Amazon.com Widgets

Should animals be used for scientific or commercial testing?

Asked by: Ikph1219
  • Its helping canser

    Back then we just had to let the people effect by disease just die now we are studying on animals that have canser to learn how to cure it for people so do you went children to die from so ya its also bad to so ya iam just typing now

  • Its not good but it shouldnt be banned either

    Scientists test on animals everything and it is thanks to that that they have found a few ways to cure animals from different diseases. This also herpès our kind (humans) greatly and fit werent for animal testing ALOT more people and animals would be dying from diseuses right now, whether i be your sibling, your friend or your foe.

  • Animals Should Be Used for Scientific Testing

    7.6 Million people worldwide die from cancer a year, 4 million of those people die immaturaly. Yes, I think that it is cruel to the animals. But what if you had cancer, you wouldn't want to die. You would want a vaccine, scientist are trying to find a vaccine, and the only way that they can get a good result is if they are able to use alive things, like animals. I do think that the number of animals used should be reduced, and that they don't starve or hurt the animal, unless it is seriously necessary.

  • http://www.debate.org/opinions/should-animals-be-used-for-scientific-or-commercial-testing Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?

    Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?
    Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?
    Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?
    Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?
    Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?
    Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?

  • Do you want your love ones to die

    Animals are different when it comes to testing them. Many times the drug, cosmetic, or other product they are testing works on the animals, but when they test it on a person it doesn't work. The Food and Drug Administration has noted that ninety two percent out of ever one hundred drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans. According to the Humane Society, registration of a single pesticide requires more than fifty experiments and the use of as many as twelve thousand animals. If you didn't know already animals are died way before human traits were devopled.

  • Do you want your love ones to die

    Animals are different when it comes to testing them. Many times the drug, cosmetic, or other product they are testing works on the animals, but when they test it on a person it doesn't work. The Food and Drug Administration has noted that ninety two percent out of ever one hundred drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans. According to the Humane Society, registration of a single pesticide requires more than fifty experiments and the use of as many as twelve thousand animals. If you didn't know already animals are died way before human traits were devopled.

  • It's very helpful

    Now I know that animal testing is cruel, more like torture but it very benefits a lot to humans. We say to stop animal testing when we eat them. We kill much more animals when eating if you feel that bad you can be a vegan. But I do think only a very small amount of animals should be used.

  • Dissecting Animals: The Real Truth

    Animals are beautiful creatures that don't deserve to be killed. It's time that we BAN this right and animals should not be killed because of that. IT'S TIME TO END THIS STUFF NOW OR ELSE YOU'LL GET THE BEST OF THE ANIMAL SOCIETY!! DO NOT KILL, LET THEM LIVE NOW! This is Dzifa Melomey and I 'speak for the animals'.
    Even AN ELEPHANT has been dissected. A POOR INNOCENT ELEPHANT! Do you want an elephant to kill YOU? Stop all this CRAZY SHENANIGANS! It's fine if the animal is dead, but cut it ALIVE? NOW I know why lions sometimes want to kill you I'm not even in MIDDLE SCHOOL and I know how DISGUSTINGLY DISGUSTING it is! And you'd probably think why a 5th grader wants to talk about it!
    Now here are my final words... DESTROY ANIMAL DISSECTION OR EVERYTHING WILL DIE!
    DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Thank you for making me read this article.

  • Animal Testing Is Wrong And Bad

    People shouldn't be testing animals because it is wrong. What if something goes wrong and that animal dies. Animals shouldn't die for a stupid project no matter how important it is. You should care for a life that can be taken away. No matter if it is actually an animal. Would you do it to a person and take away you same species life no so don't do it to an animal. Animals can become your friend so don't kill them for an project. Just an reminder if you are thinking "what else are we going to use" Use a fake dummy or just don't do in all. Just stay clueless. In conclusion animal testing is wrong.

  • Because I Said So.

    Animals should NOT be used in animal testing.

    It's no different than testing things like this on babies and toddlers; innocent and helpless. Animals should not be used as test subjects, they are LIVING, BREATHING creatures who just cannot help themselves.

    Animal testing isn't always accurate, some animals can react differently to things than humans do. In fact, that is quite often. A lot of the time when they're tested on they seem fine, but then when the product is finally tested on humans it has horrible effects. Sometimes the animals react badly towards medicines that might save the human race! And just because, say a monkey, has bad effects when taking a certain medicine, does NOT mean that humans will respond badly as well.

    Animal testing is cruel, and kills thousands of animals a year.

  • Noob babya poop

    Muhi kvk m m mmm mo ok olk cok ok kk kclk lk;lk klkclkk llk lkl klk lkl lkl klkl cklkc lk lc;lclklkclklk cl kll kl ck llk kl klklk kl klkl klk lklkl; lk lk lkl l lkl lkl klk klk lklk lkl lklk lk kk cxk lcklkl;ckk;clklkl klk

  • Animals should not be used for scientific or commercial testing. . . . . . . . . . . .

    STOP THE HATE TOWARDS THE ANIMALS. . . . . . . . .
    An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in US(UNITES STATES) for commercial and scientific testing. Opponents of animals testing say that it has cruel and inhumane to experiment on an animal. Animals are beautiful creatures that doesn't deserve to be killed because of that experiments. People shouldn't be testing animals because it is wrong. What if something goes WRONG and that ANIMAL DIES?
    It is not different than testing things like this on babies; INNOCENT and HELPLESS. . . Animal should not be used as test subjects, They are LIVING, BREATHING creatures who just cannot help themselves!
    SUPPORT THEM. . . . . . . . . SAVE THEM. . . . . . . . . .

  • Animal testing is terrible and should be banned.

    Testing animals is cruel and animals should not have to go through the terrible pain and abuse that humans put them through just for their own good. Researchers tried to be good and made the AWA to help protect animals but they only cover 800k the other 25 million that are used get abused freely with no care. STOP ANIMAL ABUSE AND ANIMAL TESTING!!!!!!!!! You sick people that don't care don't deserve to live.

  • Animals are beautiful creatures that don't deserve to be killed.

    95% of animals used in experiments are not protected by the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA), If the test goes well and it seems like humans can use it safely the product passes. If after testing an animal dies or is hurt or the product doesn’t work it fails. Sow it wrong and not safe we should find a other way

  • Animals have the right to live

    Animals are Animals. Even they are not as smart,big or powerful as Human, they are still sharing the Earth with us. Like we respect one and another, we need to respect Animals too. They aren't born to test out new products. They are born to live. If someone or something who/ which is powerful than you used you to test new products which may cause you to death, how would you feel?

  • They did nothing to us

    All these animals are here to help us in one was why should they be tested on hurt for just this stuff makes me so mad cuz they nothing our earth is dying and animals are dying going extinct and just texting on them like there life does not matter this is not ok we should stand up and say no because this is not ok and the 42% that said yes you make me sick to my stomach

  • No, just no.

    “Animal testing is cruel and inhumane.According to Humane Society International, animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to study the healing process, the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies, and "killing by carbon dioxide asphyxiation, neck-breaking, decapitation, or other means." The Draize eye test, used by cosmetics companies to evaluate irritation caused by shampoos and other products, involves rabbits being incapacitated in stocks with their eyelids held open by clips, sometimes for multiple days, so they cannot blink away the products being tested. ]The commonly used LD50 (lethal dose 50) test involves finding out which dose of a chemical will kill 50% of the animals being used in the experiment. The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) reported in 2016 that 71,370 animals suffered pain during experiments while being given no anesthesia for relief, including 1,272 nonhuman primates, 5,771 rabbits, 24,566 guinea pigs, and 33,280 hamsters.”

    Procon.Org
    Alternative testing methods now exist that can replace the need for animals. In vitro (in glass) testing, such as studying cell cultures in a petri dish, can produce more relevant results than animal testing because human cells can be used. Microdosing, the administering of doses too small to cause adverse reactions, can be used in human volunteers, whose blood is then analyzed. Artificial human skin, such as the commercially available products EpiDerm and ThinCert, is made from sheets of human skin cells grown in test tubes or plastic wells and can produce more useful results than testing chemicals on animal skin. Microfluidic chips ("organs on a chip"), which are lined with human cells and recreate the functions of human organs, are in advanced stages of development. Computer models, such as virtual reconstructions of human
    molecular structures, can predict the toxicity of substances without invasive experiments on animals.



    Procon.Org
    Drugs that pass animal tests are not necessarily safe. The 1950s sleeping pill thalidomide, which caused 10,000 babies to be born with severe deformities, was tested on animals prior to its commercial release.Later tests on pregnant mice, rats, guinea pigs, cats, and hamsters did not result in birth defects unless the drug was administered at extremely high doses.]Animal tests on the arthritis drug Vioxx showed that it had a protective effect on the hearts of mice, yet the drug went on to cause more than 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths before being pulled from the market."


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.
>