
Vote
47 Total Votes
@History_Soldier
I wasn't saying you supported the proposition.
@Debating_Horse
It's dangerous that your solution is violence.
Well, I for one think it would be better for them. DrCereal, do you think those people there enjoy socialism? I've seen many videos where they complain, I think giving them weapons rather than invading the country is a better solution. That is exactly what they want too, to take away guns so revolution cannot be possible. We give them guns in secret, a secret and large army should overthrow the socialist government.
Why is invasion (or training rebels) always a common suggestion when there's an undesirable government in power in a country? We should stay out of it. All we're going to do is start another conflict.
There has been many imperialist countries. How would the governments even know that other countries are funding rebellious groups? Start another conflict? Like a guerrilla war? Or a large scale war?
"Like a guerrilla war? Or a large scale war?" Good question, that's why I used the more ambiguous word "conflict". I believe that any violence derived from our nosiness is bad. And I was referring to a conflict between the rebels and the standing army.
Makes sense, thank you. Yes very true indeed that from unnecessary involvement in a foreign country's problems, rebellion (violence) can occur. And It would be pointless to take such action anyways too, waste of money, time, and life, increasing the image of the U.S as an imperialist nation, pushing democracy and capitalism everywhere when a socialist country arises. There must be a solution to Venezuela's problem! Maybe without violence!
I just want you to know that Venezuela is not a socialist country (I think 60-70% of their economy is still private sector), and socialism isn't incompatible with democracy.
I've googled it, and a there was a mix of "socialist Venezuela" and "Venezuela's problem" I think it has been made clear through your comment. But which source in the google search result most reliable? Take a look here:
https://www.Google.Com/search?Newwindow=1&rlz=1CALEAE_enUS751US751&ei=ukDyWcP_A8rxmAH0mIvgDQ&q=is+venezuela+socialist&oq=isVenezuela&gs_l=psy-ab.3.2.0i7i30k1l2j0i13k1l2j0i7i30k1j0i13k1l3j0i7i30k1j0i13k1.11690.11747.0.17726.2.2.0.0.0.0.264.394.0j1j1.2.0....0...1.1.64.Psy-ab..1.1.258....0.L5Nag97jGsc
(Sorry for the large URL).
I'm not sure why, but I was unable to locate headings you're referring to.
Could you just link the webpages?
Alright, Here are some:
[http://nypost.Com/2017/08/01/venezuela-a-nation-devoured-by-socialism/]
[https://extranewsfeed.Com/socialism-but-look-at-venezuela-debunking-anti-socialist-propaganda-w-actual-logic-de587c1a299a]
[https://www.Pastemagazine.Com/articles/2017/06/whats-the-matter-with-venezuela-its-not-socialism.Html]
[https://www.Washingtonpost.Com/news/global-opinions/wp/2017/01/05/as-socialist-venezuela-collapses-socialist-bolivia-thrives-heres-why/?Utm_term=.868a75fc382b]
[http://dailysignal.Com/2017/08/02/socialism-destroyed-venezuela/]
I wonder if there is a way to link pages, but I am not sure how to do that.
Your browser also affects it too. I use google chrome, I highlight the whole link, then right click to click on "go to :https://www.Sample.Com" Try to view the links if possible!
Given the websites you just showed me, I would declare that none of them should be adhered to as truth.
I base my conclusion (though it isn't settled. If you properly demonstrated to me the Venezuela is Socialist, then I wouldn't continue saying that it isn't.) off of the fact that Venezuela's economy is still primarily dominated by the private sector. That is not an attribute of a socialist economy.
I guess I would say that is true.