Amazon.com Widgets
  • Because it just does

    Yeet yet yet yet yet yet The Purpose of the Bill of Rights is. . . . The Purpose of the Bill of Rights is. . . . The Purpose of the Bill of Rights is. . . . The Purpose of the Bill of Rights is. . . . The Purpose of the Bill of Rights is. . . . The Purpose of the Bill of Rights is. . . .

  • The constitution should change!

    Social has changed we no longer and are governed by the old laws!
    For one and most importantly slavery is abolished however we still have prejudices and even the current administration is causing our country to be divided. Such a shame we certainly don't need him to revise nor his administration. Good God NO!

  • It is still relevant

    I have heard that it was said that the the bill of rights is racist or old fashioned, But there is no proof that it is racist. The bill of rights is to protect us from the federal government and we need to be protected from them more now than ever before. If it wasn't relevant, Who is going to update or change it? The government? That is a dumb idea, A quick way to lose all of your rights to the government.

  • The Bill of Rights is Necessary for Democracy

    The Bill of Rights does not afford the people of the United States any power, Instead it protects several basic human (natural) rights. The purpose of the Bill of Rights is to prevent the government from infringing in those rights. While the first amendment is important, The second allows for the physical protection of the rights of the people. The true purpose of the second amendment is not to protect the family, But to protect natural rights. In every totalitarian regime, Among the first steps to protecting the dictator’s absolute power is to disarm the nation. The dictator knows that he has nothing to fear from the people should they disagree with his rule. When the common man has no power to resist his government there is tyranny. In a government where all power is derived from the people, The means of protecting that power is essential.

  • Bor amendment 1

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, Or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, Or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, And to petition the government for a redress of grievances. 1 2 3 4 5

  • Bill Of Rights

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, Houses, Papers, And effects, Against unreasonable searches and seizures, Shall not be violated, And no warrants shall issue, But upon probable cause, Supported by oath or affirmation, And particularly describing the place to be searched, And the persons or things to be seized.

  • It's relevant still

    It is still relevant today, It is always being amended to keep up with modern day and I think that that makes it relevant. Qwer wert ert tyu u io asd fg hh hk l; zx cvb nm nm, , Mn bvcxz sdf kj wer oiu rfjm jmfcv dc d d

  • The Bill of Rights IS still important

    Explain to me where we would be if we did not have them? Without the freedom of religion you could be killed for worshiping a certain god and without the freedom of speech we literally would not have access to this debate or the internet period. Just because it was created over 200 years ago doesn't mean it is now irrelevant, The Bible was written over 2000 years ago, And it is still relevant.

  • Just because we can.

    Ummm Why do I need to give a reason. We live in a democracy it is relevant. We have the ability to make our won decisions. America has equal freedoms to live how they want to and can have their own opinions without fear of any repercussions. That is enough said.

  • The bill of rights is super relevant!

    If we didn't have the bill of rights we wouldn't even be able to have this debate. Like what would you guys protesting do without the first amendment? Also provide some actual reasons or suggestions to change the bill of rights besides the "it's 200 years old which means it's outdated" excus.

  • Needs to be revised.

    Considering it was written 200 years ago, I believe it should be looked at from a modern era point of view. People live differently now to back when it was written. I don't believe all of them are relevant like the second amendment. Why does anyone need a gun? People argue they need it to protect their families, but look at all the countries that don't allow that right to bear arms. They have less shootings. If there were less guns, the mentality of people would change to adapt to not having them. There would be less access to guns so there would be less shootings.

  • They are useless and boring.

    Jfnfj frwfi furh furg reughoe gurebgotye yfrebgoy erybgeg hefbviefb hi h vbeyhbg hrbiebr wyvefghevw hvhryiwgb f rhv kreuv yblriuewb fhrfbrhe f rhewkb fhrg ghtjem vrhreuribfr g hg h hfbre rfb hyrhr rhrf rhgbskkmjmtb jdne fnt thejd dhfn uri gtolp aqwsww sjhdbf cmxmz x dbdb dbd dbc fhf ffnfkj rhjsm euiiyrfe

  • Bucfhvbjds deug vsiujfws

    Z z z dviknerk bw ew gb egb f bf brw een rnb trn rn rf nwag e f e h br b e g rf be g br g s r bhfr b ed r b nb f bh f be db rt b ebr br b reb n

  • Everyone can do whatever they want without the bill of rights.

    You don't need a government to run everything and tell you what to do. It's just been taught to us as little kids so that's what's ingrained in our brains. Everyone can believe and talk and do whatever as they want. Some countries say you don't have rights but everyone has a right even if their are consequences.

  • Important document that needs some updates to support the current needs of the people today.

    Important definetly for its time and protecting us with its creation, But there is no reason we cannot adjust it as a people to support our new needs. In fact it would only hurt us not to. Who can say no to more rights for the citizens? The question is of course, Who and how to decide what to amend. It should be the people collectively that vote on what needs to be addressed and agree on policy not just the government.

  • The Bill of Rights needs to change

    The Bill of Rights does not comply with our day and age today. The Bill of Right was written over 200 years ago, so things have changed juristically. The Bill of Rights is still great but it just needs to be revised and changed based on our society today. Our society is way different from 200year ago. Technology has come in to use and is a big part of peoples lives today.

  • It would need a real makeover if it should have any relevance

    I believe that a lot of what is said in the United States Bill of Rights is relevant today, but that there is a lot that isn't. I think that if it should have any relevance or influence in political decisions it would need a real makeover. It is after all over 200 years old and a lot has changed since then.

  • Rdfsds ertert wqr

    Ateat eafdaewa df ewFFw ueyr wrywr rw uroqiwr ryqw urwy uqywr iowd oiuiOIQE OIWOE IQUEOISAH ROIUQOIWDA IOWOAUOIWu9OISIODUFOISUioau oru auiusoi isauoia sioau ruwi awuria faiourfiwauroiwa fif aif fiafsiouaf jaifaiouf auif ijaijsoiajd jsaoidjaisur jdiasidauorjfijoa foiasfjais jfiaouroajf saiouroiajf fjoiasiru jfoaisurfj aoisfjsaeihhieg uw08uw9qujd udisufoweu9507 r9qrpwjn 3u aurw uw9ru uw490 9u90u 99 oUW B W97592O1087NB =[0 tij0if-p=[s[d;PDPKDL;[]'FA\DFF];
    'D
    \G'
    .
    G/F,'.
    F?BXCV.
    ?


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.