yes, he was a very smart man and did a whole lot of good in china for the people there, and a lot of his ideas are still out there in the world. He was a man that knew how to lead people, and needs to always be taught in schools.
Support sans eh eh eh eh eh eh eh ehe eh eh ehe eh ehe ehe eheeh eh eh eh eh eh eh ehe eh eh ehe eh ehe ehe ehe eh eh eh eh eh eh eh ehe eh eh ehe eh ehe ehe ehe eh eh eh eh
He was traumatized from a rough childhood; causing him to grow into the most feared military strategist the world has ever seen. He promoted a system of merit rather than one of birth. He was tolerant of different religions including: Nestorian Christianity, Buddhism, and Islam. He created one of the first international postal systems.
Genghis Khan cared about his people, was an intelligent ruler with a keen eye for talent, was a quick learner, faced dangers, and boldly stood before death numerous times. Whatever wrongs he did were a single accident, after being consumed in the pain for his dying family members. He is the reason Mongolia stands as a country today.
He had established on the largest empires in history. He helped to unify people, and you can't exactly blame him for killing so many people. He had given them a chance so they could join his forces before he conquered their land, when they said no he destroyed them and took over. Of course people get killed in a war what do you expect
1. Mongol Empire practiced religious tolerance
2. Treated their soldiers well; promote based on merit than birth
3. Established a quick, vast postal system
4. Enforced universal rule of law
5. Women Benefits
a. controlling domestic affairs
b. could divorce their husband
c. they were trusted advisors
d. have better ranks than most men
6. Uniting princedoms
a. united a dozen Slavic principalities and cities into one large Russian state
b. forged the country of China by waving together the remnants of the Sung dynasty, Tangut Kingdom, Tibet, and Uighur lands
When Genghis khan was on his conquest and when he asked for them to surrendered and when they did he gave them rights and respected their beliefs. I know what you are going to say only if they surrendered he gave them rights well he gave them a chance and they did not take it so that's why he didn't give them rights
Khan helped unify Russia by developing their tax system and unifying them and their army. He also helped them by not forcing his religion on them, but let them keep what ever they practiced. Last, he gave places in Russia, like Moscow, a political say in his army. Overall Genghis did good more than bad.
Well if you think about it and our country's they are doing what he did to help hid people and he also gave them a chance to plead for their live and show loyalty and he united the Mongolian's so he is not the worst but yes we all make mistakes
He killed 40 million people including 60 thousand women ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
He killed everything he was a bad bad bad bad bad man ha ahah ah ha ah cats and dogs do not need to be killed for no reason this is abuse, he is an evil man who shouoldnt be able to kill innocent cute little small cute animals haha
Genghis Khan's legacy in history is that of a marauder, rapist, pillager, and the commander of one of the most violent militaries in human history. The fact that advances or innovations came about during his time period does not make him a good person or overcome his personal shortcomings which were pretty serious.
Genghis Khan was a war general and a murderer. I don't know how anybody can say he did more good than harm. I think that even though it was the way of the world during that time, it is still logical to say that people would have preferred that he did not exist.
I will give Genghis Khan credit for a couple of things: he was a brilliant military leader and, under his reign, there were a lot of amazing tecnological innovations and artwork. With that said, I cannot say he did more good than harm, because of the number of people he slaughtered.
Considering Ghenghis Khan's legacy I assume it would be easy to look at his work and the results of it and say that he did more good than he did harm, but in reality he was a conqueror. Ghenghis Khan had enemies, and those enemies feel at his power. No situation is all black and white. It's not about rather he did more harm or good, he did both, it's important to point that out.
Bad bad bad bad abd abd abad person very bad person bad bad bad killed may people no no no bad bad bad not good very mala bad bad bad bad bad abd abd abad person very bad person bad bad bad killed may people no no no bad bad bad not good very mala bad
How would you feel if you were hiding in a castle and he threw dead bodies over the side walls, Oh yea what if he drug you around with a horse how would that feel?? If you calculate the years he should have spent in jail it would be about 100,000,000 years
Whenever discussing historical events people tend to forget the dead. 20-40 million is a huge number but since we have no personal connection to this event almost 800 years ago, we can not feel its impact. For example, imagine if this debate were about if Hitler did more good than harm. Most people would instantly state no because of the personal connection we feel to this event.