Are there critical flaws in the U.S. Drone Program?

  • Yes and No

    Should the United States Continue its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad?

    Are military drones being used the way that they were intended correctly?
    Are they being used on innocent civilians?
    Should the United States continue its use of drone strikes abroad?

    I believe that the United States should not continue the use of drone strikes on foreign enemy ground and soil. Because this is a controversial topic, there are many who think the opposite way and have many ideas and opinions.
    By sending drones to attack enemy forces on the front-line, it also means attacking their country. If you think of the world wars (WW1+2), what ideas pop inside of your knowledgeable brain? If the thought of the world powers, the Allies and Axis sides in the world wars, you're thinking on the right topic.
    If a country on either side of the war had attacked the enemy country, they’re attacking the whole enemy side. If an individual attacked Germany, that individual will get attacked by Japan and the rest of the countries on the opposite side of the war. If the United States was attacked, the engager would have gotten engaged back by the Soviet Union, Great Britain, and the rest of the countries in that power.

    When the projectiles land and set off, it doesn’t just blow up the intended targets, it may also blow up civilians and innocent people.
    When these weapons land on the targeted people, and kill them, what does the military, navy, or soldiers, captains, generals, etc do? Do they start singing these songs as if they were at a karaoke bar: Scream and Shout by the Black Eyed Peas ft. Britney Spears? Or be singing Time of our Lives by Pitbull/Ne-Yo? All because they had killed suspected terrorists? Are they happy? Do they just sit there not saying anything, sitting in silence knowing that they had committed a mass murder legally?
    Lives that could have lived and be part of a helpful organization or grow to be someone leading a country when they need a leader most? And drone strikes are no help in the process of doing so.
    But does the military really know what they are doing with drones?

    Does the military know what problems they are causing? Rhetorically and Legally? Or things that should be illegal?

    If those cover-ups are true and legit, does the military know the pros and cons of their actions?
    Are they going to say anything to the people of the United States about how they think what they’re doing is right and what we are thinking is wrong?

    How long is Trump and the military going to wait until something happens and the conclusion is that we were right the whole time? Is that the time when Trump and the military going to do something?

    Are the nation’s leaders who we think they are?

    Thank you for taking the time to listen to what I have to say about this controversial topic.

    Posted by: TeyN
  • Yes, the U.S. should not be using drones in the first place

    February 4th, 2002, was the date of the first drone strike performed by the U.S. Since this first strike, the U.S. has followed up with numerous strikes that seem to kill all but their intended targets. In Pakistan alone, drone strikes have killed nearly 3,400 people since 2004, only 2% of which were high profile targets. This means that the 98% are made up of alleged combatants, civilians and children. In 2006 there was an attack on a supposed Taliban training camp that resulted in 86 civilian casualties. 69 of those caught in the strike were children. The terrible effects of drones on other parts of the world are not hidden, yet the U.S. continues their use because of their cheapness and unwillingness to send in actual troops. This leads into the philosophical idea of drones, Daniel R. Brunstetter, a political scientist at the University of California, states, “in the just-war tradition, there’s the notion that you only wage war as a last resort.” This is worrisome for many as the U.S. seems to use drone strikes for just about any cause. The ability to blow up anything at any time is taking the humanity out of war and placing it in the hands of some guy with a joystick and a computer monitor. Whether you believe in U.S. drone strikes or not, here is a quote by 13 year old Pakistani boy Zubair, “I no longer love blue skies. In fact, I now prefer grey skies. The drones do not fly when the skies are grey.”

  • Yes need more law

    When it comes to the issue of drones here in the United States of America there needs to be more laws and regulations when it comes to the usage of drones and the many things that they are used for. Without this the drones will continue to come out in a negative tone.

  • Scaring the citizens.

    Yes, there are critical flaws in the U.S. Drone program, because we are all afraid that the drones will be used against us. We are afraid of our own government. The government needs to find a way to convince the people that they will not be the target of a drone for having an unpopular opinion.

  • Not Accurate Enough

    I believe there are critical flays in the US Drone Program. I believe the Drone Program has led to many civilian deaths and this is being overlooked by our government. These acts should not be allowed or tolerated. The Drone Program is not accurate enough when assessing what is and what is not an enemy.

  • Many Terrorists Killed

    We are at war with terror, and fighting a war means casualties. Unfortunately, drones have killed civilians. However, drones save American lives in that the pilots are thousands of miles away instead of in the cockpit getting shot at. Even though they fly lower, not many drones have been shot down due to their maneuverability. The U.S. drone program is just fine and their use should be expanded to the civilian market as the technology becomes more reliable.

Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.