Would you rather live in the 1900's (yes) or the 2000's (no)?

Asked by: BeLogical
  • It's obvious for me.

    The 1900s were way more awesome than the 2000s. In the 1900s, especially decades such as the forties, sixties, eighties, and nineties, life was good. Music wasn't full of cuss words and bad grammar but rather it was nice and catchy, and still enjoyable despite its time period. In the 1900s, you could have an easier time trusting your government and who is leading in it (such as FDR, Truman, Kennedy, Johnson, Carter, Reagan, and Clinton). Whereas in the 2000s, trust in the government by the people is fading, with GWB's approval rating very low and Obama's number of scandals and questions about impeachment.

  • No,the 21st century would be a lot more preferable to live in.

    Well,growing up in the early 1900's was a very trying period when compared with today .There we no high tech gadgets,modern transport facilities and nothing that we see around us today.
    The field which saw leaps and bounds since a 100 years is communication. If you need to reach someone now all you have to do is send a text message to somebody's Facebook account through your Blackberry and tell them to call you. Back then, to reach someone you would have to attached a small note to a homing pigeon and whisper into his ear the directions to your buddies house. The pigeon would then fly your note across town.
    Oh,and did I forget to mention the overall economic stability in the world?Even though many countries still face considerable economic crises,it's hardly anything compared to what the 20th era faced.But,one still have to admit,living in the 1900's would still have it's benefits-greater job opportunities and cultural experiences.

Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.