Amazon.com Widgets

With the interruption between the candidates, Wouldn’t a glass booth, Separating the candidates, With the moderator controlling the microphones. . . . So the ideas can be heard?

With the interruption between the candidates, Wouldn’t a glass booth, Separating the candidates, With the moderator controlling the microphones. . . . So the ideas can be heard?
  • Interruptions would stop

    With the interruption between the candidates, Wouldn’t a glass booth, Separating the candidates, With the moderator controlling the microphones. . . . So the ideas can be heard?
    With the interruption between the candidates, Wouldn’t a glass booth, Separating the candidates, With the moderator controlling the microphones. . . . So the ideas can be heard?

  • Yes the moderator should mute the microphones and put in soundproof booths

    The first debate was an absolute mess, Both candidates agreed to uninterrupted segments but guess that was a lie. Children could do better to be honest. Both were also too busy insulting and smearing than actually explaining what they would do so most people watching learned nothing at all. If we make it harder for them to interrupt each other it would allow a constructive debate because obviously these boomers can't go one minute without breaking the rules

  • Both are Jesuitical Puppets

    They are all Jesuits, Working toward the same goals. The worst person will be elected, No matter who it is to win.

    Https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=bEWJzPytMq0 - Predictive Programming, Agenda 21, Jesuit Propaganda - Etc.

    Https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=DqkosdRK-R0 - Democrats True Face for those thinking Voting Helps

    Voting Does Nothing.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.