depends is it the cultural world or the technological world
more useful, in my opinion. And i have a low A in science. Compared to the rest of my grades, that's bad!
I am good in art than science. Also i love arts
The arts HAVE saved lives. Music is widely used in therapy, and the arts aren't cheesy.
because art is life ang sciences are going to destroy this world
Firstly, art is more subjective and a person can express or qunderstand a piece of art in their own way. On the other hand, science is objective. They must be taught in certain way through certain steps and does not really allow people to be individuals. Secondly, all throughout human history, art has been found whether that be on the rocks, papers, woods, there were art, there have been art. So worshipping science that we can live without, have been living without, rather than art that is crucial for our kind of beings is just pointless
Science is more educational and seems more required than arts. There is more science used in daily life than art like the scientific method.
Science has a tangible purpose. Art is just for looking nice and entertainment.
Science shape our world from engineering to Earth science
Arts never sent people to space. Arts never saved lives. Arts never discovered new energy producers. I could go on all day but I feel that you get my point.
I find it unfair that musicians or other types of artists are more famous and are more successful compared to individuals who actually invent the technology. They give the opportunities for such artists to exist; and, in my opinion those scientists who put a lot of work into their inventions are not awarded enough. Scientists should be more known and successful than artists since they are the ones who are trying to explain the universe and I do not see musicians trying to answer that. I just wanted to bring up the unfairness between artists and scientists.