"If guns made people safer America would be one of the safest places in the world. It's not. It is the opposite."
Guns do not "build a community", they do the opposite, they cause the deaths of everyone in your community. By having a gun in your house there is a higher probability of being killed because your 3 year old son accidentally picked up the gun than you actually using the gun to protect your family.
With guns people are killing kids in school and scaring them so much. Innocent people all over the world are dying for no reason. Having no guns is the solution to not have as many deaths. The military and police are the only people that should own a gun, to make the world a safer place.
Kids all over the world are feeling so unsafe to go to school because of all of the school shootings that have been happening. Like someone said on the no side guns don't humans, humans are killing humans. But the problem is the guns are helping humans kill people, and without guns not as many people would be dying in school and all around the world. I am not saying that we should eliminate all guns that would never be able to happen. But what I am saying is that we should eliminate all automatic guns. No human on this earth needs to own a gun that kill multiple kids in one minute.
Guns are bad for society because they are rarely ever used for self defense. Most people say they have a gun for self defense. Most people with guns just create more crime and violence. This is proven. America is not any safer just because people have guns. That is for the police, but police are also killing innocent people with guns. Who can we trust anymore? We need good gun control laws to protect the people of America. Though we have laws for gun control, they are not stopping anyone from commiting crime. Also people can steal a gun from a person who wanted the gun for self defense.
If guns where banned in the US, the amount of mass shootings, school shootings and death overall, will drop.
You don't NEED guns.
Many people would say they would, for protection, but if nobody had a gun, other than people in the army, then you wouldn't need guns for protection. It is a better option than arming teachers and preparing them to KILL someone.
Even if they put all this fancy pants safety stuff on it can still kill. My great granddad died because of a gun going of and that still had safety stuff on it. If you want to defend yourself from something bad with no weapon you need to use your mouth, Speak up and prevent crime. Yes maybe there might be a few that want to go out and make a raucous but if we ban guns, Then it will be a lot hard to kill. Also the other day I went to hunting and fishing with my Dad and there were guns just lying out in the open and ammo pellets right next to, Any bozo could just go up to it and shoot everybody in the store. Debate slapped down. P. S Sorry if I'm not good at debating.
The one of the worst mistake this country has ever made was the second amendment. This created homegrown terrorist. American people use their guns as a way to solve all of its problems. Guns in the Us are rarely used for self defense. Owning a gun is a privilege not a right.
Guns are weapons, and can't represent a peaceful society. Guns are used to take lives. How can these be good for society? The US's love of guns causes people to avoid preventing their shootings by using gun control. (Won't go in depth about gun control) If a nation has a gun culture, the 'gun' part should be discarded. Guns aren't good.
All people have the capacity for violence. Whether they use a gun or bomb is not the issue, either way the country loses manpower. Banning guns or heavily regulating guns simply makes it impossible for civilians who don't want to through the necessary channels. And those civilians who would rather be a criminal than not have one and those that are already criminals will find a way to get them as already occurs.
Because they are. . . So ya that's what i think but still i don't care what other people think of my "statement because it' s my statement and yours is yours so i say guns are bad for society. Whos with me! Because i'm with me! So who else is with me!
Japan doesn't allow guns and that makes Japan one of the safest countries in the world. I believe that for the world to be safer, Guns should be collected by the government so that one day, World peace comes to everybody. I wish the world to become a better and safer place to live in.
Tyranny always starts with confiscation of guns from their citizens, Look up the history of USSR, China, Romania (my country), Eastern Germany etc. Life is a dangerous affair and the honest citizen doesn't need a nanny state. Criminals will always disregard laws and they will always have firearms. The leftists somehow think the average human is not responsible enough to own a firearm, Only the people they pick.
Making guns a Illegal item won't stop criminals from buying guns, Even when the law abiding population has got a permissive gun law system, Criminals prefer (and most of the times only can) buy guns illegally from traffickers and clandestine ops. Drugs are the same. . . Drugs are illegal, But we can see their use rising anyway. . .
We have a right to keep and bear arms. Guns have prevented many crimes and other incidents. Just take a look at the countries that don't have guns. Crime is terrible. Murders are up. You know how Hitler eventually killed 6 million Jews? First, He's started taking away their guns, Setting them up to get massacred by the thousands. People say "Guns kill people". No, The guns don't go walk to Wal-Mart and shoot it up. PEOPLE DO. The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. I've seen arguments against that statement, But who do you think the SWAT officers that run in to a shooting are? Certainly not bad guys with guns. Think about it, Folks.
The total gun related deaths are indeed 30k, However the vast majority are suicides. If you take them out, It’s more like 10k. Even still the majority of that is gang related which gets their guns ILLEGALLY, There are states that have the least restrictions on guns and are considered the safest states. An armed society is a polite society.
Go onto youtube and search for “steven crowder guns are good:change my mind” It’s a series he does were he has an open stage at college campuses and he debates with people, So that to learn from another one’s perspective on the matter, And share his own views to the crowd as well.
Guns in themselves are not bad for society. Studies conducted by the CDC prove that statistically guns are the best for self defense and lower the chances of crime. Bans on high capacity gun mags and 'assault weapons' like March For Our Lives proposes, are not effective ways of ending gun homicides and crime. Guns are not whats bad for society, crime is. And once the nation tackles this problem from the perspective as such, there will be less illegal guns on the streets and more felons behind bars.
What should we do about guns or more specifically gun control? Well recently Australians gun control efforts have gained attention as a possible model for The United States to follow. Well, in Australia in 1996 after a lunatic used a semi automatic rifle to murder 34 people in Tasmania, the Australian government banned all semi-automatic rifles as repeating shotguns. Owners of roughly 700,000 registered firearms about a quarter of the countries 3 million total guns were required to turn them in for destruction. As my research shows this model will not work in the U.S simply because the U.S has roughly 325 million guns. This a magnitude more than any other country. Even if the Australian plan were tried and worked to perfection we’d still be left with over 200 million guns including hand guns which account to nearly 80% of gun crime. But gun confiscation has never worked to perfection and sometimes threatens to make things worse. The 2007 International small Arms survey studied 72 countries that attempted to enforce gun confiscation or registration on their citizens, they found massive deficiencies of these laws with only ⅓ of gun owners complying. If Americans defy gun bans at just the average rate that is acquired internationally then we should expect tens of millions of guns to flood into the black market. Chicago for example has some of the strictest gun control laws but yet, it is twice more likely to be shot dead in Chicago than in the Afghanistan war. Guns get banned, criminals will be thrilled, now they have the same illegal guns they already had and we the people are defenseless against them. According to the crime prevention research center “gun free zones” have been the target of more than 98% of all mass shootings. This high percentage is why such designated areas are often referred to as “unprotected and vulnerable”. While mass shootings are a complex issue with more than one action needed to prevent them, it seems unclear why gun control advocates would hold so tight to their ultimately dangerous “gun free zones”. Why is it so routine to protect our politicians, celebrities, and federal currency with guns but not our children? Owning guns is not a privilege it is our god given right to defend ourselves.
So guns are not bad if anything they are good. They reduce crime because criminals know that people are not helpless. Guns don't kill people, people kill people. Criminals will always find a way to hurt others, whether with a gun or a hammer. Guns allow civilians to act in defense to criminals.
Okay for one thing. Imagine a burglar comes into rape your mom. What do you do? Guns are banned. But this guy has a gun. What do you do? Throw a textbook at him? Nice try. You're dead. Guns are needed, even if they are banned they will still be so easy to find.