Amazon.com Widgets

Is social engineering by governments good for a country (yes) or bad for a country (no)?

  • Good for country

    Conspiracy theories are really popular, Really, But it's worth considering whether Adam Smith's theory of the invisible hand really is so reliable when it comes to conspiracy theories about government. Should conspiracy theories about social companies, Such as enron's shady dealings, Be considered and regulated? Whether individual interests can be translated into social interests in the market. The lighthouse can provide view for passing ships, But the company will not build the lighthouse, Because it is difficult to charge everyone, So should this be done by the government? We should not ask the government to ignore everything and limit its power. When the market fails, We will ask why the government regulation is not in place. Are the same people who demand limits on government power as those who question government regulation?

  • Good for country

    If the government should only protect the life, Liberty and property of individuals, Is the social engineering for the life, Liberty and property of citizens good? This typical liberal argument is boring. Any social engineering that supports one group over another should be banned. So is there a need for prisons? Should speeding be regulated and directed when it threatens the safety of another group of people? Totally dependent on personal improvement? If personal improvements were really useful, The world would be free of criminals by now

  • Social engineering is good to country

    No one can deny the great significance of social engineering in politics, Despite the many sharp criticisms it faces. All have criticized social engineering in philosophical and moral terms. Take the nazi-fascist and Soviet socialism as examples to demonstrate the disadvantage of social engineering. But the immediate benefits of social engineering to every citizen are strangely overlooked.

  • Social engineering is good for the country

    No one can deny the great significance of social engineering in politics, Despite the many sharp criticisms it faces. All have criticized social engineering in philosophical and moral terms. Take the nazi-fascist and Soviet socialism as examples to demonstrate the disadvantage of social engineering. But the immediate benefits of social engineering to every citizen are strangely overlooked.

  • No, social engineering is bad for a country

    Social engineering is bad for a country because it is usually being carried out by people who have an interest in extracting or gaining something from the land or people. It’s not usually done to help transform negative situations into positive ones, it’s usually done to make someone rich, or control people and this is wrong.

  • Social Engineering by Governments

    I personally think that Social engineering by any government is a bad thing and is totally contrary to the concept of limited government. According to the founding principles of the United States, the government should only exist to protect the individuals life, liberty, and property. Any social engineering that favors one group over another should be prohibited.

  • bad for the country

    I personally disagree,This issue is about social engineering and the impact it has on countries productivity, and quality of life. Let me define social engineering as an act by a governmental body that forces one view or another on the general public. Let me use Political Correctness as an example. Some things should not be said in the work environment simply because they cause strife or show a disregard for others. Do we control that through rule of law or by through education of people?No matter how hard we try to believe it all people are not equal in all things.

  • No: Social Engineering is Bad for a Country

    In the short term, social engineering may have benefits for elite interests or even possibly the society as a whole. In the end, however, social engineering is a form of manipulation. Such manipulation can only be done by powerful, secretive groups. This kind of division intrinsically sets up a kind of social stratification that will only be cancerous in the end, leading to decadence, corruption, and uninformed people at the mercy of a shadowy elite. The result will be primarily destructive.

  • No, social engineering by governments is a bad thing.

    Social engineering by any government is a bad thing and is totally contrary to the concept of limited government. According to the founding principles of the United States, the government should only exist to protect the individuals life, liberty, and property. Any social engineering that favors one group over another should be prohibited.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.
>