Gun Control only helps the maladapted Gun control deprives rational people of the ability to use all means to defned themselves. The idea that guns cannot be used defensively is farcical. They turn up the intensity of every contentious engagement and incentivize deescalation. A fight with fists, While it can be lethal, Is not guaranteed so the risk assessment in fighting changes.
Emotionally unstable and violent people theoretically, Thrive with gun control as they can lash out without having to consider their conduct may have lethal consequences. The assumption that people don't revaluate risk is the source of all "care laws" or "think of the children laws". They do not consider that people will behave different under different circumstances and think guns wouldn't increase negotiation instead of reducing it.
Killing people does not kill ideas (DO NOT BAN POST) I do not hope this opinion gets banned. It is vital that we as a free people remind ourselves why we believe what we believe.
Being charitable to this post, I am assuming that there is not an explicit Jewish context to this. There is a socialism problem in the United States. It has persisted for over one hundred and fifty years and has not stopped despite the attempt by the nameless one. This is because socialism is an idea that has permitted through ethnicity and won't be stopped by censorship or execution.
What can kill an idea is another idea. The idea that men can carry the image of God and that through Christ there is a path to redemption. The idea that United States is a beacon of freedom and that its influence should spread because its system creates a more prosperous society because it respects the indivdual dignity of men. The idea that our brothers and countrymen are so because of their actions not blood. The idea that marxists do not believe that men can be great because they are weak.
The victories socialism has gained has come only when people lose their connection to their God and their nation. Until that problem is solved, There will always be a supposed "hueish" influence in our society.
It is a Death Sentence by Other Means Life in prison without parole is a death sentence that uses more resources and is more vindictive than others.
What is the point in not killing someone if you are taking every natural freedom that people have? Is the entire point from then on out to continue breathing? This is not any more merciful than lethal injection as there is no opportunity for a person to obtain forgiveness anyway. Lethal injection may allow people some relief as they do not have to grow old in an environment that is proven to have negative health effects on people.
The only difference between life in prison and the death penalty is that people can say that time did it. It's cowardly and its cruel to make someone suffer for all of their natural days.
Police are instruments of the Law Police actions cannot be solely linked to the individual. Individual actions are subject to legal scrutiny because it comes from the moral foundation of this country's legal system, The Anglo-Judeo philosophy. Guilt results in punishment because it is believed that individuals act on their own accord. If this is the case, Then when they violate the law, The penalty is placed on them alone.
Police are different in that their actions are the result of their own gumption. They are acting to enforce the law. They are not robots. They have discretion and they are accountable to that discretion.
For an officer to be legally culpable, Their motivations would be self sourced. When they make a traffic stop, It is because a law (overwhelmingly so) was violated. When they enter a home by force, They are acting on a judges order.
Two examples of this are the cases of Breonna Taylor and Rayshard Brooks. The police were tasked to enforce the law and they were held accountable for their decisions in the process. However, How can one ask a citizen to perform a task that is outside the individuals own desire and still hold them morally accountable solely for all outcomes?
To not scrutinize the legal framework behind the police, Namely the legislators and judges, It is in fact unjust to hold the mal actions of law enforcement solely in the hands of the police. Surely if the only people dying in police custody were rapists and murderers, The outcry would be muffled. Now we have the issue of needing police to enforce shutting down "illegal businesses" or "failure to signal". When these interactions lead to death, One should look to the officer, But to allow judges to get away with permitting the use of swatting, And no-knock warrants, It results in the loss of citizens as a result of the wreckless actions by the judges and lawmakers. RIP Daniel Shaver, Dennis Tuttle and Rhogena Nicholas.
This opinion does not absolve police from breaking laws and protocols, But it is about, Strictly, Their actions are not the result of their own gumption, So should not be punishable by a system that requires someone acting as a moral actor in their dealings.
Trump supports Patriots over Seditioners The age of peaceful Black Lives Matter protest is over. Trump has declared Antifa a terrorist group and have sent AG Barr to arrest the rioters and the looters. These people are taking advantage of a legitimate cry for police reform that was needed to reduce the violations that were set upon the people by the legislators in pursuit of controlling the public. They are seditionists who seek to destroy the United States and replace it with a worse system where accountability is determined by race and not by deed.
If you disagree, Ask yourself why this police protest has resulted in autonomous zones and the destruction of property of private citizens, While celebrities and politicians who pass the laws remain untouched. His approach has been measured, But he will use this attack the leftists who have poisoned the black community and now have made every attempt to destroy it to use the burnt out husks as an impetus to get votes while investing in the real estate to move some yuppy tax payers and international corporations into the former homes of black people.
Jews need to be more supportive but American Jews fail to see how great this country is. I do not believe that the American people have a desire to engage in mass racial purges. They would rather all Americans come together and join together as one and face the problems without resorting to divisive Marxists tactics. The idea that someone grafitting a swastika will somehow lead to Holocaust misses the FACT that antisemitism was bordering on a cultural value by many in Europe at that time. No such attitude exists in the United States.
What do we get in return? Feeding women has created a sense of entitlement in our society. How an we continue to to support this behavior when it clearly has furthered the social divide between men and women.
We now have women who save men in their phonebook as free food. They entice them with the promise of romance, All to use them a meal coupon.
In the Bible, It says that if a man does not work, He should not eat. And if he poured his spirit out on all flesh, This should apply to them too. With that said, No we should not feed women in the year of our Lord 2020.