I think we should have dropped the bomb on Japan they deserved it. Remember at Pearl Harbor, they bombed us. The war would keep going until they were tired of fighting or until they didn't have any more men to fight with or even if they didn't have any more equipment to fight with. I think you should agree with me.
The Japanese predicted twenty million clandestine deaths defending the home islands. The more revised US estimates predicted up to four million Allied casualties with one million dead. Not to mention the 1.6million Soviet troops who had just entered the theatre of conflict and who were ruthless in their warfighting and had a tendency to die in their thousands themselves.
In comparison, the atomic bombs killed between 150,000-250,000 depending on the source. Can you really say that they were unnecessary when looking at these statistics? They unquestionably saved MILLIONS and MILLIONS of lives.
Sure, it could be said that the use of atomic weapons created a nuclear precedent that led to the Cold War, but the Soviets themselves were developing atomic weapons anyway as Soviet spies had gained access to the Manhattan Project and implemented an atomic weapons program in Russia.
Other historians have said that the US dropped them simply to show their might and assert their authority. This is absolute rubbish, the US homefront was relatively unscathed and industry was booming with exports and war manufacturing. The US was in pole position to dominate the post-war world with or without the atomic bomb.
Furthermore, cases have been made for using the bombs over non-populated areas, but where's the guarantee that Japan would have heeded this warning? They outright rejected the threat of annihilation promised in the Potsdam declaration and despite some cities suffering up to 97% damage as a result of area bombing and firebombing, Japan still refused to surrender.
Elsewhere, historians believed that a continued naval blockade along with conventional bombing would have eventually brought Japan to her knees, however, the US nor the allies for that matter had any intention of allowing a war that had raged for six years to rumble on any further when the means to end it swiftly were readily available. Anyway, with the Soviets invading on the other side, allied lives would still have been lost in their droves, not to mention the lives of the fanatical defenders. It wasn't just the Japanese army that was defending the islands, but a 'civilian militia' that numbered in the millions, all of whom were expected to fight until the last bullet.
I see these comments about 'de-classified documents estimating 40,000-60,000 deaths' and can't help but laugh at your naivety. On Iwo Jima alone there were almost 50,000 combined casualties, and while it was soverign territory, the home islands of Japan would prove a different battle.
The terrain of Japan made a land invasion highly predictable to the defenders and the planned guerilla style resistance would have created a battle of attrition. The death toll would have been millions, WITHOUT QUESTION.
I am a former member of the British military and a third-year American History student, I know what I'm talking about. I challenge any of you to come up with a more thoroughly researched argument.
We dropped the bomb because the Japanese were ruthless jerks who dropped bombs on us first. They destroyed our ships making it to where we couldn't ship as much and defend ourselves. They tore apart Pearl Harbor so much that they could have invaded there and took over and they were sad they didn't. It was only fair that we bomb them in return. It may have killed hundreds but they killed our people, too!
Yes we should have because they had plenty of opportunities to surrender and they didn't. We told them if they didn't surrender, there would be utter mass destruction put upon them. They chose to ignore it and brush it off. If we had invaded, then probably 1/4th of Japan's population would have been killed. Yes, it was terrible that so many people died, but in the end, it was what the U.S. Thought was necessary. Japan still didn't surrender after the first bomb was dropped, only after the second one was dropped, the emperor of Japan stepped in and gave the final decision of surrendering.
If the atomic bomb didn't happen a lot of people would have died for no reason. The Japanese only kept fighting because there leader was making them. All the had to do was just kick him out or something. They started the war so they deserve to bombed. It saved millions of people lives.
Think of it, they killed about 15000 people, but if they didn't do it, who knows what could of happened! The war have gone on and on and billions of people could have died! Yes, they could have just stopped at Hiroshima, but still! They killed thousands to save millions.
The dropping of those two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was very bad. However, a land invasion would have costed an excess of one million American lives. The Japanese of the 1940's would have fought to the last inch of that island, and the body count would have been astronomically higher if the bombs weren't dropped.
What if that was your Family member, Friend, Lover.
What if that was you fighting in the war. Would you want to get killed, So all people who said we shouldnt have dropped the bomb i think you need Think agian because without that bomb we would have lost more than we killed so think about that maybe just maybe you will change you mind.
The us wanted to end the war quickly without costing the lives of more soldiers. So the president agreed to drop the bombs. It made the Japanese surrender because they knew that if they continued the war they could not win. The atomic bomb's destructive power would have defeated them anyways.
A lot of the arguments I am seeing on the opposing side talks about how lots of innocent people would have been spared if the bombs were not dropped but in reality that would not have been the case.
If the US would have continued fighting without the dropping of the bomb it would have ended in the invasion of the Japanese home islands since a larger majority of Japanese people did not believe in surrender because of their Samurai code. If the US had decided to go ahead with an invasion it would have resulted in a lot more deaths since the Japanese were teaching children to run into large groups of US soldiers and under tanks and then trigger the explosives, School children were also told to attack them with sharpened wooden sticks. These sort of tactics would probably have had a lot of physiological affects on a lot of people. On top of that once the Nazis had been defeated the Soviet Union had set up a lot of puppet governments in European countries that the Nazis had previously been in control of. If the US were to do a conventional invasion the Soviet Union would probably have done the same thing, with this happening to the Japanese Home Islands a lot of other countries may have also turned against the Japanese (mainly the Pacific ocean countries).
In conclusion the US was also looking for a fast way out of the war that would have resulted in the last amount of US citizen deaths. The US also gave Japan a chance to surrender before they dropped the 1st bomb but the Japanese government did not understand the power of this weapon since nothing like this has never been seen before. In response to people who say the the bomb was dropped without warning and that their was no reason to do so, the bombing of pearl harbour procured without warning or a solid reason.
Sorry If I missed anything important or if some of my arguments are not 100% accurate, most of my sources are from western documentaries which can be a little 1 sided.
(also to lazy to fix any Grammar issues cause I was in class while typing this and that is now over :) )
No, I don't believe that the U.S. should have dropped the atomic bomb. The atomic bombs that we dropped on Japan were completely uncalled for and were an excessive show of force which could have been easily avoided through diplomatic means. The regions of those bomb sites had lasting effects of the nuclear blast and left many in the area with problems and also left their children with problems. It is ironic that the U.S. polices the world in who is allowed to carry nuclear weapons and who is not, even though we are one of the only countries to ever use them on another nation.
Using the atomic bomb, a weapon of unfathomable power to those never a target of one, was a mistake. It showed the rest of the world that nuclear energy can be weaponized, which is proven by the stockpiles held in multiple nations today, and was nothing more than a brute show of force much akin to the 9/11 bombings. Yes, delegations were refused by the Japanese government; however, we also refused to delegate with the respective governments that supported the 9/11 attacks. An old proverb states "the pot's calling the kettle black," it seems hippocritical for us to commit genocide.
It was very horrible to bomb innocent citizens, even if they were from an enemy country. Nuclear bombs should be outlawed in general, and this is an example. Had WE been bombed by Japan with a nuclear bomb, we would be outraged. They were outraged too. Yes, Japan was cruel too in that war, but it didn't give the US an excuse to showcase a weapon at the cost of countless lives.
Perhaps America could have justified one, but they dropped two, which was completely unnecessary. America could have shown the dangerous power of the bomb to Japanese leaders on uninhabited land, and they might have surrendered. America also justified the bomb by saying that "1 milion" Americans would have died had they not: a completely made up statistic. Had America gotten over their pride of having non-conditional surrender, Japan would've has surrendered if they knew their emperor wouldn't have been harmed, who was basically a religious figure to them.A America had many chances to come to terms with Japan but in all honesty they probably just wanted to see the shear destructive magnitude of the bomb.
While some warmongers love to ramble on and on about how "death is a part of war" and that "civilians die," it's simply not true in it's entirety. Targeting civilians has always been disgraceful in warfare and today it is a war crime if not a crime against humanity, especially with deaths in that magnitude. Japan was on it's way down, and destroying hundreds of thousands of innocents in TWO SEPARATE ATTACKS was just unnecessary and evil.
So what if the U.S. would've fought in the war longer? Japan would've been spared the horror. Harmless, innocent civilians were brutally murdered, the subsequent radiation made the cities unlivable for the longest time, and the environment was harmed horribly. Forget bombings, we should've fought longer!
"It is my opinion that the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were almost defeated and ready to surrender...in being the first to use it, we...adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages." -Fleet Admiral William D. Leahy.
The Japanese were actually ready to surrender long before the bombs were realized; it was the US who demanded an unconditional surrender.
Now, the atomic bomb didn't really change the tide of war that much, considering that several other Japanese cities had been bombed to oblivion, whether by one plane and one bomb, or several planes and several bombs was trivial. It was really the invading forces from the soviet union that made the Japanese surrender, and because they knew the soviets would claim many territories from Japan, among others the island Hokaido, they submitted to the US, using the atomic bombs as their reasoning.
So if the Americans didn't need to drop the bomb on Japan, why did Truman command it? It was entirely to "flex their muscles" for the Soviets to witness their power.
The U.S was against the country ,so why kill the people and not the military?It's not the peoples fault that the country would not surrender.Why should the people die for the country.If The U.S wouldn't have come up with the atomic bomb,the world would be a better place.Don't get me wrong I love the U.S,but that was really cruel,because many died.The People had no choice.
No, I don't believe that the U.S. should have dropped the atomic bomb. The atomic bombs that we dropped on Japan were completely uncalled for and were an excessive show of force which could have been easily avoided through diplomatic means. The regions of those bomb sites had lasting effects of the nuclear blast and left many in the area with problems and also left their children with problems. It is ironic that the U.S. Polices the world in who is allowed to carry nuclear weapons and who is not, even though we are one of the only countries to ever use them on another nation.
I think that we shouldn't have dropped the bomb because it took many innocent lives that shouldn't have been taken. Even though we caught the bad guys, we still got people that weren't even involved in the situation. It was a pointless act of cruelty and it shouldn't have been done!