Did the Cincinatti Zoo make the right decision in killing Harambe?Posted by: NewLifeChristian
Recently, the Cincinnati Zoo and Botanical Garden came under fire for its decision to shoot and kill a male Silverback gorilla when a four-year-old boy fell into the enclosure. Did the zoo make the right decision? Read more: http://q13fox.com/2016/05/30/gorilla-shot-killed-after-4-year-old-boy-falls-into-zoo-enclosure/
Yes, the zoo made the right decision.
No, the zoo didn't make the right decision.
While Harambe may not have hurt the child, he easily could have and gorillas have harmed people before. I wouldn't want to take that chance with a child and apparently neither did the zookeepers.
Policy is policy. If it killed the kid and they had decided to go against their own rules what then?
It was either that or let an innocent kid get hurt or possibly killed.
It was a tragedy. It sucks it happened and zoo was just doing what they had to in order to protect the kid. But I don't blame the animal. I blame the parents.
Yes, (first) without harambe dying we wouldn't have harambe memes, (second) if he was tranquilized instead of being killed, he couldn't killed the child.
Harambe should have been tranquilized rather than killed.