• Trump is bad at being president

    Every country should have something to protect themselves with weather its nukes guns or really anything I do not support trump or north Korea also all they are really doing with there nukes is testing them in the water they may nuke us but we deserve it because we will learn from it we will learn not to elect a president who has no idea what he's doing.

  • Trump is an awful president.

    Lets nuke his ass to mars, as long as I'm not in the path of destruction I'm fine with it. I sincerely think President Trump could have MAGA, but it seems he just didn't pull through. Now we need a new president who is will to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

  • Nothing is against it, nor do they pose a threat.

    North Korea, like every other country, has the right to own and manufacture nuclear bombs. Now, should they have nukes? It is up to them. But even if North Korea has nukes, what can they do with them. The two main targets of North Korea are South Korea and the United States, two countries that are in an alliance. What is North Korea's biggest way to get money, China. China provides for over 80% of North Korea's imports and exports. Clearly, China would not want North Korea dropping bombs on South Korea which is very close to China. On the other hand, the United States have very advanced military technology. The United States has the THAAD anti-missile systems that can take down North Korean nuclear missiles. These anti-missile systems have also been implemented in South Korea along with the South Korean K-SAAM system. Both countries are very protected from nuclear attack. From this we can deduce that North Korea possessing nukes is not a threat, rather a display of power. Any country has the right to display their power, if not in a violent form.

  • It Really Depends

    North Korea should be allowed to have nukes just like the US, UK, Russia, Italy and China but whether or not they use them to invade a country is a whole other question. So yes they should have nukes but only in order to protect themselves from invasion. Saying that North Korea shouldn't have nukes is hypocritical as it would basically be the US saying "Hey! You can't do that only we can do that". However North Korea and especially Kim Jung-Un is unpredictable and a serious threat but then again when Russia and the US built their nuclear weapons they where to. So like most things in this world is not black and white.

  • I am from north Korea and I love 'em!

    In north korea it is our ownly form of protection. (pardon my english). I am ownlky putting these words cos i need to write twenty six more words but now i need to write six teen more words which is wrongs cos now i need even less word to write which is precisley no more worrds!

  • Because they can

    What the headline says, because they can. No need to argue this like a Tissy fit 3 year old if they can get their hands on it they should keep it. No more details need to be said kthx. Have fun u noobs. 100 word marker is stupid too e.E .

  • Fair is fair.

    The USA has nukes. Russia has them as well. Where is our right to tell other countries they cannot? If nukes are bad, and countries shouldn't have them, then the USA ought to give theirs up first. North Korea is, as far as I am concerned, justified in building them, as it allows them to protect their own welfare. Until all nations eliminate their Nukes, none should be forced to do so.

  • Just because they have them doesn't mean they'll use them

    America has a massive nuclear arsenal, and are the only country to have used them in a war. So does america nuke every enemy it faces?
    No. Nuclear weapons are used as a deterrent more than anything.

    America needs opposition. Let's be honest, America has a nasty habit of invading lesser countries. They have their reasons, i.E oil control, political influence, needing customers for the weapons industry.

    Lets be honest again and say that if North Korea didn't have nukes, America would have invaded or be currently planning to invade it. Because the way north Koreans live is wrong. Thus the Koreans are using nukes in the same way as the Americans, as a deterrent.

    Plus with the advances in anti missile technology, and in general the state of NKs missiles, chances that a missile would land anywhere populated is pretty low.

    To conclude, if NK didn't have nukes, the'd get invaded. If they launched their nukes, they'd get flattened by a nuclear storm. Then invaded. This is the only way that NK can remain in isolation, ie the way that their country wants to live.

  • Yes, For as long as the United States has thousands of soldiers and equipment stationed in North Korea.

    North Korea should keep their nuclear weapons as a form of self defense. Why? Because it is one of the last things discouraging South Korea/US from resuming the war, And once North Korea destroys their stockpile of nukes, South Korea & the United States will no longer have to worry about a North Korean nuclear bombing of Seoul and cities on the American west coast, Which will greatly increase the chance of war breaking out on the Korean Penisula again, Given SK/US's confidence.

  • Why single them out?

    Just to be clear...I dont want ANY country to have nuclear weapons. But i think it just wrong that its ok forsome countries and not for others. Either they are allowed, or forbidden (and that must apply everywhere). Until we all agree to ban them i dont see why North Korea has to be an exception.

  • 肯 定 不 行

    朝 鲜 要 是 有 了 核 武,那 岂 不 是 要 上 天 , 就 金 三 胖 那 脑 子 指 不 定 哪 天 心 血 来 潮 朝 那 个 地 方 放 一 炮 , 那 岂 不 是 要 挑 起 第 三 次 世 界 大 战 了 ?

  • Not in a million years

    The North Korean government is unhinged. How on earth can we really trust what they would do with nukes? For those blaming Trump; it is not his fault they were threatening the United States long before he became president. Does anyone really trust a government who got upset over a movie?

  • Honestly I support military action against N.K.

    Their citizens are starving, they do not adhere to the laws of the U.N. and they serve no purpose to anyone other than a barbaric part of the Chinese sphere of influence. They have the fourth largest military in the world and they have said in all clear terms that they do have intent to attack the United States and remove all western influence from their region. I believe that a large scale multinational military campaign would be the best solution to the current problem. As awful as war sounds, the idea that we should allow a nation to do as they please and gain weapons strong enough to upset the current balance of power (or worse yet cripple the entire 1st world via the M.A.D) is NOT a superior alternative.

  • They will kill us all!

    They will send misses and blow everything up. It is going to be bad until we can get this situation under control. Some people are trying to stop this but, it will most likely fail. Somebody needs to do something about it or else we will all die.Please stop these people.

  • A gun in a madman's hand

    Undoubtedly every country want to obtain nuclear tech for military propose, but there should be a precondition that countries use it for potential self-defense, that is, to hold it and declear to have it, but absolutely not to use it. Kim attempted to use the "great, latest tech ever" to threaten neighboring countries, that is totally not the correct usage. Given that Japan, South Korea and even other Weatern countries couldn't ensure it, the state that would suffer greatly is not solely the NK, but also the mass of innocence......

  • No for Sure

    By doing this again and again they are seriously causing problems for themselves only. This so called rocket man is seriously on a suicide mission... I think not only the United states but all other countries should come together and take all possible steps to stop this nonsense. For this I'm supporting Trump.

  • Attention: If you

    Or a loved one has been diagnosed with Mesothelioma you may be entitled to financial compensation. Mesothelioma is a rare cancer linked to asbestos exposure. Exposure to asbestos in the Navy, shipyards, mills, heating, construction or the automotive industries may put you at risk. Please don't wait, call 1-800-99 Law USA today for a free legal consultation and financial information packet. Mesothelioma patients call now! 1-800-99 LAW USA

  • No they shouldn't

    Actually every country can have or make their own weapon, but use it as its made. But as we see North Korea not using it as its made. They use it to threat all countries. Means that they just want to steering the world with nukes. So North Korea Should not have nukes

  • No. But what makes them to have nuclear?

    Of course, No. We must consider what makes them to have nuclear weapons. Analogically think if we treat the crazy person, we must understand the needs of the crazy person and make forceful behavior to stop that 'needs'. Our current issue we must argue is 'so can we all live along together' I doubt on it.

  • NO, they are going to start another terrible war

    North Korea is a country that feels like they are stronger than they actually are, which is only going to get them in serious trouble with the U.N. the United States has been trying to form a treaty with them for many years, North Korea just can't seem to let go of the past. If we give them nuclear missiles, it won't start anything but trouble for people in their country and in the USA, they really should not be trying to fight anybody at this point

Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
Gareth_BM says2017-09-15T22:10:29.847
NO one is going to say they should the question is what do you do about it.
Spiffy-Gonzalez says2017-09-17T23:01:16.393
Gareth_BM, BOMB THE FUCK OUT OF EM. The only reason they have their current position of power is because we LET them. Now they're building a nuclear arsenal. They have even made it clear that they intend to build an arsenal comparable to mainland Europe.