50% 1 votes
50% 1 votes
Every accepted idea was once radical. But not every ridical idea becomes accepted. A point structured debating system encourages following existing beliefs for the best possibilty of winning. Thus inhibiting new ideas.
Lol thanks reece. 10 points for telling me what the point of a point system is.
In a world full of baboons the best fruit will always be bananas.
@Furyan5 there is no worth believing in claims that are fundamental to our existence. It's better to admit what you don't know than to be a hypocrite. Science and morality in general evolve at all times while many theologians hold on to primitive ideologies. It's pathetic. Maybe i should of made what i said more clear.
Convenient falsehood or the truth, whats better?
You tell me? How much closer are we today than we were a hundred years ago? I'll tell you. Nowhere. Do you know the definition of stupidity??? Doing the same thing again and again and expecting a different result.
You think you smart? Show me. Come up with one original idea. Just 1. Is that too much to ask?
@Furyan5 You're avoiding all the applications of applied sciences. We went from the steam engine to rocketing to the moon within 200 years. 100 is short time.
@Furyan5 I'm not smart (quick witted.) I'm more of a critical thinker.
Critical yes. Thinker...... That's debatable. Guess it depends on ones definition of thinking. I'd say you have a critcal grasp on other peoples thoughts. Can you think for yourself? We'll see. Review my debate "Belief in god is subjective". Its a theory I'm developing. I challenge you to come up with a pro or con statement of your own creation.
@Furyan5 What do you mean "think for yourself"? Look at what I've written. I wasn't the one paraphrasing quotes. You're not worth my time.