Should Nestle be extracting water from a town that is experiencing a drought?

  • No responses have been submitted.
  • No, they should source their water from another area.

    In the best interest of the residents of the area Nestlé should source the water they need from another area that is not experiencing a drought. Not only would it be more environmentally responsible on their part but it would be a show of caring and consideration for their community to lessen the strain on already restricted resources.

  • No, I believe that if anyone is in a drought a product needs to take a monetary break.

    I believe that if a town is in the middle of a drought anyone that needs water for so called "luxury" items need to postpone making said products until the drought is over. People need the water for more important household needs other than chocolate and so called treat like foods.

  • No, they should not.

    Taking water from a place that is in a drought and transporting it to places that have safe, clean water is not only irresponsible, but should be a crime. Water is an important natural resource that we cannon live without. If Nestle continues to do this, and people start dying it is tantamount to murder.

  • They need it

    This is obviously wrong, taking water from the people who have too little. ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

  • It is corporate greed

    I understand that businesses have right to do business, but we have to draw a line when it does more harm than good. People in the town are under water restrictions, and the outlook isn't good for the drought to end any time soon. Nestle should not be allowed to make the problem worse.

Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.