Do you believe Marriage should be defined between a Man and a Woman by the constitution Nationwide?
Posted by: jjohnmusic11By amending the constitution this will trump the supreme courts decision and Marriage should be defined between a Man and a Woman nationwide.
Vote
32 Total Votes
These options are strange
Yea, fail on the answers. There will be NO constitutional amendment. Support for SSM is above 60% at this point. No chance in he11 of amending the constitution with that sort of support.
Federal government being involved in things it's not suppose to be is a problem. No, I do not approve of granting the federal government more authority over anything than it already has.
I on the other hand will continue to define marriage, a religious institution, as between a man and woman.
All men (and women) are created equal. If one defines love as a romantic human connection of great magnitude, then we cannot deny that love exists between LGBT individuals. Therefore, if marriage is an institution whereby a number of individuals may express their love for one another, who, indeed, are we to get in the way of this? Freedom of expression, people.
"Love is love," is completely irrelevant to the debate. Marriage is not about "love," it's a legal contract between and man and a woman.
Marriage already has a definition and history which can be traced back to Moses and the Israelites. Marriage is a religious concept. My stance is that marriage should not be recognized by the government at all. The government should recognize civil unions between any combination of consenting adults - the only benefit of this is in the legal realm (inheritance, taxes, visitation, etc). Marriage is for churches and religion; the government shouldn't be involved at all.
Portions of this page are reproduced from or are modifications based on work created and 