nate_sk | Debate.org

nate_sk

Online:	4 Years Ago	Name:	- Private -
Updated:	4 Years Ago	Gender:	Male
Joined:	4 Years Ago	Birthday:	- Private -
President:	Not Saying	Email:	- Private -
Ideology:	Conservative	Education:	Not Saying
Party:	Christian Liberty Party	Ethnicity:	Other
Relationship:	In a Relationship	Income:	Less than $25,000
Interested:	No Answer	Occupation:	Other
Looking:	No Answer	Religion:	Christian

2 Debates

Is it a good thing for same sex marriage to be legal in the US

Hello nate_sk I have been looking for someone to debate the same sex marriage law that allows people of the same sex to be legally married. I read what you said on the opinion section, and figured that you could be a fun and challenging opponent. This debate if you chose to except will have you placed as con. We will have 5 rounds with 2 days to respond with your argument. You may present your argument in the first round. If you do take up this debate, good luck and thank you for your c...

Post Voting Period

39 Comments

Updated 4 Years Ago

in what ways does Islam justify terrorism

I'm arguing against this notion. I do not believe that terrorism has any relevance to this religion. Hope someone interesting accepts this challenge. No 12 year olds trolling please. Enjoy....

Post Voting Period

22 Comments

Updated 4 Years Ago

Post a comment to nate_sk's profile.

Add as a Friend

Add to My Favorites

Block this Person

Challenge to a Debate

Report this Profile

Send a Message

Share with My Friends

Debate Statistics
Debates:	2
Lost:	1
Tied:	0
Won:	1
Win Ratio:	50.00%
Percentile:	87.66%
Elo Ranking:	2,009
Statistics based on completed debates.

Activity Statistics
Forum Posts:	0
Votes Cast:	0
Opinion Arguments:	3
Opinion Questions:	0
Poll Votes:	0
Poll Topics:	0

0 Friends

nate_sk does not have any Debate.org friends.

nate_sk has not added any photo albums.

The BIG Issues
This list identifies where nate_sk stands on popular issues. The choices are limited to the following:

N/O - No Opinion
N/S - Not Saying
Und - Undecided
Con - Against
Pro - In Favor

If you are logged in, you will also see green or red bullets next to each issue, which indicate whether you agree or disagree with nate_sk on that particular issue.

You can also click each issue to find other members that agree with nate_sk's position on the issue.

Disagree: 0.00%

Agree: 0.00%
•	Abortion	ConComments A nation can be judged according to how they treat those who cannot help themselves. Historically speaking, there are no references to abortion before the year 1400 B.C. As early as 2000 B.C., in Egypt and Mesopotamia, there are records of drugs that caused miscarriages, but the Egyptians had a high view of life, even mummifying fetuses. The Assyrian Codex in 1100 B.C. stated that abortion was punishable by impalement. Persian law in 600 B.C. called abortion willful murder. Note what Josephus, in his histories of the Jews, states concerning abortion, "The law orders all the offspring to be brought up, and forbids woman either to cause abortion or to make away with the fetus, a woman convicted of this is regarded as an infanticide because she destroys a soul and diminishes the race." One would wonder why it was so clear to the ancient world and yet so murky to the modern era! The United States is a country where 5,500 abortion clinics abort 30% of all pregnancies. In our nation's ca
•	Affirmative Action	ConComments DEFINITION OF 'AFFIRMATIVE ACTION' A policy in which an individual's color, race, sex, religion or national origin are taken into account by a business or the government in order to increase the opportunities provided to an underrepresented part of society. Problem: You cannot correct historical prejudice of culture_A towards culture_B, by now giving culture-B more rights and privileges than culture_A. This, in fact, creates inequality of rights (ie, pulling the "race card" is not a privilege originally given to whites, only non-whites; this is an example of inequality. How many whites do you know that pulled the "race card" when fired from a job? In fact, I have a couple non-white friends who told me they would pull the "race card" if they lost their job, and say they were let go because of the color of their skin....they were serious too.) Furthermore, it is sinister and evil to cause culture_A to feel as if they themselves caused culture_B to suffer long ago, and therefore must n
•	Animal Rights	ProComments Animals can't speak for themselves. If we don't, who will?
•	Barack Obama	ConComments Socialist. Anti-Semite. Anti-American.
•	Border Fence	Pro
•	Capitalism	Pro
•	Civil Unions	ConComments A mere forgery of what God instituted as male and female marriage. Get your own material, people. God has already claimed this one.
•	Death Penalty	Pro
•	Drug Legalization	Con
•	Electoral College	Und
•	Environmental Protection	N/S
•	Estate Tax	N/S
•	European Union	N/S
•	Euthanasia	N/S
•	Federal Reserve	N/S
•	Flat Tax	N/S
•	Free Trade	N/S
•	Gay Marriage	N/S
•	Global Warming Exists	N/S
•	Globalization	N/S
•	Gold Standard	N/S
•	Gun Rights	N/S
•	Homeschooling	N/S
•	Internet Censorship	N/S
•	Iran-Iraq War	N/S
•	Labor Union	N/S
•	Legalized Prostitution	N/S
•	Medicaid & Medicare	N/S
•	Medical Marijuana	N/S
•	Military Intervention	N/S
•	Minimum Wage	N/S
•	National Health Care	N/S
•	National Retail Sales Tax	N/S
•	Occupy Movement	N/S
•	Progressive Tax	N/S
•	Racial Profiling	N/S
•	Redistribution	N/S
•	Smoking Ban	N/S
•	Social Programs	N/S
•	Social Security	N/S
•	Socialism	N/S
•	Stimulus Spending	N/S
•	Term Limits	N/S
•	Torture	N/S
•	United Nations	N/S
•	War in Afghanistan	N/S
•	War on Terror	N/S
•	Welfare	N/S