As of right now, for my debate class, I am arguing against the "Stand your ground" law. Going into this debate, I stood for the law, now that I get into it and look on the other side, I still stand for it. The concept of the SYG law is ideal and simply animal instinct, fight or flight. I will say, the way that it is being implemented and controlled is haphazard and not thought out. I have been looking hard into the other side for about three days, a collective 7 hours, and I still stand with the STG law.
Stand your ground laws are in effect just self defense laws with the retreat clauses. Of course some might think all self defense laws should be done away with but most agree with self defense laws. In many states to prove self defense they must prove they tried to retreat from the attacker. I say if you are attacked you should be able to defend yourself without having to run away first. If someone attacks you I think that is enough reason to 'stand your ground' and resist.
A lot of people will use this to back them up when they get stuck in the middle of a situation like George Zimmbermans case. I truly believe that he deserves to goto jail for a LEAST 20 years. Trevon Martin deserved to live more of his life. He did not deserve to have his life taken away at suck a young age
I believe any person should have the right to defend themselves in a situation if it is necessary. Being about to stand up for yourself is a right that everyone should have in this country. I do believe that this law should be legal in all states, No matter the party which runs it.
It is my right as an american to defend my family and those I love, from anyone or anything that wishes to do us harm, whether the threat comes domestically or foreign, it is my right. If I am taking a walk with my family and some wannabe thug tries to mug us you can be sure that I will use force to ensure my family is safe
With shootings so common these days we law abiding citizens must arm ourselves. If any law breaker can go out with a gun and shoot someone because they were busy "retreating " instead of meeting force with force. Then how many more innocent people will be murdered or injured. If someone is threatening your right to live they deserve what is coming for them. We are making ourselves more vulnerable by prohibiting our right for self defense. Those who shoot those unarmed deserve a penalty yes especially with the tragic event that occured in florida. The other people shouldn't be put in danger though because someone else didn't follow the rules. Stand your ground rules can save innocent lives.
I unfortunately live in NY where we have the Duty to Retreat and let me tell you it has cost more lives than you could immagine on the wrong side. Good people losse their lives out of fear of being prosecuted. All because if someone in the jury thinks you can retreat even if it is something rediculous you get charged with murder.
Without this law, we are vulnerable to our attackers and it's unfair to take away a form of self defense. If you are allowed to be where you are and are abiding by the law, you SHOULD have the right to fight back in any way possible, even if its by use of arms.
If an intruder comes into your home or on your property and you feel your life is in danger, Then defend yourself. But if you get pushed or get into a fight this doesn't work. The problem is that the law is too vague. A man just got killed for pushing a man who was yelling at his wife about a parking lot and didn't want to back down. He was pushed and pulled out a weapon and fired. Do you think he was in danger for his life? Who can judge that but the person, Which means no court can tell a person how to feel so it can't be managed effectively without some stipulations.
The stand your ground laws are bad all around. They give someone the right to commit murder. George Zimmerman was innocent because of this horrible law. He provoked Travon Martin to the point where Travon attacked him. Once Zimmerman realized he was slower and a worse fighter. He decided to kill him because he knew he had the right to because he was "defending himself". It is not a self defense law. It is a coward law and a fallback for commiting murder.