Amazon.com Widgets
  • The world needs the UN

    The UN helps other country and they help even others. If we don't have the UN people are going to fight and there will be more fights and wars going or world war III will happen. UN has important meetings that can even help us. It doesn't make sense that we don't need the UN. Do you want to die while there is a war going in your country? Of course not. That is how we need the UN

  • The U.N is critical to world peace.

    Since the establishment of the U.N, there has yet to be a large-scale war between any Great Powers, not even between the U.S and the former Soviet Union. While proxy wars continue today, they are declining at a noticeable rate. The U.N has also allowed smaller and underdeveloped nations to receive aid, and have a say in the increasingly globalized society of our world.

  • The world does need the United Nations, now more than ever

    The preservation of peace requires transparent communication and an international forum such as the United Nations is the most effective means of ensuring this. The majority of arguments against the United Nations come not from the belief that the UN is unnecessary but rather that it undermines the position of individual nations by requiring their contribution to the common good, or that the United Nations is inherently hamstrung by its structure. The former point is pure self-interest that has held the human race back for centuries, and the latter, whilst more understandable, smacks of throwing the baby out with the bathwater- reform is undoubtedly needed to make the United Nations more effective and less beholden to the objections of individual nations, but an abandonment of the United Nations means that international issues become even harder to resolve because there is no clear international forum for acceptable resolution.

  • The world doesn't need the United Nations.

    The United Nations can't do anything without the support of one of the member nations. Although a lot of people go to the general assembly and talk about important issues, they almost never make any real progress. President Wilson intended for the UN to prevent future wars after World War I. The UN has hardly been successful.

  • No, It Doesn't

    The world needs the United Nations like I need a lump of coal in my stocking for Christmas. The United Nations effectively is a body that puts economic pressure on large, developed nations, from lesser-developed nations. Instead of focusing on improving one's own lot, many small nations use the UN as a forum for handouts from the developed world.

  • Absolute power corrupts absolutely, And oftentimes makes even more corrupt banks.

    The United Nations, And its predecessors the League of Nations and the Triple Entente, Must take one of to paths- bureaucratic decentralization, In which they become paralyzed, Or try to take more centralization. This breeds massive amounts of power (meaning corruption), Which results in an economic inflation cartel which can only end in serfdom. Either the United Nations will continue to fail to do what it was created to do, Or it will succeed which will certainly bad for everyone but the cartel and the 1%.

  • It is so corrupt

    The united nations is so corrupt. It knew the genocide was going to happen in Rwanda but it did nothing to stop it because Rwanda is poor and has no resources. But when it came to saving Kuwait, the UN were more than happy to jump in because the nation is oil-rich.

  • It is so corrupt

    The united nations is so corrupt. It knew the genocide was going to happen in Rwanda but it did nothing to stop it because Rwanda is poor and has no resources. But when it came to saving Kuwait, the UN were more than happy to jump in because the nation is oil-rich.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.
>