Amazon.com Widgets
  • We Need gun control!

    Almost 40 people die everyday from the result of a gun. More than 30,000 people die from a gun in one year. Guns have the power to take away someone's life. A life. For what? Money? What could possible be more precious than life? Gun control laws don't want to take away guns. That's not practical. Gun control laws only want to make it harder to get a gun, so that people may use it more responsibly. These laws aren't only wanted, they are needed.

  • Yes it does

    Yes it does The second amendment states, "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." People still have the right to have a gun, even if that right is regulated. Americans still have freedom of speech even though they can't yell fire in a theater.

  • Lllllllll n n

    Lllllllll
    m m m m m mmmmmmmmmmm m m m mm mm mm m m m m m mmm m m m m m m m m m m m mm m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m

  • Original Second Amendment

    The founding fathers intended this law so that the people would be able to rise up against the government if necessary. Now, we'd need tanks and drones and nuclear warheads to even take on the United States Government. Should we arm all civilians with such weapons? Absolutely not. We shouldn't treat guns any differently.

  • Yes it does.

    This world is dangerous, weak gun control laws are destroying this world in about the last twenty years there ha been about sixty mass shootings, and yet supporters are still con-gun control. When a society doesnt bat an eyelash at having about thirty little children massacred, we all as a society need help,l

  • Where do we draw the line?

    Where to draw the line with respect to arms regulation is a subject rational people can discuss. Anyone who believes that people should be allowed to carry machine guns, RPGs, grenades, and even nuclear weapons, is just not playing with a full deck of cards.
    Some people have a practically religious interpretation of the second amendment and refuse to recognize the supreme court's rulings.

  • The Second Amendment is gun control.

    Pity the poor Second Amendment, the most misunderstood and misapplied text to be found in the United States' Bill of Rights. While it specifically does allow Americans to own and use firearms, it does not guarantee them freedom from regulation. It most certainly does not forbid any sort of governmental regulation.

  • The second amendment allows for gun control

    The second amendment states, "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." People still have the right to have a gun, even if that right is regulated. Americans still have freedom of speech even though they can't yell fire in a theater.

  • Yes for Gun Control

    People seldom actually read the wording of amendments and allow the media and lobbyists to tell them what it means. The right to bear arms does not mean that a person can keep nuclear warheads in their living room, for example. The second amendment only allows for the right to bear arms, it does not suggest that people can carry any weaponry they want.

  • Constitution

    People seldom actually read the wording of amendments and allow the media and lobbyists to tell them what it means. The right to bear arms does not mean that a person can keep nuclear warheads in their living room, for example. The second amendment only allows for the right to bear arms, it does not suggest that people can carry any weaponry they want.

  • Guns=life life = guns

    If we have a gun control law then it would cause an unbalance in the government and that will increase crime rate by a lot and that concludes our argument this is your best host possible and now this is Inferno King signing off for one last debate of my generation.

  • Guns=life By: the Inferno King

    Guns are the way of life I feel that if guns are controlled then the crime rate might triple just from protests alone. That is why we do not need a gun control law for it will unbalance the world as we know it.
    This is Inferno King signing off.

  • We need guns

    We need guns because if we don't we can easily get attacked and killed in are home on the street or at the mall sure bad people have guns to kill bet that is why we have background checks and if we do get ride of guns people can still get them because when was the last time you saw nonprescription drugs on shelves.

  • No gun control

    Need to have guns to protect us if we need it
    hi my name is hudson i like guns we need them to protect we need them
    hi my name is jeff i like cheese cake it is so good it taste like a cheese cake
    boi yea man guns

  • "The Founding Father's did not include weapons of mass destruction" And other fun stuff

    A letter was written to Thomas Jefferson asking if cannon would be allowed under the 2nd Amendment, in reply to this Thomas Jefferson essentially says in a bunch of old times words, of course. That sounds like a weapon of mass destruction to me.

    Also gun control would not do any good on keeping gun crimes down, considering the ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives) has gone out to say with evidence that, "8% of the nation's 124,000 retail gun dealers sell the majority of handguns that are used in crimes." ATF also showed many other ways that the guns were received including but not limited to, the illegal market, straw purchases, and theft.

  • Shall NOT Be Infringed

    The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. What part don't you liberals get?? The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that the right belongs to individuals, while also ruling that the right is not unlimited and does not prohibit all regulation of either firearms or similar devices.

  • Support the second amendment get ready of gun control!

    I agree so far with the no's! I support the second adendment and if there is law right now on gun control there shouldn't be! Because it doesn't say here ur hand gun and getting ready of rifle and what kind of guns u can own! It doesn't say that! Plus it doesn't say gun control on it!

  • It supports citizen military service. So go join your state militia.

    It supports state militias against too much centralized control, not personal rights to collect arsenals. The second Amendment was both a reaction against the british seizure of the state militias' weapons in the Powder Alarm as well as a move by the anti-federalists to curb federal power. It was only interpreted as a right to individual militarization in 2008.V http://killingthebreeze.com/we-the-people-the-truth-about-americas-deadly-gun-boom/

  • It supports citizen military service. So go join your state militia.

    It supports state militias against too much centralized control, not personal rights to collect arsenals. The second Amendment was both a reaction against the british seizure of the state militias' weapons in the Powder Alarm as well as a move by the anti-federalists to curb federal power. It was only interpreted as a right to individual militarization in 2008.V http://killingthebreeze.com/we-the-people-the-truth-about-americas-deadly-gun-boom/

  • No on gun control

    The 2A should not be infringed ... Gun control does just that, period.
    For those that make the excuse that armed citizens couldn't stop the US Military. Just for a moment read the News headlines and apply it to the topic. The Syrian rebels with limited heavy weapons has been a taking territory against better equipped and train government forces. It is the WILL of the armed oppressed that continues to survive for years.
    1. Our military are volunteers not draftee. They sworn an oath first to US Constitution not to a political zealot.
    2. Our military, on their own, has won a war since 1926, American Indian war and the Indians.
    State side Military bases nearly totally rely on the civilian populace for basic support operations. Only those Military bases in Blue State might maintain State support. But where are the major of the combat and training centers? Mainly in Red States.
    3. There are more armed civilians then the military, even if you include the navy and marines. Not to mention, the armed citizens have much more practical experience with their firearm then the total military population.
    4. The armed citizen population a many more seasoned veterans and retiree then currently in the military stateside.

    In many states, body armor is not illegal to own, and likely better quality then what the current military.

    If the gun control zealots keep pushing, the SCOTUS might declare Ammosexuals a protected class ...Then the Gun Control Activists would be Screwed .. Bi time.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.
>