glowingdisco
glowingdisco's Forum Posts

Vote on my debate!Posted 7 years Ago

My debate is called "Abortion Defiles the Unspoken Rights of an Unborn Baby". and give me tips please
Forums Home > Society

How to be Funny!Posted 7 years Ago

Hello, boys and girls, ladies and gents, are you suffering from chronic unfunniness?
Do you continually get the punchline wrong? Are you tired of everyone rolling their eyes before the joke gets out your mouth?

THEN THIS IS FOR YOU.
HOW TO BE FUNNY

1) STOP TRYING TO BE FUNNY. BE WITTY INSTEAD. PEOPLE LIKE WITTY.
2) SMIRK. EVERYBODY LOVES A CUTE SMIRK. UNLESS YOU'RE UGLY. THEN DON'T.
3) WATCH KEVIN HART VIDEOS. SERIOUSLY. WATCH THEM. AND REALIZE HOW STUPID YOU ARE FOR EVEN ATTEMPTING TO TAKE NOTES FROM HIM. YOU SUCK.
4) ONCE YOU REALIZE YOU SUCK HARD (no pun intended, all you dirty hoes) START TELLING JOKES TO BLONDE CHICKS. THOSE BITCHES WILL LAUGH AT ANYTHING.
5) FOR THE GRANDE CHALLENGE, TELL JOKES TO OLD PEOPLE. THEY WILL BE YOUR HARDEST CROWD (SPOILER ALERT: you will fail).
6) LAST BUT NOT LEAST, IF YOU ARE READING THIS FORUM AND IS TAKING NOTES, NOTE THAT I, THE CREATOR OF THIS, HAS NO IDEA HOW TO BE FUNNY. THAT BEING SAID, I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. THAT BEING SAID, THROW AWAY YOUR NOTEPAD AND REALIZE THAT YOU HAVE CHRONIC UNFUNNINESS AND WILL DIE A LIFE OF MISERY AND IN A STOIC-LIKE ENVIRONMENT (HOSPICE IS WAITING ON YOU). [don't worry, I'll be there too......cracking jokes about how weird you look dying]
Forums Home > Funny

Only MassiveDump Can Use This ThreadPosted 7 years Ago

INTRUDER.

INTRUDER.

INTRUDER.

intruder.
Forums Home > Miscellaneous

Homosexuality unnatural?Posted 7 years Ago

At 8/27/2013 8:47:29 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 8/27/2013 7:33:16 AM, GeekiTheGreat wrote:
At 8/17/2013 5:00:33 PM, medic0506 wrote:
At 8/17/2013 10:31:38 AM, Rational_Thinker9119 wrote:
Homoxuality is found in over 1,500 species. Only 1 species has homophobes. Now who is unnatural?

"An example is the effort by Bishop John Shelby Spong to show that homosexual acts are OK because some animals practise them. As it stands, the argument is invalid. To make it valid, another premise is needed that states: whatever animals do is OK.

1) Animals practise homosexual acts;
2) Whatever animals practise is OK;
C) Homosexual acts are OK.

To prove the argument to be sound, that premise must be proved to be true. Conversely, to prove the argument to be unsound, the premise must be shown to be false. This can be done by showing that it leads to a ridiculous conclusion:

1) Animals practise rape and cannibalism;
2) What animals do is OK;
C) Rape and cannibalism are OK.

Now if one does not accept the conclusion, if one is logical one must reject one or more of the premises. As (1) is empirically true, (2) must be the false premise. So Spong"s argument contains a false premise and is thus unsound."

http://creation.com...

What you said is correct, but your saying it is "ok". When what we are trying to argue is that it is natural. Cannibalism is NATURAL, does not mean it is ok.

If by natural, you mean that the behavior can be found in animals, then I don't contest that sex between a male and a male, or female and female, can be found in nature. But what good does that broad a definition do for your argument, when it requires that all other aberrant sexual behaviors, that are found in animals, to be labeled natural as well?? I don't see how it helps the case for homosexuality, if in order to have it included as a natural behavior, you also have to include, rape, pedophilia, inter-species sex, cannibalism, etc. Doing so reduces homosexuality to nothing more than animalistic instinct, using whatever means available to achieve sexual gratification. It becomes a purely physical attraction, accomplishes nothing aside from fulfilling sexual desire of the participants, and makes it no more worthy of special treatment than any other sexual aberrancy. Granted, the consensual nature may give you the right to argue for sodomy not being labeled criminal behavior, in other words that it be tolerated by society, but that's it.

Animals do not rape, because animals have no way of consenting, so fix that.

I beg to differ. A couple years ago I was at my son's place watching a ballgame. He had a bulldog and his girlfriend owned a dachshund. We heard the dachshund yelping like she was being killed, and when we ran in the room she was being raped by the bulldog. It was very obvious that she was not consenting, and trying to get away from him.

Aside from that incident though, how is it that you know that animals have no way of communicating consent or disapproval, amongst themselves??

Evolutionists claim we came from animals, so I guess our behaviors are justified. oh the irony.
Forums Home > Religion

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.