It depends a lot on what exactly you're enforcing on, but "all weapons" is overkill. Not to mention that even if you were to ban just guns, a lot of shootings are known to involve firearms that were illegal anyway. Weapons have tons of practical uses outside of killing, so at least in the case of idk, non lethal pistols and most knives/daggers, it should be fine. Also non-combat recreation exists, albeit as a bit of a flimsy point.
It really annoys me when people want a whole freaking weapons closet though, like at that point you know something's up
We southern people are better than dem northern people cause we use a shotgun instead of a baseball bat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . We would be the first to survive a attack . . . . . . . .
You southern people tried to break away from the U.S. to try and keep slaves. You are pure evil. And what attack? Nobody is going to attack you, unless you mean the union, which you lost against. So, no, nothing you said is true.
Guns are weapons of mass destruction. We should not use their name as freely as 'the' or 'a'.