@Brendan 19 they have engineerie gmos for many purposes including the elimination for the need of pesticide. Your opinion is so invalid I find it hard to believe you are serious. The genes in all crops have been manipulated by humans I very the course of thousands of years. Gmos is just a more precise and (much) quicker way to do so.
@triangle.128k Those regulations are necessary. Listen, we can't have businesses spewing toxins into the environment that harm people's health. I'm pretty much a libertarian (economically) up until people get hurt, because, as always, people getting hurt is not a good thing . . .
@NewLifeChristian you do realize that most of the EPA's allegations are based on nonsense and the majority of them (even if true) couldn't possibly hurt anyone? Draining a swamp is not the end of the world, but not doing so could be the end of several businesses who profit from doing so.
@themightyindividual Like I said before, it's not just draining a swamp, it's destroying hundreds of wildlife habitats. This isn't a minor issue like many like to make it to be, it's a serious problem, and in the future, we might not have any more swamps because of tyranny from big corporations.
Environmentally friendly processes increase as time passes. There's no point to burden economic growth because of some animals and trees dying. Slight clearing of natural habitats is a necessary evil for future development and economic growth. In fact, many important pharmaceutical drugs come from the amazon rainforest.
@triangle.128k In regards to that last part, I agree that we should collect materials for important medical drugs in the Amazon rainforest; however, major deforestation (which is being done today) is not necessary, and therefore, should not be done.
Instead of more government enforced environmental regulations the solution is the free market. Logging companies would definitely want to replant the trees they cut down if they owned the land (as a farmer replants the crops he harvests). The problem is that in many countris the government owns the land and private logging companies have no incentive to replant because they don't own the property they only work on it.
@NewLifeChristian You know those Africans in poor areas where they struggle to get food? Tell them how bad GMOs are, and I'm sure they'd be happy to hear. Especially considering GMOs have helped to feed people like them.
Lol BrendanD19 calm down, we're talking about food production not the environment! No one cares about the environment when it is weighed against the needs of human beings' digestive systems. GMOS increase food production.
@themightyindividual True, increased food production is definitely a plus from GMOs. The alleged claims against them usually use pseudo-scientific methods, and they aren't effective in disproving how GMOs are harmful.
@BrendanD19 Then clearly judging by your comment, there's nothing wrong with GMOs. The problem would be the pesticides being used against crops. If anything, GMOs make the effects of pesticides a lot less of a risk then they could be.
Even if GMO's don't have a significance impact on the human body, there are still many more blatant effects. When farmers spray round up on genetically engineered crops, they have to wear full body protective suits. In multiple studies, most of the rats who were given the round up herbicide, developed tumors. What quickly effected the rats, can slowly effect humans. Besides GMO's themselves, Monsanto is still one of the most corrupt corporations. Every threat to its power is wiped out. They force smaller farms to pay a fee for the sole purpose of owning land that they want ownership over. They are connected to every company that makes processed and artificial foods, that are quite dangerous despite how the crops are grown. Monsanto has ties with Nestle, Kraft, Coca Cola, Kelloggs, Mars, Pepsico, and the list goes on. Other impacts that have been linked, but not proven to be caused by GMO's are environmental, increased herbicide use, and the takeover of smaller businesses. It is not just a liberal idea to believe that GMO's are harmful.