• Yes

  • No

33% 6 votes
67% 12 votes
  • They kill civilians 98% of the time.

  • I did a whole PSA project on it and man, it has some seriously screwed up consequences. And Mualala Yusafsai once pretty much gave it blame for Pakistani terrorism.

Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
tajshar2k says2015-05-08T20:32:04.9892170-05:00
I support them, but we need to do a better job making sure civilians aren't killed by it.
Texas14 says2015-05-08T21:34:18.9946403-05:00
Why do you support them?
tajshar2k says2015-05-09T08:15:24.8105860-05:00
To kill terrorists who are hiding out in the mountains. Its cheaper than sending in troops, or using airstrikes. Plus it can fly around longer, because there is no pilot.
58539672 says2015-05-09T10:05:33.4609112-05:00
Even if we stopped using drones, we would just use traditional fighters, attack choppers, artillery, missiles, etc. These attacks are not going to stop, regardless of what medium we use to carry them out. Drones are the cheapest, safest, and most accurate of the options available.
BryanMullins says2015-05-11T08:42:33.0693470-05:00
I do not support airstrikes in pakistan, its very wrong, they have no real targets to aim at, and the military is dead, ALL THE SOLDIERS ARE DEAD!!!!
BIGC says2015-05-12T17:18:15.7794436-05:00
You think that terrorism is dead? Have a look at the news buddy..... ISIS!?
Midnight1131 says2015-05-12T17:31:03.8240902-05:00
BryanMullins, you should know that the airstrikes in Pakistan aren't targeting the Pakistani military, but rather the terrorists, and the terrorists aren't dead.
Stefy says2015-05-12T19:09:36.0323659-05:00
Funny story im actually doing my final art project on predetor drones. It's hard to paint words in urdu.

Freebase Icon   Portions of this page are reproduced from or are modifications based on work created and shared by Google and used according to terms described in the Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution License.