• Yes it should be regulated

    The internet should be regulated just like television. Children should not be able to have access to free porn; people should not be able to ruin someone's life or career with postings and articles on Google; people should not be able to have access to all of your PRIVATE information.

  • The Internet should absolutely be regulated.

    People should use the Internet to do research, write e-mails but not be able to use it as a weapon to cyber bully kids, adults and business. Many people these days are just cowards, hiding behind the Internet and posting nonsense. This should be banned. People need to get a life and not destroy lives of others. There is no social responsibility or accountability any longer. Where will this all lead to? We are supposed to be civilized and not junk, yet the world is turning for the worse it seems. These "freedoms" don't lead to anything positive. Use the Internet properly but not to vent anger.

  • Born to Porn

    Yes, the Internet should be regulated. At the moment the unrestricted access to information allows for free speech and in the right place this should be allowed. However, what many advocates of free speech fail to see is that the information, knowledge and data sometimes communicates with the wrong people. For example Porn sites are supposed to be restricted to the over 18s, yet we accept that under 18s will access them. Would it be right for your 14 year old daughter to see pornographic images? Probably not.

    Can we rely on parent's to make sure these images are not accessed by their under-age children? Probably not

    Do people who advocate that the Internet should not be regulated feel that this is acceptable and an inevitable part of unregulated Internet access? Probably.

    Parent's can regulate their child's online activity whilst in the home, but with the amount of free WiFi access around cannot regulate them when away from the home.

    We need Internet regulation to keep vulnerable members of society protected from the information that could harm them.

    Should the Government regulate the net?

    Of course they should. Who else would we trust to do such a job?

  • I would like an internet that separates between porn/gambling and general sites.

    Pornography is destructive, it ruins peoples lives. Therefore, all porn sites or gambling sites should be forced to have an EFFECTIVE "Prove you're 18" type of entrance without showing lewd pictures on the cover page. I think the majority of internet users wouldn't mind posting their adult content appropriately if so instructed.

  • Too Much Trash

    I am a retired military member. I served 20 years defending the rights and liberties that so many people abuse or take for granted. I personally believe that some limitations should be put on the internet. There is as much misinformation on the net as good information...Heck, probably more. People will write things that they wouldn't normally say to someone. If someone's name, picture, or video is used in any article, the person it is about should be notified and and given the opportunity to approve or disapprove the information before the page is published. Porn, hate groups, terrorist tips, weapons, drugs, and the like should not be so easily available to anyone who uses the internet. Anyone can lie about their age and gain access to information or products that they should not have access to. Just saying...The general public is not responsible enough to use the internet safely or correctly. Limit it now before it's too late. Laws need to be put into place to protect our children, the irresponsible, and the ignorant.

  • The internet should be regulated by the government to a certain extent.

    In my opinion, it should be somewhat regulated. I'm more on the yes side because sure everyone deserves their privacy, but there's children out there that have access to anything that is viewable on the web. Whether it be something educational, to something censored or nudity involved, children shouldn't be able to view this at their expense. The internet should be controlled by the government to provide a friendly and free internet service.

  • The internet should be regulated in the same way that society is.

    The internet should be regulated by the government, just as other venues of media and commerce are. There is no plausible reason that something on the internet should be exempt from Intellectual property and commercial laws, as well as laws that cover other forms of media such as television and radio. The very real and dangerous presence of illegal images such as child pornography and voyeuristic videos alone are a reason that the web should not be a free-for-all. The internet should mirror society at large -- while free speech and liberties are important, we acknowledge a social contract to give up a little of our liberties in exchange for certain protections. There is nothing unusual or nefarious about that.

  • It could prevent life-ruining crimes.

    You have your right to an opinion yes, by all means. As do you have a right to express it. And I think that no government should make any attempts as to censor articles regarding political, religious or other kinds of opinion. Nor should there be taxes. And porn is a matter of parental control, and not a national issue.
    My religion aside, there are no reason porn should be made illegal given it is fully legal, and everyone involved is in on it by choise.
    But what is I told you that where a lot of the porn you see, the girl is raped. Human trafficking is a industry, like drugs, only far more unethical. Young girl, perhaps younger than 10 yrs old can be kidnapped and become a piece of merchandise. And by government regulations, this can be stopped, alongside child-pornography, and other extremely unechtical uses.
    Everything illegal in the real life should be illegal on the web, and everything legal (for example express yourself) should be legal here.

  • I am young

    I don't want to see yucky sites even Facebook is to far so it should be regulated only if they want if for example young kid like me but either way people will still put yucky and gross stuff on the internet so it doenst really matter but it should just because of the young kids

  • Regulation by its very nature sets limits to freedom, which is the most basic principle of democratic societies

    There is a contradiction intrinsic to the notion of regulating what are supposed to be the free means of expression and information in a modern society. Dennis McQuail stated that “Regulation by its very nature sets limits to freedom, which is the most basic principle of democratic societies.” At the very least, this means that there have to be clear and convincing reasons for tougher regulation, and although we can give general justifications for regulation that help to reconcile it with principles of freedom and democracy, we cannot escape from this underlying tension. The advancement in technology and the exponential growth in the online industry as well as the demand for innovative information deregulation and low monitored regulations however break the barriers that stifle the online industry and enhance its growth.

  • NO, the government should leave the internet alone

    Information wants to be free. The government should not have the ability to control freedom of thought. Unfortunately, some people will use that freedom for bad causes, but government should be involved in controlling those bad people and not the internet. If we put the power to control the internet into the hands of government, that power itself can be abused. I would rather know there are websites that offer illegal or undesirable content than not know what I am being blocked from seeing.

  • No, the internet should not be regulated by the government.

    The internet provides the general public with important information that the government may want to hide for one reason or another. Transparency is an important idea to both business and government activities, and since both the business and government sector do not provide adequate transparency (or information to the public) it's up to the internet to fill in as many of these holes as it can.

  • Absolutely Not.

    The Internet is one of the last free grounds for Americans. it is one of the last places that the government has not taken control of. All the people of the world own and have created the Internet, and we should not be restricted or regulated in our use of it.

  • It would mean a loss of free speech.

    The Internet is a global tool used for education, communication, and business. If the UN were to regulate it, it would result in a loss of free speech. Also we would be censored and denied our right to the information the government doesn't want us to see, such as what is on Wikileaks. You have to remember the Internet was created by the people, not the government.

  • No freaking way!

    My reason is because the entire world cannot be taxed the same way. The USA already is in a high amount of debt and they would only end up wasting more money like they are currently. They should find another solution for the problems they have caused without ruining it for the rest of the world.

  • Who would regulate it?

    The Internet is an international tool. The United States of America are not the only people who use the Internet. Who is to say that the Internet is America's (or anyone for that matter) to regulate? The Internet doesn't "belong" to the government, it was created for the people who use it.
    Yes, there are things on the Internet that society frowns upon, such as child pornography, online trolling, and cyber-bullying. However, with any new form of communication, it should be expected that there are people who would abuse it. But the Internet is so broad a medium, that not only would it be nearly impossible to regulate, even if we found someone suitable to regulate it.

  • A Free Place For Everyone

    The Internet is a means for people all over the world to explore, to expand their knowledge, to communicate, to receive information. If they are to be restricted by the government and the law, the purpose of the Internet is defeated. What good is this huge bounty of information and data if people are unable to utilize it fully?

  • I do not believe that the internet should be regulated by the Government.

    This is because, by allowing them to do this you are enabling them to control your views. Also, although many people believe that this will help to target terrorism, it also invades the privacy of ordinary members of the Public. Why does the government need to know minor details e.g. what you like to buy on the internet? I dont believe this is necessary, therefore I do not think the government should be allowed to regulate the internet. I suggest instead that they gain the ability to gain knowledge of suspected criminals, as opposed to snooping on ordinary and innocent civilians.

  • Freedom of speech

    Governments control enough things already. That's just the governments of the world taking what is truly ours, not the governments. Us users of the Internet frown upon child pornography and that stuff. We try to do what we can but its not the governments to control. Pretend a giant movement is going around to stop the NSA but they just shut it down. This means corruption could happen and the internet would be used and controlled by the rich. Governments could stay in as long as they want if you give them that power. There are too many possibilities.

  • Impossible to Regulate

    It is impossible to regulate the Internet because if a country wants to put down a site such as Facebook due to political issues in that country is it really fair that the rest of the world cannot access that website? One of the biggest problems we will face if we regulate the Internet is exactly what should be regulated because all countries have their own opinion. We all are culturally and religiously different which affects our opinion

Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.