Amazon.com Widgets
  • Yes it could be possible for same-sex people to reproduce

    Recently research has provide a evidence that we can reprogram skin cells into egg cells or sperm cells. It has been effectively work only in mice but in the far future it might be possible to be tested in human. However human anatomy is much more complex than a mice.
    If this could work on human then babies can be born from single parents or same sex parents.

  • Even if same sex reproduction would be possible

    In many questions if men could live without women or if women could live without men, people use reproduction as an argument to why not. This argument is no longer good since scienctists are now working on artificial wombs and artificial sperm, which could allow same sex couples to reproduce without the opposite sex.
    But even if we would leave reproduction behind, whe world would be worse both if there were no women and if there were no men. The both genders are different and good at different things and they are supposed to cooperate together. Women, for example, are much less aggressive and cleaner than men are while men are on average stronger than women are. There is also somebody who wrote that since some creatures could manage without for example oxygen that means humans would manage without women too and if there were no women from the whole beginning of life then it would not be a big deal. I do not agree on this one, since humans are mammals, and it means that they need both the male and female to reproduce, the male to fertilize and the female to give birth and feed, and artificial wombs and artificial sperm did not exist from the very beginning, so that would mean there could be no humans neither, and even if there were humans with only one gender then they would die out because of no possibility of reproduction.

  • Anything is possible.

    Practicallly, life is not possible without women now a days but if we talk from the beginning if their was no women than it would be possible that life would have been existed.
    During the evolution of the life, life existed in every form and no matter their is air, water, soil. As fishes and marine animals doesn't need air, few bacteria and viruses doesn't need oxygen that means life is possible in every condition.
    So, For humans also life is possible without womens.

  • What kind of question is that? Of course not.

    Not only would the world be a really shitty place if all women disappeared (yes, even shittier than now). We'd probably be plenty of years behind in technological advancement. But also, obviously, there cannot be life with only 1 gender. Were all the women to be gone, humanity would last until all of the men died off and then there's nothing. This question is silly since while women can't create life by themselves, men cannot either. We need each other to survive as a species, deal with it.

  • Even if same sex reproduction was possible

    In many questions if men could live without women or if women could live without men, people use reproduction as an argument to why not. This argument is no longer good since scientists are now working on artificial wombs and artificial sperm, which could allow same sex couples to reproduce without the opposite sex.
    But even if we would leave reproduction behind, whe world would be worse both if there were no women and if there were no men. The both genders are different and good at different things and they are supposed to cooperate together. Women, for example, are much less aggressive and cleaner than men are while men are on average stronger than women are. There is also somebody who wrote that since some creatures could manage without for example oxygen that means humans would manage without women too and if there were no women from the whole beginning of life then it would not be a big deal. I do not agree on this one, since humans are mammals, and it means that they need both the male and female to reproduce, the male to fertilize and the female to give birth and feed, and artificial wombs and artificial sperm did not exist from the very beginning, so that would mean there could be no humans neither, and even if there were humans with only one gender then they would die out because of no possibility of reproduction.

  • Even if same sex reproduction would be possible

    In many questions if men could live without women or if women could live without men, people use reproduction as an argument to why not. This argument is no longer good since scienctists are now working on artificial wombs and artificial sperm, which could allow same sex couples to reproduce without the opposite sex.
    But even if we would leave reproduction behind, whe world would be worse both if there were no women and if there were no men. The both genders are different and good at different things and they are supposed to cooperate together. Women, for example, are much less aggressive and cleaner than men are while men are on average stronger than women are. There is also somebody who wrote that since some creatures could manage without for example oxygen that means humans would manage without women too and if there were no women from the whole beginning of life then it would not be a big deal. I do not agree on this one, since humans are mammals, and it means that they need both the male and female to reproduce, the male to fertilize and the female to give birth and feed, and artificial wombs and artificial sperm did not exist from the very beginning, so that would mean there could be no humans neither, and even if there were humans with only one gender then they would die out because of no possibility of reproduction.

  • Not to my knowledge.

    Theoretically, we could clone people using an artificial womb, but to the best of my knowledge, we have not developed it yet. The big issue is the genetic time clock. Over time, the ends of our DNA called telomeres get shorter. Once they are gone, our cells have issues with reproducing. That means if they use cells from an adult for cloning, part of the cells life has already expired so that the age of the donor would be subtracted from the the age the clone will live to. For instance, if a person was 50 when they donated cells but died of old age at 90, the cloned baby would likely die at 40 because it's cells could not reproduce properly.
    Thing is, I can't say that this technology doesn't exist. For all I know, other countries, or even this country, may have been secretly doing this for a long time despite it being banned.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.
>