Amazon.com Widgets

Putting political parties aside, if two political candidates had campaigns that were equally as good as each other. which would you be more inclined to vote for: The candidate with noticeable tattoos (yes) or the candidate without tattoos (no) ?

Asked by: Ryuuikari
Putting political parties aside, if two political candidates had campaigns that were equally as good as each other. which would you be more inclined to vote for: The candidate with noticeable tattoos (yes) or the candidate without tattoos (no) ?
  • No responses have been submitted.
  • Without, Feels safer

    The tattoos may be innocent, But there is a low chance the politician with the tattoos may be a gang member, And I wouldn't want my country to turn out like Mexico. The man without tattoos is probably safer and has more responsibility and self awareness. However, I would pick on who leads the best and decide on their views, Not by whether or not they're inked.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
TheINFJNala says2014-09-19T18:04:28.663
I don't give a fig if they have tattoos or not.

I care more about their beliefs and actions.
>