Guys, look at this like a food chain. We humans are part of the food chain. Like how lions eat rabbits for their NEEDS, we use animals for our NEEDS. Nature gave us our brains- a specialty only to humans. Nature gave tigers their fangs and claws, as their specialty. The tiger NEED other animals for their survival. We NEED other animals too for our survival. The tigers go and get it, and so do we! So, why are you guys in the opposition against humans for obtaining our NEEDS, but not the tigers for acquiring theirs?
You may say that we are being cruel, but aren't tigers ripping limbs out of a deer more cruel? We humans are just mammals, but with a talented brain bestowed by the nature. SO USE it! Just like how a tiger use its gift of fangs and claws! There is NOTHING wrong with us for using animals for research as we are - sorry to reiterate- obtaining our NEEDS, just like any other animals do.
Say a loved one has been diagnosed with a once fatal disease; it may be because of animal research that medicine can help them live. If i had to choose between the life of a dog and the life of my brother, child, niece, nephew, any person i knew, i would pick the person
Would I rather have my hair fall out and become bald or the rabbit's hair which was going to be used for other purposes anyway? Do I want my skin to be burned by unknown chemicals that weren't tested? I believe that I don't want that harm to be put onto me. Therefore, animals should be tested to keep the safety of humans
Animal testing is not always ideal, but it remains necessary for research. While it is important to consider the well-being of animals when conducting such research, it must also be recognized the potential knowledge, developments, and discoveries that can be gained. Since such research can lead to new products and medicine that have the potential to improve and save the lives of both humans and animals, it is justified.
Animal testing is one of the main start points for the invention of penicillin. Drug testing is an important and long process. In a world that is so dependent on the reliability and advancements of medicine to survive and function it would be strange not to test new methods in some way. Would you rather a possibly beneficial drug be tested on humans before animals?
People who are against treatment of animals as the experimental object for medical purpose kindly stop taking medicine or any kind of vaccine. As we all have advanced to a modern era from stone age. This progress of human transformation saw many advancement order to make not only human's but animal's life convenient as well. Taking the example of such research i would like to demonstrate it's constructive use on animal. With the help of medicine the cow who got seek of some disease can be cured and made to produce 20 litre milk a day.The lion suffering with any disease can be cured back to normal. So, the development of such research doesn't only help us while it gives back life to animals suffering with any problem as well. I also agree with the nature's food chain as explained by many fellows above. Can you stop a snake hunting mice and make it to eat grass, no you can't. As many people told the whole world is a family, I request them to convert the non vegetarian animals into vegetarians as ng a family member it should be your responsibility. I also request them not to use any medicine if they are fallen ill, only then you could support your arguments.
If we didn't test on animals we wouldn't know if a certain medicine is good for us or it doesn't work. The experiments are sometimes bad. For example, using animals for makeup, that's bad. We don't need makeup-.-. That's pretty much useless. The poor animals shouldn't suffer to make a woman pretty. -,-
Testing of experimental pharmaceuticals and other medicinal products has benefited human society greatly. It allows us to comprehend in more detail the medicines we use daily to treat life-threatening diseases and infections. If we stop using animals for research in the name of "animal welfare", then we are acting extremely irresponsibly and limit our ability to combat disease, ultimately endangering ourselves.
If it was for diseases, than yes, because that can help the lives of humans in the future. But, if you take an animals life away for stupid reasons like makeup, hair products etc... because it makeup isn't helping deaths or anyway important really, so why should it kill an animal?
Testing for makeup is a bad thing, but if it's for a vaccine or medicine needed to treat humans, then we should test. That's why it's called a TEST. We need to see if it's safe for humans or not. If we use it straight away without testing it, a whole lot of people would have died. Because of those animals, most of you are alive.
Why cant we test on sick people instead of animals? They could possibly get better instead of the cruel abuse that we are doing to these poor animals. It should be the humans, not the animals!!! They die every day because of humans. If we care so much to find out whatever chemical works, we should test it on ourselves!!!
Just like humans and every other living organism on Earth, they have rights too. I am pretty sure most people might say that humans are more important then animals. But animals have feelings too. How would you feel if someone close to you like a brother or sister was taken off to a lab to be tested on? Well, that is the same way an animal will feel. Just because we can not understand most animals howls, barks, or yells, we can understand their behavior. When they are separated from their mothers or fathers, they are sad. If you watch Disney's documentary "African Cats" you will feel hopelessly sad when those poor little baby cubs are separated from their mother and siblings. They have a the most precious, sad look on their face while crying out looking for their family. Would you like to feel that? Well I am pretty sure no animal wants to feel or ever experience that.
Written By: Danielle Sutter
Humans just test on animals for the curiosity of it. There is no need to study and kill them. Humans should be tested on instead of animals because the results would be more defined. Humans are already used to test on by the FDA. About 92% of drugs that work on animals are dangerous to humans. If humans never existed, the world would be a better place. No global warming, animal abuse, or any other bad things you can name.
People... OPEN YOUR EYES. Just because we are a "superior" species does not give us the right to harm helpless, defenseless, innocent animals. If we are so superior, then why have we failed to find another way to test? There is no excuse, absolutely no excuse, to harm any living thing, even if it is for the benefit of humans. Think about yourselves in that position: hopeless, scared, sad. Really think about it. What kind of a life is that? It's a life that no innocent living creature should have to go through. WAKE UP and realize that humans are losing their sensitivity, our humaneness.
Animals are being treated horribly people! We need to stop this. I believe we should use prisoners who will never get out of prison instead of the animals. And I do get if some of you family members are in prison forever you might not want to read this but if they are sentenced to life or 99 years there is no chance for them. They would be good test subjects I would think. Did you know I am doing a report on "Should animals be used for testing and I like it so far. :) Lauren
Animals shouldn't be used for testing because it is totally unfair to the animal being tested on. They don't have a choice, or a voice of their own to say no or defend themselves. I know it's to make sure products are safe for humans, but animals think and feel just as much as we do.
I am pretty sure most people might say that humans are more important then animals. But animals have feelings too. How would you feel if someone close to you like a brother or sister was taken off to a lab to be tested on? Well, that is the same way an animal will feel. Just because we can not understand most animals howls, barks, or yells, we can understand their behavior. When they are separated from their mothers or fathers, they are sad. If you watch Disney's documentary "African Cats" you will feel hopelessly sad when those poor little baby cubs are separated from their mother and siblings. They have a the most precious, sad look on their face while crying out looking for their family. Would you like to feel that? Well I am pretty sure no animal wants to feel or ever experience that.
D d d d d d dd dd dd d d dd d d dd d dvd d d d d d dd d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d dd d d d d d d d d d d
It is realy cruel and very horrible and should not be done. People say dog is mans best freind,would you kill your best freind. Dogs are one of the most tested on than any other animal. And it is more likely the animal dies than lives. That why it should be stoped
Would you test on the life of your pet? If no, then why would you test on thousands of other animals? Animals are exactly like us, but they just evolved differently and have different ways of staying alive. Having genes like ours doesn't mean they are exactly like ours, so why aren't we testing on criminals or something?