Amazon.com Widgets

Should the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution be revoked?

  • Yes it should be revoked

    Too many people are dying in the US.
    Donald trump is the one complain about all of this after an attack, But he was the one talking about how great the NRA is during his campaign. All those who carry firearms are hypocrites, Unless they think that innocent people deserve to die.

    ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS

  • Need guns so we are safe.

    Wild Wild West There are just too many guns in the USA. No joke, but it is one country that I don't wish to visit anytime soon, because even a friend or aquantance, or his kid, may accidentaly shoot me in his home. The condition for the 2nd Amendment is non-existant today. Thus not all Americans need to own guns. But what's necessary is, to remove guns from criminals, with strong enforcement agencies. It's they who should keep America safe, so Americans don't have too. Otherwise the government is simply telling the public to do policing job. Now is that civilised.

  • Are your arms for a "well regulated militia"

    Start with the text:

    "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

    The "well regulated Militia" justification is an archaic fiction in light of modern warfare. At a minimum do away with the amendment in this archaic form. Create a newly enumerated right to use arms for hunting and self defense, but explicitly allow regulation to stop illegal uses and mass casualty events. Bump stocks, large clips and quick change clips are not justified for hunting or home defense.

  • How many more?

    How many people have to die in this country from gunfire before we decide to revoke the 2nd amendment? The irony of the fact that we are losing the War on Terror right in our own backyard due to caucasian american men killing people with their legally purchased guns. Go figure!

  • Let the children die, just don't take my guns

    The second amendment was put in place when the country was formed and is no longer valid in today's environment. Attention rednecks: this isn't the wild west any more. Our forefathers would be rolling in their graves if they could see the monster they've created. It's scary how resistant to change the conservatives are...Therin lies the true threat to our safety. To not even entertain the idea of sensible regulations speaks volumes about their intelligence. Appalling. The North should have just let the South secede.

  • Yeehaw. Why do stupid yanks love guns so much.

    Revoke the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution.
    Guess what in England...In Liverpool, it is illegal for a woman to be topless except as a clerk in a tropical fish.
    So why do you Yanks still have this stupid Amendment about its perfectly fine to fire guns at everyone every day of every month.

  • Everyone that said "no" is braindead.

    Piers Morgan please visit America next time there is a shooting next month in whatever school or city it happens in. There is too many braindead American's so the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution won't be revoked.
    Oh and to the braindead Americans. When Royalty used to be the government in UK, it was once illegal to eat mince pies on Christmas Day because the king hated them.

  • Wild Wild West

    There are just too many guns in the USA. No joke, but it is one country that I don't wish to visit anytime soon, because even a friend or aquantance, or his kid, may accidentaly shoot me in his home. The condition for the 2nd Amendment is non-existant today. Thus not all Americans need to own guns. But what's necessary is, to remove guns from criminals, with strong enforcement agencies. It's they who should keep America safe, so Americans don't have too. Otherwise the government is simply telling the public to do policing job. Now is that civilised?

  • Irrelevant and stupid

    The 2nd amendment was created in the days when our country was weak and was seen as an easy target by bigger countries like England to take advantage of. So without a military it was expected that all citizens rise up and try and repel the invading force. We have a military now so this is no longer necessary. The militia has evolved into the modern military. Also we no longer live on a harsh frontier were you had to defend yourself from Native Americans and wild animals. Guns are also more effective at killing people now. Im sure if the founding fathers saw people having mental meltdowns and then going out with there deaths machines to mow down random people in tight crowded urbanized areas they would at have some gun restrictions implemented if not take away guns all together.

  • The right to bear arms in the bill of rights is way too dangerous, and too deadly for America

    This right in the bill of rights tells people
    to purchase and use firearms to protect themselves, but they use them to hurt or even kill people, and then they become criminals, especially, people who are part of radical Islam. All gun shops should be off limits to criminals or radical Islamic groups.
    It has been on the bill of rights about 239 years. It should be revoked so all Americans and our nation can be more safer, and free of guns after what happened recently at a gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida with a deadly shooting that killed 48 people. If someone is shot with a gun, he or she could be killed instantly, that is how dangerous guns are. This is a reason why that the right to bear arms should be revoked to keep all Americans safe

  • Hell no.

    The most fundamental right we have is the right to life because all other rights depend on that. It doesn't make sense to grant people a right to life, but then deny people the ability to protect it. So I think the right to own guns is essential and it would be wrong for any government to deny people that right.

  • Absolutely not.

    Firearms unlike some tend to believe are still a huge part of this country's tradition and ideals. A lot of American homes have firearms, in fact there are at least 300 million firearms in the United States. The right to keep and bear arms is as important as the right for a religion and freedom of speech as it makes sure our voice is heard, and we are not trampled by the government. Ever.

  • Power corrupts, and we have to maintain out own government.

    Robing the people of the ability to defend themselves from threat foreign or domestic is wrong. Simply put all government eventually will become corrupt. Stalin took control in turmoil of the overthrowing of Rasputin. Hitler used his own laws to get what he wanted. The greatest threat to use is the lawful evil groups, who secretly take control, and the come out with conquering half the world, and don't say it can't happen to us, because that type of thinking invites the event in the first place. Fahrenheit 451, animal farm complacency and ignorance invites dictation. Holding on to our rights and if necessary guns is the only way to prevent corruption.

  • Last chance on rights

    Rights are protected, not decreed by governments - or so this nation's founders thought. Perhaps this country has become one of sycophants and not free people. If true, good luck keeping the particular rights you hold dear, because someone will find fault in them and just as easily take them away.

  • Absolutely Not!

    The 2nd Amendment was a well thought out addition that was added by a generation that had first hand experience with corrupt governments and war. We have become too complacent as a country and should not abdicate the responsibility to protect ourselves. When you do that, you give government all of the power. At some point, our government will fall, either due to foreign influence or it will simply become too corrupt to support itself. At that point, we will be back to the age where every man, woman, and child will need to protect themselves. I would rather be prepared and keep my guns.

  • Repeal won't stop criminals

    As it is, criminals do use legally acquired guns to carry out crime. However, if laws were passed that restricted the purchase of firearms, criminals aren't simple going to give up. They'll get their guns illegally. Either way, they'll have guns. The question is whether or not us law abiding citizens have the ability to defend ourselves when the criminals strike (whether their guns are legal or not). Revoking the 2nd Amendment isn't a question of criminal violence, it's a question of noncriminal self-defense.

  • Guns dont kill people, irresponsible people do

    If you support the revocation of the 2nd amendment then you are are a complete idiot. If you think guns kill people then again you are an idiot. I own many guns, and none of them get up and go kill anyone. It is the user. Stricter gun laws, yes. Getting rid of guns, no. If criminals are getting guns illegally now just wait and see if they outlaw guns, there will be even more guns coming into this country.

    Next time you go eat ice cream, make sure you blame the spoon for making you fat...Not the fat user who keeps getting more and more ice cream making them fatter and fatter.

  • The right to bare arms

    Some one walks into your house in the middle of the night, breaks your door down, with the look of drug fueled rage. He wields a 10 inch machete and attacks you family, buy the time the cops get to your house, your family is slaughtered, and the man runs off into the darkness. Alright. Same thing happens, but this time you, the civilian hears your door break in and your family trust you because with your gun, you can hold off the enemy or intruder, until the cops come, or it the criminal refuses to back down, you take matters into your own hands, you do what you need to and pull the trigger, you call the cops, tell them the whole story, and the position of the attacker, and you then are found not guilty because you saved your family from a threat.

  • Redecks arent safe

    As a fellow redneck myself, i will not feel safe if the 2nd ammendment is revoked. Just imagine, im banging my sister when all of a sudden her husband walks in. How am i supposed to defend myself against him? If i have a gun ill be able to get rid of him and marry my sister.

  • Rednecks arent safe

    As a fellow redneck myself, i will not feel safe if the 2nd ammendment is revoked. Just imagine, im banging my sister when all of a sudden her husband walks in. How am i supposed to defend myself against him? If i have a gun ill be able to get rid of him and marry my sister.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.
>