Should democrattically decided publc hangings of undesirable ppl be a new additiom to local or state criminal justice system, as an alternative form of death penalty as well as a form of eugenics and population control
Because you never who may resemble a rapist or pedophile tv character. It will be the start or a new ivf eugenics movement, killing off those who shouldnt breed
Voting on whether someone should die is pretty low. Because every "once" in a while, you get some sycho group who dislikes a person and jumps to death. With a strict guideline as to whether or not someone should die, there will be very few people who do something not worthy of death but are killed because people are mad at them.
Trying to kill anyone who doesn't agree with you leads to complete bigotry and a very uneducated society. Galileo was judged for heresy, and Socrates was executed for his beliefs - the majority isn't always right. If they had killed everyone who believed that the Earth wasn't in the center of the universe, then we'd still be believing the wrong thing.
Trying to kill someone who merely resembles a pedophile character on a TV show is stupidity beyond bounds. A successful eugenics movement, which is already a contradictory statement, would need to be based on more realistic and meaningful values.
The problem with democratically decided public hangings is that they result in mob rule. Think of how many unpopular minority opinions you hold. Imagine if the majority could vote to have you killed for holding those opinions. If democratically decided public hangings became a reality, this could very well happen.
Great thinkers such have Socrates have already died as a result of such mob rule systems of punishment, and if such systems were implemented nowadays, many more like him would die.