No Survivor is the new Jeopardy. Okay so this is an easy answer for many reasons. 1) The show is still receiving massive ratings and making CBS a ton of money. 2) The only situation in which Survivor ends is if Jeff Probst can no longer host it which a) is not happening anytime soon and b)he could simply be replaced with a former player such as Parvati, Malcolm, or even Joe Anglim. Same as Big Brother ratings are good the only way it ends if if Julie Chen steps hosting in which case Jeff Schroeder takes over since that is so clearly what CBS is preparing him for with all of his new jobs at CBS interviewing players as they are evicted and before they go into the house. 3) If Survivor were ever to go off the air some new kind of reincarnate would eventually come to fruition so there is really no point in ending the show when it will just reconfigure in a new way somewhere else and make just as much money. These are the reasons why Survivor will be on for a very long time at least i hope so that ay i have more chances to get cast on a season. ;)
YES! Ciera Easton is the definition of a player deserving of a Second Chance! Anyone who voted no obviously either has not watched Blood Vs. Water or has no appreciation for the game of Survivor. This girl was the best strategic player besides Tyson on Survivor: Blood Vs Water. She knew she had no shot at making it deep into the game unless she voted out her mom so she did that to further herself. Then once she realized she was destined for fourth place she made a last ditch effort by forcing the tie to draw rocks. Had the rock tie gone her way Tyson would have left that night and we probably would not be having this debate because Ciera probably would have won her season. So YES Ciera is one of, if not the most deserving player of a second chance in the history of Survivor.