• Paparazzi are Scum

    Paparazzi are scum who invade people's privacy on a regular basis. If normal people were harassed by men taking photographs, these people would be prosecuted for stalking and assault. The paparazzi should be banned because celebrities do selfies all the time on social media, so we don't need 20 million pictures of Kim Kardashian and her family.

  • The paparazzi should be banned.

    The paparazzi serve no real purpose and they are a nuisance to everyone. People should stop paying for tabloid magazines because they are a low form of culture and they are libelous. Rather, we should treat celebrities with respect when due or simply ignore them when they start to behave badly.

  • In many situations, yes

    The paparazzi makes celebrities lives impossible and causes many safety concerns and issues. If the paparazzi was banned then there would be a lot less information for stalkers to use to find celebrities. Celebrities and their families could live in peace without having to constantly watch over their backs or shield themselves from cameras.

  • They are normal people

    Celebrities want to live a happy life but they can't with paparazzi following them around 24/7. I get it, it's their jobs but you don't need to bombard them. They can take pictures at special events or premieres but seriously, why would you take a picture of them going to the supermarket? They need food too! They aren't aliens!

  • Celebrities have a life too.

    Celebrities have a life they already have to deal with fans chasing after them so they don't need hundreds of cameras in there faces especially after a hard day. I don't get the need to follow them around 24/7 they are human beings they are normal too. I don't think you would like it if you had cameras at the frount of your house waiting for you too come outside would you?

  • Why do we need to know everything?

    Yes we are very curious but is it seriously necessary to invade their privacy. Cant we just get a life and leave theirs alone. Yes, some of the celebrities like all the attention but people are going a bit overboard with the whole thing. They are humans to and they really shouldn't have to be harassed.

  • I have a debate

    Hi guys, I am currently doing a debate at school and my topic is this and we all also affirmative. I have listed a lot of things in my debate like: Princess Diana, Lara Bingle when a Paparazzi tried to trip her and also the recent fight between Packer and Gyngel (if that's how you spell it) I hope these ideas helped you! By the way if you have any ideas please submit here, thanks

  • Yes,In Most of Time

    As human beings all around the world (we do not want to be embraced anyway). Well You say information is important ,So I say important for who ? What purpose ? If data is gotten by high level information officials in the government for the safety of people not to be abused and for black market of commercials its even very good and effective if not any sort of announcement about about any celebrities personal life without his or her own permission even supportive ones are non ethical and must be banned.

  • Individuals should be respected

    Paparazzi's are contributing to suicides, depression, accidents, and troubling lives of both "famous" people and their loved ones such as children. This needs to stop. If I want to see an artist, I pay to go see them perform, for example. It is not humane to allow paparazzi's to take away they life from these "famous" individuals.

  • R.I.P princess Diana

    Princess Diana died because of the paparazzi chasing her what if this happens to more of our famous stars if the paparazzi was banned we wouldn't have to deal with the loose of our stars.
    The paparazzi also ruin the images of our stars such as selena gomez and Justin bieber kissed do you really believe that?

  • No they shouldn't

    There are already many laws that exist that we can use to help regulate the problems celebrities face with the paparazzi. It is Illegal for the paparazzi, like any other person, to trespass. Therefore the paparazzi are not allowed to enter private property without the permission of the owners. This would limit them from taking photos of celebrities in their houses, backyards and at any other venues which have restricted access for the public. It can also be argued as a consequence of this that the paparazzi can also be restricted from taking a photo of a celebrity whilst the celebrity is on private property from an adjoining property. When a photo was taken of Kate Middleton, sunbaking topless, whilst on private property by a photographer with a long lens in a neighbouring yard, the court ruled in favour of Kate and had the photo withdrawn from circulation. The paparazzi are also not allowed to harass or stalk famous people. In the unlikely case that they do most celebrities have a form of security protecting them. The High Court in the UK has in a few instances enforced the anti-stalking laws, for example One Direction Singer Harry Styles won a case against a particular group of paparazzi. This group was banned from pursuing him in the street or waiting outside his house. Other everyday laws that the paparazzi must also abide by all the usual road rules. The photographer who intentionally drove into Lindsay Lohans car in the United States in order to get a photo should be charged with reckless driving. Paparazzi who pursue celebrities in cars or on motorbikes, still need to abide by the road rules. The police can pull over and charge them with speeding and dangerous driving if they are in fact breaking these laws. If the police enforce these road rules better then accidents such as the tragic one that claimed the life of Princess Diana may have been avoided. It should now be clear that the Paparazzi should not be banned as there are already other laws in place which can be used to regulate their behaviour.
    In order to prevent incidents that can be caused by Paparazzi, we should introduce new laws that protect the celebrity’s rights and wellbeing. For example, a celebrity should have the right to not allow a picture to be exposed to the media. This way the stories in our magazines are not just a biased inference that is affecting the celebrity. Magazines should be made to obtain written consent from the celebrity to use photos of them, this would avoid court cases like the one that Kate Middleton had after the photos of her sunbaking on vacation were published in a French magazine. Kate deserves the right to see the photos before they are made public. The paparazzi should not be allowed to take pictures of celebrities who are in a vulnerable situation. Simpler rules could also be put in place.

  • I do not think the paparazzi should be banned.

    I do not think the paparazzi should be banned. I do however think there should be some sorts of regulation on what they are allowed to do. It is ridiculous that they stand around trying to catch celebrities coming out of their own homes. I guess our culture is partially to blame too though, because there are so many mindless drones who consume the drivel that the paparazzi puts out.

  • No, they have a place in society.

    No, the paparazzi should not be banned, because they serve a place in society for those who are interested. The paparazzi have found a way to make an honest living by taking photographs. There is nothing wrong with that. Occasionally, they invade privacy, but that should be handled on a case by case basis.

  • must have some freedom

    The paparazzi have the right to do what they do under the laws of the United States of America. They have the right to free speech as long as they are not hurting people in the process of doing what they do. There should be some type of balance that goes on.

  • No. Paparazzi are generated by celebrities.

    To be honest, most people who are famous today are famous because they want to be. Youngsters do not want to be talented performers. They want to be celebrities. And these celebrities call the paparazzi whenever they want attention. Those serious actors and singers who want privacy do not do that and they get their privacy so it isn't the fault of the paparazzi.

  • They need money

    They properly do not like what they are doing they need it for money. I do not know why people do not give them a chance. If you want them to be banned maybe you should give them some money and try helping them. We need to do our part in this we need to give them a chance we need to think what if we had the option to be a paparazzi and we had no home but that could change if we joined we will get paid a whole lot of money! We need to give them 1 chance thank you.

  • Celebrities feed of publicity

    The way celebrities get their money and earn their success is mostly by publicity. If the celebrities get a lot of publicity, Whether it is positive or negative, More people will want them to star in ads, Tv shows, Movies, Perform, Etc, Thus leading to more money for the celebrities.

  • Marketing of celebrities

    Paparazzi really serve at doing the promotion of celebrities. Often people who we don't see often on screen, When caught by paparazzi, They are kind of being remembered again. Moreover, They make celebrities more famous by clicking their photos and posting on social media. They have a huge contribution in the fame of others.

  • The Paparazzi shouldn't be banned by Emma

    The Paparazzi shouldn't be banned. Many people think they should, But what about the people who are Paparazzi people can make $500, 000 a year, And if they were banned all the Paparazzi would have to get a new job. Another reason is it's a job so just because celebrities don't like it doesn't mean they should be banned. For example, Some people may think teachers, Doctors, Or babysitters are not nice or rude, But that doesn't mean they should be banned, Does it? Also, There are laws and the paparazzi follow them, So if they are doing nothing wrong they shouldn't be banned. What about info if it weren't for the paparazzi how would information spread. The paparazzi shouldn't be banned.

  • Momom mom momma

    They gave their money back and they started out on a birthday and then you didn’t have a job and then they started going back and they started going back in a good time to give them the same money to go back to their job they started going back and then you got killed in a job and then they gave their job to a homeless people they didn’t want you money and then you didn’t want them money and then you can not go back and then you have money

Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.