Vote
40 Total Votes
Neither - Voter Comments
John_C_1812 says2017-09-29T11:29:13.9814982Z
Report Post
A woman representing the United States Constitution would be titled Prasedera, not President as it is illegal for a woman to be President of the United States.
The fact of the matter is that neither candidates actually was in any position to represent the United States Constitution. Each for their own reasons.
In spite of the fact that neither candidate can express ability to be President of the United States. Either candidate still had a right to try to obtain representation before the United States Constitutional separation by voters consensus.
Bitch_Goddess says2017-09-29T15:17:14.5360070Z
Report Post
John, it is not illegal for a woman to become president. It is not recognized by the constitution, but it is still not considered illegal. This being because back then, women were not allowed in positions of authority. However, if you couldn't tell, the time has moved on and women are able to be in such positions without eyes looking at them like they're crazy. Just because it was not seen as fit back then, doesn't mean it is illegal now.
Barcafan99 says2017-10-08T21:21:34.7281781Z
Report Post
They both are abhorrent.
Donald Trump - Voter Comments
That's why he did win. Hillary is a criminal who should be in prison
The right person won; the other is a liar, a crook, and vindictive!
Portions of this page are reproduced from or are modifications based on work created and 