Science supports evolution. Stawman arguments made by creationists are used to make it seem correct. When we want to be objective about it we look at the evidence, and it points to evolution. Sorry creationism, it is not your day.
Alright beast, first of all, how could you POSSIBLY assume that we beleive everything isn't intelligently desighned. Second of all, your follow up makes LITTERALY no sense. If i snapped my fingers and a rose appeard... Well, i mean... Yeah... Of course that can't happen. You're arguing for the wrong side... I think... Maybe i could tell if it wasn't as... Random...
Christians are far more within their tradition of they affirm both, God created the cosmos as pregnant with life. Miraculous intervention on Christianity is the only thing that is "teleological" ... miracles are used FOR establishing a covenant in order to stand out among all other pagan 'gods' (probably demons if they exist.) Miracles FOR vindicating prophets and ultimately the work and teachings of Jesus. Random miraculous intervention where it is trivial doesn't need to be fought for if its conjectural at best.
There is proff of evolution, u can test it your self the main principle of evolution, natural selection. If you want to know refer the internet
evolution and natural selection prove that we have evolved. The human race has learned to adapt to many places on Earth environment
Religion began as a way for early man to explain natural phenomena like earthquakes, lightning, floods, etc. Man came up with the best explanation he could at the time to help explain "why are we here?" and "what happens after you die?". Science has filled in the blanks particularly in the past couple of hundred years. The only way we know about "creation" is from the bible, which was verbally passed from generation to generation before it was every written, then it was translated and changed several times. There were no eyewitnesses to those events. It never says "God said to me..." Science (evolution) has proof; the Bible's interpretations are assumptions.
I keep hearing from creationists that evolution states that we evolved from monkeys - it doesn't say that at all. We share a common ancestor with modern apes. This is not the same as evolving from monkeys.
Creationists are misinformed. They are being lied to. It is really sad how little of the world they will understand.
Proof, evolution has it creationism doesn't.
Can I ask one question if you believe in evolution. Then you believe not everything is intelligently designed. If nothing was intelligently designed then you should be able to snap your fingers and a rose appears in your hands. Ohhh. Whats that. You can't do that. Well I knew it wouldn't. Second how did we evolve from bacteria to fish to reptiles to monkeys to humans. Because as I have learned a dog can't make love with a duck and get a cute baby mixture. That wouldn't be right. Now would it.
A world this complex cannot have just created itself. That makes no logical sense.
I believe that the changes in people over time was not from evolution, but from inbreeding. since i believe adam and eve were the ancestors of everyone, all that inbreeding changes people. then it reached another choking point with noah and the flood. this would explain the skulls of early humans they dug up being different then today. there's no way i came from a retarded fish frog that banged a turtle and eventually turned into a human.