Amazon.com Widgets
  • Can't handle marriage then don't do it.

    Female involvement in state sponsored genocide. Have categories to distinguish people into “us and them”.A dominant group uses law, custom, and political power to deny the rights of other group and legitimizes the victimization.One group denies the humanity of the other. Members of it are equated with animals, vermin, insects or diseases. The majority group is taught to regard the other group as less than human, and even alien to their society. Indoctrinated to believe that “We are better off without them.” Extremist terrorism targets moderates, intimidating and silencing. Inflammatory rhetoric and hate propaganda with the objective of creating fear of the other group. Their property is often expropriated, they are even segregated. They are deliberately deprived of resources in order to slowly destroy them. Programs are implemented to prevent procreation, Children are forcibly taken.The victim group’s basic human rights systematically abused through extrajudicial killings, torture, forced displacement and homelessness. End the Gendercide of your sons.

  • Ban Marriage Instead

    Just ban marriage, the notion of being trapped in a loveless relationship is real and divorce is all to easy and ruins lives, so just ban marriage and take money out of relationships. Marriage is nothing more than entrapment and should be banned, then there would be no need to ban divorce

  • No, but there needs to be a good reason.

    Far too many people get divorce nowadays. I still think divorce should be allowed in cases where harm may result, or other problems are causing a marriage that is dangerous, but nowadays marriage is treated flippantly. People should need a good reason to divorce before they nullify a serious legal contract.

  • Its the married couple's choice.

    The governments should not intrude in their (married couple) problem. We give the choice to the couple at the start to the conclusion, and if we ban this, then we are limiting the citizen's freedom. The governments should be responsible to give freedom to the citizens , aren't they ?

  • Of course not, What?

    Suggesting divorce should be banned is dangerous. Not just because it violates personal freedom but it also places way too much emphasis on "marriage. "

    People should be allowed to separate if they aren't happy and don't want to be together anymore. Yes, Kids may be affected, But I'd rather kids face divorce than face an abusive relationship.

  • Don't think divorce should be banned.

    I disagree that divorce should be banned. If one married couple does not love each other then they should have the rights and accessibility to leave each other and find someone else to enter their lives and be happy. We shouldn't force people to be together if they do not want to be and they should have the freedom of decisions. They could also be abused by the opponent and if the divorce was abolished, it could be dangerous (unhealthy relationship) and unhappiness with people that wants the divorce.

  • If you don't live them, don't be with them

    Divorce is sometimes necessary. Such as if your marriage is not working out. You shouldn't be forced with somebody you do not want to be with. This is why, if absolutely necessary, divorce should be legal. If it were illegal, you could be stuck with somebody you don't love. Or, even worse, you could be stuck with somebody that treats yopu badly and maybe even hurts you.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.