• "Never, never I say, cause the Ku Klux Klan is here to stay"

    I believe that it was nothing more than real anti-German nonsense. It was victor's justice basically speaking. The Scots mistreated and murdered Rudolph Hess without mercy too. But as for the trial I think it was nothing more.
    I mean look at it this way, if Brits and Danes won't be tried for their colonial crimes, as we saw against Ireland and Greenland

    Then the "evil" Germans or the other fascist enemies of WWII should not be tried either.

  • They wanted a certain outcome.

    This is what was "proven" at Nuremberg and what Jewish historians say today:

    1945: Dachau and Buchenwald had gas chambers.
    2018: Dachau and Buchenwald did not have gas chambers

    1945: Four million Jews killed at Auschwitz
    2018: A million, maybe a million and a half, mostly Jews killed at Auschwitz

    1945: Two million Jews killed at Majdanek
    2018: 78,000 Jews killed at Majdanek

    1945: 700,000 Hungarian Jews killed at Auschwitz
    2018: 460,000 Hungarian Jews killed at Auschwitz
    Bonus: Note the inconsistency between this and the total claimed at Auschwitz

    1945: Germans did the Katyn Massacre
    2018: Soviets did the Katyn Massacre

    1945: Steam rooms and electric floors at Treblinka
    2018: Uhh... Never mind

    1945: Lampshades made of Jewish skin
    2018: Uhh... Never mind

    1945: Soap made from Jews
    2018: Uhh... Never mind

    1945: muh six million
    2018: muh six million

    This is what Jewish historians like Hilberg, Gilbert et al. Admit today.

  • The whole thing was a lie

    1. The defendents were not allowed to deny the main charges- all submitted documents were considered real and factual and all witness statements were as well and not subject to cross examination
    2. Only the defendents were subject, not the allies who would have hung for the same crimes.
    3. The defence were not able to see any documents that were not read into the court transcript or call any witnesses to their defence that were not able to testify and there.
    4. All key "confessions" were obtained by torture
    5. The evidence was falsified
    6. The German's were impossible to prosecute under a normal trial because they conducted themselves the best out of all combattants- any real crimes the allies were also guilty of.
    7. It was an exact analog of medieval witch trials
    8. The only legal strategy available was "know nothing", "minimised involvement" or blaming someone who was not there (that's how Eichmann and Mengele enter the story- the only reason in fact).

  • Are you mad?

    What possible profit could there have been to fake such n event? And the corpses of the executed? We're they fake too? As to the fact if the Nuremberg trials were fair, here one can have a say, since most of the German scientists were immediately scooped up by either the USSR or the USA

Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.