Is ignoring video game age ratings bad for kids?

Asked by: SimpleAndrew
  • Yes, some kids are just too impressionable.

    Although this is essentially up to the parents to judge, I simply don't think that ignoring age ratings on games is harmless. Children can be very impressionable and might not be able to take video game content with just "a pinch of salt". Simply ignoring age ratings can result in young children being exposed to all the unthinkable graphic violence, nudity, rape etc which exists in many games today. Especially as games are getting more and more realistic. Yes it is up to the parents and how they deem their child but simply ignoring age ratings all together is an ignorant and potentially harmful step.

  • Nope ignoring games might be the best option for teens who are undergoing stress or anger from school

    Playing violent video games doesn't make you into a psycho or a murderer, there a safe alternative to getting anger out without causing physical harm. The games are fun and cooperative and most include a setting that removes blood and gore/language. They greatly improve hand/eye coordination as well as strengthening the mind

  • Age Ratings don’t Represent the Media

    Most age ratings are merely a sign or warning. You can’t just strictly go by the rating. Most ratings are the way they are because of regulation, but it doesn’t really help. Many times, the game/media include some content that is a part of it and would contribute to it overall. There are some media that employs things such as gore regularly, which should be rated highly, but other media should not simply because it contains slight “violence”. Furthermore, the censorship should be simply to help little kids to steer clear of much more inappropriate notions, not for others to not experience new things which would not influence their lives significantly. Good supervision is a very good thing, but age ratings simply restrict newer views and experiences.

  • ESRB was better back then

    Example: The game Earthbound for the SNES was E 10+. But now on the game simulator, it is rated T because nowadays, these parents are more overprotective because of what's going on all around the world. Parents nowadays are like: "I'm not letting my kids watch the live action Jungle Book because it is too "scary"" or "Pokemon will get my kids mind warped". These parents are probaly grew up in the atari 2600 gen.

  • It's about maturity, not about age.

    I've been playing violent video games since I was 8 and I've never attempted to reenact any of the actions depicted on a video game or on a movie, That goes for other kids I've grown up with as well and kids I know today. It also probably good for them because studies show that there's been a decrease in youth crimes since the release of video games. Beside, like Steven says it also limits stress.

  • No, most games are rated too high.

    Most companies over rate their games. E 10+ games can be played by children younger than 8 years old. Most games are just slightly violent, e.g. a wrestling game or something similar. Younger kids are fine playing them, but some parents are overprotective and don't let them play games that are perfectly fine.

Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.