The earlier you teach the kids, the easier to teach, and more useful.
It is extremely useful, until high school ages.
Once people grow up into adults, it is just more difficult to learn, and not even useful.
It is good to teach, but the parents must learn to be ambidextrous before teaching their kids.
How they can "teach" sth they don't know?
(this is why parents "force" it, because they have no idea how difficult it is)
I've always thought someone who is ambidextrous was born with that ability, and does not gain it over time. That being said, I think it would be a very beneficial thing for someone to able to do the typical tasks, such as write and drive, with both hands. God forbid, if something happens to them and they lose a hand for example, they will still be okay.
Pitching: left hand is better because it's easier to tag people out on first base.
Basketball ambidextrous is a huge advantage. They'll be unstoppable driving up and down the court. If a player can only dribble with one hand, it's easy to know which way they'll go when being pressed.
Same with soccer. If you're on the left side of the field, you need to know how to use your left foot to attack the goal as well as your right when on the right side.
If you can use both hands you will be more flexible. Note-taking will be easier. Most importantly you will exercise both of your hemispheres. Some parents try to make their left-handed kids completely right-handed? Why? Two is better than one. Likewise a right-handed child will benefit from training in the use of his less-prefered hand.
I'm ambidextrous but I believe this is down to my biology, I don't think it can be teached. I have two grandparents who are left handed but, at school were forced to use their right hand, but it didn't make a difference because they are still left handed now. I don't think you can 'teach' it, you just are or aren't. If it IS possible to teach it, I don't think that would be natural
Also I must say, being ambidextrous gives me no upper hand to my friends who are not. It isn't that advantageous. I do think I read some statistics about ambidextrous people being lower in intelligence and happiness, but I'm not sure how accurate that is.
It is too much for a parent to force an unnecessary skill on his child. While it does increase brain function, it is not worth the risk of alienating a child because he or she does not see the point in learning a skill that then causes the parent to be strict in order for them to learn it. If the child develops a genuine interests in acquiring that skill, then he should pursue it. That's a better opportunity for the child and parent to actually connect.
I hardly think this is a pressing public issue. I think parents should worry about teaching their kids the basics at this point in our society. Being ambidextrous is not a particularly important quality that one can put on their resume'. Therefore, parents, just worry about something much more crucial to their well being.
Teaching your children to be ambidextrous is insane. Who comes up with these topics?
Unless you are born ambidextrous, you brain is either right or left wired. Trying to change that just causes problems.
Teaching your child to speak multiple languages is great; but, to use both hands, will hurt the child.
Ambidextrous Children Have Greater Risk of Language, Behavior Problems
Teaching kids to be ambidextrous is not a good idea because it just isn't worth it. We have lived fine using one dominant hand; why waste time teaching a skill that is useless? Instead, use that time and energy to teach children something useful, such as a new math technique, or how to tie your shoes.
So, being ambidextrous myself, I think kids she be able to use any hand they want. Being ambidextrous is completely pointless. There is no specialness about that ability, and anyone being born with it is more frustrating than anything. When I was younger, I was in baseball, and when I was first beginning, I decided to bat left handed, even though I wrote with my right hand. Everyone thought it was weird. I much rather have one dominant hand because it isn't useful.