Amazon.com Widgets
  • Mini guns are simply for personal defense and fun.

    The M134 Minigun is a 7. 62×51mm NATO six-barrel rotary machine gun with a high, Sustained rate of fire (2, 000 to 6, 000 rounds per minute). [2] It features a Gatling-style rotating barrel assembly with an external power source, Normally an electric motor. The "Mini" in the name is in comparison to larger-caliber designs that use a rotary barrel design, Such as General Electric's earlier 20 mm M61 Vulcan, And "gun" for the use of rifle caliber bullets as opposed to autocannon shells.

    "Minigun" refers to a specific model of weapon that General Electric originally produced, But the term "minigun" has popularly come to refer to any externally powered rotary gun of rifle caliber. The term is sometimes used loosely to refer to guns of similar rates of fire and configuration, Regardless of power source and caliber.

    The Minigun is used by several branches of the U. S. Military. Versions are designated M134 and XM196 by the United States Army, And GAU-2/A and GAU-17/A by the U. S. Air Force and U. S. Navy.

  • Ar-15s be gone, Mini guns welcome.

    I agree that schools should ban Ars but allow mini guns for fun. We need mini guns in are lives guy. Lets all come together and fight Ars so we can spray mini-guns. Lajksdflk;asjf;lkjas;klfjas;lkfj;laksdjfl;kasdjfl;kjasdlk;fjal;kdsjfl;kadsjflk;ajdflk;ajsdf;lkjsdafl;kjasdl;kfjasdl;kfjakl;dsfj jfjdkljfl;akjflk;djafl;kajdsklfjadsf j;kldasjflk;dasjfkl;jdfl;kjasdfkl;jas f;lkjfakls;djf l;aksdjfkla;sjfdakls;dfj;lkasdfj asd;lkfjadkls;fjlaks;d f;laksdfjakl;sd fjl;kadsfj ;klasdfjlk;asdfj l;aksdfj l;kasdj f;lkas fjd;lkadsj f;lkadjs fkl; afjsdkl; af askfj a;lskf

  • It should be banned

    The AR-15 gun should be banned because many more shootings are happening due to the fact that there are many guns available for anyone to buy and although I agree that people should be allowed to have guns for protection, There is no reason to have an AR-15 for defense.

  • Remove all bans.

    The Second Amendment was pretty clear that the people should be allowed to have guns for the security of the country. Back when it was written, The guns common people had were very similar to or the same as what the military would use. Clearly, If a foreign nation is going to invade us, The people would need guns that would give them a good chance to hold off an enemy invasion. If you needed to protect your home and family against people with guns capable of full-auto firing, Would you be able to be of any help if all you had was manual loading gun like a bolt action? No. If that's all you had, You would be better off fleeing and letting them take over your home.

    Tho I don't think the guns should be restricted, I am not saying that just anyone should be able to have them. We all know that there are people out there that pose a risk to others because of their violent history or mental condition. These people should be denied access to any firearm.

  • No they shouldn't be banned

    I understand that most people who say they should be banned are actually not informed on the topic of guns and how they work. An Ar-15 (AR stands for Armalite Rifle) is a class of rifles that is the father of the modern day M4, And contrary to popular belief they are 2 totally different firearms, They just look similar. The Ar-15 is a SEMI-AUTOMATIC rifle, While the M4 is a select fire rifle that can either be shot in semi-auto/full auto OR semi-auto/burst. The news media has led some to believe the Ar-15 can kill hundreds, Yes without a doubt it can, BUT so can every other high powered rifle (not that the Ar-15 is a High powered rifle) can do the same amount of damage if not more. Another argument I see a lot in the media is that you don't need an Ar-15 for hunting, You don't need one for hunting but its safer than say a 30-06 which is a more popular round that is more powerful, While 30-06 rounds will go through a deer with ease and continue going which may cause damage because some people don't check what is behind the deer which could be another human or property which are now dead because you used a really powerful round that will go through the deer with ease, . 556/. 223 is a much safer cartridge for hunting because since it's low power will prevent it going through the deer or if it does go through the deer it will not have the same power as a high powered rifle that could cause collateral damage. Another thing the media says about the Ar-15 is that it is an assault rifle, It is not, An assault rifle is a firearm designed to be able to fire in 2 different modes, Whether its safe/semi/full or safe/semi/burst, The Ar-15 is only able to do safe/semi which means it is not an assault rifle, It may look like one but it is nowhere near an assault rifle. Another argument I hear brought up is that many people believe that. 556/. 223 is a super powerful round, That is not correct, Those cartridges are actually not made to kill, Rather to maim/injure the reason for this is that the Americans found out that in Vietnam that maiming is more effective than killing the enemies, The reason for this is that maiming means they are out of the fight as well as 3 others to tend to his wounds as well as he could be captured, Another useful thing in my opinion is that the enemy looked like civilians so if a civilian is shot, They will not be killed. In the news many people will always say it is the "weapon of choice" for murderers, Not true in fact, Most murders are done with a handgun, That makes sense, Yet the media still believe someone is going to go walking around in public with a rifle that is not easy to hide.

  • It is a sporting rifle

    The ar15 is great for hunting and target shooting. It is no more dangerous than other weapon when placed in the wrong hands. The shooter at virginia tech used a semi-automation handgun to kill 34 people. Banning the ar15 will do little to stop mass killings, But it will infringe on the rights of law abiding citizens.

  • Most people who say yes don't know guns.

    First the AR-15 is not full-automatic you can't hold down the trigger and bullets will repeatedly come out. It is SEMI-automatic which means when you hold down the trigger only one round will come out. Also the AR-15 uses a 223 which is basically a 22 with more powder behind it. Guns like the thirty-aught-six uses a extremely strong ammunition, But its not "scary" enough to ban. The AR-15 defiantly is not the deadliest weapon civilians can get many Semi-automatic pistols are more deadly and are used in more then 60% of the crime yet Liberals know that if they target one gun that looks "scary" instead of a group of guns they can get away with it easy're.

  • No! No way!

    Once they get the law "no assault weapons" all they have to do is say, "That 243. Hunting rifle you have? That`s an assault weapon" to EVERY GUN YOU OWN! And besides, The 2 amendment was talking about war weapons. I should be aloud to own a tank if i wanted too! The right to bear weapons was so that our government had a fear of the people! I love to shoot my Dad`s AR 15. It`s a lot of fun.

  • No we should not ban them

    A well regulated Militia, Being necessary to the security of a free State, The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, Shall not be infringed. A well regulated Militia, Being necessary to the security of a free State, The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, Shall not be infringed. A well regulated Militia, Being necessary to the security of a free State, The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, Shall not be infringed. A well regulated Militia, Being necessary to the security of a free State, The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, Shall not be infringed. A well regulated Militia, Being necessary to the security of a free State, The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, Shall not be infringed. A well regulated Militia, Being necessary to the security of a free State, The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, Shall not be infringed. A well regulated Militia, Being necessary to the security of a free State, The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, Shall not be infringed. A well regulated Militia, Being necessary to the security of a free State, The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, Shall not be infringed. A well regulated Militia, Being necessary to the security of a free State, The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, Shall not be infringed. A well regulated Militia, Being necessary to the security of a free State, The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, Shall not be infringed. A well regulated Militia, Being necessary to the security of a free State, The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, Shall not be infringed. A well regulated Militia, Being necessary to the security of a free State, The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, Shall not be infringed. A well regulated Militia, Being necessary to the security of a free State, The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, Shall not be infringed. A well regulated Militia, Being necessary to the security of a free State, The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, Shall not be infringed. A well regulated Militia, Being necessary to the security of a free State, The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, Shall not be infringed. A well regulated Militia, Being necessary to the security of a free State, The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, Shall not be infringed.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.