We can prove that the universe is still expanding to this day and it definitely isn't slowing down. There is an "edge" of the universe but we can't interact with it because on the other side there is literally nothing. The universe hasn't gotten there yet. Most of the universe is empty space but past the edge it's a lack of empty space. It is nothingness.
Absolute nothing has absolutely no properties. It has no dimensions. No height. No length, No width. No weight. No gravity. No radiation. No frequency. No laws. No consciousness or whatever you can think of. It is simply a state of non-existence. Period. As soon as you give it a property, it becomes "something". If you could take everything out of a container you wouldn't end up with nothing. Because the container has dimensions all you would end up with is a container of empty space (the container gives the empty space dimensions and therefore is "something". Sort of like taking all your money out of your bank account. It would be empty but you would still have the bank account or container.
If everything had a beginning, then at one point there was absolutely nothing. If this is true, then how did matter, space, time, and so called dark matter come about? Until we learn more about the universe this is not comprehendible. This also brings up the thought of eternity. That is a whole different discussion.
As much as id like to believe there is no such thing as nothing as something has to come from something but how far back does this go? Its inconceivable...If nothing has to be something, then the very beginning of anything that is something has to come from something and thus theirs no beginning, no birth, no form of any kind, but can we rule out the very meaning of nothing? Our sense of the word to describe a thing(universe and beyond) that we know so little about, whos to say something, a thing is not actually nothing in the true meaning of what its all about behind the curtain, the only answer I can come up with is that the question in itself Is like an endless thought.
Absolutely nothing is equal to a perfect vacuum or O degrees Kelvin and O pressure. In labs were super close to creating a perfect vacuum we can do a billionth of a degree Kelvin. Our universe was set In place with the perfect ratio of space to mass so a perfect vacuum isn't even possible in the obbservable natural universe.
There is always some sort of vibrational frequency of Energy, Whether here or there. There is known Energy and unknown Energy. And that's all there is. As a "simple" example, If a person says, "there is nothing in that room". That is false, Because that room has walls, Or a ceiling, Or a floor, Or even air.
There is no such thing as nothing. As simple as that. "nothing" is a figure of speech. The only simple way I can describe this regards to the 'creation of the earth', Scientifically: the world was created from "the leftover gas from the nebula that made the Sun. " (in simple terms). With this, There wasn't anything, There was the sun, And before that, There would have been atomic particles. . . However, If you don't believe in 'the big band theory', Then, At the beginning (the Christian version) it states that "there was nothing". But there was God? Look, I am a Christian, Im not questioning the religion, In this example, I am simply stating that there is no such thing as nothing because there was God before there was anything.
There simply cannot, It's impossible! Nothingness is impossible because then it wouldn't be nothingness as it would still be something and there can be absolutely nothing anyway. Because if there was absolutely nothing then there would always be absolutely nothing and nothing would ever come from it because there would be nothing to come from it because there would be nothing there in the first place because there would always be nothing and that just isn't possible.
"Something" had to exist for you to exist, and we know that's true because You know you exist. So, if you know you exists, and you are created from this Something, would that not imply this something understands Life exactly as you do? This Something is creator, and creation, which means "Something" has the same properties you do :)
Scientists define nothing as the absence of something. If we know what nothing is doesn't that make it a something? If you thought of the universe ending, you might think of a black abyss that is nothing. But the fact that we know what the nothing would be, that makes it a something.
And if the universe was formed from nothing, then that means that nothing is the purest form of everything. Nothing cannot exist without it being something.
B v v v v v v v c cc cc xfv f g c c g cgfc xxx c c cgc d dd gf ghf c vv v v vv v v v v v v v v v b b b b b b b b b b
So the conservation of mass states that mass can neither be created nor destroyed. Remember that. Someone else said this on the same topic "As much as id like to believe there is no such thing as nothing as something has to come from something but how far back does this go? Its inconceivable...If nothing has to be something, then the very beginning of anything that is something has to come from something and thus theirs no beginning, no birth, no form of any kind, but can we rule out the very meaning of nothing?" So if nothing exists then that means there must be no beginning, so the amount of mass that exist in this instance has always existed, and mass is the very substance that makes up everything. So if mass never changes, and it,never has nor will, then there is no way that nothing has, does, nor will ever exist.
The law of conservation of mass statespecially that "mass can neither be created nor destroyed". We will come back to this later, someone else said this about this very topic"As much as id like to believe there is no such thing as nothing as something has to come from something but how far back does this go? Its inconceivable...If nothing has to be something, then the very beginning of anything that is something has to come from something and thus theirs no beginning, no birth, no form of any kind, but can we rule out the very meaning of nothing?" Basically saying in order for their to be nothing there had to,be no beginning, but if there is no beginning how is there any certain amount of mass? If mass cannot be created or destroyed wouldn't that mean that the amount of mass in the world will always be the same, and since mass makes up everything, proving that nothing cannot exist. And scene😅
I will be simple. Even if we can not percieve a thing there is always something. Even before God realized that he was. He was. If nothing truely existed. There is no way we could be here today. Nothing equals nothing. Therefore. How is it that we are here? That can only mean that the universe has always been and we are clueless to infinity.
Nothing has intrigued me ever since I was a youth. I was brought up in a religious home and was taught that God created the universe out of nothing. So it seemed clear that nothing was vitally important to my world view. Nothing was the starting point of everything. Nothing was the simplest, most natural state of affairs before God finally realized how dismal and painfully boring nothing can be and, after an eternity of procrastination, decided that it would probably be a good idea if He got off His omnipotent ass and tried to make something out of nothing.
Nothing is fundamental.
Nothing is the ultimate default scenario.
Nothing will help me understand God.
Nothing is sacred.
If I can’t get my head around nothing, how can I possibly hope to understand anything?
These are among the many reasons why nothing fascinates me deeply.
I also realized that I am, indirectly, made of nothing. After all, if the universe was made from nothing, then, as an infinitesimal piece of the universe, I also came from nothing.
It is truly sobering when you realize that, at your core, you are inherently just a tiny slice of nothing.
But there is a problem with nothing, a really serious one.
Nothing has never actually been observed or detected.
In fact, not only is nothing difficult to detect, it is also incredibly difficult to even imagine, much less comprehend. If you are searching for nothing, it is very difficult to know exactly what you are looking for or to recognize it if you ever find it.
To really qualify as true nothing, there must be no matter, no energy, no space and no time. There is no beginning, no end and absolutely nothing in between.
There is not even a super abundance of nothing, nowhere and never.
After all, that would be something.
Just utter and absolute nada!
There cannot even be any possibility or potentiality of anything.
Last, but not least, there can be no observer to verify and declare that nothing actually exists.
But without any possibility of verifiable observation and confirmation, nothing must necessarily remain utterly and forever undetectable.
I’m no fool. If nothing is utterly undetectable, then on what basis could we assert that nothing really exists? What is the difference between something that is, and forever will be, utterly undetectable and nothing at all?
The answer, of course, is “nothing.”
Therefore, if nothing is necessarily forever beyond detection, can we meaningfully and credibly assert that nothing exists?
I hardly think so!
It’s actually very hard to escape the conclusion that nothing simply doesn’t and can’t exist.
If nothing really existed, how could we even be engaging in this intellectual masturbation?
It seems that the cliché is true after all: Nothing is impossible.