In a patriarchal society, Girls must be harshly disciplined since a very young age. Her role as a female has to be instilled in her mind so that she is a proper, Obedient, Self-sacrificing, Male-adoring woman in time for puberty.
Boys, On the other hand, Should be free to be free be themselves as long as they're not doing anything illegal or particularly immoral.
Regardless of gender though, All children and wife must submit to the Male head of the house. If you disrespect or disobey Daddy, If Daddy thinks you've done something to deserve a punishment, Then you will be punished.
If my little girls disobey they get punished, And I think that's fine, You know. Like some people said, Girls need some punishment, More than boys.
You know what I do with my little slutty girls? I whip their cute little bums, Then I insert my penis into their tiny little arseholes. It's never pleasant, They always cry, They always bleed, And they always regret misbehaving.
I like it when my papa bites my nippies and when he slaps my cheeks or when he puts his peepee in my mouth and makes me drink it! He says its cuz i wuz bad gurl and its important to learn so he hits and punishes me and its ok i like it :3 uwu
I and most people who grew up in my generation and before had parents that disciplined their kids including physically and the vast majority of us have/had no issues because of it. If anything, It made us more accountable for our actions.
I think one of the biggest problems today is the lack of accountability. People blame others for things they do wrong. Don't blame my reckless driving, Blame the officer. Don't blame me for my bad grades, Blame my teacher. Don't blame me for my poor work ethics, Blame my boss and of course, Don't blame me for getting pregnant, Blame the baby. Your not the victim, Your the perpetrator who deserves what they get. If your never forced to face the consequences, You will never learn from it. If you do something you know is wrong, You should have to suffer the consequences of your actions. Sometimes that means having things taken away, Sometimes it means giving you time to think about it and other times it means you should suffer physically.
Don't get me wrong. I am not in favor of abuse. For parents, They key is love as well as respect. A parent shouldn't strike their child in anger but out of love as well as to gain their due respect. If a child defies or disobeys their parents, It shows a lack of respect that needs to be corrected in some manner. Sometimes, The best way to quickly correct such behavior is by making a big impact both figuratively and physically.
A long time ago, My mom was asked to watch a friend of hers child. Her friend had a hard time finding someone to watch the child as it tended to do some very bad things such as break stuff and make a huge mess. After her friend came back she noticed her son playing quietly and her house (my moms) in perfect order. She asked my mom what she did to make him behave? My mom had no idea so she asked her son "Why where you so well behaved here and not other places? " to which he said "She spanks. " No, My mother didn't spank her fiends child but she did spank my older brother and the other child saw this. It was this fear that made him so respectful and obedient around my mother so made a huge positive reaction.
Me and my older brother were physically disiplined when we were young. But my parents got tired of it so they didnt physically discipline my younger brothers, And all I can say is that they are much less well mannered. In my opinion screaming at your child is worse than a slap on the wrist psychologically. But at the same time, Just telling the kids not to do that isn't enough. I am not endorsing beating your kid up, But a little slap might help.
The current generation of Millennials and Generation Z's majority are entitled, Disrespectful, Careless and conceited, Narcissistic brats that act out because they've never lived in a structured environment. Children used to be spanked on a regular basis for acting up, Getting into fights, Stuff like that. Fathers used to whip their sons with their belts, What generation was that? The Greatest Generation, The ones that fought World War 2, And they grew up getting belt-whipped when they got in trouble badly enough. We could learn from our past. So long as it isn't without reason.
If children disobey their parents should be allowed to hit children if they don’t listen or if they are misbehaving okay and yes parents should hit their child and yes my mom hit me once and I learned my lesson ok 👍 so yeah my final answer is yes ok good bye 👋
There are a vast amount of people now who give in to their children. If they cry, Give them the chocolate bar or worse, The device! This simply shows a very feeble parent, And how do you think this will last? The child grows up to be disobedient. When you are young, You will have respect for your parents if they are strong and imposing.
As soon as you give up your power, You have shown the child that they are "smarter" than you (in their minds). Parents who are abusive or who are hitting their children for unrelated reasons are bad, That is true, However sometimes discipline is needed.
This strong attitude while the child is smaller helps to cement the fact that the parent is not open to being pushed around, And is rather the one who is in control. This control stops tantrums, And overall has had a general improvement on the mental outlook of my peers who have been treated similarly.
Somewhat interestingly, For all those people on their high horse about "human rights violations", The peers of mine who have strict, Disciplinarian parents are very well-behaved, Well mannered, Stay away from drugs and substance abuse, And are more inclined to be happier and enjoy life. After all, If you're used to everyone giving in to you and someone else has you a metaphorical "smack", Suddenly you are saddened because you can't get your way.
This all said, There is no excuse for genuine abuse and this is only an effective disciplinary measure if used with other, More caring methods, Such as rewards for good behaviour, As it is important to have children trust their parents but recognise that they are also to be respected.
Physical discipline is necessary to teach children respect and order. Many people in California are disrespectful because their parents didn't discipline them to be respectful or they beat them for fun. It is sometimes necessary to maintain order within the family and keep the children from becoming spoiled but there are times when it is unnecessary.
I think that parents should absolutely be allowed to hit their children and their teenagers as well if they disobey them ok and yes I think that parents should be allowed to hit their children and teenagers ok ok ok ok ok ok so yeah my final answer is yes ok ok bye bye
No, Parents should not be allowed to hit their children if they disobey. The punishment that children face for disobeying should be merciful and should help them understand the possible consequences of their decisions. Hitting them is the complete opposite of those things.
If you have to hit your child to make them obey, Maybe the rules you're enforcing aren't very fair. And I'm pretty sure it would be child abuse.
We are taught not to hit other people, And that violence isn't the answer. Then what are the parents if they hit? It shows that they are a hypocrite. I don't understand the need to hit children. There are many other ways and possibilities to discipline your children if you intend on using violence as your answer, Perhaps you should rethink how you discipline your kids.
Adults are much stronger than small kids and can hurt even if they don't intend it. It is painful, Unpleasant, And scary for anyone to be hit by someone twice their size.
Violence may shock a kid into behaving, But if it works long-term, It works because there is a credible fear or threat of violence. Violence and fear neither make for a healthy, Loving family environment nor teach moral lessons. If the goal of discipline is to teach a child the moral foundations they need to make good decisions independently of being watched by an authority, It must teach them the reasons behind why something is bad. Age-appropriate reasoning enables kids to come to the appropriate decision themselves. It needn't be complicated - "You shouldn't steal because somebody else worked hard to pay for that. /Would you like it if I took your game from you? " "Susan looks like she's hurt and upset. Do you think that's because you hit her? "
Obviously, Kids aren't always responsive to common sense. In these cases, It's easy to get angry. Other punishments that don't make the child see their parent as someone to fear include 'time-out', Chores, Or forfeiting something the child was looking forward to or enjoys. For it to work, It ought to be in proportion to what they did, And followed through on. If a kid learns that your non-physical warnings are serious, They are more likely to respond seriously to them. Discipline is difficult to get right all the time, But it's the overall trend that the kid will remember. Hitting isn't necessary to have a behaved child. It's more about being consistent, Firm, And serious.
When u hit children for their wrong deeds, There is literally no communication. They'll probably grow up to be a violent person and won't even understand the basics of communication. Communication is an essential element of life and it should be learnt by all children. With parents hitting children, Communication in all means fails so lmao yea jokes on you parents i guess.
If a child misbehaves and all you do is push a bookshelf on them or what have you, They don't learn anything about what they did and why it's wrong, And all they'll learn is that if they do something wrong they'll be hit, Which leads to them thinking that their best friend Suzy who won't share her Oreos deserves a smack.
I think in some extreme situations it might be justified, But in most others it is simply child abuse, Primitive people perpetuate violence when they hit their kids, Its like when slave owners beat their slaves, So slavery is wrong so is beating your kid, Only backwards vile typesdo it
Based on some research I did, Spanking kids can have some bad effects on them (ex. Violent behavior, Depression, Etc. . )
There are better ways to discipline children other than spanking because spanking them doesn't reach them anything from right and wrong most times, It usually teaches them fear and that they can't make mistakes. I would say that if anything else doesn't work on the kid, Than spanking is the last resort.
But otherwise, Spanking is not really good discipline.
Children learns by seeing and watching something or by looking. . Usually children see what there parent do or their elders and the children follows that and learns that so if the parent hit the children the children will get trauma and make child also do that hitting and so when the child grow up and marry and have a child, They will do the same thing. And also if the parent hit the child the child will have a trauma and the love on the family will brake.
If you hit a child, It’s just going to make them more rebellious and resent you even further. Is it really necessary to even hit your child? You’re basically giving him/her the example that hitting someone solves problems, Because you’re parenting by hitting a child. That’s not a very good role model. You shouldn’t solve things or win arguments by using physical force.
Hitting your kids is abuse. If you hate them so much, Give them up for adoption where they'll be treated better. It teaches blind obedience, Nothing more. It is just taking advantage of them and saying that they are not human beings. If you hit your child, They can hit back, And should. Any parent who loves their child would never do this. It is selfish and parents only do it to make kids feel like they have no power. Kids owe you nothing. They did not ask to be born to you. Stop treating them like your punching bag.