Is the Zero Tolerance Policy actually needed in our educational system?

  • Yes, teachers and students need to trust each other.

    Yes, the Zero Tolerance Policy is needed in our educational system. Teachers and students need to be able to trust each other. A student should not have to return to a school where another student bullied them or perpetrated violence and got away with it. Students need to feel secure in their school.

  • Most definitely

    I strongly believe it should be. I go to a comprehensive school, in my last year of compulsory education and I must be honest, it is ridiculous what students can get away with. They could probably get away with murder. I was bullied in the first four years of high school. I constantly told different teachers around the school what was going on but they basically ignored me. When one of my teachers finally listened to me she told my head of year, who did absolutely nothing about it apart from give the bully a slap on the hand and left it at that. It has had such an impact on my life as well. I think I have recovered from what has happened, but imagine if there was a zero tolerance policy implemented in our educational system, it wouldn't have got so serious. Oh, and another thing, I think it would be beneficial as it would prepare us for the world of work. You don't get a 2nd chance in a work place, so why should it be like it is in our educational systems?

  • They aren't needed

    A 5-year-old was suspended for telling her friends that she was going to shoot them with a Hello Kitty bubble gun. Yes, really. It's wrong if a student is being mean or showing real violence, but a bubble gun is not severe. The zero tolerance policy isn't needed. It's unnecessary.

  • Children are still developing their sense of morality and right and wrong.

    Schools do need to teach consequences for actions but throwing a student out of school for a mistake is a mistake in itself. The slowest part of the brain to develop is the morality and inhibitions. Students will make mistakes and get involved in undesirable activities before they even realize what is going on. It does not make them bad people and it does not necessarily even mean they will be toxic to other students. Discipline needs to be decided on a case by case basis and take all the extenuating circumstances into account.

  • No, because people could misinterpret actions.

    Zero tolerance is not a good idea for an educational system, because people can misinterpret actions. An example of this is someone trying to compliment a student. That student can take it the wrong way, as an insult. Should a person be punished for doing something that was not intended? I don't think so.

    Posted by: RedKris46
  • I think the Zero Tolerance Policy has become a way for educators to 'pass the buck' when faced with a difficult decision.

    While based on good intentions, I think Zero Tolerance Policy has turned out to be a 'one size does not fit all' policy that too often excludes any shred of common sense that might allow for mitigating factors. Keeping order in schools has traditionally been the job of educators, and I think that as much as possible, it is a function that should be returned to them to be carried out in a reasonable and thoughtful manner.

    Posted by: SuddenRashad84
  • A Zero Tolerance Policy is not useful in our educational system, because it leads to punishments unfitting of the offenses that lead to them.

    Zero Tolerance Policies do not allow room for any discretion on the part of the teacher, principal, or staff, regarding the behavior or meaning of the action of the student. Under a Zero Tolerance Policy, a child who draws a picture of a weapon, no matter the context, is punished to the same extent as a child who brings a weapon to school. When these offenses are clearly not of the same severity, the punishments that follow should not be identical.

    Posted by: CooperativePrince

Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.