• It most definitely should!

    Male Genital Mutilation is a horrible act/ritual affecting 1 in 3 men around the world with no real benefits. (The supposed HIV reduction has been debunked as a myth and it has been found that it actually INCREASES the risk, With one study finding it has as much as a 300% increased risk. )

    Stop Male Genital Mutilation - His body, His rights.

    (Also, Don't claim that just because it's you're child you can mutilate them. If you have a daughter, Since she's your child, Would you be allowed to touch her inappropriately or put acid on her cl*t? NO! So stop with the hypocrisy. )

  • Of course, It is mutilation

    That circumcised men think they have lost nothing counts for nothing, As they have never experienced the alternate. As a man circumcised as an adult after being sexual, I KNOW there is a big difference: the loss is huge.

    The foreskin is a major sexual organ. The removal was originally introduced to deliberately reduce sexual pleasure of men (just as removing the clitoral hood on a woman is to reduce a woman's sexual pleasure, Which is why it is outlawed in most countries).

  • No, Coming from someone who was circumcised twice.

    It is not a mutilation by the same standard as say female genital mutilation. Its a basic procedure to remove a layer of skin to allow for easier cleaning and keep up with judaeo christian norms. No child is traumatized by tge experience, People who have a problem with it are looking for attention.

  • Leave the governement out of it

    No need to involve the governement in the decision. It should be up to the parents and the doctor. Why does everyone always feel the need to have the goverment involved in every aspect of everyone's life? How would that even be enforced? Would you have goverment employees checking children's genitals every so often? All it'll do is make those that want it done get it done illegally.

  • No, And I was circumcised

    No studies say it increases the risk of HIV also there are other Pros such as:
    Less risk of urinary tract infections

    A reduced risk of some sexually transmitted diseases in men
    Protection against penile cancer and a lower risk of cervical cancer in female sex partners

    Prevention of balanitis (inflammation of the glans) and balanoposthitis (inflammation of the glans and foreskin)

    Prevention of phimosis (the inability to retract the foreskin) and paraphimosis (the inability to return the foreskin to its original location)

    It was taken from here: https://www. Webmd. Com/sexual-conditions/guide/circumcision

    The website also stated problems which are less severe and less likely.

    Also it is on obligation on Jews and Muslims so they should have there rights, Right?

  • No Because It's Harmless

    My Respond to the Case was answered clearly in the Replies of brodiescott76 's Comment so I hope you could answer me here with The Sources so I can answer you back

    Circumcision: is a surgical procedure to remove the skin covering the tip of the penis to remove unpurity.

Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.