imsmarterthanyou98
 
Online:4 Months Ago Name:- Private -
Updated:2 Years Ago Gender:Prefer not to say
Joined:5 Years Ago Birthday:- Private -
President:Other Email:- Private -
Ideology:Liberal Education:Not Saying
Party:Independent Ethnicity:White
Relationship:Not Saying Income:Not Saying
Interested:in Women Occupation:Student
Looking:Friendship, Networking Religion:Agnostic

God's Standards = the Only Objectively Reliable Standards in Life

Purushadasa
imsmarterthanyou98

An objectively reliable standard is a standard that is reliable regardless of any human being's or group of human beings' opinion about it. Any and all standards that don't adhere strictly to God's standards are necessarily concocted by a fallible human being or a group of fallible human beings, and are therefore merely the subjective opinions of fallible human beings as opposed to being objectively valid standards: Therefore any and all such ungodly human standards cannot possibly be objecti...

Debating Period
2 Comments
Updated 1 Year Ago

Define Love Objectively

Sidex
imsmarterthanyou98

The purpose of this argument is to define "love" objectively. I have created the theorem below that as not been proven wrong which objectifies morality. The link below it clarifies how the theorem was created. I will make a statement of love in regards to the theorem. You may counter that statement or you may counter my objective definition of "love". The con/against has the burden of proving me wrong in any aspect. The pro/for has the burden of not being wrong. My argument will include to you t...

Debating Period
6 Comments
Updated 2 Years Ago

Resolved: The government should ban smoking in public places

ThinkBig
imsmarterthanyou98

Resolved: That the government should ban smoking in public places. Rounds: R1. AcceptanceR2. Opening argumentsR3. RebuttalsR4. Defense/Closing Rules 1. No forfeits2. Any citations or foot/endnotes must be individually provided in the text of the debate3. No new arguments in the final round4. Maintain a civil and decorous atmosphere5. No trolling6. No "kritiks" of the topic7. My opponent accepts all definitions and waives his/her right to add resolutional definitions8. For all...

Debating Period
1 Comments
Updated 2 Years Ago

This House believes that a non-religious God is likely and this belief is reasonable

Francie123
imsmarterthanyou98

This will be a debate with one very strict aim - to argue whether belief in the likely existence of a 'universe causing and sustaining' being is reasonable. This debate will not use any arguments, at all, that require a believer to prescribe to Christian, Islamic, Jewish or other religious ideas. For example, the Bible will not be accepted as evidence. The idea that God is omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent - and therefore, for example, must exist in order for there to be justice in th...

Post Voting Period
6 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago

How does one prove the existence of color to a blind man?

ViceRegent
imsmarterthanyou98

Atheists are constantly demanding Christians prove the existence of God, but it is no more possible to prove to a spiritually blind man the existence of a spiritual reality than it is to prove to a physically blind mind the existence of color. It is not that evidence is lacking, for all of reality is proof of the existence of both God and color, but the blind man is literally unable to see it....

Post Voting Period
72 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago
imsmarterthanyou98
Debates:58
Lost:11
Tied:14
Won:33
Win Ratio:75.00%
Percentile:99.51%
Elo Ranking:3,571
Forum Posts:19
Votes Cast:26
Opinion Arguments:1
Opinion Questions:0
Poll Votes:20
Poll Topics:1
1 Album
Stuff
Updated 5 Years Ago
Disagree: 0.00%
Agree: 0.00%
AbortionPro
Affirmative ActionN/S
Animal RightsPro
Barack ObamaCon
Border FenceCon
CapitalismCon
Civil UnionsPro
Death Penalty
Drug LegalizationPro
Electoral CollegePro
Environmental ProtectionPro
Estate TaxCon
European UnionPro
EuthanasiaPro
Federal ReservePro
Flat TaxPro
Free TradePro
Gay MarriagePro
Global Warming ExistsPro
GlobalizationPro
Gold StandardPro
Gun RightsCon
HomeschoolingPro
Internet CensorshipCon
Iran-Iraq WarCon
Labor UnionPro
Legalized ProstitutionPro
Medicaid & MedicareCon
Medical MarijuanaPro
Military InterventionCon
Minimum WagePro
National Health CareCon
National Retail Sales TaxCon
Occupy MovementPro
Progressive TaxCon
Racial ProfilingCon
RedistributionCon
Smoking BanPro
Social ProgramsPro
Social SecurityPro
SocialismPro
Stimulus SpendingCon
Term LimitsCon
TortureCon
United NationsPro
War in AfghanistanCon
War on TerrorCon
WelfareCon