The truth of the matter is, the Earth is dying because of all of the people in it. If we do not do something sooner rather than later, we are going to be in a lot of trouble. Watching how high our population is would be a good first step.
The world is becoming overpopulated. To save ourselves and our families we need to restrict the amount of kids you can have, because too many of people are collecting money and taxes on their kids when they don't need it. This would also help with retirement and welfare because we wouldn't be paying out so much money to pay for all these people. (baby boom is a good example.)
Have you not seen the destruction of the planet on the news and for yourself? Every day animals are going extinct because of humans destroying their homes and killing them for selfish reasons like money and their pelts to wear. Pollution is causing the arctic to melt and destroying more of their homes and disrupting the food chain, the very backbone of life for the animals. We are ruining the land, the sky and once more people are born this process of destruction speeds up.
I not only think population should be controlled, it should be enforced by law. Humans may say animals are overpopulating, but we're the only species that's overpopulated.
More people could survive on Earth - badly. But not for far into the future.
Ecological recovery is urgently needed for long-term sustainability - for all species.Ultimately, we depend on many, if not all, of the others.
Real sustainability will require a change of attitudes towards all aspects of life and all forms of life. We need a global community of scientists that are able to think freely without bureaucratic and financial constraints. We need their technologies, but more so, we need their analyses of conditions to inform a new form of leadership with trust based on truth.
Societies would then aim for the necessary conditions for sustainability, including an end to poverty, and for equality based on new attitudes to "rights" Property rights and the concept of "employment" would be anathema in a sustainable world.
A declining population - just enough to suppress any need for "growth" - would leave room for hope, optimism and the attitudes these would inspire.
Human population has increased at an almost exponential rate. With this growth comes an increase in demand for land, food, water, energy, and other resources. As human numbers grow species and their habitats diminish. The bulk of evidence suggests that human population growth is an important underlying cause of biodiversity loss. According to the most recent projections, by the end of the 21st century human population could reach as high as 16 billion or as low as 5.5 billion.
...Not quantity but quality is necessary for this planet to survive! Don't you see it?
The world is overcrowded already and full of hungry innocent kids born in ultimate misery.
The planet is not an endless space full of goods for another 10 billion of hungry throats.
Very soon the human life will become nothing else than terrible existence in hunger and misery.
The finite nature of acceptable air, water, soil and material resources has been exceeded with the concomitant collapse of viable ecosystems throughout the world. Limiting conditions to population growth include potable water, agricultural water, agricultural soil, marine fish habitats and populations, air temperature, severe drought or flooding, fertilizer components, etc. Populations have been controlled by three main factors in the past. These are famine, war and disease. The same factors will again come into effect as climatic conditions worsen. The only solution is to reverse the consumption of planetary resources needed for human existence. This can be done by limiting population growth voluntarily or by allowing nature to take its course.
Daily, there are a greater amount of people born into poverty than comfort, human nature strives and claims to be about equality however we seem incapable of ever being able to achieve it. We should stop the rate of births for a few years and allow those already born to achieve a higher potential. But we may as well try to stop the Suns rise.
There is no longer any use for high populations as we move into a post industrial society. It's childish to presume that all people are born with the right to reproduce. These are ideas from a more primitive, selfish society of greed and assumed self importance. It's time for people to grow up. We're owed nothing, we owe everything to this blue planet.
The current population of the planet is around 7.2 billion. By 2050, the U.N. Department of Social and Economic affairs already predicts that there will be an estimate of about 9.6 billlion people on th planet. Most of the population will most likely occur in countries like China and India. As the population now sours, food and nessities will be a must needed factor to suport the population of the people on earth, resulting to deforestation of the planet.
It includes abortion and killing children, which is crime! If giving birth to a child that is illegal, killing them and aborting their future is a larger crime. Where do you see humanity. Also 50% of the land on earth is covered up with human, what about the other 50? Also to control the population, proper education is needed to provide but can the world bare to educate people? No, so no sense in blaming people for giving birth to a illegal or third child.
A government or other authority can not impose limits to human rights. That being said I do agree with population control. There are ways to enact these limits without the authoritative restraints. We should make all forms of birth control easily accessible and free. It is much cheaper to pay for a pregnancy prevented than to pay for an accident. We should also stop giving tax benefits for having a child. In that same spectrum we need to end assistance to families. If the family has too many kids, let them all starve or learn to live off the land. We need to get back to survival of the fittest.
Some couples like to have a lot of children, because they feel happier and more comfortable with more members in the family. It’s somebody’s freedom to decide what they want for their family. The family is a couple's decision to make. Government should not control the decisions in a family.
There is no good, legal way to do so. The only effective way, would be to institute a limit on how many children you can have, which is a violation of human rights. If I wish to have only one child, thats my right. But it's also my right to have 10 children, if I so choose. The government should not be in the population control business. They have no right to tell me or anyone else how many children we can have.
In our modern world, freedom is highly regarded. Having children is a freedom that should not be deprived from people. However, it is true that the unimpeded growth of human population is created enormous problem.
Since limiting human population growth is ethically unjust, thus wrong to legalize, we can only limit human population growth through social methods. If government resources are put into spreading scientific info to the general public, and encouraging people to think of environmental implications of their lifestyle when making decisions, I think a portion of people would actually refrain from having big families, or choose to adopt instead.
Since we all know how much media affect us, I also wish more TV shows like Bones would surface (or similar influence in media), instead of ones like Vampire Diaries or those reality TV shows. Bones has been great at raising odd topics of society, especially at touching those topics from a delicate objective viewpoint. It inspires thought while delivering entertainment.
I do not agree with limiting population growth. It is wrong to me You are basically telling people that they can have a certain amount of kids. What if people want a big family? That is something many people of the world want and it is wrong to tell them they cannot.
No government or any other such ruling body should limit human population growth. Having children is a cherished moment in one's life, and so long as the individuals having children are responsible parents, they should not be restricted from having them. In addition, many of the results attributed to overpopulation such as resource strain and pollution are really the result of neglect, carelessness, and greed on the part of other humans. Instead, governments or similar ruling bodies should advocate better decision making. In addition, studies show there is a correlation between education and a lower birth rate. More education and a lower birth rate is a solution that benefits multiple parties rather than just one or a few.
If overpopulation were to be achieved, it will either A) not be a problem, or B) cause many people to eventually die because of there is no way for the people to live a sustainable life since the population limit has been supposedly exceed. A) if it is not a problem there is no need to control it. B) In that case there is still no need to control it because it will ultimately control itself. even though there is suffering from route B) there is still suffering caused by controlling it.
Mandel thought an overpopulation crisis would happen about a hundred years ago. It didn't. Technology always keeps up. Even famines aren't caused by overpopulation/not enough food. They're caused by economics and the fact that many governments don't have a social safety net in place to deal with problems like this and some can't afford it. Talking about overpopulation makes it easy for people to dismiss problems like world hunger. The fact is we could abolish world hunger by the end of the year if wealthier nations came together and agreed to it.
There are problems with every proposed means to hinder the natural expansion of mankind. Condoms dull sensation, have problems of poor fit, semen backpressure, and multiple modes of "failure." Many people have practical or "religious objections" to especially "artificial" methods of "family planning." Pulling out is said not to work very well. Each drop of precum can contain up to 50,000 sperm, and often more than a few drops oozes out of the penis head long before ejaculation. It seems humans were designed to steadily multiply.
As a pro-lifer, I very much favor a greater spread of human life, and a much stronger flow of babies into the world.
As the world population grows, the numbers of parents yearning for more children can also easily grow. Yet another compelling argument for the continuing natural enlargement of the human race.