnessed publicly to believe the philosophies of Ra (Lucifer about mortality mixed incorrectly with eternity based on the realities created by the Ra family of the Sons and Daughters of God];
now **nothing that they propose to do will be withheld from them** [to build thousands of cities and pyramids like before the flood to live the Law of One].

Come, Let Us go down and there confuse their language, That they may not understand one another"s speech. "

So the Lord scattered them abroad from there over the face of all the earth, And they ceased building [expanding]
the city [No mention of the tower. The tower was built].
Therefore its name is called Babel, Because there the Lord confused the language of **all** the earth; and from there **the Lord** scattered them abroad over the face of **all** the earth [before the earth was divided in the days of Peleg].

Your assumptions do not fit the Bible. Reevaluate your assumptions. Where did the white man and black man come from? The answer is in the Bible from Genesis 1 to Genesis 15. No other sources are needed. Men and religions do not stand of the sea of glass.

Go occult Israel!

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.